# data[].attributes.body
This is the only designated work/seating area in the library. Both the tables and chairs are stationary (not on castors). The tables are awkward to move (heavy and odd-shaped). I'm nervous whenever I drag the tables that they will rip the carpet.

# data[].attributes.body
If I want students to feel comfortable in the library to collaborate, sitting around one big table isn't going to help. . . . .

# data[].attributes.body
The shelving is all fixed, including this stack (one of three stacks) of nonfiction resources. These take up about one third of the centre floor space.

# data[].attributes.body
With the amount of floor space these stacks take up, it means there is very little other space for student use. I feel these stacks create a "tug-of-war" between needed resources and flexible learning and creating spaces for students.

# data[].attributes.body
There are three desktop computers on a long counter. They get used multiple times a day by students searching on the catalog for books and approximately for four hours a week by Grade 6 and 7 students for typing up assignments.

# data[].attributes.body
The counter space can accommodate more than the three desktops but the extra space is just used for storage of materials (and a giant Cat in the Hat stuffed animal). There is also "wasted" space under the counter that is used for empty totes.

# data[].attributes.body
What about moving these tables out of here and hanging a green screen on rollers in front of or behind the projector screen (which is on rollers). Either screen is there to be pulled down when it is needed.

# data[].attributes.body
These are teacher resources.  What about moving these to the back office, where teachers can still access them and make more room for student books and materials.

# data[].attributes.headline
Facing the Front (Student View During Read Alouds)

# data[].attributes.subject
Facing the Front (Student View During Read Alouds)

# data[].attributes.body
Signage leaves a lot to be desired and hardly encourages participatory learning. Especially in the nonfiction section it is minimal, dated, and not consistently accurate.