# data[].attributes.body
reflection here

# data[].attributes.body
The content area that I enjoy and feel comes the more naturally is the integrating digital tools and  content.  The availability to differentiate and give feed back is more fluid.  It also helps to keep learning culturally relevant to a changing generational demographics.
-Justin

# data[].attributes.body
The area that comes most naturally to me is Targeted instruction. That is the foundation to any teaching or teaching method. Flexible content is the area I need to explore more. Gathering multiple relevant resources is always the challenge for in a blended learning environment. BONUS: I think the change in the wording was a good choice. originally it implied that the content needs to digitally based but flexible content suggests multiple media types.

# data[].attributes.body
The area I'm most comforatable in is using data to drive instructional decisions. Having been an instructional coach, data was at the forefront of the conversations I would have with the teachers. It focused my discussions on a specific area of concern so that we could begin addressing the way in which to move forward and help the student succeed. Looking at data allows me as a teacher to reflect on my effectiveness and practices and improve upon them in meaningful ways.
I would like to dive deeper into the student reflection and ownership area. I know the impact I can have on my own practice when I reflect on what I've done, so to empower students to utilize that tool can have significant gains on their performance and accountability.
Bonus question: I like the new term of "flexible" content rather than the original term of "digital" content. This emphasizes the fact that the materials used vary and are not just limited to digital technologies and programs. Teachers will gain a deeper understanding that there needs to be an ebb and flow between a variety of materials and technologies:  "mixing three different types of instructional materials: those that are foundational, adaptive, and highly customizable."

# data[].attributes.body
The area that comes most naturally to me this year, is Student Ownership and Reflection. I have taken time to research methods and feel comfortable and knowledgeable enough to use it daily in my classroom.

The area I need to explore more is Flexible Content. The structure in my classroom regarding this area is lacking and I deal with many troubleshooting issues and my students are unable to work independently much of the time.

# data[].attributes.body
The area that comes naturally to me is being data driven.  This is something I'm doing on a daily basis to make sure that my students are understanding the content that is being taught.  Making sure that I am then using the data to form small group instruction to help reteach those students that aren't mastering it.  The data also gives me a way to extend the learning for those students that are getting concepts right away.  This also helps to improve my lessons during them and for the next time.
The area I would like to explore more is student reflection and ownership.  This is a goal I'm working towards for the second semester because there is so much value in students being able to reflect on their learning and to really get to talk about what is working for them and what needs to be improved.
I noticed that the term was changed from digital content to flexible content and tools. This means that you are able to be flexible with what content the students are using and it could be different for different students.

# data[].attributes.body
The area from the Core 4 that I feel comes most naturally to me would be the area of

# data[].attributes.body
The area that comes naturally for me is Targeted Instruction - I like being able to identify the area of need for students and then targeting my instruction, as well as seeing where students will need to be by the end of the year and making sure to spiral the content.
I think that being able to explore the  newly updated area of flexible content and tools (rather than just digital content) will be helpful - I see the need for changing the title/description so it does not just limit this core area to "computer" use, it allows for other tools and content to be used to focus instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
The area that comes most naturally to me is Targeted Instruction.  I find it necessary to identify the specific areas that my student are proficient  in as well as where they may need support.  This allows me to review and spiral content throughout the year for all students while also adjusting material to be presented in a different way for some and accelerated for others.
The area I need to explore more is Student Ownership and Reflection. I think that students will benefit from being allowed time to reflect, discuss and document their own learning and goals.

# data[].attributes.body
This is the area that comes most naturally to me, as I have students journal each week to reflect on what they have learned.  That being said, I'm going to add the step of them reflecting on what they would "like to learn" based on their reflections for each week, as we do into the next.

# data[].attributes.body
What's compelling about personalized/blended learning is the idea of empowering students to be in control of their learning by providing them with the tools, information, and skills they will need to be successful lifelong learners.
The question it leads me to then is HOW to teach today's students to have the motivation and desire to push themselves. It seems like this would increase both of those areas naturally, but I find, more often than not right now, that the kids want to do the least amount of work as possible. They seem to want fast, simple answers GIVEN to them without exerting any effort on their part. I attribute this "laziness" in part to the technologies they have at their disposal. They can "ask Siri" or "ok Google" their way to finding a vast amount of information, but to require them to dig deeper is becoming more and more difficult. I can see this implemented

# data[].attributes.body
Personalized learning is compelling to me because it simply makes sense.  We all like to learn in different ways and we get frustrated when students don't learn the way we are teaching.  Giving them the ability and opportunity to learn in a way that speaks to them is exciting.

My questions are mainly logistical and for my own classroom- How does this look in large class sizes? Where can I physically set up a Flexible Content area that will be unobtrusive?

# data[].attributes.body
I like the updated Flexible Content and Tools component. I feel like that is one of my strongest areas. I like the ideas of the Student Reflection and Ownership pieces and look forward to integrating some of these ideas into my classroom

# data[].attributes.body
Personallized

# data[].attributes.body
I like the Flex model and Station Rotation Model. The playlists are very interesting and something I want to use more effectively.

I would not want to use the Flipped model. Not all students at our school have actively involved parents or access to technology at home. Maybe I am just nervous to give up that part of control in my classroom!

# data[].attributes.body
The area that comes more naturally to me is student reflection and ownership.  I would like to continue to explore  integrating digital content.

# data[].attributes.body
What is compelling me about PL is the students freedom of movement and choice, to get through the same content. The main concern for me is the preparation of materials - how to get all the pieces prepared for students beforehand. I also have questions regarding accountability both for students and for the teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
What is compelling to me is that the Blended Learning mindset should more than incorporate the use of technology into the classroom; moreover, the use of the technology needs to directly inform what is being done in the classroom, not just be used as a tool to make classroom tasks easier to complete.

# data[].attributes.body
The most compelling thing about PL is that it individualizes learning for all student regardless of what category ( high, medium, low) of learning they may fall into. I also like that it focuses on incorporating student interest as a motivating factor.

# data[].attributes.body
I like that there are many different models for teachers to use

# data[].attributes.body
I like that there are so many different models to work from and that teachers are not expected to all do the same one. It's personal for the kids and for the teacher. I would like to try the flip model.

# data[].attributes.body
The most compelling mindset in personalized learning, for me, is the endless possibilities for the interaction of learning for ( and between) both teacher and the student. When students are interested and excited in their learning, I am interested and excited about what I am teaching. This helps to build that Student Teacher relationship that makes learning purposeful and meaningful.

# data[].attributes.body
The most compelling thing to me about personalized learning is the ability students have to direct their own learning.  They have a pathway designed for them and they get to move along at their pace.  This really gives the students ownership of their own education and I also feel it develops their intrinsic motivation.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the choices within the different models: especially the different levels of learning model and the flex model.  The flipped model would be interesting at our school; however, lack of internet access at home for about 50% of our students would be a difficult roadblock.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the playlist flex model and the stations which I use now. The kids really like to rotate to the different stations and activities and having small group instructional time with me. I am not a fan of the flipped classroom concept. I like to teach the concept the way I like and I am not ready to give that up plus I do not trust that 100% of the students will get it done and then I would be teaching in class anyw

# data[].attributes.body
The most compelling part of PL is that it allows me to reach all of my student groups (low, middle and accelerated ) in ways that are meaningful to them. We all learn in different ways.  To encourage and support engagement in the classroom it is important to allow students to engage in ways that are meaningful to them personally.
My main concern is in establishing a set routine and actually implementing all of these ideas into a seamless, daily routine.

# data[].attributes.body
I really like the rotation and flex models.  Both of these allow students some choice in what they are doing and also the teacher to meet with students in a small group setting and focus on what those students need.  Also in both models it allows for collaborative learning.
I would not want to use the flip model because I'm not sure that the home piece would happen the way it needs to for it to be successful.

# data[].attributes.body
The flex model is the model I use the most frequently as it allows for the most creative input by the student forcing me, as a teacher to be more creative and think on my feet.
I think the model I don't like to use is the flipped model.

# data[].attributes.body
I am excited about all the potential these ideas hold. I think when presented correctly they can be great cornerstones to build a program upon but I struggle with the student motivation and accountability piece. I would love to further explore these strategies and see what i can implement in my classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
What I find to be compelling about PL/BL is that students take control of their educational progress. Giving students the ability to see they can be successful and master concepts which they deem too difficult for themselves is giving them the confidence they need to continue to push through the ups and downs not only in their educational journey, but also in the journey called life.

The questions I still may have is to learn how to find the time to plan and collaborate with other teachers when we share students. As it would be best if we share what we see as strengths and struggles for the students.

# data[].attributes.body
I love the flexible options. I find that my students grow bored with routines quickly and I am excited to provide lots of options not only for their enjoyment but to cater to their learning styles and interests. I feel like I will be much for satisfied as a teacher when I can communicate more one on one with my students and offer more options to meet them where they are or where they are going.

# data[].attributes.body
What I like it the ability to give my students choices in how fast they move and what activities they're doing. I also like that the direct instruction is still a major component in the process, that the teacher is not just a facilitator, but an active member of the learning process.
What I cannot see myself doing yet is the flex learning model. I am new to the grade this year and need to develop an understanding myself of what the standards are requiring and what material I am using.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the Flex Model and the Station Rotation Models. I also like the Flipped Model but do not think it is appropriate for my grade level. These choices allow students choice while still allowing me to work with small groups when needed.

# data[].attributes.body
I need to work on the highly customizable content. I touch upon the other items and the percentages vary from day to day and unit to unit, but I am always lacking in the teacher created, highly interactive and data driven items. I try but I can't find a great way to convey these items to my students. I need to look more into platforms, but after reviewing these items I feel more motivated than ever to do so...especially knowing that I am presenting this information to my campus soon

# data[].attributes.body
1. Which area of the core 4 comes naturally to you?

1. Data-Driven Decisions

2. Which area would you like to explore further?

1. Targeted Instruction

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is compelling to you about PL?

1. Since personalized learning is not a one-size-fits-all approach, there are varying interpretations of how different schools, districts and organizations that partner with them might define the term as they develop curriculums that work best for their communities.

# data[].attributes.body
Targeted Instruction is the area that comes most naturally to me because in band we have goals every rehearsal and we set the goals of what parts of our music we wish to learn. Giving those goals lets the ensemble have areas we want to have a sole purpose to focus on. Exploring more as to what ways would Data-Driven Decisions be made for a Band room. Band is very closely related to more extra-curricular activities that are hands on based engagement. It is in many ways compared to a sports activity and what ways to would a coach create Data Driven decisions for his team. I think the Core 4 categories are good in more specific common core areas of learning in comparison to an art related subject.

# data[].attributes.body
PL does not fit within every subject, every school, and every classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the use of Self and peer Evaluation with students giving Peer Feedback within the band classroom. I will inevitably have students who will struggle playing music and with the class giving positive feedback to those students will help give the struggling student the confidence they need to improve. I would be very opposed to Flexible seating because there may be a door to many behavioral and classroom problems. Also with band students have seating arrangements for very classical reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
I mainly have Foundational content and Highly Customizable content  because in my 5th and 6th grade band I teach music fundamentals in a different customized curriculum. I try to spend 30% of our learning from the traditional band books and music and 70% using outside non traditional methods of teaching music. This makes learning band more flexible, more engaging, and more enjoyable for students including those who are really need to take their time as slow learners. I'm missing Flexible content and that is because there is a very large lack of resources in music with flexible contents of learning. If there are flexible contents of learning available in Music the procedures to allowing those contents require a mass amount of approval through the district administration.