# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson should be on the 20$ bill. He really was not that bad of a person to his slaves since he treated them very well. The presidents even before him owned slaves so why just target this one president.Jackson despite the trail of tears it was really not his idea he just approved of it for the people of the US. He also was a war hero which helped him win the presidential election.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that Jackson should not have stayed on the $20 as long as he did. I agree that Andrew Jackson was a great man and was vital to the now extremely important United States, he did do some questionable things in his lifetime.  not only did he own 150 slaves when he died, but he drove out native Americans, and contributed to the trail of tears. In his time, yes, Andrew Jackson was a hero and there was nothing more to it. but in this day and age, there's going to be a lot of people who don't want to have an owner of 150 slaves advertised on something held in such high regard such as our currency. So in conclusion, Jackson being on the $20 back then was more than acceptable, but times have changed and Harriett Tubman is a more fitting representative for the U.S. twenty dollar bill.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that Jackson should not have stayed on the $20 as long as he did. I agree that Andrew Jackson was a great man and was vital to the now extremely important United States, he did do some questionable things in his lifetime.  not only did he own 150 slaves when he died, but he drove out native Americans, and contributed to the trail of tears. In his time, yes, Andrew Jackson was a hero and there was nothing more to it. but in this day and age, there's going to be a lot of people who don't want to have an owner of 150 slaves advertised on something held in such high regard such as our currency. So in conclusion, Jackson being on the $20 back then was more than acceptable, but times have changed and Harriett Tubman is a more fitting representative for the U.S. twenty dollar bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Despite the bad things he did like forcing Native Americans westward on the trail of tears and owning slaves, he did many great things for America. Back then people didn't know any better and thought of slavery as a normal thing. I don't think it's fair to call him a bad man because of it. Jackson laid the framework for democracy, paid off the national debt, gained new lands for America, strengthened relationships with foreign nations and issued a new currency. During the War of 1812, Andrew Jackson led his men in the Battle of New Orleans and defeated the Creek Indians allied with the British. These are all good reasons as to why he should stay on the $20 bill, however I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea for Jackson to be replaced by someone like Harriet Tubman.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson should stay on the 20 dollar bill because he did great things but also did some bad things. The bad things back then were not considered bad at that time. There was no point to look back on what he did because what he was doing was normal. The trail of tears was intended to be a good thing for America but it ended out killing thousands of Indians. The end result made Jackson look at that time a good guy but now he is looked down upon by some.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should be removed from the 20$ bill. We should not be represented by someone who has disgraced this country by owning slaves, forcing people from their homes, and many other things that have contributed to his removal. He did very few things for America and most just included war. The bad things greatly outweigh the good things that Andrew Jackson has done.

# data[].attributes.body
While Andrew Jackson has done many bad things, I do not believe that he should be removed from the $20 bill. Instead, I think we should take his actions and what he did for what they are. He did own slaves, and he did help pass the Indian removal act, it's important to remember that he also did many great things for this country. He removed the national debt and improved our government's structure of democracy. He was a hero during the war of 1812 and the battle of New Orleans. And he even removed all of the national debt. I believe we should instead celebrate him for his many accomplishments rather than condemn his for his few misgivings.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Congress's decision to remove Andrew Jackson from the 20 dollar bill because I think that there are better people that could go on it instead. Andrew Jackson is a controversial character in American History because of the things he did for his country, some of which were good and some of which were bad. He was a war hero from the war of 1812, and during his presidency he eliminated national debt and expanded voting rights. At the same time, however, he neglected to give any more rights to anyone that wasn't a white man, and his shutdown of the National Bank was one of the causes that lead to the Panic of 1837, an economic depression that many people suffered from. In addition, the Trail of Tears was a terrible catastrophe that killed about a forth of the Cherokee at the time. I think that when compared, the bad things that Jackson did outweighs the good things that he did. At the very least, why keep someone so controversial on the bill when you could have someone who is much better all around?

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson shouldnt be removed off of the 20 dollar bill because he was a good president and helped out the country a lot, even though he supported bad things like slavery & indian removal & the trail of tears , those were his personal beliefs & he felt like it was right. What he belives as a person doesnt really have that big of an affect on the country. He can beleive in many bad things do good things for the country. Also Jackson was not the only president who owned slaves so if he has to be removed then all the other presidents who owned slaves would have to be removed for it to be fair, and he did so many good this for America that i feel like he should be able to stay.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should remain on the 20 dollar bill. During his presidency he got rid of national dept, helped improve democracy, and expanded foreign relations. Like everyone else who has ever lived, Andrew Jackson had his flaws. He approved of the Indian Removal Act that led to the death of thousands of Native Americans. He also owned slaves. However, slavery was commonly used at the time and I don't think you can judge someone who lived in the past based on today's standards of what is right. Andrew Jackson was a hero during the War of 1812, especially during the Battle of New Orleans. Andrew Jackson made mistakes, but also helped the United States develop in to the country that it is today. People need to learn to preserve and remember history, rather than destroy and forget about it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that president Andrew Jackson should be removed from the $20 bill. Andrew Jackson did some great things for our country. Some of these things include being a war hero and leaving his presidency with the nation in no debt. But, some of the things he did I do not agree with and that is why I think he should be removed. These things include owning slaves and making Native American groups go on the Trail of Tears. Around a quarter of the Cherokee population died after the relocation was over.

# data[].attributes.body
I do agree that President Jackson should be removed from the 20$ bill because although he did some incredible things he also did not do some incredible things. A lot of people today only recognize Jackson for his wrong doing and I completely agree because yes he was a war hero and lead American forces to a victory at the Battle of New Orleans, and he'd done a lot more for the government he is not named the greatest president ever for his other actions like the Indian removal. Another reason I think President Jackson should be removed is he went against what the supreme court said to do which is not very president like of him considering the supreme court said not too. He also owned many slaves which he abused, I know so did a lot of other presidents but they didn't keep doing multiple bad things like Jackson did. President Jackson is not a good role model or someone to be seen on the 20$ bill everyday which is why I think Harriet Tubman is a better fit to put on the 20$ bill because she is a great symbol to represent American History, unlike Jackson who does not deserve to be on the bill for more years than he is already.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Andrew Jackson should not be taken off of the 20$ bill. Andrew Jackson was doing things everyone did back during his time. Jackson did well for the U.S. He established democracy, improved the economy, and became a popular leader in the U.S. Slavery was a thing that everyone did back during his time. Jackson was born during the time of slavery, so that was what he was taught and what he learned on his own. If Andrew Jackson was to be taken off of the 20$ bill then Shouldn't George Washington be taken off of the 1$ bill too? This is why rotating the face of currency would be a great way to do things. Instead of just presidents, there could be landmarks and other leaders too.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that I believe that Andrew Jackson should not be removed from $20 dollar bill. Even though Jackson approved the trail of tears and owned slaves it is not like Washington or any other President before Jackson didn't own slaves or kill Native Americans so I believe if they want to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 dollar bill then they should remove Washington and Jefferson as well because they both owned slaves and were reasons for Indian moving west. Although I do not believe that Washington nor Jefferson should be removed as well because they did more for the U.S than Jackson but Jackson won the U.S major battles in the was of 1812 and created on of the greatest econmies in American History. All in all, Jackson did some bad things as a president but those actions do not out weigh the great things he accomplished.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should be taken off the 20 dollar bill. He has done some good things for the United States of America, but has also done very bad things too. He forced Indians off their land and that is not good. He is a very bad representation for USA and does not deserve to represent the United States! He is very bad person and needs to be removed immediately! He made decisions for the USA that only helped him personally and that is not what being the president is about. The president is supposed to make decisions to help the United States as a whole, not just to help him. I strongly agree with congress and needs to be taken off!

# data[].attributes.body
I think that congress made a good decision in taking former President Andrew Jackson off of the $20 bill. He did help our country through some tough times, but he also removed Native Americans from their land that they had lived on, and owned over 150 slaves. He was not a person who cared about other people aside from white men. I feel like all of the people on all bills should be removed from their position on bills, but coins can mostly stay. I think that we should swap out people in our currency roughly every decade. For instance, in 2030, we can have MLK, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Susan B. Anthony, Harriet Tubman, etc. I think that these would help represent more people without getting the designs to a certain point of staying forever, so new people can share the spotlight.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that taking Andrew Jackson off the $20 would be a good idea. He has set amazing examples such as saving the country from debt and participating in war, but he himself had replaced Grover Cleveland. Along with his great achievements came his bad actions. He had owned slaves and basically was the reason behind 'The Trail of Tears'. Along with 'The Trail of Tears', he also almost never spoke up about it or had any intention of helping or stopping it. As said in the opinion piece written by Daniel Feller, we should perhaps look at the British. The British change their currency every few years with new historical role models which doesn't create and 'hurt feelings'. This is why i think that the removal of Jackson would be a good thing.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree with Andrew Jackson being removed from the 20 dollar bill. The great things that he has done are not being seen at all, instead the bad choices he has made are seen as the main points of his life. He began the documents for what would become the Trail of Tears he did not complete them. It was another president who did yet President Jackson takes the blame. Then people act as if President Jackson was the only president to own slaves, when there were 11 others.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson, in my opinion, should remain on the $20 bill. Regardless of the fact that he owned slaves, many people at the time did as well and that's just how it was during that time period. Based on my research, he made multiple substantial changes to our government and banking system. I think he made many wise decisions that impacted the democracy we have today. People don't really know how he was as a person and just judging him based off some research they found about him. Also he seemed like a cool and chill person and him owning slaves isn't a good argument for why he should be removed from the $20 dollars because the first president of the united states owned slaves and he's on the 1 dollar bill and many other presidents were slave owners too. In conclusion, he might as well stay on the $20 dollars and it's just no point of changing it since his impact on America happened many years ago.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Yes, he did make some bad decisions such as owning slaves and causing the trail of tears. If someone is put on currency the person deserves to be there for a reason and they should not be removed. Andrew Jackson led the United States through the War of 1812 and the Battle of New Orleans. Andrew Jackson also did many things to improve the United States in financial ways. Andrew Jackson helped the United States pay off national debt and strengthened relations with foreign countries. Once Andrew Jackson's presidency was over, everyone wanted him reelected because of how good he did in office. I feel that we are completely over looking the things he did as president and how he helped the United States in many many ways and only focusing in on his bad choices. I believe that Andrew Jackson should remain on the $20 dollar bill even though there is bad in his past, the good things he did out-weighs the bad.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that Andrew Jackson should be removed from the 20$ dollar bill. I feel this way because of what he did to the Trail of Tears and the Cherokee people. He also wronged black people by owning many slaves a the president. He may have great president but he was not a great person.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that Andrew Jackson should be taken off the $20 bill. He was a great president and did significant things as President and he was a great leader. I think he should be removed because he did bad things that were clearly wrong and easy to change. The Trail of Tears and how he acted with the slaves was just unaccepctable.

# data[].attributes.body
Honestly, I agree with andrew jackson being removed from the 20$ bill. He not only owned many slaves but also caused the trail of tears which is something that can not be excused. While he did do good actions such as copying off the national debt and doing better towards democracy. It still does not mean what he did is forgton. there is definitely a better person that could fit to be on the 20$ bill. Someone one who has not done such problematic action

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with congress. I personally feel like he should be taken off of the bill. Andrew Jackson might have helped the United States out. But he did not care about all the people of the United States. I know a lot of slave owners might have owned slaves but it was still wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Even though he did do some bad things, he was still a good man and did lots of things to help America. Some things he did that weren't right were things like the Trail of Tears and how he had slaves. Some good things he did for America were things like helping defeat the British at the Battle of New Orleans and he authorized the United States. All in all, I do not think he should be removed from the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with the congress taking andrew jackson of the 20 dollar bill. Even though Andrew jackson did great things for america but he still did a lot of bad things to. He made decisions off his own belief even if it wasnt good for the country. He moved the native americans from there land that they made a treaty on. He had over 300 slaves and didnt do nothing to help no other race just his own. I personally do not think andrew jackson should be on the 20 dollar because he is not person someone wants to look up to.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally do not think that Andrew Jackson should be removed from the $20 bill. Even though he has made some horrible decisions, he's also done some good things for us. Although he could have handled the Indian Removal act in a much better and safer way resulting in less people dying in his hands. Because of all of the people that died while he was president i think that he chose to do that the wrong way.  He also owned more than 300 slaves and did not free any of them. That is one of the bigger reasons that people want him off of the $20 bill. But some of the good things that he has done are getting rid of the national debt and increasing trade with foreign nations. So i personally dont think that he should be removed from the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that congress made the correct decision in removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill. While Andrew Jackson may have done many great things for our country I feel that the negatives of his time in office outweigh the positives. He owned many slaves, only cared about the rights of white men, and caused the Trail of Tears. Some of these qualities were characteristic of the time period, however, our currency should represent the morals Americans uphold today. I do not believe that Andrew Jackson should be hated because he did many great things for our country but if we were to leave him on the $20 bill it would be excusing all of his horrible actions against minorities.

# data[].attributes.body
Recently, Andrew Jackson has been decided to be removed form the 20$ bill according to Congress. I disagree with this act. When people think of Andrew Jackson they think of the Trail of Tears and the owning of slaves, but what they don't see is the hero he was as president and not during his presidency. One courageous thing that he did was in the battle of New Orleans he was a hero in that battle. Also him Taking away national debts. He helped build the future of this country and who knows where we will be right now without his leadership. Every person has a made a poor choice in their life and no one is perfect and for those reasons that is why I believe that Andrew Jackson should stay on the 20$ bill

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I think congress made the wrong decision in removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 dollar bill. His choices in owning many slaves and supporting the Indian Removal Act, which killed many Cherokee Indians, was morally wrong. However, Jackson accomplished many great things for the United States of America. These things include removing national debt, leading America as a war hero like in the Battle of New Orleans, and he helped shape and build democracy for our country. As president he represented citizens like famers, mechanics, and laborers unlike past presidents. Andrew Jackson is not the only one to make poor decisions, no one our currency is perfect. In conclusion, despite his poor choices, his many accomplishments overpower them and he should remain on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 dollar bill. He was a great leader and signifies greatness for this country. Even though there wasn't a reason for him originally being put on the 20$ dollar bill, he deserves to stay. His influence on this country is still seen everywhere today. He made a lasting impact on this country and we honestly should keep that influence on our currency as a sign of bravery and courage.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I believe that Andrew Jackson should be taken off the 20 dollar bill. While Jackson did many good things for America, such as paying off national debt and fighting in the Battle of New Orleans, he also did many awful things. Jackson owned over 150 slaves, and also enacted the Indian Removal Act. This means that he forcibly displaced thousands of Native Americans who just wanted to live on the land they were born with. I also find it ironic how Jackson is believed to be a "symbol of democracy" when he only extended the rights of white men. These reasons I've stated explain why I think that placing him on the 20 dollar bill, possibly one of the most circulating pieces of U.S. currency out there, would be a bad representation of America. All in all, while Jackson did a few good things, the significance of his awful deeds hold bigger than his good actions.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Andrew Jackson should not be removed from the 20 dollar bill. He might have been a bad person but he wasn't a bad president. He helped push america out of dept and expanded democracy. Also I think removing him would be a waste of time and money. Money spent on making new bills could easily be transferd to a different task which could help a lot. In conclusion I theink andrew jackson can stay on the 20 dollar bill because of how good a president he was and becuase i think that it is a wast of resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson shouldn't get removed from the 20$ bill. Starting off, he had done many horrible things throughout his lifetime, such as owning slaves while still in office and the Indian Removal Act. He took a harsh approach forcing Native Americans out of their land, instead of making an agreement where he and the Native Americans could both benefit from it. That doesn't mean that he didn't play a large role in shaping our country into what it is today. He was a great president and an incredible leader, proving this at the Battle of New Orleans to win the War of 1812, before he even became president. He also paid off national debt and gained new land for America. Although he committed many terrible acts, his good deeds outweighed his negative actions, which is why I think Andrew Jackson should stay on the 20$ bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Even though, he made a few bad decisions in his life like Indian removal, and owning slaves. Even tho owing slaves is a very bad thing many people during that time period also owned slaves. He changed a lot of things that benefited the United Staes tho like he improved the government an enormous amount, and he also made The U.S's financial system extremely better. He also made America the strongest country in the world by winning the United States a lot of battles the United States where supposed to loose. Even tho Andrew Jackson might have been the most interesting and controversial presidents ever I still believe he deserves the right to remain on the 20$ bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree with the idea to remove Andrew Jackson from the 20$ bill. I believe that all currency should keep the face of the President that was originally chosen. Even though Andrew Jackson did some bad things like the Trail of Tears and owning slaves, in doing so, he expanding towards the west, dug us out of the hole of debt, and strengthened foreign relationships. He also set the groundwork for democracy and was a veteran war hero. Replacing him would also start even more division in our country which is the last thing that we need. In short, there is no reason to replace Andrew Jackson on the 20$ bill.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I think Andrew Jackson should be taken off the 20 dollar bill. Although he did do good for America the amount of bad he did is unmatched. Even though he has been on there for years and it will only cause bring me attention to the situation. Jackson was an overall bad person and does not deserve to represent America any longer. Before he was elected he was viewed as a hero but after he gained more power he abused it. He  forced the Indians off their land and was responsible for many deaths. Andrew dehumanized people and only treated white men as the most important people. He also keep slaves and had them for years. Jackson was an overall bad person and does not deserve to represent America any longer.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson should be removed from the 20 dollar bill. Andrew Jackson has done much good for the nation such as expanding democracy and nationalism, as well as improving American Economy. He has also committed many atrocities. He passionately fought for the Indian Removal Act and did nothing to improve the rights of minorities such as African Americans. He may be a war hero, but his face on our currency represents our nation. Jackson's achievements may outnumber his cons but his cons outweigh any achievements that he accomplished. His face on our currency is a representation of our Nation. The United States fights for freedom and Andrew Jackson's face on our currency betrays the ideals of our nation.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, i disagree with this plan of action. I feel that Andrew Jackson had done horrible things and they should not be forgiven but i feel that replacing him is and unneeded expense for our country. Andrew Jackson was a good president but not a good person, that doesn't mean that we need to forget about him and replace him. I think that replacing him wouldn't do much of anything. It is almost impossible for the bills with him to run out of circulation and if they try it would just be a waist of money and time. I feel that it wouldn't really mean much to just replace him on a piece of paper.

# data[].attributes.body
An inquisitive controversial question posed- should former president Andrew Jackson continue to appear on $20 bills? In my personal opinion, he should be removed from the $20 bill due to many of what he did, and of what he did not do. He may have extended the land to the west, founded the democratic party, and increased trade within his term, but that is not all that defines what he did. According to The Magazine of the National Endowment for the Humanities, he had about 160 slaves. The experience of one of his slaves, Hannah, was documented. Interestingly, she said, "He was good to us." On the other hand, he had made his fortune from the slave trade and the hard work from his slaves. Jackson also had signed the Indian Removal Act, which forcibly removed the Seminole, Choctaw, Creek, Cherokee, and Chickasaw Indians from their lands. Over 6,000 of the relocated people died from Starvation, small pox, heat exhaustion, et cetera. According to Commercial Appeal, "Jackson had been laying the groundwork for such ethnic cleansing since the War of 1812," Throughout his life, Jackson made many great decisions for the betterment of the country, but the bad decisions he made outweighs that. Therefore, he should not be present on the $20 bill and should be replaced with someone more worthwhile.

Sources:
Commercial Appeal

National Endowment for the Humanities

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the 20$ bill. I think that Andrew Jackson has made some mistakes in his lifetime including the Trail of Tears. Even though he had made some mistakes, he helped our country so much and deserves to stay on the 20$ Bill. Every single man that is on our currency is there because they helped make our country into what it is today including Andrew Jackson. I think removing him is not the right decision because he did so much for our country. Andrew Jackson was able to make our country debt free before the end of his presidency which no other president has been able to do. In conclusion I think Andrew Jackson should remain on the 20$ Bill because of all the good things he has done for our country.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I think congress's decision to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill was the right move. Although I think he is more than worthy of being there with him being a president who made so many great changes and moves for America for that time, some of his decisions are viewed very differently today. With him causing the Trail of Tears along with his amount of slaves he owned, he is viewed as a bad person in that way. On the other side, the good things he did for the country as president like getting the U.S out of debt and leading troops in the battle of New Orleans and more, in my opinion made him worthy of the position on the $20. The reason I believe that he should be removed is that with how controversial he is in today's world, I think removing him and having possibly a rotating currency is a good idea for the U.S going forward.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with congress. Their decision is a good idea since Andrew Jackson was a very controversial president. He did do great things like paying off national debt and fighting in the Battle of New Orleans. But he expanded the rights of American citizens. Expanding rights is good and all but it was only for white men, meaning the women and anyone of other races are not given their rights.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with congress's decision to take Andrew Jackson off of the 20$ bill, but I think at some point, he should be added back at some point. The British have a very good system for dealing with the faces on currency. They rotate the faces every few years to someone who represents a value that British citizens believe in. This is something that I feel Congress should look into. I do not believe that the faces on currency should stay the same for the rest of time. I think that Andrew Jackson should not be banned from being on currency. I feel that it is difficult to judge someone who lived 200 years ago by today's standards. I belive that he should be on U.S currency, but others should aslo get the chance to be on our money.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is a good idea to remove Andrew Jackson from the 20 dollar bill. Andrew Jackson is a very contraversial president in America that has done great things to help our country, as well as affecting our country in awful ways. I believe he should be taken off the 20 dollar bill because although Andrew Jackson did a lot of good things for America like paying off national debt, helping to fight in the Battle of New Orleans, and expanding the rights of American citizens (mostly white men), he also made a lot of mishaps and bad decisions throughout his presidency. Jackson forcibly removed the Native Americans from there land causing the Trail of Tears, discriminated against African Americans, and did nothing to protect or create rights for the Native Americans, African Americans, and women of America. All of these people are so important to the American society and economy, regardless of there race or gender. At the time, Andrew Jackson was viewed as a hero, and had a lot of power that he could have used to help change America's perspective on these circumstances for the better. However, he chose to continue to accept and expand these awful things that were happening to many Native Americans and African Americans in America. Andrew Jackson was such a bad example for the American people by contributing in these awful things. I think that the faces used to represent American money should be people in our country who truly deserve it. They should be someone honorable that we can all look up too. They should show kindness, bravery, encouragement, and be able to express there own opinions even if it was not popular. I think that Andrew Jackson did not chose to do what was best for America, and disrespected so many innocent people. This is why I think it is a good idea for Andrew Jackson to be removed from the 20 dollar bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with congress and think that Andrew Jackson should not be removed from the $20 bill. While yes, he did own many slaves and enlisted policies like the Indian Removal Act which were dehumanizing to many Native Americans, we can learn from his mistakes and know not to do anything of the sort in the future. Also, he did plenty of things that were very beneficial to our country and helped it grow into the nation it is today. No president before Jackson had been able to get rid of the country's debt until Jackson successfully left our country debt-free when he concluded his term. He helped expand Democracy and give a voice to the "common man". We shouldn't judge him by his worst mistakes, but by all of the great things that he did for this nation that helped it become the America that we know and love today.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that congress made the right decision to take Andrew Jackson off of the $20 bill. Although Andrew Jackson did many great things like helping the U.S. in war and boosting them financially I feel like his bad actions outweigh his good deeds. Andrew Jackson was a slave owner and he discriminated against Native Americans and African Americans. I do not want to be seen as a country that rewards people who discriminate like Andrew Jackson, by putting their face on money. I feel like our currency shows a lot about our country and I don't want the face of a slave owner to represent our country. Another reason I believe that Andrew Jackson should be removed from our money is because he influenced the Trail of Tears. This tragic event forced Native Americans out of their homes and made them walk many miles to a new home. The Trail of Tears is a great example of how he did not care abut everyone and should not represent our country. Although Andrew Jackson helped our country in many ways he hurt it much worse.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally think that removing Andrew Jackson off of the 20$ bill is a great idea. I think that he was a good president in some aspects, but a bad person. While he did help America by being a leader /hero in the war of 1812, got rid of the debt we had, and expanded democracy, he also didn't think about other groups of people that lived in the U.S. He made lots of money of the hard labor of the 161 slaves that he had at the time of his death. He also signed the Indian Removal act which forcibly relocated Native Americans on a terrible, horrible 5,045 mile journey that they didn't have to take and risk so many lives. Both of those bad choses that he made left people traumatized, disturbed, and others grieving the loss of loved ones. In conclusion, I feel as though another person would be a much better candidate than he is.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think it would be most logical to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 dollar bill. Some may argue that this is unnecessary and the things Jackson did were in the past. Yes, Jackson was president during a time when his actions could be dismissed or weren't seen as entirely wrong. But that doesn't mean they should be ignored today. Andrew Jacksons face is not one that should be representing todays America. We shouldn't continue to have the face of a man who caused the death of at least 3,000 native Americans through forced displacement on the currency that represents our nation. Yes he did expanded voting rights, as long as you were a white male you could vote. Andrew Jackson personally embraced the institution of slavery and he became a wealthy slaveowner. I feel that this is not the type of person we want to be representing current America and our values.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think it would be most logical to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 dollar bill. Some may argue that this is unnecessary and the things Jackson did were in the past. Yes, Jackson was president during a time when his actions could be dismissed or weren't seen as entirely wrong. But that doesn't mean they should be ignored today. Andrew Jacksons face is not one that should be representing todays America. We shouldn't continue to have the face of a man who caused the death of at least 3,000 native Americans through forced displacement on the currency that represents our nation. Yes he did expanded voting rights, as long as you were a white male you could vote. Andrew Jackson personally embraced the institution of slavery and he became a wealthy slaveowner. I feel that this is not the type of person we want to be representing current America and our values.

# data[].attributes.body
Should Andrew Jackson be removed from the $20 bill? In my opinion he should, in 1836 he tried to overthrow the U.S. National Bank. The Andrew Jackson controversy can go back and forth, he did a lot of good, but he also commited several illegal activities. The part that gets difficult is when you realize that we glorify people like George Washington, but he also owned slaves, so the argument can get difficult, but in my opinion, in todays date, Andrew Jackson should not be on the $20 dollar bill even though he was seen as a hero, and that should go to someone more deserving, someone who did things the right way, and for the good of everyone else.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's a good idea to remove Andrew Jackson from the $ 20 bill of American currency. You shouldn't celebrate his mistakes like the Indian Immigration Act and owning slaves. We should put leaders like Harriet Tubman on the $ 20 bill because of the leadership she showed throughout her living. The decision to include Jackson in the $ 20 bill has been highly controversial for many years I think  Congress made the right decision because he didn't want to be known for the strong women who supported the right, not what he did to the American people. Harriet Tubman is a good candidate to replace the $ 20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the removal of Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is a good idea. Even though he created the spoils system and paid off the debt, there were many unacceptable actions he made during his presidency. First of all, he supported the Indian removal act, which forced several Native Americans out of their homes so white settler could take their land. Also, Andrew Jackson owned around 150 slaves and never freed any of them, which in modern day should not be overlooked or excused. In conclusion, Andrew Jackson was a good president, but he does not embody the United States moral code.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that it is necessary to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. This is really controversial, as he has done awful things like own slaves, but other presidents did bad things as well. This is simply the way things were back then. The world is in no way condoning his actions by having him on a dollar bill and is just praising him for his heroic deeds and bravery. He can be viewed in many different ways. He did awful things such as the Indian removal/coveting of Indian lands and slavery, but he also paid off the national debt, gained new lands for America, and strengthened relationships with foreign nations. For many people he was the "idol of the American people and that the people of the United States honored Andrew Jackson before all other living men at the time." I believe that this enough warrens his continuation on the $20 bill. I very strongly dislike his awful actions to the Indians and slaves, but I am choosing instead to look at all the heroic and amazing things he's done.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Andrew Jackson should be removed from the $20 bill. I think this because he supported the removal of native Americans, cheating on his wife (being on the smaller side of things considering everything else he did), and owning 161 slaves when he died. While he did great things to our country, he wasn't the greatest president by a long shot.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Andrew Jackson should be replaced on the $20 bill. My reasoning is that there should be a person that represents what we stand for better. I think that Andrew Jackson was a bad person, good president. While reading my peers comments, I see many replies on Jackson owning slaves being customary. Even though owning slaves was sadly normalized, Jackson still took part in the act. He owned and abused around 300 slaves in his time. Although, he isn't all bad, Jackson did great things. He supported the fact that trying to relocate the Native Americans and forcing them onto the Trail of Tears, which was a extremely difficult path was wrong. The Trail of Tears was very dehumanizing and difficult, it happened to the Native Americans without confrontation or valid reasoning. Furthermore, I feel as though Andrew Jackson only made certain actions to hide his true colors. Such as winning the Battle of New Orleans

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson should be removed from the 20$ bill because he did not place himself as president. Yes, he may have the name "President Jackson," but he did not represent himself as one. Andrew Jackson did provide the democracy, that we have today, but he killed Native Americans, and owned slaves. Just because previous presidents owned slaves, it does not make it right. Andrew Jackson could have been the change in society, but instead he just went along. Andrew Jackson also killed countless Native Americans; they had leave their home, and find new territory. Andrew Jackson has committed acts, which in my book cannot be forgiven. Harriett Tubman should be on the 20$ because she actually represented herself in a positive way, such as helping slaves go to Pennsylvania.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson should not be on the $20 bill. Even though he did good things for the United States like paid of the national debt, gained new lands for America, expanded democracy, and strengthened relationships with foreign nations. I think they made a good decision to put him on the bill then, but now people are realizing that he needs to be replaced. He did more bad things than good things and one example is he signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 which led to the Trail of Tears. Jackson was worse than a slave owner, he was a slave trader. To make things worse, he earned his fortune enslaving others.The Cherokee nation referred to Jackson as “Sharp Knife” because of the way he destroyed people and their lives. Harriet Tubman deserves to be on the bill more than Jackson because she helped to make sure the final slavery defeat in the U.S. by aiding the Union during the Civil War.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should be removed from the $20 bill. Although Jackson did some beneficial things for America like getting rid of the National debt, that does not excuse the harm he caused the Native Americans. He caused immense suffering and was the reason for a quarter of the Cherokee populaton's deaths'. Even the Native Americans that survived the trail of tears were still forced from their homes and moved across the country to land that the white settlers didn't want. Jackson was also a harsh slave owner and an overly confident president. In my opinion, keeping Jackson on the 20$ bill would be an embarrassing representation of America.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the decision that Congress made, removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill. Andrew Jackson made poor decisions such as owning many slaves. He also signed the Indian Removal Act which led to the deaths of many Indians. The ways that he removed the Indians were unjust, and Jackson should have taken a more rational approach to this whole situation. Even with his bad actions, Andrew Jackson was still one of the most respected presidents of his time. Andrew Jackson helped to pay off the national debt and acquired more land for settlers. Jackson strengthened our associations with other countries. One of the most important things Jackson did was set up the framework for democracy in America. There are approximately 8.9 billion $20 bills in circulation. This is too many $20 bills in circulation to be able to change the iconic face on this bill. Other presidents did terrible things as well. If we are changing one of the bills, why not change all of them? With Andrew Jackson being such a controversial person, there are many opinions about him. I, however, do not believe that he should be removed from the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson should be removed from the $20 bill because he didn't represent our country very well. Before his presidency, he was a considered a war hero after leading an army in the battle of New Orleans. He used brilliant battle tactics to defeat the British. During his presidency, he laid out the blueprint of the democracy we have today, he was the first and only president to completely pay off America's debt, and gained new lands for the country. While these events made a load of people consider him to be a good president, another load of people didn't quite like him because of how controversial he was. In other words, some of the things he did during his presidency weren't in the best interest of the people, and even the people who stood by him didn't always side with him. For example, the Trail of Tears event mostly resulted in death, sickness, and malnutrition for these Native Americans, and they went through great suffering. Also, we know that slavery was very frowned upon in our history, but Jackson condoned this and owned at least 300 slaves himself. Furthermore, we should rotate our currency some, too. Other people, places, and events concerning our country should get proper recognition aside from just our past presidents.

# data[].attributes.body
I say that Andrew Jackson should be taken off the $20 bill. Andrew Jackson did do several good or even great things for America, but we shouldn't just take into account the things he did too or for America. Andrew caused the death of 20% of the Cherokee. Andrew Jackson is not the only president to do terrible things, but that does not mean we should let it go. Just because other people did wrong does not make it okay. I my opinion that just feeds the idea that maybe most of if not all the currency should be changed. Andrew Jackson is surely not someone who reflects the image America wants or should want to present. We aren't just arguing about whether or not Jackson was a good person or president; we are debating whether he should be one faces of America. There are certainly better people to place on the $20 bill and even other bills or coins that have possibly not received as much spotlight as they deserve. Andrew Jackson Should not be forgotten, the good or the bad. Though, he also should not be on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with congresses decision to take Andrew Jackson off of the $20 bill. Although Andrew Jackson took many actions that improved our country such as helping the U.S. financially, he also made big mistakes. One of the biggest reasons for his removal is him being a big supporter of Native American removal. Andrew Jackson believed that congress should pass the Removal Act of 1830 which would result in congress being able to pay Native Americans for their lands. Andrew Jackson wanted all of this land so that his white settlers could have more room to grow farming lands and cities. Another one of Jackson's mistakes is his number of slaves that he owned. By the end of Andrew Jackson's live he owned about 150 slaves, and Jackson never freed them. Taking into account the actions that our society is taking today it would be a wise decision for Andrew Jackson to be removed for his discrimination toward the Native American people. Our country has taken so much time and effort to get away from slavery and injustice towards certain groups that having someone on our own money reminding us of those times is not a good idea.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Andrew Jackson should stay on the 20 dollar bill. Although he did some very bad things such as the create Indian removal act and owned slaves he also did some good things. He got rid of the national debt, increased trade with foreign nations and was a war hero. Even thought he was not the best president that we had he did benefit the in some very positive ways and should stay on the 20 dollar bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the decision in removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is a good idea. Andrew Jackson had many great accomplishments during his presidency, like expanding democracy, gaining new land for America, and paying off national debt. For these reasons and plenty more I agree with why he was first put on the bill, but now I think it is time for him to go. I think this not only because of the bad things that he did during his presidency, like forcing Native Americans off their land and owning over 100 slaves without granting them freedom, but also because there are other very important American leaders that deserve to replace him. I feel like replacing Jackson with Harriet Tubman would be the right thing to do since she was such a great leader in her time and still is to many people today. I also think that if we have the same people on our bills for forever, then other important people in American history won’t get the recognition that they deserve.

# data[].attributes.body
The problem with removing Andrew Jackson from the 20$ bill is that eventually all the other money (coins and paper) would also have to be changed. Seeing how divided our country has become over the last decade, it is clear that no one person or symbol would be universally acceptable. To start changing the people or places printed on the money is like opening Pandora's Box. No one would ever be satisfied and every year there would be petitions to change it again and again. Therefore, if we were to change our currency, it should be replaced with simply the number amount it represents. So, the twenty-dollar bill would just have a big #20 on it, the ten-dollar with #10, and so on. Numbers are universal and do not represent any one group. By doing it this way, no one should be offended and the design on the money would never have to be changed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson should not be removed form the 20$ bill. Although Jackson did own slaves back then some of the other presidents before him also owned slaves. Another controversial choice he made was the Indian Removal Act where thousands of Native Americans were forced to leave there homes and move to where is now Oklahoma. This was known as the Trail of Tears and about 4,000 Native Americans died. Although the Trail of Tears was a very bad thing no one knew any different at the time. Even though he made some bad decisions he had some very good moments as well. Jackson was a hero in the Battle of New Orleans leading us to a drastic victory. He also got rid of U.S debt which was a huge accomplishment. A lot of things Jackson did as president has helped shaped the U.S today. While yes, in his life he made some bad decisions it was the good decisions that made the biggest impact in history.  So this is why I believe Andrew Jackson is worthy of his spot on the 20$ bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that taking Andrew Jackson off of the twenty dollar bill is a good choice. I believe that the worst thing that he caused was the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was a horrible event that killed four thousand Cherokee members. He forced them out of their home land and moved them somewhere completely new. That is most likely why so many people want him removed from the currencey. Jackson was a hero to many but to others believe he was one of the most controversial presidents. I don't necessarily think that he's evil but I don't think that he was a good person either. He's more so in the middle. A shade of grey if you will. It is important to hold a discussion that features  both sides in order to come to a well rounded conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Andrew Jackson should be removed from the 20$ bill. Though he did do some good thing in his time as president, he also took actions against many people that lived in America. He was in support of slavery and the trail of tears. I think his actions taken against actual people that lived in America are enough to get him removed and replaced on the 20$ bill. I'd like to use this space to also mention that other presidents, that are depicted on our currency, have done bad things to the people they were supposed to be guiding and protecting. Instead of having people who hurt the people they weren't supposed to on money, we could have people who helped people in America.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson should not be removed from the 20 dollar bill for several reasons. If you remove Andrew Jackson from the 20 dollar bill for things like the Indian Removal Act and him owning slaves, you need to remove Washington from the 1$ and Jefferson from the 2$, for both of them did very similar acts. George Washington, for instance, owned 123 slaves and burned down several Iroquois villages during the Revolutionary War. Jefferson owned over 600 slaves during his life. While Jackson has committed several sins, he has also done several things for the good of this nation, such as expanding voter's rights and ridding us of national debt. He is not a 100% evil or 100% good man, he is a bit of both worlds. He should not be removed from the 20 dollar bill for doing the same sins that other presidents on the dollar committed. I don't condone these acts of Slavery and Indian Removal, in fact O despise them, but you shouldn't blame Jackson for them happening considering how he grew up and the time he came from. It is important when reviewing a topic such as this to examine all the factors involved, including the time he grew up in and the things presidents such as Washington and Jefferson as well. History is not black and white, there is a TON of gray area in there as well.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should not be removed from the $20 bill. Although Andrew Jackson has done some unjust actions, he also did many great things for this country. I do not agree with the methods Andrew Jackson used to solve conflicts. He could have used a more humane and safe way for the Indian Removal Act. Because of all the deaths at his hands, I think that he chose an unjust method. Andrew Jackson could have taken a more peaceful and logical approach such as negotiating with the Indians. Negotiating money, crops, and land with the Indians would have saved many lives as well as solve conflicts in the future. Andrew Jackson's method was to barge into Cherokee land and hold them at gunpoint. Because the Cherokees were at gunpoint, they had no choice but to relocate. After analyzing Jackson's methods used for many conflicts, it seems as if he chose the violent way majority of the time. Some positive things Jackson did for the United States was leaving presidency without any debt and being a great leader in war. He also laid out the framework for Democracy. Maybe Andrew Jackson was not meant to be a president but rather a general or soldier. The process of making $20 bills with a new face would take time. Even if people want Andrew Jackson off the bill, he will never be gone. There will always be a 20$ bill with Andrew Jackson's face on it. Not only would the process of making new bills come in bulk, it would cut down trees at a higher rate. Being a controversial president, there are many opinions on Andrew Jackson and his actions.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it is fine to remove Andrew Jackson as long as it does not affect other more important jobs in the government. However, since there are a lot of things going on right now in the government I don't think it should be a main focus. Even though he has done some very bad things like owning slaves and the trail of tears he did get rid of debt in America and was very financially responsible during his term. Also, even though his actions are not okay it is important to remember that during this time these things were very common. But, if it does not disrupt the government's more dire issues at hand there shouldn't be anything wrong with changing the $20 bill since he was such a controversial president.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Andrew Jackson should not be removed from the $20 bill. Yes, he owned slaves but so did other presidents before him such as Washington, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe. Andrew Jackson paid off national debt and broadened democracy. The mindset back then was different from the view people have now. The Indian Removal Act was considered “beneficial” to Jackson because it helped the White Americans. With slavery and segregation removed in the U.S., the owning slaves idea is an awful idea. To make a compromise with the people who say that more people of color and women should be on bills, new bills could be added to shine a light on unrepresented individuals in history.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally, I believe that Jackson should be removed from the $20 bill. However, I agree with the British: I think we should rotate our currency. So, in theory, I want to not just have Jackson removed; I want all of the old white men removed from the currency. They might come back at times throughout the future. This plan provides the chance to honor women, African-Americans, Native Americans, Asian Americans, LGBTQ+, and other important people throughout our history. Our money does not just have to honor statesmen or presidents; it can give the spotlight to the people less spoken about. In conclusion, I have nothing against Andrew Jackson in particular. He did many great things for our country, which kind of cancels out the slavery and Native American hating, because he was a product of our kind. It kind of translates to a president posting hateful comments on social media. Other presidents did things just as terrible and sometimes were just terrible. However, I believe it is time for a change. I believe that change can start with our money, whether the penny, one dollar bill or the 100 dollar bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think Andrew Jackson should be taken off the $20 bill. During the time that Jackson was in presidency, people did not live in the same situations. They did not know of phones, cars and electronic devices. People were suffering and dying from malaria as well as many other fevers and illnesses. Jackson during his time had some great accomplishments for the U.S., such as clearing the nation from national debt, along with fighting and winning many battles. Although I can understand that his owning of slaves and cruelty to Native Americans can be interpreted as inexcusable, taking a piece of history from 200 years ago and trying to make it fit into a centennial with completely different laws, standards, and expectations, does not make it any better or serve any justice for the neglect he exhibited.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Yes, he did have some mess ups like being a slave holder. Also, removal of Native Americans known as the trail of tears. Back in the day people did not know that was a bad thing to do. People only focus on his bad things. Andrew Jackson also had some very positive accomplishments like Paying off the national dept, gaining new lands, and amazing leadership during the war of 1812. He led troops at the Battle of New Orleans resulting in an American Victory. Andrew Jackson is a hero. Although, the person replacing him is very worthy of the spot I believe he should remain on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like I am on the fence about congress removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill. We need to not only look at the negative - like look at the positives he had. He was able to get the whole nation out of debt which is amazing, and he lead his troops and fought valiantly in the battle of New Orleans. not only do we need to look at the face of the 20 dollar bill, but think of how much natural resources they wasted to inflate the money supply for them to remove all of the $20 bills and replace them all at the same time. This will take a large toll on the economy because they have to start over printing all of the 20 dollar bills that exist now. But don't get me wrong- I love the idea of having large historical female figures on money such as Rosa Parks or Harriet Tubman. But now for the negatives of Andrew Jackson. He was one of the few few people to have over 200 slaves at the same time until the day he died. He also gained all of his riches from his slaves. So in closure we need to reconsider seeing the positives and the negatives before making a decision.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally believe that it is good decision to remove Andrew jackson from the $20 bill. Andrew Jackson was not known as a great person in American History. Andrew accomplished several good impacts in the United States while being president, such as spreading democracy to more  Americans. Andrew Jackson was a veteran of two wars, he also payed off national debt. Andrew Jackson was known as a horrible person though. He encouraged the Indian removal act forcing Cherokees out of their homes. Him doing this made them to have no home and everything they had was taken away. He might have been known as a "hero" to some people, but owned more than 100 slaves. Taking Andrew Jackson off the $20 bill has been a very controversial topic over the years. The reason I say "it is a good decision to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill", is because of all the poor decisions he made. All thought he was a great president, he was a terrible person. When being on a bill I think that you should represent all good.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should be taken off the 20$. I think that it is a good time to take him off giving that their are other historical figures that did not get as much recognition as him. Future generations should have a chance to understand that even though he made some great accomplishments for the U.S he also did some really terrible things throughout his presidency. For example He supported the Indian removal act, he also owned over 200 slaves without ever granting them freedom. I think that a lot of people know who Andrew jackson is and what he did so, putting someone new on the 20$ would give a better knowledge and understanding of some of the other important people throughout history. Even though many people think that once someone is added to U.S currency I think that it is ok to change it every once and awhile. Changing the people on the U.S currency will help teach people about other historical figures and open up many more educational opportunities. Some candidates that could be considered for the replacement of Andrew Jackson would be, Harriet Tubman, Eleanor Roosevelt, or Martin Luther King. Andrew Jackson should be removed from the 20$ because is considered one of the most controversial presidents in U.S history.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that it is a good idea to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill. We should not celebrate his mistakes like the Indian removal act but celebrate the real leaders like Harriet Tubman. The choice to put Jackson on the $20 bill has been very controversial over the years mainly because he forced Native American tribes to relocate and was a slave owner. I think that Congress made the right decision because we do not want to be know for what he did to the people of the United States but for the strong women that stood for what is right. Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and Eleanor Roosevelt would all be great candidates for the replacement on the $20 bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is good that Andrew Jackson is voted to be removed from the 20$ bill. He might've freed America from national debt, led the U.S. to victory in New Orleans, and expanded voting rights to American citizens, but what did he do for Black and Indigenous people? He might've been a great president, but he was a horrible man. Jackson owned over 100 slaves; when he passed on, he did not release a single one. He also forced the Trail of Tears on Native Americans killing thousands on their hellish journey. He might've been a hero to the "common man", but who were they really referencing? Things might not completely become the way they should be in America for Black and Indigenous people, but this is a step forward because removing Jackson, is removing what he stood for. Andrew Jackson being the face of the 20$ bill just lets me know, that despite what he has done, America still stands for oppression against Black and Aboriginal Americans.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the decision to remove Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill. Although people are saying once someone is added to a piece of currency they should never be removed, I think Andrew Jackson is an exception. Andrew Jackson encouraged the Indian removal act forcing Cherokees out of their home. The Cherokees had no choice other than to start a long hard journey with no home or belongings. He was also a slave owner and treated people unequally based off of their appearance. While he may have done good for America, I don't think he is a good representation of an American hero. There is no doubt that Harriet Tubman is more than worthy to be on the $20 bill so she should replace Andrew Jackson because he is not how we want to represent our country.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Yes, he did do some bad things such as own slaves and caused the trail of tears. But if someone is put on a important item like currency, or a monument then that person deserves to be there. Andrew Jackson led the United States through many battles and wars and won them. Andrew Jackson also did many things to improve the United States in financial ways. Andrew Jackson helped the United States pay off all national debt and strengthened relationships with foreign countries. He also issued for new currency policies. Once Andrew Jackson's presidency was over, everyone wanted to re-elect Andrew Jackson because of how good he did in office. Are we as United States citizens going to overlook the fact that Andrew Jackson did very bad things? No, but are we going to forget all the good he did for this country and how helped the United States in many many ways? No again. I believe that Andrew Jackson should remain on the $20 dollar bill even thought there is bad in his past, there is a lot of good as well.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the decision to remove Andrew Jackson from the 20$ bill because once you are added you should never be removed. Although he did some very bad things such as the trail of tears and owning slaves, he was a very good president. Jackson was a veteran of two wars and was committed to them. He had the willingness to protect and better the common person. Jackson laid the framework down for democracy and strengthened many relationships with foreign country's. After Jackson left office, many people wanted him to return because he did very well in office. Everyone saw him as a man of the people, as they knew he would sacrifice himself for the country. The question is still unanswered, but I believe he should stay on the 20$ bill. Even-though he made some wrong decisions he had more acceptable actions.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I think that Andrew Jackson should be taken off the $20 bill. Although he was not a horrible person, he also was not a great person, and I think if you are on a bill you should represent all good. Jackson did do some good things such as  paying off national debt and strengthening relationships with foreign nations. On the other hand, he forced Cherokees off their land and left them with nothing. He also owned over a hundred slaves which was definitely not a thing to be remembered. I think it would be much more of a fit for someone like Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill because she was a great symbol in American history and does not represent anything bad.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion Andrew Jackson should be taken off the 20 dollar bill. In todays day and age he is seen as very controversial and having done terrible things. While yes, he did some amazing things like leaving presidency without any debt, being a war hero, and more, I don't think those good things should be able to overlook the bad. He pushed the Indian Removal Act which maybe when looked like the right choice but now it's clearly the wrong one. This act led to Van Buren to starting the Trail of Tears. In doing so he went against what the supreme court said to do which is just unacceptable. He also had many slaves, never freeing any of them, that made the majority of his profits. Even if we looked over these facts, we still face the problem that not all Americans like Andrew Jackson and think he was a great value to our country. Due to this I believe we should change it to someone all Americans can look up to and be proud of.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20. Andrew Jackson may have owned slaves and created the trail of tears, but these actions can be easily dismissed. Multiple presidents after Jackson owned slaves, yet he is the only one receiving backlash. The trail of tear was a horrible thing none-the-less, but it was simple colonization. Colonization was a huge goal for Americans at the time, and so many people before Andrew continued to colonize as well. Plus, people forget the incredible things he has done. Andrew was an American hero, issued for new currency, paid off al national debt, strengthened democracy, and gained tons of land. Because of the extravagant things Andrew Jackson has done, he belongs on the 20 dollar bill.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't agree to this removal. I believe that he should stay on the 20 dollar bill for he is a hero. one of many reasons is that he oppose both the National Bank and money. but he had also made a goal of his administration for the destruction of the National Bank. Which, he did own a slave until he died, but that doesn't matter now. but lets focus on the important things he did like became a hero for leading his troops into the Battle of New Orleans, being a leader of a militia, and he made the Spanish retreat from Florida therefore claiming it by the Americans. therefore he should stay on the 20$ dollar bill for all he has done for us, doesn't matter what evil things he has done but thats in the past, think about if he wasn't here, without Andrew Jackson, thousands of lives would have been lost at the Battle of New Orleans, Mississippi would become a state much later, and John would've been Major General of Tennessee.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson should be taken off the $20 bill because he was not a great figure in American History. As a president, Andrew Jackson benefitted the United States by spreading democracy to more Americans and was the only person to rid the nation of debt. His actions to keep America from becoming a bureaucracy and establishing nominating conventions were positive influences on America. Jackson had also been a war hero, leading American forces to a monumental victory at the Battle of New Orleans. These actions make some think he is a great president, however, this is only partially true. Jackson approved of unjust laws that forced Native Americans off their land and sent them on the Trail of Tears, a grueling journey that killed thousands of Native Americans. Jackson's atrocities against Native Americans completely violated the beliefs in the Constitution that "all men are created  equal." He was complacent with the issue of slavery so he could use his slaves to make money. These actions do not make him an evil figure in American History, but keep him from being great. To be on a bill, you have to be great, not good. Presidents  Washington and Jefferson had also owned slaves but did not commit atrocities as Jackson did, which is why they are still considered great. Andrew Jackson should not be on the $20 bill because he was not a great figure in US history.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should not be taken off of the $20 bill. I personally think that one of the best things he could have done for the country was rid us of debt, and he did just that. While yes, he did make some bad decisions and some would consider him a bad person, that doesn't make him a bad president. He also led troops at the Battle of New Orleans, which ended in a drastic American victory. He helped shape what America is today, so I don't think that he should be removed from the currency of a country that he fought so hard to protect and build up.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like for today's day and age congress made the right decision taking Andrew Jackson off the $20. Andrew Jackson is viewed as the most controversial president ever. He was a slave owner and made decisions best for him and not the country. When he was first put on the $20 barely anyone talked about the Trail of Tears and how it killed thousands of Natives to Tennessee and Georgia. Since then the United States has evolved in the way that the country functions and thinks. One of the most popular things that people argue for why Jackson should be on the $20 is because he was the first president to leave the office with the nation having zero debt. Undoubtedly he is the most controversial president of all time and there will be no doubt that even after he is off the $20 people will want him back on it.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like Congress made the best decision for the times we are in now. When Jackson was put on the bill initially, no one really talked about the Walk of Tears or how 4,000 Cherokee people died during that. Now, the nation is much more self aware of these things and I think that's the main reason it is being changed now. However, Jackson made many great decisions for the nation financially and was the first president to leave office with the country having no debt. He is no doubt the most controversial president because of some of the amazing things he did and some of the awful things he did.

# data[].attributes.body
Andrew Jackson is now being removed because what he did was horrible moving people out of their home for generations and forcing them to walk for miles a day but it was normal at the time because it was what the people wanted he is no longer worthy of being remembered on a piece of paper because of what he did. his legacy is still of a hero to the American people and he did some great things to like erasing national debt.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill. Even though, he owned slaves many people during that time period also owned slaves. He made many influential changes to our government and financial system. He had many great decisions that made a positive impact on the government we have today. These are some of the ways Andrew Jackson was the most controversial president.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Andrew Jackson should stay on the 20$ bill. While he wasn't perfect during his life time, he did many good things. He was seen as an American hero, he won the Battle of New Orleans. He handled foreign affairs great and he left us in no debt. While he did sign the document that would cause the Trail of Tears, it may have been unbeknownst to him that it would kill so many. He did own slaves as well, but for the time that was a customary thing. While I don't think he was a great man, he was a good man and deserves to be on the 20$ bill.