# data[].attributes.body
Source B shows that C is wrong as they are different in whether there are supporters for president Morsi's rule in Egypt. Source B says that " he had stripped himeself of his legitimate right to rule". This implies that no one supports Morsi. What he does for the country are wrong (1) . In contrast (2) , C says that" I believe he's that best person to rule this country." This shows that there are still a minority of supporters in Egypt and they believe that he's the most suitable leader in leading Egypt. Hence, B shows C wrong (3). L4/5

B is reliable when I cross-refer to source A. Source A  shows that Morsi is seated on a broken chair with the word "REVOLUTION" ,holding bat. There are also broken bones and blood stains on the floor. This shows that the change in Egypt under his rule have caused damage to the citizens just like he was hitting them with the bat, it also shows that he has no supporters as there is no one around him (4). Hence, since A supports B , B is reliable (5).

Ms Ang's Feedback
(1) Good use of own words for explanation of evidence!!
(2) Good signposting to show difference!!
(3) Skimpy statement. Reiterate difference btw sources = show C wrong.
(4) Good inferences of cartoon details!
(5) Reliable and so?? NAQ! CR not awarded.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C says that president Morsi
should not be forced out as president of Egypt,as he was the best person to rule the country.source C says"I believe he's the best person to rule this country." (1) L1/1 (NAQ!!!)However,this is contradicted (2) by source B which caims that More I should be stripped of from his power.Source B says "President Morsi had been trying to make himselfinto a pharaoh,and in the process he had stripped himself of his legitamate right to rule.(Still NAQ!!!) (3) // When i cross-refer to D,source D supports source B in the fact that Morsi should be removed from presidency as he was becoming too doctorial(4).Source D depicts president Moresi as Adolf Hitler,implying that he was ruthless and dictorial,and he should not be in power. (5) Since source D supports source B,source B is reliable and thus source B is able to prove source C wromg (6)

Ms Ang's Feedback:
(1) Entire sentence is listing of what is in Source C: has no relevance to qn. No difference or similarity/comparison being done.
(2) CONTRADICTED SHOULD NEVER BE USED FOR COMPARISON. In comparison, sources are either similar or different. DO NOT USE "CONTRADICTS". Reserve the word "CONTRADICT" for CR when a source shows the EXACT OPPOSITE of another source.
(3) So? Still NAQ!! Start CR new para!!
(4) Does student meant "dictatorial" instead of "doctorial?" + Reason for CR to prove reliability of B need to be clearly stated
(5) Good description of pic as evi and gd inference!
(6) CR generally ok!

# data[].attributes.headline
Source B shows that source C is wrong as they differ in their views towards President Morsi. (1) Source B tells me that Morsi was well-favoured by the Egyptians. (2) Source B says "alternative to military's move was civil war." This shows that the Egyptian Army decided to seize power from President Morsi due to his inpopularity (3) among Egyptians and his inablility to rule. On the other hand, Source C tells me that Morsi was well-favoured by the Egyptians . Source C says" I believe he's rhe best person to rule this country. " This shows that Morsi had gained the confidence of his people and they were supportive of himand liked him . (4) Since Source B and C differ in their views towards Morsi, Source B is able to show that Source C is wrong. (5) L4/5

# data[].attributes.subject
Source B shows that source C is wrong as they differ in their views towards President Morsi. (1) Source B tells me that Morsi was well-favoured by the Egyptians. (2) Source B says "alternative to military's move was civil war." This shows that the Egyptian Army decided to seize power from President Morsi due to his inpopularity (3) among Egyptians and his inablility to rule. On the other hand, Source C tells me that Morsi was well-favoured by the Egyptians . Source C says" I believe he's rhe best person to rule this country. " This shows that Morsi had gained the confidence of his people and they were supportive of himand liked him . (4) Since Source B and C differ in their views towards Morsi, Source B is able to show that Source C is wrong. (5) L4/5

# data[].attributes.body
(6) When i cross-refer to source E, it also tells methat President Morsi was not well-favoured by the Egyptians. Source E says "opposition groups are planning street rallies thisweekend

Ms Ang's Feedback:
(1) Good clear difference stated with MI given.
(2) Student is confused. Does student meant Morsi was "NOT" well-favoured instead?
(3) "Inpopularity"-no such word. Student meant "unpopularity" But good attempt to explain evi given.
(4) Good inference attempt
(5) Good- Clear concluding statement for this para!
(6) Unclear why student is doing CR. Source in question to prove reliability missing. i.e. Source B should be mentioned. E.g. Similarly when I CR Source B with Source E,  Source E states....

# data[].attributes.headline
Source B show that C is wrong as they differ in comparison (1). Source B says that " he had stripped himself of his legitimate right to rule."  This implies that 

# data[].attributes.subject
Source B show that C is wrong as they differ in comparison (1). Source B says that " he had stripped himself of his legitimate right to rule."  This implies that 

# data[].attributes.body
Ms Ang's Feedback:
(1) difference btw B & C not stated (no Matching Idea (MI) given)
"differ in comparison" = confusing language, repetitive. Differ = doing comparison.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B shows that source C is wrong as they differ on their views towards President Morsi. L3/3 (Difference/Similarity unsupported)
Source B tells me that Morsi was not

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. Source B shows that source C is wrong. Source B states that President Morsi is unsuitable to be the president of Egypt as he is attempting to make himself a dictator. The evidence is '' President Morsi had been trying to make himself into a pharaoh..." Hence, the evidence shows that there is no support for president Morsi's rule in Egypt. Source C states that President Morsi deserves to be the legitimate leader of Egypt. The evidence is "I believe he's the best person to rule this country." The evidence shows that there is support for president Morsi's rile in Egypt.Hence, Source B shows that Source C is wrong as they differ in showing whether President Morsi is suitable to be the president or not. (L4/5)

Source B shows that source C is wrong as both sources contradict each other on the views of whether president Morsi's rule in Egypt is supported. ( AVOID using "contradict" when doing comparison. CLEAR CR STATEMENT NEEDED HERE)Source B does not support Morsi while Source C does.(// CR to support Source B's reliability in new paragraph!! NOT CR  Source C!)Furthermore, Source C is not reliable as source E  contradicts source C. As stated by source C, "I believe he's the best person to rule this country." which shows that there is support for president Morsi. This view is contradicted by Source E which says "...they are calling for his resignation."This shows that Morsi's rule is not supported by the people.

(Concluding statement for CR belongs to previous para + CR above did not prove B's unreliability but C's unreliability. Student is confused) Hence, Source B does not show that Source C is wrong as Source B is not totally reliable as it is contradicted by source E (AVOID bringing in CR conclusion in final para). Source B  has an ulterior motive. (and so?? NAQ. Link back to Qn! e.g. Source B does not show that Source C is wrong because it has an ulterior motive which makes it unreliable) Source B is influencing Egyptians to go against president Morsi's rule in Egypt and also convince Egyptians that Morsi is not fit to be the leader. As seen from Source B, "President Morsi had been trying to make him into a pharoah." The intended outcome is to rally people to overthrow President Morsi (Good use of provenance, questioning of the author's position to assess reliability. Analysis can be deeper by analysing tone & language. e.g. exaggeration in "pharaoh")  L6/7 if concluding statement is given for concluding para.