# data[].attributes.body
Aaro

# data[].attributes.body
Liza

# data[].attributes.body
Daniel

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan

# data[].attributes.body
I thought Shayna was good

# data[].attributes.body
Daniel, Shayna, Liza

# data[].attributes.body
Shayna

# data[].attributes.body
I think he had very specific reasons

# data[].attributes.body
I think Peyton did super well with here eividence

# data[].attributes.body
Liza

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan

# data[].attributes.body
Great conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
Overall very awesome!

# data[].attributes.body
Not everyone knew what was happening

# data[].attributes.body
Both team did very well

# data[].attributes.body
Someone is making it up as they go

# data[].attributes.body
Not prepared a good conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
Both teams should probably have talked more in between each section to be more prepared...including when the first two groups were up there.

# data[].attributes.body
Not everyone knew what was going on

# data[].attributes.body
Shouldn’t look at Mrs.Gill while talking. Should look at other team

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like there was some repetition in the negative team’s rebuttal.

# data[].attributes.body
Positive side started out not too good but now is doing better

# data[].attributes.body
Positive side needs stronger evidence

# data[].attributes.body
The negative side had a really good counterargument.

# data[].attributes.body
Oh snap... rebuttal coming on strong

# data[].attributes.body
I feels both sides are really even!

# data[].attributes.body
SPEAK UP!!

# data[].attributes.body
Both sides had really good evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
They have good evidence the negative side

# data[].attributes.body
Great comback

# data[].attributes.body
Can’t hear anything. Need to speak up

# data[].attributes.body
I can’t hear very well.

# data[].attributes.body
Louder

# data[].attributes.body
Good reasons

# data[].attributes.body
Negative evidence was stronger and better

# data[].attributes.body
Should have been planned better so no awkward silence

# data[].attributes.body
Good evidence

# data[].attributes.body
Need to have ideas planned out

# data[].attributes.body
Negative had good evidence

# data[].attributes.body
The rebuttal was great until the pause... good detail and evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Awkward silence

# data[].attributes.body
Had good evi

# data[].attributes.body
Needs to have their ideas planned out better

# data[].attributes.body
Need to be thourogh throughout their responses

# data[].attributes.body
Good reasons

# data[].attributes.body
The negative side was really strong!!!!!!!!!!

# data[].attributes.body
More strong evidence‼

# data[].attributes.body
They are speaking loudly

# data[].attributes.body
Gives good evidence in Ryan's grou

# data[].attributes.body
The group against the positive side gave good evidence

# data[].attributes.body
which side is which?????????

# data[].attributes.body
Good argument (negative)
Good counter argument (negative)

Cons
Too many pauses(positive)

# data[].attributes.body
Strong reasons with evidence to back it up

# data[].attributes.body
The negative side had very good evidence

# data[].attributes.body
They need to look at the the other team and not at Mrs.Gill

# data[].attributes.body
The people work together

# data[].attributes.body
Liza had a very good reason👍🏾

# data[].attributes.body
They should have added stronger evidence to support their answers

# data[].attributes.body
QUIET CHILDREN
SPEEK UP

# data[].attributes.body
They could’ve been louder

# data[].attributes.body
Positive could have had better reasons

# data[].attributes.body
They were very quiet🤫

# data[].attributes.body
They where mostly talking about one thing.

# data[].attributes.body
They where virry silent

# data[].attributes.body
They had good reasons

# data[].attributes.body
They were very quiet

# data[].attributes.body
They had very strong sentences

# data[].attributes.body
They all talked and made good examples.
They also where saying strong evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros :strong reasons and good evidence

Cons:need better evidence would’ve

# data[].attributes.body
Pros-  There is no stuttering, or very rarely someone does not understand what they say.

There is evidence that most people are well prepared for the debate.

Cons - the arguements on one side seem short and not as thoroughly developed as they should be.

If someone needs clarifying again, it may not be the best effort put torwards the arguement

Someone was too quiet. Louder, please.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros  they presented strong arguments

Cons one of their reasons confused me

Pros  they had understandable reasons
Their conclusion was very clear in what is was presenting

Cons they did not speak loudly enough

# data[].attributes.body
Pros-strong reasons and good evidence to back up the reasons
Cons-

# data[].attributes.body
Pros-
*The negative side made a good point with other people not being able to see Marley and the other ghosts.
* The affirmative side made a good reason with Scrooge not having a good imagination.

Cons-
* I think that the negative side could have had a better Rebuttal to prove their side right.
*The affirmative side could have explained the first reason a little better.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros
Citing Evidence From The Book
Good Vocabulary

Cons
Someone Said "We Believe"
Off Topic

# data[].attributes.body
Pros: the left side of the room stated strong evidence to support their idea

Cons:  the right side was inaudible for some parts

# data[].attributes.body
Pros

Cons

# data[].attributes.body
Pros
*used a good tone and quite a good volume
*had good reasons
*Daniel used a great volume
Cons
*volume was not good sometimes.
*had reasons that were hard to follow

# data[].attributes.body
Pros 😄
Negative side had good reasons 🙂
Positive conclusion was very good🙂
Cons 🙁
Positive side could have been louder- some of them were hard to hear ☹️
Positive rwasomswere not as good- there could have been more thought put into them☹️

# data[].attributes.body
Pros

Most of the time there was a good flow.

Debaters seemed calm and well prepared (most of the time).

The Scotland Yard night watch rebuttal was lit.

Cons

Good reasons but poor elaboration, if any
Ex. "Door knocker turned into Marley’s face”
So what? That was from Scrooge’s point of view and could’ve been used as evidence for hallucination, but you said that the door knocker was the ghost and ghosts don’t turn into door knockers...

"Back then in London people would’ve been sleeping.”
Stop making up facts.

Poor collaboration and connections between each reason.

Don’t use personal experiences as evidence.

The structure of the debate itself was stiff and controlled.

Both pros and cons were targeted towards the debators’ performance as a team, not individuals.

# data[].attributes.body
Daniel’s reasons are very specific

# data[].attributes.body
Pros- very specific, work together

Cons- hard to hear, not enough organization, the groups said I think and we believe