# data[].attributes.body
1978: There was fear that the lake would soon dry out and have the same outcome as the would. They find out that the levels for the had became low and the lake has now. This cause many problems concerning the gulls that would nest and feed there.

# data[].attributes.body
1900:the city was low on water supplies and need to find a source since there was a drought. They didn't have enough rain and so the drought was increasing
-
1902: The federal reclamation act would later then provide the city with what was needed to construct structures to bring water from the valley to the agricultural region.
-
1904: the water situation was now dire and LA needed a water source from Owens valley to store that water underground. But Mulholland faced the water rights to that Lake which he fought for. the settlement ended in the city having to pay in order to get that water.
-
1905-1907: There was the first bond issue for the La aqueduct. Mulholland also attempted to get the people to vote on using the Owens valley water but the project didn't pass. Then there was a need for federal help to get the Reclamation project going but they were refusing to give it to him till Roosevelt opened the project then in 1907 terminated the project.

# data[].attributes.body
1913: Now Los Angeles was able to get its water from the Owens lake
-
1920: With the population growth and the city's growth, there was an even more drastic need for water but a severe drought.
-
Most of the agriculture was affected by the drought and wanted to use the water source of Owens valley to grow their crops. The issue with this is that the people living near the lake were losing their water resources due to LA's use. Now the city had to pay to get that source of water, this resulted in many farms declining in the agriculture region.

# data[].attributes.body
1941: The mono lake extension diverted water from 4 of the 5 feeder creeks of mono lake into the LA aqueducts. This would effect most of the wildlife that lived in the mono lake.
-
1950: most of the people that fought to get the rights to keep the lake left and moved to different places.

# data[].attributes.body
1983 - The California Supreme Court ordered that the city had to follow all environmental standards when taking the basin's water

1984 - The Rush Creek was restored following a lawsuit by the Mono Lake Committee, The National Society, and California Trout Inc.  -  Lee Vining Creek's Flow was restored

1989 - Diversions were haltered by the State Superior Court because of pending results of a study that effects 6,377 levels (40 feet below level) had on the lake's ecosystem. This was to protect the gull colonies.
|
|

Due to the events, California legislature passed AB444, which established $60 million for Los Angeles to work on reclamation and project facilities.

# data[].attributes.body
1990 - Walker and Parker Creeks were restored
|
|
Following the creeks restoration the 3rd district court of appeals ruled that flows would have to be reestablished.