# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Do you like the artwork? Then click in to read~! ヾ(๑╹ヮ╹๑)ﾉ”

# data[].attributes.body
Reflecting on my research proposal, I find that it was a valuable practice that helped me compose my P&S essay much more effectively.

The feedback I received from Professor Joe boosted my confidence in the clarity of the problem I chose to research on. I had initial concerns because the “problem” doesn't follow the typical two-party argument format. Instead, the ethical dilemma of genetic testing arises due to the difficulty to formulate universally applicable rules for what is ethically the “right thing” to do. I appreciate that I was able to maintain the same focus throughout my research paper, without the need to narrow or broaden the topic significantly.

Regarding the sources and evidence used in my research paper, I successfully referenced all three sources included in the proposal. However, it's worth noting that I didn't interpret source 2 in the same way as I had presented in the proposal. Source 2 is a research paper which suggested a tension between the statements of the AAP and ACMG. But through my research, I came to see a different perspective. Source 3 highlighted a reconciliation between the two statements, which I found more aligned with my understanding.

One significant differnce from my proposal was the solution I ultimately provided in my P&S essay. Originally, I proposed prenatal testing as a solution. As I researched and gained deeper understanding of the topic, I concluded that this topic was better suited for a separate investigation rather than serving as a solution to the ethical challenges surrounding genetic testing in youth for adult-onset diseases.

In conclusion, my research proposal served as a solid foundation for my research paper. It accurately identified the problem, maintained a narrow focus, and incorporated valuable sources. However, it also showcased the evolving nature of research, as my interpretation of some sources and the chosen solution shifted during the research process.

# data[].attributes.body
Take Away:
Youth genetic testing for adult-onset diseases highlight the importance of informed consent, and the challenge when facing SFs and VUSs. Set guidelines are elusive due to the subjective nature of ethics.
Genetic counselors can help by 1) inform individuals and 2) balance between the potential advantages of early detection and intervention and the potential drawbacks

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of this post is just to show the background painting :D

# data[].attributes.body
The posts in this padlet are not finalized yet. Your answer to my questions would be very helpful to me! Thank you so much!

1) I named the section using the topic of my papers. Was this design choice confusing or was it helpful?

2) I haven't completed my introduction writing. So far, does it sound good to you? What else should I include?

3) I aimed to emphasize the resistant nature of this subject in my P&S essay. As a result, I included several sentences in the concluding paragraph of my paper. Does it appear out of place since it wasn't discussed in earlier sections of the essay?

4) I've adjusted the bio's perspective as requested, changing it from first-person to third-person. Does it come across as awkward? Do you have any suggestions for further improving the bio, either in terms of clarity, flow, or content?