# data[].attributes.body
I learned that Cinco de Mayo is not actually a celebration of Mexico's independence but rather a celebration of a Mexican victory over the French army in 1862.

Cinco de Mayo is not even celebrated in Mexico as heavily as in America. Americans have commercialized the holiday and used it as a way to market to Latino customers and provide an excuse to eat American Mexican food and drink tequila.

Cinco de Mayo was originally brought to America by Mexican laborers as a way to show their national pride.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a line between protest and crime.  Lately it seems that all protests somehow involve the looting of local businesses.  This is not protesting.  By stealing from the local shop owners, the looters are hurting the community rather than trying to make it stronger.  Protesting is joining together to defeat an injustice.  Looting simply adds to the problem.  It only weakens the community.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the perfect answer to your question can be demenstrated through the protests in Baltimore. Of course we have the right to protest, garenteed by the first amendment, but when the protests become unlawful, that's where we draw the line. Several small businesses saw their dreams crumble because of the riots in Baltimore. Shops where ripped apart, broken into, robbed! And not a dam thing is being done about it! Protesters are braking the law, and they should not be allowed to protest any longer because of their actions.

# data[].attributes.body
As american citizens, we have the right to free assembly and speech and are free to protest. Does this mean that we can protest however we want to? Where is the line drawn between an innocent protest and a crime? Is it right to respond to violence with violence? What are some alternatives?

# data[].attributes.body
Most would agree that taxes are necessary for the government to function. What kinds of things should be taxed? Is it right to tax someone on their income? Why? Should tax rates increase as income increases, or should there be one flat rate

# data[].attributes.body
I saw several good points made on the R1 comments about the possibility of a new revolution in America. Many of the examples used that may start a revolution revolved around gun control and I agree that that is a very heated debate that has very strong opinions on both sides. Some people spoke of a fight/ war that could potentially break out between the American people and the government. Personally I think any physical confrontation with the government would end poorly for civilians. However, I saw some good ideas for peaceful protests against an issue that is firmly rooted in the potential for violence. I think that it would look very good for anti-gun control supporters to lead peaceful protests as that would set a better example for the pro gun control side. If anti gun control supporters decide to act violently, then they would simply be proving the pro gun control side right.

# data[].attributes.body
Recently I noticed that we have to pay taxes a lot. I didn't know how many laws require us to pay taxes. I just thought that taxes are only on products I buy or money I earn. But there are more other taxes than I thought. So when I saw the picture at the first time, it reminded me of other taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
Income tax to me should be based on a percentage of a persons earnings, and everyone should contribute the same percentage of there income towards taxes. If all men (and women) are created equal as the constitution says, why should the government be allowed to take more money from the rich rather than they do from the poor? There are so many opportunities in this country for all people to make money, some just want it more than others. Rich people work just as hard as poor people, and taking away a much larger portion of their income gives them less incentive to work.

# data[].attributes.body
"The hardest thing in the world to understand is the income tax." - Albert Einstein

This quote is kind of funny, especially coming from Einstein. It is true that many would say income tax is one of the most complicated things they have to deal with. The way taxes are, especially progressive taxes, there are so many loopholes and deductions and the lack thereof that filing one's taxes can be a nightmare. I think that this statement is pretty significant coming from one of the greatest mathematical minds of all time.

# data[].attributes.body
I choose this picture because it was the most interesting picture I found on the topic of income tax. It appears that this person is being overburdened under the weight of the tax. This is an interesting visual metaphor for the pressures that taxes put on many people.

# data[].attributes.body
This article highlights some of the big discrepencies between the theoretical progressive tax and the actual state of the US tax system. With all of the tax deductions and different rates on different types of income, some people benefit and others are SOL. According to the article, the Obama's have an adjusted gross income of $700,000+ and pay a cumulative tax rate of about 20%. Meanwhile, Obama's secretary who makes less than 1/7 of that ends up paying a higher percent of their income. Mitt Romney is subject to about 15% tax rate and he makes upwards of $21 million in a year. These are just examples that demonstrate the ways in which the progressive tax system can and will end up being unfair and different from what it intends. This because in some cases, certain incomes are subjected to different rates. For instance, in the case of Mitt Romney, he makes most of his money off stocks and stock income is subject to a 15% flat tax. There are holes in the system, and this writer suggests either making the progressive rates universal are moving to a completely flat tax system.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
let's kill the progressive tax rate system - cnn

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Let's kill the progressive tax rate system - CNN

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dorothy Brown says it's time to get rid of the myth that we have a progressive tax rate system, and instead move to taxing all forms of income at the same rate

# data[].attributes.body
There are only two sure things in life: "death and taxes".

Progressive taxes have a nasty habit of discouraging achievement. When people know that any increases to their income are going to be taxed more heavily, it discourages some people from trying hard to advance.

The higher the taxes, the more agile people become. Then, tax dodgeball insues. The higher the taxes and the more there is to gain from tax evasion, the more peole are gonna do it. Plain and simple.

Progressive taxes are also a lot more complicated than flat taxes. More number crunching, more questions, more ambiguity. This also negatively benefits the government as they need to use more time, money, and resources to enforce more complex taxes and ensure compliance.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
by Mario McDaniel

Death and taxes are always quoted as the two sure things in life. Another sure thing is the great debate over what types of taxes are the most cost effective and lead to the highest levels of prosperity for most people. Although we may never quite solve this age-old question, we can look at some of the disadvantages of one of the main taxation mechanisms around: the progressive tax.

Discouragement of Achievement

One of the major downsides of progressive taxation is that it inherently discourages people from working harder and becoming more successful. With a progressive tax bracket, additional monetary benefits are diluted with higher taxes, and at some point people may come to the decision that making more money is not worthwhile because of the higher tax rates.

Higher Incentives for Tax Evasion

In comparison to a flat tax, progressive taxes give people more of an incentive to evade taxes simply due to the different tax brackets. At higher tax rates, tax evaders have a higher propensity to evade taxes because there is an opportunity to save money. On the other hand, a flat tax rate always has the same risk and reward ratio when it comes to tax evasion.

Complexity

A progressive tax system is inherently more complex and more difficult to administer and enforce. Because the laws and regulations necessary to enact and enforce multiple brackets have to be more complex than a flat rate counterpart, it is more time-consuming for accountants and individuals to ensure compliance. This essentially leads to a more costly compliance and enforcement.

About the Author

Mario McDaniel is a lawyer and hands-on entrepreneur. He has a Juris Doctorate degree from Florida State University and an MBA degree from Florida Gulf Coast University.

Photo Credits

dollar sign image by Alexander Zhiltsov from Fotolia.com

Copyright © Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, all rights reserved.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Death and taxes are always quoted as the two sure things in life. Another sure thing is the great debate over what types of taxes are the most cost effective and lead to the highest levels of prosperity for most people. Although we may never quite solve this age-old question, we can look at some of the disadvantages ...

# data[].attributes.body
About progressive taxes, it does sound good but what about the people who work hard to earn that amount of money (say the people who earn more than the norm)? Is it fare to them that they work harder to earn that money and have to pay even more because of that?o

# data[].attributes.body
Taxes are usually used for the public. When I had a trip, I needed to go to restroom. Public restroom is useful and it is for free. But it is maintained by taxes. This is good article for the evidence of how the government uses taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
Progressive taxes (same thing as graduated income tax) help to decrease income distribution inequality by subjecting peoples with higher incomes to greater tax rates than those with lower incomes. This benefits lower income households and small businesses by increasing the proportion of income that can be used on living expenses or expanding the business. In general, progressive tax systems also tend to increase the government's overall tax revenue. This benefits society by allowing more funding for programs such as welfare, public services, education, and medical assistance/health care. Theoretically, the benefits listed above to small business and economically struggling households translates to higher revenues for other organizations and larger businesses.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Progressive tax systems are designed to subject a larger percentage of income to taxation for individuals, households and businesses with larger incomes, while lowering the tax burden on those with lower incomes. According to Progressive Policy Institute, the debate between flat and progressive tax systems is robust, with valid arguments on each side. Progressive taxes carry significant benefits to economically disempowered households and society as a whole.

Income Distribution Inequality

A principle benefit of progressive taxes is the ability to offset inequalities in income distribution. Progressive proponents argue that under a flat tax system, economically struggling households must sacrifice a larger portion of their purchasing power to tax obligations than higher income households, and progressive taxes serve to correct this imbalance.

Benefits to Society

A progressive tax system allows a government to collect a larger amount of tax revenue, which, according to a research paper on sciforums.com, can be used for the benefit of public services, such as education, welfare and medical assistance.

Small Business Benefits

The smaller tax burden placed on lower-income entities in a progressive tax scheme allows small businesses to increase their net income, providing further stimulus for small business formation and growth.

Household Benefits

The same benefits experienced by small businesses are also experienced by individuals and households. Due to the smaller tax burden, economically struggling families will find themselves with extra money to pay bills and additional purchasing power.

Macroeconomic Benefits

The net increase in household and small business purchasing power translates into higher revenues for organizations across a significant number of industries, which can serve to boost macroeconomic performance.

PARTNER CONTENT

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Are the Benefits of Progressive Taxes? | Sapling.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Progressive tax systems are designed to subject a larger percentage of income to taxation for individuals, households and businesses with larger incomes, while lowering the tax burden on those with lower incomes. According to Progressive Policy Institute, the debate between flat and progressive tax systems is robust, with valid arguments on each side.

# data[].attributes.body
Tax revenue for the government benefits the taxpayer in many ways. A few examples include the construction and maintenance of public roads and highways which are essential for a car travel, probably the most widely used form of transportation in America.

Public schools account for the vast majority of education opportunities available to Americans. Almost every expense related to the establishment and maintenance of a public school comes from tax dollars.

Tax dollars also pay for public safety services such as police, fire, and EMT services.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Who benefits when taxes are collected? - NM Taxation and Revenue Department

# data[].attributes.body
Who: US Federal Government

What: Instituted taxation on the income of US citizens. The US institutes a graduated income tax. This involves an increase in the tax rate as taxable income increases. "The concept of taxing income is a modern innovation and presupposes several things: a money economy, reasonably accurate accounts, a common understanding of receipts, expenses and profits, and an orderly society with reliable records."(quote taken from the link below)

When: Income related taxation has been around since the early days of the Roman republic. Income tax has been in America since 1862.

Why: Income tax is the greatest source of revenue for the federal government to support its functions, programs, and other expenditures.

Where: This blog will focus on Income taxation in the USA.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Most jurisdictions require self-assessment of the tax and require payers of some types of income to withhold tax from those payments. Advance payments of tax by taxpayers may be required. Taxpayers not timely paying tax owed are generally subject to significant penalties, which may include jail for individuals or revocation of an entity's legal existence.