# data[].attributes.body
Agree: I don't understand the reason to separate people if everything they are going to use and occupy are going to be equal? If it was someone's choice to use a different facility, then that is their choice. However, segregation in America was forced.

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly agree that segregation implies inequality. If every aspect of each separated party is supposedly all equal, why separate the groups at all? There would be no need to, because you could simply have no separation and everyone would be as equal as before.

# data[].attributes.body
Separate cannot be equal. Separating people by race implies the supremacy of one group.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree. by separating people, it shows that they are not equal. There is no reason to separate two groups if they are considered equal.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree but I'm more towards the middle -->
I think separate, just the fact that they are separated for some reason shows that they aren't the same which I guess also means unequal

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that separate is not equal. If everything is the same, why is there a need to separate?

# data[].attributes.body
I think that separate cannot be equal as well

# data[].attributes.body
Strongly Agree Is the facilities and resources are all the same what would be the need to separate them?

# data[].attributes.body
Disagree. It is not the separation that is unequal, but the *act* of separation. It is only unequal if there is no choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Segregation does imply inequality. Separate but equal cannot be true, especially if racial inequality is already made customary in the South.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, if two people are separate, they are inherently unequal. There is no way to accurately enforce separation between two of the same, so if there is separation, there is not equality.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that separate cannot be equal. Why would there be a need to separate people if they are thought to be equal?

# data[].attributes.body
I agree. If two groups are separated, it means that they are not seen as equal. If they were seen as equal, there would be no reason to separate the two groups.

# data[].attributes.body
Title

upload

link

search_web

camera

more_horiz

# data[].attributes.body
Agree: I think you should be able to separate people and have it be equal. However, when one party involved in separation is determining it, that makes it inherently unequal. Also, when the dominant party makes the other party's separate systems worse than theirs (for example, being kicked out of first-class seating), it makes the system unequal.

# data[].attributes.body
Agree: I think two things being separate doesn't inherently make something unequal , but forced separation could never be equal because they're not the same. Why have separation if the goal is for both sides to be completely equal?

# data[].attributes.body
Agree: I think that by dividing people into separate facilities on the basis of race, those who enforce this segregation are admitting that they think one race is too inferior and unworthy of the same treatment and privileges that others enjoy. Segregating public spaces means that both groups are treated differently based on their race, meaning that the conditions of these facilities correspond to how they are perceived (in terms of social status).

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly agree that separate cannot be equal.By have 2 equal but separate groups is still overtly separating the 2 groups.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree as two people who are separate are unequal based on the past. People would not be separated if they were equal.

# data[].attributes.body
When two groups are separated, that line of separation becomes a fulcrum upon which the two sides are compared and oftentimes when one sides rises, the other falls.