# data[].attributes.body
Communication was confusing due to the intervention of many people. Preference for a single person communicating about the process.

# data[].attributes.body
Doubts about the usefulness of the technical information included in the PPT templates.

# data[].attributes.body
Changes in prioritization rules and resource availability did not represent the real need of each cluster.

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of opportunity to participate in the prior analysis before the meeting to present the prioritization results.

# data[].attributes.body
Challenges with the availability of capabilities and resources, especially in FS.

# data[].attributes.body
Need to improve deadlines and clarity of information to perform activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Templates require a lot of time to detail and were considered complex.

# data[].attributes.body
The time for the assessment phase was not enough. Need for defined steps with a schedule.

# data[].attributes.body
Information that comes and goes back, need for a proper flow and tools to handle modifications throughout the cycle.

# data[].attributes.body
Many tools in the ideation phase (PPT, Excel, Cards).

# data[].attributes.body
Focus only on Brazil, need to involve stakeholders from different multifunctional areas in the countries to prioritize projects.

# data[].attributes.body
Need to understand the FS workload for ongoing projects and new ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
The financial simulator can be improved.

# data[].attributes.body
Need for more transparency in the prioritization process and new classifications.

# data[].attributes.body
Poor multifunctional collaboration, with final approvals arriving very close to the field season closure.

# data[].attributes.body
Correct allocation of resources and R&D regarding the number of trials.

# data[].attributes.body
There are still opportunities to simplify the process.