# data[].attributes.headline
Desire to improve culture norms and practices

# data[].attributes.subject
Desire to improve culture norms and practices

# data[].attributes.headline
Operational model and how it affects who we give grants to

# data[].attributes.subject
Operational model and how it affects who we give grants to

# data[].attributes.headline
impact goals are key to driving potential grantees and how grants are structured

# data[].attributes.subject
impact goals are key to driving potential grantees and how grants are structured

# data[].attributes.body
timeline of all the pieces can affect even the first grant opportunity - if we're rushed on time, it can affect if we reach out to them

# data[].attributes.body
can we subsidize or change what we ask from the proposal? it can be a lot of time going back and forth on the proposal

# data[].attributes.headline
our GA system is great but our process is what makes us get in our own way

# data[].attributes.subject
our GA system is great but our process is what makes us get in our own way

# data[].attributes.headline
Is there a way FC can ping timelines for each grantee? In regards to what Liz says, have a rolling calendar for each? Is that too much distraction?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is there a way FC can ping timelines for each grantee? In regards to what Liz says, have a rolling calendar for each? Is that too much distraction?

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of just asking them to ignore certain sections, can we have a shorter proposal

# data[].attributes.body
being invitation only, can there be a 1x a year open call? Otherwise it puts sig responsibility internally to know about all the networks and opportunities to reach out to

# data[].attributes.body
I've found there's more transparency when we actually connect with GA and flexibility in what is actually needed

# data[].attributes.body
provide a general op grant to start a learning process and think about their work over the long term and co-create in their objectives as it aligns with Irvine

# data[].attributes.body
knowing earlier can help initiative staff to have a conversation in understanding the true cost and better subsidize the total work, even if in draft form

# data[].attributes.headline
changing guidelines for 2nd / 3rd time grants

# data[].attributes.subject
changing guidelines for 2nd / 3rd time grants

# data[].attributes.body
work to get good grant proposals from the beginning, sometimes we ask consultants to help with some of the work and support grantees in developing strong proposals that can help them to take to other funders also

# data[].attributes.body
get on the phone, ask 2-3 questions and let that be a report, with follow-up of financials

# data[].attributes.headline
culminating grants alternatives without giving a report

# data[].attributes.subject
culminating grants alternatives without giving a report

# data[].attributes.body
especially with those not legally required to have reports

# data[].attributes.body
we have great conversations with partners, why is there so much emphasis on the exact written craft of the story?

# data[].attributes.body
is there a cultural norm that if a good grant = well written proposal?

should be giving freedom to people on the front lines doing the important work - how can we better interrogate the way we're doing things?

# data[].attributes.body
there's accountability and a culture about what's required for proposals and consequent expectations, and how that trickles down