# data[].attributes.body
the fog was thicker than  my ice cream

# data[].attributes.body
No, this ruling wasn't/isn't fair because of the unlimited amounts of money being channeled into the political campaigns."Democrats cried foul, saying the elections were being bought by deep-pocketed individuals and companies and questioned what the donors expected in return for their contribution.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion the Super PACs isn't fair because  it's only going to be passed for the ones who favor it. It also gives the candidates an advantage especially if they have a bigger business because they would get more towards their campaign as well.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was unfair because it only supported certain candidates with unlimited money

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion the Super PACs isn't fair because  it's only going to be passed for the ones who favor it. It also gives the candidates an advantage especially if they have a bigger business because they would get more

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, it is very unfair due to whichever candidate has a bigger buisness behind them are provided the most contribution to their campaign without having to do too much themselves

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is unfair because of the unlimited amount of spending they have on a certain candidate.

"..... said the government cannot restrict the spending of corporations, unions, and other groups for political campaigns..."

# data[].attributes.body
i think it gives other candidates too much advantage there for it isn't fair

# data[].attributes.body
I think PAC's have such a large influence to campaign, or electoral, funding that it is unfair.

# data[].attributes.body
It is unfair because it was helping the republicans more than anybody. "Some $80 million was spent by super PACs. Most republicans are rich.

# data[].attributes.body
The voters are being bridged and there opinions ar no longer truly there own

# data[].attributes.body
i think it isn't fair because pacs makes other candidates have

# data[].attributes.body
"Super PACs are independent political committees that support a candidate with

# data[].attributes.body
"Some $80 million was spent by super PACs during the midterm election cycle." Republicans candidates benefited greatly from the PACs' largesse hurting the Democrats. Which is unfair and dissapointing.

# data[].attributes.body
"If you can't get your own super PAC, you are obviously doing something wrong. Get good and get your own. Although you don't need doners to win, look at Bush"

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it was unfair because the super  " helpedfund raise for the republicans with the

# data[].attributes.body
I think, with allowing this to continue, the voters are being bribed and their opinions are no longer truly their own, therefore making them invalid. As Rowen said, "...the elections were being bought by deep-pocketed individuals and companies and questioned what the donors expected in return for their contribution."

# data[].attributes.body
I think the Super PAC's are unfair because bill or laws are going to be passed in some peoples favor. For example Obama said "it was a threat to democracy and said it was a victory for Wall Street. Allah Mallah Laqbar

# data[].attributes.body
It is not fair. The BCRA applies a variety of restrictions to "electioneering communications." Thus being dealt, the 1st amendment is being violated by not allowing the "electioneering communications" have freedom of choice and speech. There shouldn't be restrictions as to how someone runs their campaign. They should be able to choose how to gain voters with no restrictions

# data[].attributes.body
Is is not fair

# data[].attributes.headline
"President Obama criticized the Citizens United ruling, calling it a threat to democracy and a victory for Wall Street and Big Business" (Rowen). I fully agree with this statement (my example

# data[].attributes.subject
"President Obama criticized the Citizens United ruling, calling it a threat to democracy and a victory for Wall Street and Big Business" (Rowen). I fully agree with this statement (my example