# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read 7,366 reviews from the world’s largest community for readers. International phenomenon Angie Thomas revisits Garden Heights seventeen years before the…

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Read 5,573 reviews from the world’s largest community for readers. All About Love offers radical new ways to think about love by showing its interconnected…

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Black Panther by Ta-Nehisi Coates Omnibus

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ta-Nehisi Coates’ complete, acclaimed story of a king who sought to be a hero…a hero who was reduced to a slave…a slave who became a lege...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Surviving the City (Surviving the City, #1)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tasha Spillett’s graphic novel debut, Surviving the City, is a story about womanhood, friendship, colonialism, and the anguish of a missi...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Hi, if I may chime in. From what I gathered, what the novel is attempting to do at this point is to question who is the writer and reader of the journHi, if I may chime in. From what I gathered, what the novel is attempting to do at this point is to question who is the writer and reader of the journal and the novel itself. It is quite clear that Ruth (the character) is supposed to be the same person as the author, and the entire novel can be seen (and is usually understood) as her commentary on Nao's journal. The catch here is, Ruth Ozeki (the author) wrote both Ruth (the character's) parts and Nao's journal. If we look at the novel through this lens, then the missing pages of the journal, which then reappear, are basically Ruth's thoughts as she is writing the journal, and Nao is just a fictional character. This is of course just one of the interpretations and the novel suggests (through the analogy with Schrodinger's cat), that two things can happen at the same time and coexist at the same time (just as the cat is both dead and alive in the box). All this is quite mind-boggling but I hope I'm making any sense. The idea is therefore this 'metafiction' and converging of realities, in which we question who Ruth as the author, Ruth as the character, and Nao really are. In fact, they all might be the same person, or, as the quantum theory would have it, just three (possible) realities existing at the same time. For as much as we know, Nao might be Ruth if she grew up in Japan. - It's just a thought and a possible interpretation, but this is precisely what is so amazing about this novel. :) ...more (less)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Hi, if I may chime in. From what I gathered, what the novel is attempting to do at this point is to question who is the writer and reader of the journHi, if I may chime in.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The epidemic of gun violence in this country has sparked many young people to activism - this book celebrates a diverse group of passionate young activists working for change in interviews and profiles and then invites others to join.

Written in 4 parts, the book moves from laying out the complex issue of gun violence (suicide, homicide, domestic violence, mass shootings, accidental deaths) and how we got to this point before transitioning to a wide range of possible solutions, with a lot of nua...more

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The epidemic of gun violence in this country has sparked many young people to activism - this book celebrates a diverse group of passionate young activists working for change in interviews and profiles and then invites others to join.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tommy Orange’s wondrous and shattering novel follows twelve characters from Native communities: all traveling to the Big Oakland Powwow, ...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Author Tiffany D. Jackson delivers another ripped-from-the-headlines mystery that exposes horrific secrets hiding behind the limelight an...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The book, "The House on Mango Street" by sandras Cisneros should be read by everyone because it describes how different people live and what they haveThe book, "The House on Mango Street" by sandras Cisneros should be read by everyone because it describes how different people live and what they have to deal with. ...more
In the book Esperanza is a little girl that explains her life and the life of others in the neighborhood. She explains that her house is not what she expected and how he wants to move out of there as soon as she gets the chance to do so. She also describes the lives of different neighbors. For example, Rosa Vargas is a single mother of a lot of kids who struggle to keep all of them in line and under control because her husband left without leaving anything behind. I wish they would have explained some of the characters lives better because some were really brief.
I encourage people to read this book because it talks about child abuse, and teen pregnancy in a way where it isn't that graphic for young readers. (less)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
Nenia ✨ I yeet my books back and forth ✨ Campbell

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The book, "The House on Mango Street" by sandras Cisneros should be read by everyone because it describes how different people live and what they haveThe book, "The House on Mango Street" by sandras Cisneros should be read by everyone because it describes how different people live and what they have to deal with.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The book was written in 1949, way before the events described became reality. If you are reading it with hindsight alone, yeah, than you missing the pThe book was written in 1949, way before the events described became reality. If you are reading it with hindsight alone, yeah, than you missing the point big time. The author was brilliant and the clarity and capacity of projecting himself to the future of comunism is just amazing. ...more (less)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The book was written in 1949, way before the events described became reality. If you are reading it with hindsight alone, yeah, than you missing the pThe book was written in 1949, way before the events described became reality. If you are reading it with hindsight alone, yeah, than you missing the point big time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
What a bizarre question. No, of course it isn't. It's a classic, thought provoking, story that is loved by millions. It's the most boring thing ever wWhat a bizarre question. No, of course it isn't. It's a classic, thought provoking, story that is loved by millions. It's the most boring thing ever written. ...more (less)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
What a bizarre question. No, of course it isn't. It's a classic, thought provoking, story that is loved by millions. It's the most boring thing ever wWhat a bizarre question. No, of course it isn't. It's a classic, thought provoking, story that is loved by millions. It's the most boring thing ever written.