# data[].attributes.body
Even though table 5 had a lot to say, much of the stuff they said to counter Table 6's two statements was all over the place

# data[].attributes.body
Table 5 brought in irrelevant information and table 6 had reasonable arguments

# data[].attributes.body
Table 6 won because their arguments made more sense and were better than the ones Table 5 made.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 had the upper hand in this debate due to the composure of their argument and their clear and concise rebuttals.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 had the better argument and was more convincing in their argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 had more points in favor, while Table 8 mainly focused on the fact that it would be expensive.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hayden won, Obviously. Much more back bone, supporting statements, convincing opinion, consistent bombardment of facts.

# data[].attributes.subject
Hayden won, Obviously. Much more back bone, supporting statements, convincing opinion, consistent bombardment of facts.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 had the strongest arguments and had Table 8 stumped

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 had a better argument and made good points.

# data[].attributes.headline
Our table believes that nicks table won the argument because they seemed more prepared and had better rebuttals 

# data[].attributes.subject
Our table believes that nicks table won the argument because they seemed more prepared and had better rebuttals 

# data[].attributes.body
We think group 1 won because they had stronger points to back up their argument and had very good retaliations.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 is the winner because they made a stronger argument on the topic and were move convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
They both did well, but table 1 was able to explain their argument a little better than table 3.

# data[].attributes.body
They had better points and were not saying things that are hypothetical like Table 6 did.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 8 had stronger and statistical facts while Table 1 only had weak theoretical ideologies

# data[].attributes.body
We believe that team 8 won because Divay just was arguing, whilst table 8 was debating.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 provided better arguments and counter arguments to the points that Table 3 brought up.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 won because they had better and more convincing arguments to defend their cause. Table 4 just seemed to repeat herself.

# data[].attributes.body
Table 1 had very good points to make about civilian contractors. Team 4 did well, however, they didn't have a strong an argument. Also, they said that civilian contractors make LESS than Army contractors however they make thousands more than them.

# data[].attributes.body
First off table 4 should be disqualified for trying to provide help, and Table 1 had much stronger arguments and had Table 4 backed into a corner

# data[].attributes.body
Nick provided statistics that defended his case, while the other group could not successfully counter the argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Group 3 had much stronger statistical evidence and facts on hand to debunk all his opponent's claims

# data[].attributes.body
We think group 3 won because they had stronger points and were able to defend their points better

# data[].attributes.body
We felt team 8 won because the argument was better

# data[].attributes.body
She had a stronger argument which came to a good conclusion and she pulled it all together well.

# data[].attributes.body
i believe that table 8 won because they had a lot more information and facts to back up their claims

# data[].attributes.body
Table 8 brought up really strong points and hard based facts rather than theoretical ideology. Good debate though.

# data[].attributes.body
This was overall a good debate. They each had great statements but towards the end, Table 8 got stumped and was not able to counter Table 7's statement. Therefore Table 7 won.

# data[].attributes.body
Had a more secure argument and was able to provide more points in favor of their argument

# data[].attributes.body
We believe table 6 came out with the dub because Amanda gave a better argument and Divey gave false information

# data[].attributes.body
I thought that if debaters got outside help from their teams then they would be disqualified... I thought those were the rules.

# data[].attributes.body
They both had good arguments, but Petar intervened and that should be an automatic disqualification because that the rules?

# data[].attributes.body
We think Group 6 won because Group 5 had interference and help from their other team members which broke the rules

# data[].attributes.body
Divay clear winner, OWNS team 5 with FACTS and LOGIC and GRAPHS

# data[].attributes.body
Table 5 is DiSqUaLiEd peter needs to keep his mouth shut

# data[].attributes.body
Table 6 won because Table 5's debater had to get help as Table 5 was clearly stumped by Table 6's arguments