# data[].attributes.body
(My example is not related to class)
I choose Claim 1: Nike is the most popular shoe brand because Evidence Card Z shows that Nike sold more shoes than any other brand in 2019. I chose this evidence because it makes sense that Nike is the most popular brand since more people bought their shoes.

# data[].attributes.body
Hi Everyone! Please make sure that your participation in this discussion is appropriate and that your responses meet the CFS that are listed in the classwork. Here are some sentence starters to help out. Check out my example post!

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that claim 2# is correct. According to evidence card B, there are more cows ( which likely use more cellular respiration that most forest animals) than the population for forest animals in any time period in the graph. Evidence card D also supports my answer because, decomposers are now using more cellular respiration due to the excess wood. Therefore I believe that the carbon in the area has risen due to a increase in cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Claim #2 is true. According Evidence card B, it showed that decomposers increased massively in year 3. Also, decomposers help produce cellular respiration. Evidence card D also supports my claim because it shows that there was some trees left over and decomposers used that to decompose and help produce cellular respiration. Which the products of cellular respiration is carbon dioxide. (Carbon dioxide gets release into the air). This shows that claim 2 is correct. PERIOOODTTTTT

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #1 is correct. According to evidence card D, it shows how to wood was left for the decomposers to do cellular respiration but less trees means less photosynthesis meaning that they aren't using carbon dioxide to do photosynthesis but if it is just because of cellular respiration photosynthesis is still happening and takes the carbon dioxide that cellular respiration produces so I think claim #1 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 1 is correct because according to evidence card d its showing that they are left there to decompose, decomposers get energy storage molecules from the dead matter but less trees means that photosynthesis cant happen so if trees die there is less oxygen which causes us to have more carbon dioxide this is why I think claim 1 is correct

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because according to evidence card D because decomposers are using ore cellular respiration due from the excess wood.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct because according to evidence card A and evidence card C trees do photosynthesis at a higher rate than grass. This means that there is a decrease in oxygen and energy storage molecules and because of this the rate of cellular respiration is going to suppress the rate of photosynthesis causing the increase of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that claim 2 is correct because according to evidence card b it shows that in the graph you can see that the decomposers population increased a lot. a reason why the decomposers population increased was that decomposers help produce cellular respiration. which can mean why their population increased a lot.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is correct. According to evidence card B shows that decomposers and cows population increased which they produce more cellular respiration which increased the cellular respiration. This shows that the increase of cellular respiration lead to increase of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because evidence card C tells us that trees produce more energy storage molecules but if all the trees are cut down then they are going through photosynthesis less so less carbon dioxide is be taking in so carbon dioxide would increase.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is the correct answer because deforestation leads to less trees, then there is less photosynthesis which will be less co2 taken from the sky. Evidence card c supports my claim because trees uses up more co2 than grass. so that means there will be an increase in co2.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct because according to evidence card b there were more cows and this caused more cellular respiration. I think that this claim is true because it makes more sense that claim #1

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct. This is because card B in the graph is explaining how there is more cellular respiration happening, and the decomposers had increased. This shows that because on an increase in cellular respiration also makes an increase of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Claim 2 is correct because in evidence card D it says that when the cut down trees, they still leave some and decomposers get their energy from the dead trees and perform cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Claim 1 is correct because according to evidence card C, it shows that since trees are being cut down, photosynthesis isn't happening. If photosynthesis isn't happening, then carbon dioxide would increase since it isn't being used up. This shows that carbon dioxide is increasing because photosynthesis is only done by producers and trees do the most for photosynthesis. But since the trees are being cut down, photosynthesis isn't happening and carbon dioxide isn't being used up.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Claim 2 is correct because in evidence card D it's talking more about how their is more Cellular respiration happening, so the carbon dioxide is increasing by the air. This shows that the carbon dioxide is all around the air due to the increase of cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because when plants do photosynthesis they use up a lot of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is correct because in Evidence card D it talks about how the dead trees turned into dead matter and that the decomposers fed on that and that caused their population to increase and when they increase the rate of cellular respiration also increased which therefore makes claim 2 correct

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that claim 1 is correct because evidence card A shows a decrease in trees till they are all gone, and an increase in grass. To add on to that evidence card C says that trees produce a lot more energy storage molecules than grass, and that means that trees do a lot more photosynthesis. This evidence shows that there is more carbon dioxide in the air because there is less photosynthesis. To conclude, I think claim one is true because the given evidence supports it more.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Claim 2 is correct because in evidence card D it says that when the trees were cut down, some were left and so the decomposeres fed on the energy storage molecules in the trees, and because of this the decomposer population would decrease and because the decomposer population would also increase the amount rate of cellular respiration. So I think Claim 2 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 2 is correct because when we look at the facts the more organisms there are the more cellular respiration and when we look at Evidence card B it shows us an increase in several organisms and when they all increase so does the production of cellular respiration. Also when we look at the facts when the trees are cut down the decomposers come to get its ESMs and in return the decomposers increase and when they do so that lets them perform more cellular respirstion and cellular respiration is the release of carbon dioxide. So I think claim 2 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that claim 1 is correct because according to evidence card c it tells us that grass doesn't produce as much energy storage molecules than trees, which means that trees do a lot more photosynthesis.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct because according evidence card D that decomposers take the energy storage molecules from the dead trees. And because decomposers give of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Claim #2 is true because, card B in the graph is explaining how there is more cellular respiration happening, and the decomposes had increased. This proves why I think Claim #2 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 2 is right because the card shows that decompoers increased and decomposers makes carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Claim #2 is correct because Evidence Card B shows that the amount of decomposers are increasing so the amount of cellular respiration will also increase. Evidence Card B also states that all the producers that were cut down and burned were decomposed, so that could be why the amount of cellular respiration increased and why the amount of decomposers increased too.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because the evidence in card B shows the amount of decomposers and how they increasing. This is showing how cellular respiration can also increase.

# data[].attributes.body
i think claim #2 is correct because evidence card D talks about the the tress being cut down and how decomposers get their energy storage molecules from the dead tress that were cut down and then do cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because most of the evidence cards make a lot of sense and agree more with claim #2 . Like evidence card D tells us how because of the deforestation then decomposers are able to  create enough energy for cellular respiration. Also in evidence card b it tells us how the decomposers population increased a lot and they help create carbon dioxide. So because of these 2 reasons i think claim #2 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is right because evidence D tells us that they cut down trees, some decomposer still have some energy from the energy and has preform cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because evidence card D shows that they had leftover trees and left it there to decompose, so when the decomposers decomposed the wood they got energy storage molecules which gave them more energy in order for them to preform cellular respiration. This shows that evidence card D supports the fact that claim #2 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim two is right because more dead trees means more food for decomposers. so decomposers can perform more cellular respiration. and the more cellular respiration the more carbon dioxide in the air

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because there are more food for decomposers because of the trees. Evidence card D show that wood was left in the field to decompose. This is why I think that Claim #2 is the correct answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2 is correct because if they burry the wood underground that means that the decomposers will have more food and they will perform more cellular respiration and there will be more carbon dioxide in the air

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is right because it shows us that there is less photosynthesis and also less oxygen too

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is correct because evidence car D there were more food for decomposers because of the trees.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 2 is correct because it talks about how there is not much of photosynthesis as there was before and also how there was low oxygen then there was before so I think claim 2 is more correct then claim 1.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because it talks about how photosynthesis decreased and that caused the carbon dioxide to increase and I think that is correct because for producers to do photosynthesis to make energy storage molecules, they would need to take in carbon dioxide to do so. In evidence card c it shows a tree and a grass plant and it says that the tree produce more energy storage molecules and but the grass plants doesn't produce that much at all, so there is less photosynthesis and so there is a increase in the carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 1 is correct because in evidence card c it says that grass does not make as many energy storage molecules as trees so less photosynthesis is happening.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1 is correct because Evidence card C says that trees make more energy molecules than grass so if the trees were cut down there would be less carbon dioxide taken in by the trees to do photosynthesis. That's why Claim 1 is correct.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that claim 1 is correct because in evidence card c it is saying that trees make a lot of energy storage molecules so less photosynthesis is happening so there is more carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 1 is corrrect because when photosynthesis decreased then the carbon dioxide increased.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2 is correct because this claim is best supported by evidence. There is more evidence about how the population of organisms who perform cellular respiration increased, so the level of carbon dioxide would increase due to the rate of cellular respiration increasing. There isn’t enough evidence showing how less photosynthesis made carbon dioxide increase since the population of trees did decrease, but there was still grass to replace it.

# data[].attributes.body
claim 1 is correct because this claim has the facts to back it up. And it's more of a reasonable claim than the other option. Why do I say this? There is more evidence on how claim 1 is correct, and it shows that by giving us a picture of when the trees died, sure the grass replaced them, but trees are more efficient at photosynthesis and cellular respiration. With many of the trees gone, the balance that was there is now gone, and the levels of c02 will increase because the population of the producers as a whole, has now decreased, and the producers are going to have a hard time trying to keep using that c02 for photosynthesis since there are less producers.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because there is more evidence in claim 1 it also gives us a picture also if the trees die photosynthesis is better with trees

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2 is correct because there is more cellular respiration which causes more carbon dioxide. A evidence to support my answer is when the trees were cut off decomposers were able to get a lot of energy to increased cellular respiration and since trees are producers then there is no carbon dioxide being used which caused it too increase carbon dioxide since its not bring used only created.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct. This is because card B in the graph is explaining how there is more cellular respiration happening, and the decomposers had increased. This shows that because on an increase in cellular respiration also makes an increase of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct. This is because card B in the graph is explaining how there is more cellular respiration happening, and the decomposers had increased. This shows that because on an increase in cellular respiration also makes an increase of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct because in evidence card B the graph was explaining that there was an increased amount of cellular respiration happening because the number of decomposer increased.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 2 is correct. In evidence card B, it shows that the decomposers were increasing so there were more cellular respiration

# data[].attributes.body
I think Claim #2 is correct because there was an increase in the decomposers' population, which caused there to be more cellular respiration. Which makes Claim #2 correct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because evidence card D shows that the dead trees give decommposers a chance to make cellular respiration and that increases carbon dioxide in the air.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim #2 is correct because there was in an increase in the decomposers population and in evidence card D it tells us how the decomposers increased in their population because of the dead trees giving them a opportunity to make cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct because the decomposers  had an increase in their population, because in evidence card D it shows that after some parts of the trees were left their they turned into dead matter which had a chance to which helped the decomposers increase in their population.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is correct. According to evidence card B shows that decomposes and cows population increased which they produce more cellular respiration which increased the cellular respiration. This shows that the increase of cellular respiration lead to increase of carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 2 is correct because evidence card b shows that the decomposer and cow populations increased. Since these populations increased, more cellular respiration was happening and the amount of carbon dioxide also increased.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1 is correct because less photosynthesis can easily make co2 more likely in the air. one piece of evidence is there is more grass than trees and trees are a good source to have less carbon dioxide in the air because leaves help less co2 get in the air.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct because there was a increase of decomposers population. On Evidence Card B, it shows on the graph that decomposers were increasing when deforestation was happening. When there are more decomposers, there will be more cellular respiration happening.

# data[].attributes.body
i think claim 2 is correct because evidence card B shows that the decompose and cow population increased so that mean more cellular respiration and the amount of carbon dioxide increased.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because in evidence card c it shows that trees produce less  energy storage molecules so when you destroy trees less photosynthesis is happening.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is correct because evidence card D show that after the trees were cut,the decomposers get more food. Decomposers perform more cellular respiration,so carbon dioxide increased in the air.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because in Evidence card C shows that tress produce less energy when they are dead matter which means there are less photosynthesis and there is more Carbon Dioxide in the air

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim 2 is correct because in the cards it shows that there was a major increase in decomposers. Decomposers do cellular respiration, and they drastically increased.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim two is correct. The evidence that support my claim is evidence two which shows that decomposers are increasing throughout the years causing more cellular respiration because we need decomposers in order for cellular respiration to happen. Another piece of evidence is D which supports my claim because is shows Decomposers used the energy stored molecules in the dead tree trunk and that made cellular respiration increase.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 2 is correct because  evidence B shows how  the years went by so the decomposer in order for cellur respiration to occur. Another piece of text evidence is D which shows once the trees where cut down some of the tree trunk was used to give energy storage molecules to decomposers that made cellur restiraiton...

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that claim two is correct.  The evidence that supports my claim is evidence B  which shows that decomposers are increasing throughout the years causing more cellular respiration because we need decomposers in order for cellular respiration to happen. Another piece of evidence is D which supports my claim because is shows  That once the trees were cut down some of the trees trunk was used to give energy storage molecules to decomposers which is needed for cellular respiration 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that claim two is correct.  The evidence that supports my claim is evidence B  which shows that decomposers are increasing throughout the years causing more cellular respiration because we need decomposers in order for cellular respiration to happen. Another piece of evidence is D which supports my claim because is shows  That once the trees were cut down some of the trees trunk was used to give energy storage molecules to decomposers which is needed for cellular respiration 

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim two is correct.  The evidence that supports my claim is evidence B  which shows that as the years went by the decomposer increased specifically  by year 3 they went up causing there to be more cellular respiration to occur. Another piece of evidence is D which supports my claim because is shows decomposers used the energy stored molecules in the  dead tree trunk and that made cellular respiration increase.

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim # 2 is correct. I think this because evidence card b shows that the decomposer and cow populations increased. because these populations increased, more cellular respiration was happening which caused the amount of carbon dioxide to also increased.

# data[].attributes.body
i think it is claim 2

# data[].attributes.body
i think that claim two is correct.
The evidence supports my claim is evidence B which shows that the decomposer and cow population increased and this why decomposers do cellular respiration

# data[].attributes.body
I think claim 1 is correct because evidence card c says that trees make more energy storage molecules than plants do. This shows that trees perform a lot of photosynthesis which is probably taking up all the carbon dioxide. After the trees get absolutely slaughtered there was less things taking in carbon dioxide.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the correct answer is claim 1 because photosynthesis takes away the carbon dioxide and turns it into fresh air because in evidence card 3 it says "Each year one tree produces a lot  more energy storage molecules than one grass plant". that supports my answer that claim 1 is correct

# data[].attributes.body
I think that claim #2 is correct. The evidence that supports my claim is evidence card D. It shows that more trees were cut which means decomposers would be getting more energy storage molecules. With more decomposers there would be more cellular respiration.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is claim 2 because my evidence that i choose was card B because if cellular respiration increased then carbon dioxide would also increase cause carbon dioxide is one of cellular respiration products.