# data[].attributes.body
The two maps illustrate the overview of the rural area which is a local town whose name is Fosbury in two different periods of time, 1980 and 2015 to be exact.

Taking a slight witness of the two, we can effortlessly recognize various developments of the industrial ,residential ,commercial factors.

Looking at the West side of the map,

There were significant changes in the residential site which had been the block of flats to the north of the roundabout and many other houses that had been constructed in exchange for the park.About which, the park had been relocated to the north west of the roundabout, opposite to the residential houses that were erected. Another point to make is that the extension of the two tennis courts which transformed into the sports centre.Also ,the grocery store was upgraded into the supermarket located opposite the car park which was a replacement for the terraced houses.

Although various developments, the hotel remained to be the same in the two periods of time . In contrast, the fields were demolished to make place for the industrial warehouses.Moreover, the key features of the two years is the roundabout whose construction was made together with the two small byways which was opposite to each other in the east and west side of the map.

# data[].attributes.body
An’s writing

The maps depict the renovation of the suburban area of the town of Fosbury between 1980 and 2015.

Overall, the area has extensively changed from residential to industrial and commercial, which is noticeable by the different facilities.

The conversion of the residential area which was the change of terraced houses in the East has been replaced to the west of the town and has been enlarged. In the next 35 years, the block of flats and the grocer’s shop were demolished to make way for a roundabout. Furthermore, the park area was relocated to the wasteland next to it which minimizes the size of the area.

To the south of the town, a sports center was developed from a tennis court which creates a blank for another car park of the supermarket. The noticeable change is that the field was replaced with warehouses.

# data[].attributes.body
The maps presents the outskirts of a town named Frosbury between 1980 and 2015. Overall, there have been many changes made to the town such as development of it's residential, commercial and industrial area.

In 1980, the town had quite many residential are scattered around the outskirts, for instance houses, a block of flats and a few terraced houses. However 35 years later, the terraced houses were removed from their previous placement to replace the area that the old park once stand. With the new addition of a roundabout, consequently the block of flats was demolished. With the exception of the row of houses to be unchanged.

On the commercial side, the groceries' shop is now converted into a supermarket moved to where the terraced houses used to be. Leaving the hotel to stay the same.

# data[].attributes.body
The maps depict the developments which took place in the outskirts of the town of Fosbury between 1980 and 2015.

In general, there were a number of notable changes to the residential, commercial, and industrial area.

In 1980, there was a park on the left hand side of the map, but during the next 35 years, the park was moved to the empty space next to it. This relocation make way for the terraced houses, which was also made a relocation, from the top right corner to the left hand side of the map. Furthermore, the block of flats which was to the left of the terraced houses in 1980 was knocked down after 35 years.

Another major change to the area in 2015 was the development of more commercial and industrial features. The demolition of the grocer’s shop didn’t seem to affect much to the commerce of this area because of the construction of the supermarket in 2015. On the industrial side, in the empty field on the bottom left corner, warehouses were opened up for storages.

# data[].attributes.body
The two maps demonstrate the development of the outer area of the town of Fosbury between 1980 and 2015. In general, more facilities were added and less greenland remained in this 35-year period.

As can be seen from the maps, in 2015 there was a roundabout in the middle of the town. On the west side of the town, in 1980 was more deserted, but during the next 35 years, more residential and recreation area were constructed. The most noticeable changes is that the park was replaced with terraced houses and moved to the vacant land. Furthermore, there were a new sports centre and a car park which were altered the two tennis courts.

Another major change to the area was found on the east side of the outskirt zone. In the north, there was a flatness in terraced houses and in 2015, a car park and supermarket were erected. The grocery shop and block of flats were knocked down and the fields were then replaced with a warehouses. In contrast, there were some facilities remained. The neighborhood and the hotel were not renovated and still located the same places as they were in 1980.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1980, the town has quite many residential are scattered around the outskirts.For instance some houses, a block of flats and a few terraced houses.However with just 35 years, with the new appearance of the roundabout,the block of flats was knock down and the terraced houses was remove from the top right of the map to replace the old park.With the new appearance of the roundabout,the block of flat was tear down.The row of houses was only the one that haven't had any change for 35 years.Another major change to the area in 2015 was the development of the tennisconverted

# data[].attributes.body
The given maps demonstrate the development that took place in the outskirts of the town of Fosbury during the period from 1980 to 2015.

Overall, there has been a numerous changes in the residential, commercial, industrial and traffic aspect of the town throughout the 35-year period. The most striking alteration was the construction of the roundabout and the warehouses.

The most noticeable change of the place is to the clearance of the field in order to make room for the warehouses to be built. Another change is the introduction of a roundabout in 2015 at the intersection of the roads on the left side of the old block of flats in the middle of the area. On the commercial side, by the year of 2015, the terraced houses to the north-east of the intersection had been demolished to make way for a supermarket and a car park.

Another aspect of the area that had been changed through the 35-year period is residental aspect. One of the changes is the relocation of the park which used to be far from the intersection in 1980. By 2015, it had been moved in order to make way for terraced houses to be built. Another alteration is that the old block of flats near the intersection of the roads was knocked down. However, the houses and the hotel to the north of the roundabout remained through the period.

# data[].attributes.body
The map illustrates the developments of Fosbury’s town between 1980 and 2005. Overall, the changes depict the extension and improvement of residential, commercial and industrial facilities during 35 year-period

In the year of 1980, the town was a combination of residential and recreation features. However, in the next 35 years, the park was moved to another location which facing the street to make way for terraced houses. Moreover, the tennis courts were modernised into the sports centre.

Another major change to the area in 2015 was the development of more industrial and commercial features. The most noticeable is the introduction of the roundabout which alter for the last street. The fields was demolished to make way for

# data[].attributes.body
The two pictures demonstrate a general look of the urban area about the evolutions that took place in the coastal town of Fosbury in the 35-year period, between 1980 and 2015 accurately.

Overall, within much evidence, the noticeable changes were the infrastructures. Moreover, there were some newly converted accommodations as a way of modernizing the suburbs, for instance the development of various orbits: residential, commercial, traffic and industrial.

In the year 1980, the town had only straight roads with simple left and right turns at the end of them. At the top of the map, to the west we can see the residential site, where houses and hotel remained at the same positions after 35 years. However, the park had been relocated to the north west of the roundabout and the previous land became an individual area. Furthermore, the center of the town, which consisted of a block of flats, grocer's shop and a piece of land next to the park were remarkable changes: demolished and expanded to erect the new one roundabout and added some small roads in 2015. Another amenities to notice for us are the two tennis courts, which were renovated into a sports center and car park.

With some remaining infrastructure in the south of town, the grocer's shop has not disappeared completely, instead, it is made better as a supermarket, revealed face to face with a large car park, which is a conversion of terraced houses. In addition, the fields were knocked down to construct industrial warehouses. What's more, the special highlight is that the map is increasingly minimalist, expanding space and developing more traffic.

# data[].attributes.body
The maps depict the modernization of Fosbury’s town in 1980 and its next 35 years.

Overall, there was a range of changes in the appearance and replacement of buildings.

In the year 1980, this town had many empty spaces with a huge number of green trees, but it had been converted into industrial factors. Particularly, the giant area of fields located in the south-east corner of the picture had been turned into a warehouse. Opposite this situation was the sports center and its car park next to the place that used to be the tennis courts in the past. Moreover, the highway had been enlarged in order to lead to these features. Further development was the construction of the roundabout in the middle of this map, allowing better traffic in infrastructure.

Another major change in the area is the removal of residential and commercial areas. Terraced houses situated in the up-right of this map had been knocked down to make way for the supermarket, which has its car park behind. In 2015, new accommodations were built in the western part of Fosbury’s town, which is next to the park, was an unused land in the past. Additionally, the grocer’s shop and block of flats are no longer exist in front of the hotel. The houses in this map’s top-left corner is the only one that still remained stable from 1980 to 2015.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, having a high income when choosing a job has been a trend in people that are finding for works. Good salary will always impress all of us, however, I believe that although money is necessary but it is not the only thing that we take into consideration when choosing a job.

On the one hand, I agree that money is necessary because it helps us everything in life. For instance, it improves our working quality. When people are satisfied with the amount of money they earn, then salary plays an important role like our motivator at work. It does not just help people to have motivation but a big amount of money may let people be able to improve some other skills, to get some essential degrees that their desired jobs require. However, getting a high salary may be connected with other consequences.

Nevertheless, I believe that other considerations are as important as than what we earn in our jobs. Only consider money may lead us to work in toxic working environments where people are willing to do anything to get money. In addition, people may accidentally choose an unhealthy occupation that is against the law. Next, with money as people’s motivation, it can turn into pressure everytime and people can’t even realise that. You will work with fear and anxiety of being reduced the salary and you will have no more happiness, and enjoyment in work. Finally, some bad colleagues will be envious with your salary and it is easy for you to be in danger as a result of the problem that other colleagues always want your position.

On the whole, salaries affect people’s choice of profession significantly but through the consequences that are given above, it is clear that money does not outweigh other motivators.

# data[].attributes.body
There is an argument that the most crucial aspect of deciding on a career path is to have a high income. While financial stability is undeniably important, other factors such as job satisfaction, a healthy working environment is also a key player in the decision making department.

On the one hand, I agree with having a job that gives people enough money to support their basic needs. For example, needing to pay off their housing, bills, healthcare and education. All most everyone, wants a salary that at least can allow them to put food on the table each day. If they were to choose a profession off of interest only like for instance, artists and musicians who are known to to do so usually fail to provide for themselves and their family to live comfortably.

On the other hand, I believe that other considerations are as equally essential as that of their earnings. One of it being their own enjoyment at work, as they easily find a mundane job that pays well but is completely boring. Furthermore, this could lead to a bad performance during work as they find no feelings of happiness. In addition, having a healthy work environment is also vital to a career choice. For example, having a caring manager or friendly colleagues could make a huge difference to a worker's levels of happiness and quality of life in general. If not, it could create a toxic work place which could slowly diminish the workers' health.

In conclusion, having a job that pays well certainly affects people's choice of career, but personally I think that there are other considerations that outweigh money.

# data[].attributes.body
writing task 2 unit 4

Employees tend to select jobs based on the number of salary. Even though the size of the income is one of the most crucial influences on choosing career, I still strongly believe that there are many factors equally affecting on it.

On the one hand, the high amount of money earned from people’s job can provide satisfactory daily necessity for them. In the other words, some basic demand will be guaranteed such as paying for food, electricity, water, and the worker’s hobby. If people lose the abilities to satisfy their own needs by themselves, they will become the family’s pressures. For instances, Vincent Van Gogh just sold only one panting in his all life, so he had to depend on his brother’s money to buy colors and maintain the others activities.

However, in spite of the role of income, choices of profession should be decided by contentment. This career creates positive influences on people’s emotion by its features and workplaces. It means workers find the deep and meaningful happiness, passion, and willingness in completing the missions. Not only do these feelings produce the high-quality life, they also let employees achieve success easily. For example, some volunteers working for charities or non-monetary organizations do feel hopeful for their future because of their job.

In conclusion, the decision to choose a career should be equally depended on many different reasons to make sure that people will feel satisfied with their choice.

# data[].attributes.body
There is some personal opinions that the most critical features of choosing any career or job is having a high income.While financial secureness is truly important, a non-toxic environment is also a key in the decison to choose the most suitable jobs for yourself.

One one hand, i agree with having a job that having enough pay for our basic needs.For example, the salary need to be enough to pay for housing, bills, healthcare and their children's education.Most of us want a salary that at least can allow us to having three meals each day.If we want to choose jobs that depend on their interest only like for instance, artists and musician who are known to do so usually fail to provide for themselves and their family to have a comfortable life

On the other hand, i always believe that other consent are equally esential as that of people's earnings.One of it being their own employment at works, as it is quite easy to find a trivial job that pays well but nothing special.Moreover, this could lead to depression during work because there is nothing interested them.In additon, having a non-toxic environment is also a very important aspect to choose the job.For example, having a kind manager or friendly colleages could make a big different on your performance than the opposite one.

To summary, having a good pay could certainly affects people's choice of career, but individually I think that there are also a lot of other features that are much more important than money

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, most people usually prefer working for a job whose payment is high. I believe that money is one of the most essential consideration when it comes to selecting a job.

Having said that, I totally agree with the idea that the working environment is as crucial as the salary.On the ground that your surroundings are far more important if you want to develop your working skill as you might assimilate from the experienced workers. Another point to make is that if you meet kind employees, the higher of your happiness at working will be and the result is that you will work harder for the company. If people select their job by looking at the profit they will get, it will be uncertain that if they are suitable for the occupation.Gradually, even if the salary meets their basic needs, they will be indifferent to their current profession as they wont have any motivation for the work.

Nevertheless, money does play a vital role in everybody’s life simply because everyone needs money and the more you make the easier your life will be,for instance, we all have to pay for education, medication, food,… and having a stable finance security will not only maintain your life but you could also give a hand to your relatives who are in debt. However I can relatively sympathize with people who chase their dream job but can not make enough amount of money to pay for numerous fees to maintain their families’ life.

In conclusion,while other factors are as crucial as salary when it comes to selecting a profession, I undoubtedly believe that salary outweighs all other sectors’ merits.

# data[].attributes.body
It is said that a high-income job would be considered as the main criterion to apply for work. While passion for work is generally necessary for an effective job, I believe that higher-income work has more possibility to be an integral part of a job.

In general, working for a high-income job can have a high chance of leading to depression and a state of boredom when it comes to long-term jobs. The lack of passion results in a decreased ability to concentrate and work efficiently. Furthermore, a higher-income job comes with the requirement of better responsibility which would lead to pressure in working.

Despite that, people nowadays are likely to choose a high-income job as the result of getting a better social status and daily necessities. Undoubtedly, higher-income jobs come with the chance of higher social status. Money can afford better respect in a relationship because of the noticeable changes in the human mind. For example, the way that wealthy people get more respect, and the ability to access more social benefits. However, the most important reason that decides people's job criteria is personal expenses and daily necessities. High-income jobs allow people to spend money more freely and give a satisfactory feeling of not worrying about prices. Food, electricity, and monthly tuition, …all cost a huge amount of money which means a smaller amount for personal expenses. A higher income will access the ability to deal with these.

To sum up, a higher amount of money takes the lead in people's requirements when applying for a job despite the lack of efficiency.

# data[].attributes.body
Many people decide their career path based on the size of income they are offered. From my personal perspective, I disagree with the idea of salary is the only key aspect to consider when choosing a job because I believe that there are many factors that are also considerable.

On the one hand, people's choice of career is based on the money they could earn because of many reasons. One of them is that money provides people their basic need for their life such as housing, food, healthcare and so on. Most people have a belief that a job that provides them the salary they need to afford their basic needs is worth-choosing. Another reason is that people partially judge others by looking at the properties that they possess such as clothes, accessories, electronic devices and vehicles. If they own fancy clothes from an expensive brand or the latest watch, people usually will have a respectful manner towards them

Nevertheless, I believe that money is not the only consideration when choosing a career path. There are others factors that should be thought of when people are making the decision of their career path. One of them is that how people feel about the job. In particular, having an interest in the profession they are following will grant encouragement to themselves and therefore, it will help them to have a positive manner when working. Futhermore, this will lead to a more efficient performance that may lead to promotion in the job. Another factor that should be considered is the working atmosphere. Having a job that provides lucrative income but requires them to work in a stressful atmosphere at work may lead to many consequences. One of that is that they may encounter mental illness such as depression. However, having a good manager or friendly colleagues can boost their performance at work.

To conclude, money is indubitably an aspect that affect people's choice of profession. However, I believe that others factors that should be considered alongside with salary when people are choosing a job.

# data[].attributes.body
Over many decades,people still debating about the question whether well paid is the beyond essentialreason of all to access the career path.Although the matter of finacial long time assurance is undeniable,mental factors usally are the reason people want to settle with the job

On the one hand,i agree with having job that produce enough finaces to satisfited the basic need for a person.Most people consider it a priority to atleast have a salary that can serve them well to cover these need and allows them get an average quality of life. It can be seem that having bare minimum life need such as payrent,education,bill,house care is alrealy a difficult problem for those who struggle with having non-stable financial but a passion career.Even for well-khown artist not always live comfortably without financial strain.Others with better wages filled their physical materialistic passion to have motivation continue their lack of interesting carerr or satisfied their ambition by higher their social posistion,gaining a certain respect from their social circle so that they feel themselves succesful and important in people thoughts

Not with standing,Financial stability is matter,it still doesn’t make other aspect of

the job any less important.Firstly,the khowing about the enviroment and people you work with is extremely valuable for finding a job,having a potential,kind manager or friendly,enthusiastic colleague for example can make huge difference to workers’ experience and joyfulness at work keep them in a productive status and optimistic mind make the atmosphere become comfortable.Secondly though with an art soul get the opportunity to be themselves chase their passion make them feel life is meaningful leaving the fact their lack of property.Those people will just pleased by feeding themselve theirs wishes to contribute their talent to the world rather than making a tons of money but an emty soul.Finally sometimes self development about thoughts,enlarge your perspective is matter than have an high income job

In summary,eventhough financial factors is an evitable reason to decide a job,i dont assume that it happens to be more important than any mental aspect

# data[].attributes.body
Choosing career always being a most essential and difficult part of our life. Prefering high income or job satisfaction has been an argument for a long time. Personally, while there are ideas that money is the key consideration when deciding on career, i still partly agree with other factors are equally important.

On the one hand, Job with high salary can bring a huge economic source to people in order to meet their basic needs. For example, costs such as food, housing , bills, healthcare can be a serious problem for those choosing their career by satisfaction. While high income will allow people to cover these needs and improve quality of life. What is more, a high salary job can help enhance their social position, earn respect from family, relationship. A high-earners will get positive look from everyone because of their jobs, which bring to them a great confidence and satisfying

On the other hand, I also believe that other consideration are just as important as what we earn in our jobs. Firstly, people choosing career path that they love could reach a high level of happiness, make them feel sense of achievement. Those are more valuable than money for them. Secondly, oppotunities for personal growth and career advancement play a significant role in job selection. A job that allow an individual and encourage skill development can help people rewading more.

In conclusion, while high income can help people pay their costs and play a significant role in choosing career. However it should not be the sole criterion. Job satisfaction and chance for developing individual and skill can also be an important factor

# data[].attributes.body
Over many decades,people still debating about the question whether well paid is the beyond essentialreason of all to access the career path.Although the matter of finacial long time assurance is undeniable,mental factors usally are the reason people want to settle with the job

On the one hand,i agree with having job that produce enough finaces to satisfited the basic need for a person.Most people consider it a priority to atleast have a salary that can serve them well to cover these need and allows them get an average quality of life. It can be seem that having bare minimum life need such as payrent,education,bill,house care is alrealy a difficult problem for those who struggle with having non-stable financial but a passion career.Even for well-khown artist not always live comfortably without financial strain.Others with better wages filled their physical materialistic passion to have motivation continue their lack of interesting carerr or satisfied their ambition by higher their social posistion,gaining a certain respect from their social circle so that they feel themselves succesful and important in people thoughts

Not with standing,Financial stability is matter,it still doesn’t make other aspect of

the job any less important.Firstly,the khowing about the enviroment and people you work with is extremely valuable for finding a job,having a potential,kind manager or friendly,enthusiastic colleague for example can make huge difference to workers’ experience and joyfulness at work keep them in a productive status and optimistic mind make the atmosphere become comfortable.Secondly though with an art soul get the opportunity to be themselves chase their passion make them feel life is meaningful leaving the fact their lack of property.Those people will just pleased by feeding themselve theirs wishes to contribute their talent to the world rather than making a tons of money but an emty soul.Finally sometimes self development about thoughts,enlarge your perspective is matter than have an high income job

In summary,eventhough financial factors is an evitable reason to decide a job,i dont assume that it happens to be more important than any mental aspect

# data[].attributes.body
In the pursuit of a career or job, the allure of a high income holds substantial appeal. Undoubtedly, financial stability is a fundamental aspect, providing a sense of security and enabling various lifestyle choices. However, elevating income as the primary consideration neglects the multifaceted aspects that contribute to a fulfilling career.

While financial remuneration is crucial, it represents just one facet of career satisfaction. Job satisfaction stems from a diverse array of factors, including but not limited to work-life balance, a supportive work environment, opportunities for professional growth, and alignment with personal values. Ignoring these elements in favor of a high income might lead to disillusionment and dissatisfaction in the long run.

Furthermore, the pursuit of a fulfilling career encompasses intrinsic motivations beyond monetary rewards. Passion, purpose, and the alignment of one's work with personal values significantly contribute to a sense of fulfillment. Many individuals find immense satisfaction in careers that may not offer the highest financial compensation but resonate deeply with their interests and values.

It's essential to acknowledge that societal perceptions often prioritize financial success, but true contentment in a career arises from a harmonious blend of financial stability and personal fulfillment. A well-rounded approach considers not only the financial aspect but also the emotional and psychological facets of a job. Pursuing a career solely for financial gain may result in unfulfilled aspirations and a lack of genuine satisfaction.

In essence, while a high income is undeniably appealing, it shouldn't overshadow the multifaceted aspects contributing to career contentment. Striking a balance between financial stability and personal fulfillment ensures a more holistic and gratifying professional journey, where individuals can find meaning, purpose, and enduring satisfaction in their chosen careers.

# data[].attributes.body
Many individuals express that the amount of money they earn should be prioritized over other considerations when finding an occupation. From my point of view, I agree that the financial rewards are crucial, but I am convinced that some considerations are also essential. In this essay, I will give the reasons and prove it with facts.

It is obvious that money is one of the most important things in order to sustain life. First of all, support for basic necessities such as food, electricity, and water is dependent on money. Their demand for public healthcare is temporarily growing, and the inhabitants should pay for healthcare provision on their own. If their salary is not enough to meet the social standard, they will face a huge range of difficulties and struggle to survive. Secondly, finance is able to show humans' value in society. It may be a big discrimination between inhabitants whose jobs are profitable and unprofitable. Because of the salary, we might be ranked at neither high nor low levels in the community, and we might be observed to receive either more or less respect from other people as well. Therefore, choosing a high-income occupation can help habitants reach a better life.

Nevertheless, choosing a life-long career also needs other considerations, not just earning. Strongly understanding ourselves should be paid attention. Every single person is needed to figure out strong and negative points by themselves for searching for a suitable job and associating with one career for the rest of their lives. Additionally, the preference for the occupation is as important as the previous consideration. There is no doubt that challenges will be set up while we are at work, and it requires us to work harder to overcome the obstacles. We can easily give up due to the pressure it takes, but once people enjoy their jobs and clearly identify the aim to achieve, it can create motivation for developing themselves, enthusiasm for contributing to work, as well as defeating challenges.

In conclusion, whilst our jobs are considered high income, it could be depended on their understanding and their own interests for those reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
There was a significant increase in the proportion of Japan workforce in the service industry throughout the period

The proportion of Japan workforce in the service industry has a substantial growth, began at just above 30% and reached a peak at over 70% over the period

The percentage of Japanese workers who work in the service industry had increased by 40% from 35% to 75% over the period

The percentage of Japanese human resources in service rose significantly in 15 years

# data[].attributes.body
The figure of service industry in Japan creeping up dramatically by 40 percent in the next 15 years from 2005.

-At the beginning of this period, the percentage of Japanese service industry began with 35 percent and then it has a sharp growth to 75 percent.

-There was a significant increase from 35 percent to 75 percent between 2005 and 2020 in proportion of service industry in Japan.

-The Japanese public administration in 2020 reached at 75 percent whereas this figure in 2005 was just only 35%.

-The business that does work for customers in Japan in 2020 was higher than its percentage in 2005 by approximately 40 percent.

# data[].attributes.body
- In the early years of the 21st century, there were only 35% of Japan workforce in service. By contrast, this number then multiplied almost two times to 75% in the next 15 years

- The number of service industry in Japan workforce grew considerably from 35% to 75% in the 15-year period.

- Between 2005 and 2015, there was a growth in service industry in the workforce of Japan.

# data[].attributes.body
At the start of 2005, the percentage of Japan's service workforce began with 35%. Nonetheless, a remarkable rise occurred after 15 years, with this figure rose to a significant level of 75%.

# data[].attributes.body
In the early 2000s, Japan workforce in service sector is not as crowded as the manufacturing sector. In contrast, in the year of 2020, the service column turned out to dominate the manufacturing column as the numbers of workers in service sector doubled between the year of 2005 and 2015.

The labour market had been attracted to work in service sector from 2005 to 2020.

numerous laborers have made up their mind and started to work in service sector.

People are gradually shifting from manufacturing workplace to service workplace, which led to the significant growth in the percentages of service column.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart indicated the proportion of the England workforce in five most vital sectors of the industry,which consists of manufacturing, services, agriculture construction, energy/water between 1841 and 2011.

Overall, the manufacturing and agriculture/fishing and energy/water are all experience a reduction in the numbers of workers. In contrast, the services and construction are witnessed a growth throughout the year.

In terms of the manufacturing industry, it dominated the graph with the highest percentages of workers in the year of 1841 with 36% of labourers.However, the following year experienced a significant descent from 36% to 9% in 2011. Moving on to the two columns of agriculture/fishing and energy/water, the two both dewelled in the percentages of workers from 22% to 1% in 2011 and from 3% to 1 % in 2011 respectively.

On the other side, In 2011 Services and construction industry both ascended to substantial numbers of labourers from 33% to 81% in 2011 and from 5% to a slight rise to 8% in the same year respectively.

# data[].attributes.body
The provided bar chart illustrates the number of the UK’s human resources in five vital industries between 1841 and 2011. Overall, there was a significant climb in the servies sector, beginning at 33% and reached a peak of 81%, whereas the manufacturing and agriculture/fishing sector witnessed a drop of 36% to 9% and 22% to 1% respectively during the same timeframe.

In terms of the servies sector, in 1841, it started at 33%, which is the second highest percentage of the five industries, then it experienced a dramatic rise by 48% ( from 33% to 81% ) over the period. Moving on to the construction sector, the statistics show a gradual increase from 5% to 8%.

By contrast, the number of employees in manufacturing registered a steep dip to 9% from 36% in the beginning.

by

# data[].attributes.body
The given bar chart illustrates the statistics of the UK labor force in five different large sections in the years 1841 and 2011.

Overall, the data shows the employment patterns and it's changes over the 170 year period. The most notable transformation is present at the service section, which had a massive increase, in contrast the manufacturing and agriculture/fishing sections both went through a significant decline.

In terms of the manufacturing section,

# data[].attributes.body
The provided bar chart gives the information about the differences in the number of employees in five crucial industries from 1841 and 2011. Overall, the percentage of the service and the construction industries experienced a rise, whereas the others showed a significant decline.

There was an upward trajectory in the service industry’s percentage in the given period, reflecting an increase from 33 percent to 81 percent. Furthermore, the number in construction’ workforce witnessed a slight increase during decades, with a jump from five percent to eight percent.

On the other hand, the figure of manufacturing and agriculture industries

show a dramatical fell, reflecting a decrease in more than 20 percent. Finally, the number of energy went down slightly, dropping from 3 percent to 1 percent.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart demonstrates the percentages of the UK's labor force in five majors manufacturing in 1841 and 2011. Overall, as it can be seen that services sector's percentage is the highest among all fields while the others industries had a noticeable decrease in 170-year period.

In the middle nineteenth century, there was only 33% of UK workforce in service section. By 2011, however, a significant growth was observed with a jump to 81%. Turning next to the manufacturing employment experienced a considerable fall, plummeting from 36% to 9% by the end of the given time frames. This divergent trend emphasizes that the industrial in the UK is changing from manufacturing to services

# data[].attributes.body
The provided bar chart demonstrates the changes in the number of employees in five major sectors of the UK’s industry between 1841 and 2011.

In general, the percentage of the workforce in services had the highest increase in 170 years passed by, and the percentage in construction had slightly increased between 1841 and 2011. While the other sectors had a drop in the percentage.

Between 1841 and 2011, the services sector experienced a significant increase from 33% to over 80% in its workforce which was considered to be incredibly higher than other sectors. The construction sector also got a slight peak-up of 3% in 170 years which rose from 5% to 8%. However, compared to the manufacturing sector, the slight changes in the percentage did not cause the construction sector to have a higher workforce than manufacturing in 2011.

According to the year 1841, the number of employees in the manufacturing industry was seen as the highest amount among the five major sectors. In 2011, its percentage fell significantly from 36% to 9%. Also, there was a clear view of the decrease in agriculture/fishing.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart demonstrates how many percent were five major industries partite in the England workforce in the 50-year period between 1841 and 2011.

Overall, there was an upward trend in services and construction. Whereas there was one of decline in manufacturing, agriculture/fishing and energy/water. In the beginning of the period, manufacturing sectors had the highest percentage, however, by the end of the period, services then soared to the highest percentage.

What stands out is that in 1841, the major that included most of the UK workforce is manufacturing with 36%. By contrast, that percent then fell to 9% in 2011. In the mid of the nineteenth century, there was 33% UK workforce in services, by the end of the given time frame, that major’s workforce multiplied by 2,6 times to 81%.

As can be seen from the chart, in 1841, agriculture/fishing which once engaged almost one fifth of the total workforce was reduce to 1% in 2011. Sharing the same trend, energy/water also fell by 2% from 3% between 1841 and 2011. Nevertheless, construction major rose from 5% to 8% of the UK workforce at the end of the period.

# data[].attributes.body
The provided bar charts illustrates the proportion of the UK workers in five major industries in 1841 and 2011.

In overall,the data below designate a dramatic modification in a 170 year-period.The most extreme change is perceive in the service feature,which saw an agressive increase,contrasting sharply with the manufacturing and agriculture/fishing feature,which both experienced a downward trend.

In term of manufacturing feature,it was the chief employer in 1841,capturing 36% of the workers.By 2011, however, this feature had decreased sharply to just 9%.Regarding the service section,a different trend is observed: while accounting for a comparable 33% in 1841,it increased dramatically to enclose 81% of the workforce by 2011.This contrast in trends highlights a dramatic realignment in the UK's employment landscapes,remove from manufacturing to service dominance.

In the present

# data[].attributes.body
The given bar chart depicts the changes in the UK workforce distribution in two different years, 1841 and 2011.

Overall, there were both upward and downward trend for all five industries. For example, the services industry and the construction industry swelled over the period. By contrast, the other three sectors had their proportion of workers dropped throughout the given timeframe. In 1841, manufacturing stood at the highest and energy and water was the lowest in the percentage of workforce. However, by the end of the period, the services sector had risen significantly and become the highest. The agriculture and fishing sector and the energy and watet sector decreased to the joint-lowest after 170 years.

In terms of the services industry, it had the percentage of employees at just above 30% in 1841. By 2011, this number has plunged dramatically to the peak of just above 80%, becoming the dominant employer. Turning next to the construction sector which had it's number started at 5% in 1841. This number went through a modest uptick of 3% after 170 years.

Meanwhile, a different trend was observed from the other three sectors. The manufacturing industry, which engaged above 30% of the workforce in 1841, plummeted by approximately 27% in 2011. Moving on to the agriculture and fishing sector, which once held just over 20% of the workforce in the start of the given timeframe, experienced a dramatic drop to approximately zero percent of the labors. Turning next to the energy and water sector which once engaged just over one percent of the workforce in 1841. By 2011, this number had plummeted to around zero and become the joint-lowest with the agriculture and fishing sector.

# data[].attributes.body
the provided chart depicts the tendency of UK employees of those 5 major sectors of two desperate period between 1841 and 2011.

Generally,there was a remarkable adjustment happened during the end of nearly 2 decade.As we can seen,the service sector has  the most attention-grabbing transformation,reach its peak at 81% in 2011,meanwhile others show a sharp decline or unnoticeable increase

In terms of the manufacturing and agriculture/fishing sector both start with a

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram demonstrates the proportion of the United Kingdom workforce among five major industries in the year 1841 and 2011.

Overall, services and construction sectors had an upward trend while Manufacturing, agriculture/ fishing and energy/ water had a downward trend during this period. Particularly, this percentage in services industry was the highest in 2011, whereas this figure was the greatest in 1841. Energy/ water is the one which is lowest in both years.

What stands out is manufacturing sector had the number at 36%, higher than the others in 1841. In the next 170 years, the proportion of people worked in manufacturing sector fell enormously to 9%, lower by approximately 72% compared to the proportion of people worked in services sector in 2011. Additionally, this figure reached a peak after experiencing a steep growth by roughly 48% from 1841.

As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of humans worked for construction industry rose minimally by 2%, from 5% to 8% between 1841 and 2011. Moreover, this figure in agriculture/ fishing sector was 22% in 1841 and then reducing to 1%, which was as the same as the figure in energy/ water sector in 2011. energy/ water sector had the lowest number in both two years, which was only 3% in 1841 and just 1% in 2011.

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram demonstrates the proportion of the United Kingdom workforce among five major industries in the year 1841 and 2011.

Overall, services and construction sectors had an upward trend while Manufacturing, agriculture/ fishing and energy/ water had a downward trend during this period. Particularly, this percentage in services industry was the highest in 2011, whereas this figure was the greatest in 1841. Energy/ water is the one which is lowest in both years.

What stands out is manufacturing sector had the number at 36%, higher than the others in 1841. In the next 170 years, the proportion of people worked in manufacturing sector fell enormously to 9%, lower by approximately 72% compared to the proportion of people worked in services sector in 2011. Additionally, this figure reached a peak after experiencing a steep growth by roughly 48% from 1841.

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram demonstrates the proportion of the United Kingdom workforce among five major industries in the year 1841 and 2011.

Overall, services and construction sectors had an upward trend while Manufacturing, agriculture/ fishing and energy/ water had a downward trend during this period. Particularly, this percentage in services industry was the highest in 2011, whereas this figure was the greatest in 1841. Energy/ water is the one which is lowest in both years.

What stands out is manufacturing sector had the number at 36%, higher than the others in 1841. In the next 170 years, the proportion of people worked in manufacturing sector fell enormously to 9%, lower by approximately 72% compared to the proportion of people worked in services sector in 2011. Additionally, this figure reached a peak after experiencing a steep growth by roughly 48% from 1841.

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram demonstrates the proportion of the United Kingdom workforce among five major industries in the year 1841 and 2011.

Overall, services and construction sectors had an upward trend while Manufacturing, agriculture/ fishing and energy/ water had a downward trend during this period. Particularly, this percentage in services industry was the highest in 2011, whereas this figure was the greatest in 1841. Energy/ water is the one which is lowest in both years.

What stands out is manufacturing sector had the number at 36%, higher than the others in 1841. In the next 170 years, the proportion of people worked in manufacturing sector fell enormously to 9%, lower by approximately 72% compared to the proportion of people worked in services sector in 2011. Additionally, this figure reached a peak after experiencing a steep growth by roughly 48% from 1841.

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram demonstrates the proportion of the United Kingdom workforce among five major industries in the year 1841 and 2011.

Overall, services and construction sectors had an upward trend while Manufacturing, agriculture/ fishing and energy/ water had a downward trend during this period. Particularly, this percentage in services industry was the highest in 2011, whereas this figure was the greatest in 1841. Energy/ water is the one which is lowest in both years.

What stands out is manufacturing sector had the number at 36%, higher than the others in 1841. In the next 170 years, the proportion of people worked in manufacturing sector fell enormously to 9%, lower by approximately 72% compared to the proportion of people worked in services sector in 2011. Additionally, this figure reached a peak after experiencing a steep growth by roughly 48% from 1841.

As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of humans worked for construction industry rose minimally by 2%, from 5% to 8% between 1841 and 2011. Moreover, this figure in agriculture/ fishing sector was 22% in 1841 and then reducing to 1%, which was as the same as the figure in energy/ water sector in 2011. energy/ water sector had the lowest number in both two years, which was only 3% in 1841 and just 1% in 2011.

# data[].attributes.body
The illustrated flow chart delves into the workforce distribution across five pivotal sectors in the UK during the years 1841 and 2011. Notably, the service industry emerges as the predominant force, commanding the highest percentage in both years. This surge is particularly noteworthy, catapulting from 33% in 1841 to an astonishing 80% in 2011.

A compelling trend reveals itself as the manufacturing sector, once a prominent player at 36% in 1841, undergoes a substantial decline to a mere 9% in 2011. In contrast, the energy and water industries show minimal workforce involvement, standing at 1% and 3% in 2011, with even lower figures of 1% and 2% in 1841.

Of particular interest is the widening gap between manufacturing and services. While they were relatively close in 1841, this gap expanded to a substantial 70% difference in 2011. This shift highlights a fundamental transformation in the employment landscape over the years.

In summary, the workforce distribution in the UK witnessed a remarkable transformation, prominently marked by the ascendancy of the service industry and the decline of manufacturing. The energy and water sectors, though marginal, experienced slight growth. It is crucial to note that in 1841, only construction at 5% and energy and water at 3% fell below the 10% mark, whereas in 2011, the majority of sectors exceeded this threshold, indicating a significant shift in employment dynamics. This nuanced shift adds complexity to the narrative of the transformative changes in the UK's workforce distribution over the highlighted years, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of employment dynamics during the periods of 1841 and 2011.

# data[].attributes.body
the provided chart depicts the tendency of UK employees of those 5 major sectors of two desperate period between 1841 and 2011.

Generally,there was a remarkable adjustment happened during the end of nearly 2 decade.As we can seen,the service sector has  the most attention-grabbing transformation,reach its peak at 81% in 2011,meanwhile others show a sharp decline or unnoticeable increase

In 1841,what stand out is that manufacturing was at the top with 36%  and energy and water were bottom of the percentage of workforce.Nonetheless,over 170 years,there was a significant decline convert manufacturing to 9% the agriculture and fishing,witnessed a drop from 22% to 1%,follow the resemble tendency energy and water sector also reduce from 3% to 2%.

By contrast,agriculture and fishing,construction showed some upward trend.The agriculture/fishing experience an extreme convert go straight from just only above 30% in 1841 but reached peak of 80% in 2011,construction also had a slighty boost up from 5%-8%

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram demonstrates the proportion of the United Kingdom workforce in five different major industries in the years 1841 and 2011.

Overall, the workforce’s percents in services and construction sectors had an upward trend, while the ones in manufacturing, agriculture/ fishing and energy/ water had a downward trend during this duration. Particularly, this percentage in the services industry was the highest in 2011, whereas this figure in manufacturing industry was the greatest in 1841. Energy/water is the one that is lowest in both years.

What stands out is that the manufacturing sector’s workforce had the number at 36%, higher than the others in 1841. In the next 170 years, the rate of people working in the manufacturing sector fell enormously to 9%, lower by approximately 72% compared to the proportion of people working in the services sector in 2011. Additionally, this figure reached a peak at 81% after experiencing a steep growth of roughly 48% during this period.

As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of humans working in the construction industry rose minimally by 2%, from 5% to 8%, between 1841 and 2011. Moreover, this figure in the agriculture/fishing sector was 22% in 1841 and then reduced to 1%, which was the same as the rate in the last other sector in 2011. The energy/water sector had the lowest number in both years, which was only 3% in 1841 and just 1% in 2011.

# data[].attributes.body
- In the early years of the 21st century, there were only 35% of Japan workforce in service. By contrast, this number then multiplied almost two times to 75% in the next 15 years

- The number of service industry in Japan workforce grew considerably from 35% to 75% in the 15-year period.

- Between 2005 and 2015, there was a growth in service industry in the workforce of Japan.

# data[].attributes.body
After over 200 years of development,it’s an unevitable statement that computer was one of the most viable human invention.Nevertheless,recently the number of people using this tech gadget to solve all kind of problem in their life rise significantly.I believe this tendency leads to a negative display of mortal society in the further time.

One of the most predictable movement is that traditional building will be alternate with high-tech machine for easier connect with our home computer.This can be seen as a way to combine computer and reality which will leave a consequence on eco system and natural enviroment for overuse electricity.Animal lost their habitat to construct more electrical factory.The next generation have opportunities to interact with computer and technology in general very soon make it implausible to seperate them from virtual life.

# data[].attributes.body
In today’s fast-paced world, technology is being developed and is tending to be deepened in the future. Therefore, our reliance on computer-based technology is reaching greater level in our lives day by day. This phenomenon may not only lead to positive development but also have a strong negative effect. In this essay, I will discuss how the changes might be related and delve into how they are advantageous and detrimental.

Foreseeing the future, it is undeniable that a larger number of individuals will pay attention to technology, particularly computer-based careers, on account of its multi-functional ability. AI, or some machines that are created thanks to technology, can help humans solve such tough problems as its functions, which have already been set up. Take the household robot as an example; this product shows its helpful operation in houses with a range of busy members, dealing with housewives’ work, and keeping their house clean. Furthermore, technological machines will be able to replace people for numerous difficult tasks, such as cleaning buildings’ glass or waste and recycling collectors. Many critics express that technological inventions are playing an important role in our lives and will continue to do so in the future; thus, it is necessary to concentrate on technology.

It seems to have cons for those services, whether relying on them in an acceptable way. Nevertheless, there would be on the downside if we relied on it excessively. Indeed, humans might find it hard to think actively due to a shortage of creativity; for example, AI can help our imagination come out by realizing our thinking just based on our word descriptions. Not only that, overreliance on computers may make teenagers isolate themselves from society; they may not intend to communicate with anyone. A lack of exercise and staying healthy might be a problem as well. Living in their own rooms, including darkness around, they could have some mental health issues, like depression or anxiety disorders. Moreover, their lenses can be affected too. It is factual that the percentage of teenagers needing glasses because of their visual trouble is higher nowadays.

In conclusion, technology is only beneficial to us once we are dependent on it efficiently. On the other hand, individuals are usually addicted too much to computers, and it is expected to continue to grow in this technology-driven future. As a result, this phenomenon leads to a range of mental health problems.

# data[].attributes.body
In today's current world, humans have relied tremendously on computer-based technology. With this topic, two questions sparks up: How will the future be affected by this dependence on technology, and does this reliance have a positive outcome? In this essay, we will look at the potential path the future might take with our increasing dependent on computer-based technology.

With the knowledge of people today still relying heavily on computer-based technology, it is apparent to say that our reliance in the future will also deepen. We can envision a society in the future where even the lightest and simplest of work like taking out the trash or sweeping the floor won't be completed with the help from technologies. But this could also implies to technically work for many industries, replacing people with a machine that is more intelligent and makes less mistakes.

However, an advanced technological world may not be ideal.

# data[].attributes.body
In today modern world, computer-based has been developed magnificently. As a result, we are depending on technology more and more due to the variety range of the technologies. From my perspective, this tendency is extremely beneficial for us, but we always need to be cautious about it regarding our brain skills. These points will be reviewed in the scope of this essay.

First of all, with the rise of computer-based technology, it is obvious that they play a crucial part and continue to enhance the quality of our lives. Basically, we are able to work less and spend more quality time with our families. For instance, lots of people had worked from home during the pandemic, which allowed them to spend more time with their family members. Furthermore, it is important to note that people will have the option to pass all mundane jobs to machines and do only what they are keen on.

On the other hands, we must keep in mind that these computer-based technology will also caused detrimental impact on our lives. First and foremost, human beings will be replaced by this machine leading to the increase in the unemployment which is intrinsically tied to the rate of the crime within the nation. Furthermore, the absence of physical presence of teachers in the classroom can raise the problems of discipline within the students. In other words, social development of these pupils will be harmed and thereby, will cause a hindrance in the nation's social growth.

From above, it can be seen that computers will be used for various activities at home as well as at educational institutions in the future. But, excessive utilization of this machine can boost the issues related to job causing rise in the crime and afflict the young people's development. It is thus hoped that people will be made aware of the harmfulness of relying too much on computers.

# data[].attributes.body
In the modern world, technology has become a requirement of human and it is believed that we are coming to be intensely dependent on computer-based technology. This reality has lead to two questions: How will the future be affected and is it a good idea for people to rely so much on computers. In this essay, I will discuss about the way technology will change human lives and my reliance on this tool.

As can be foreseen, it is clear that mankind dependency on computer-based will continue to grow deeper. As human become more lazy, we will use technology to complete our tasks even with the smallest one. For example, daily activities in the future will require technology like using robots to vacuum the house instead of doing it by human. Furthermore, more factories will using robots as a worker, automatic systems and less human are working as machines are more efficient and less absences than people needed in holidays.

It is clear that dependency on computer-based technology can cause many negative results. It will lead to biologically harm like some physical health problems especially obesity, weakness. Since robots tend to do most of human daily chores, people will become lazy and inactive, and progressively lead into worldwide obesity.Furthermore, as there are less human worker, many people are unemployed and there might be more homelessness, computer-based technology can seizes the world and people are no longer be freedom.

In conclusion, technology will make a lot of differences in human lives in the future especially with daily activities and working systems. Personally, I strongly against people’s dependency on computer-based technology to avoid getting biologically harm and can self-control our world.

# data[].attributes.body
In the present day, society’s dependence on computer-based technology has risen unprecedentedly. Two significant sides need to be answered: How can this situation happen in the following period, and will it bring any advantage to people? In this essay, I will inform the predictions and contemplate the downsides of our reliance on computer-based technology.

In the future, it is clear that our demands for using computer-based technology might reach a high level. First and foremost, because technical devices have been modernized consistently, they can complete a large number of complicated tasks that are impossible with humans. Therefore, technology has been becoming an essential part of social operation.

However, because it may hold a crucial role in our lives, we can be affected terribly and unpredictably. Reliance on computers leads to damaging our physical health due to not exercising regularly, and continuing to use eyes for a long time. Furthermore, mental health also might tend to be destroyed because the light coming from the devices releases the harmful substances creating sleep disorders. Not only will the dependence on technology lead to the reduction of health’s quality, it also makes people lack creativity. In other words, humans have computers come up with new ideas instead of creating by themselves so they may be unable to think independently if this situation has continued for a long time.

In conclusion, it is apparent that computer-based technology is developing significantly in the next period and becoming a main part of human lives. Despite the fact that they are going to be cutting-edge and provide advantages to society, the dependence on them will release a large number of negative effects. I suggest that we should balance the frequency of appearances of technology in our activities to protect the quality of our lives.

# data[].attributes.body
With the rapid growth of technology in the past few years, there has been a noticeable human reliance on computer-based technology which is anticipated to continue to increase in the future. Analyzing further the situation, some anticipations have been made about how computer-based technology is likely to change human behaviors when it comes to the future.

In the future, technological development will significantly affect human life and work which create great opportunities for increasing life quality. The convenience that computer-based technology bring up for

# data[].attributes.body
In today's modern world, our dependence on computer-based technology has increased to a unrivaled level. As we look ahead, two questions arise: How will this reliance develop in the future, and is it advantageous for humans to rely on computer? In this essay, I will predict how this reliance will evolve and also make my opinion on what downsides will come when we depend on computer.

Forseeing the future, our dependency on technology will continue to deepen as time flow by. With each passing day, computer and such devices are being upgraded in order to have more functions to serve humanity. This will lead to more usage of these devices in the future because of their convenience. Moreover, despite being able to complete their daily tasks such as cooking, shopping and so on as an instinct, people will rely on technology to do these tasks. In term of the economy, many industries may soon witness a revolution of automation, potentially depleting the demand for human labor in many aspects.

However, as we proceed to the future, our reliance on computer will bring many drawbacks to us. Over-reliance on computer may ruin human's creativity and critical thinking abilities. For example, if we use computer in our activities such as creating art or solving calculative problems, we will not use our skills and therefore kill them. Moreover,

# data[].attributes.body
In our rapidly evolving world, the intricate dance between humans and technology unfolds in a nuanced manner. Examining our current state, we find ourselves deeply immersed in remote work collaborations, relying on digital tools, messaging apps, and video calls for communication. Simultaneously, entertainment is dominated by streaming services and online gaming, highlighting the multifaceted role of technology in our lives. As we peer into the future, the landscape foresees faster devices and seamless tech integration into daily life, promising efficiency and innovation. However, potential risks such as cybersecurity threats and data privacy concerns cast a shadow on this optimistic trajectory.

The impact of this tech surge reveals a dual nature. On the positive side, there's increased efficiency through streamlined processes and quick access, fostering innovation and problem-solving. Yet, negatives loom in the form of dependency on technology for basic tasks and the rising concerns of hacking and data breaches. Future trends indicate a trajectory towards smart assistants, automated processes driven by AI and automation, augmented reality enhancing user experiences, and the Internet of Things connecting devices for convenience.

Currently, technology is deeply ingrained in our daily lives, from constant smartphone use to dependence on computers for work and entertainment. Additionally, the integration of smart home devices adds a layer of comfort and convenience. The future outlook envisions growing independence facilitated by advanced AI, reducing the need for assistance through commonplace robots managing household chores. Advanced technologies like self-driving cars and everyday items with augmented reality features signal a tech-centric future.

The purpose of these technological innovations is to serve humanity, with robots aiding in healthcare and routine health monitoring, and the rapid development of AI algorithms saving time through automated services like grocery delivery. As we tread this path of increasing tech reliance, it's vital to strike a balance, recognizing potential downsides like stifled creativity and unemployment risks. Navigating towards a digital future requires a nuanced approach, where the advantages and drawbacks of technological dependency are carefully weighed to ensure a harmonious coexistence.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, in term of technology, it might seems to most people that high-tech electronics are getting control of humanity’s life which influence on the way our society functions and operates as homo sapiens strongly depends on cutting-edge technology. As we contemplate on this subject, it will raise two main questions: How will technology develop in the future? Is it beneficial to our human’s life if we continue to put more and more reliance on it. In this essay, I will dive into these major problems by considering the effect of computers and technology.

It is certain that Technology accompany with human’s intelligence is getting better and better everyday as in a modern society. Consequently, the products of our intelligence meeting the needs of people are getting into daily usage more and more than before, people could use them to educate children or for any other services such as healthcare or recreational purposes. More than that, we are likely to witness automation in industry reducing the cost of hiring human labour.

However, it is vital for us to recognize the disadvantages of focusing on using these high-tech too much as it will take away our creativity and the ability to have our own thought which is the natural fundamental function of our mankind such as if students depends too much on AI to d

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, in terms of technology, it might seems to most people that high-tech computer systems are strongly relied on by considerable number of people and we couldn't deny the influence made by technology on the way our society operates. As we contemplate on this subject, it will raise two main questions: How will technology develop in the future? Is it beneficial to our human’s life if we continue to put more and more reliance on it. In this essay, I will dive into these major problems by considering the effects technology had on our society and progressive pace of developing hi tech in our society.

It is certain that technology accompanying with human’s intelligence is optimized every day . Consequently, the products of human's intelligence meeting the needs of people appear in daily usage more frequent than before, people could use them to educate children or for any other services such as healthcare or recreational purposes or even automation right at our houses. More than that, we are likely to witness automatic robots working in industry to reduce the costs of hiring human labour.

However, it is vital for us to recognize the detrimental effects of taking part in using these high-tech too much as it will take away our creativity and gradually the ability to have our own thought which is the natural fundamental operation of our mankind will significantly misfunction, in reality, if students depends too much on AI to deal with their schoolwork, they could not apply their knowledge in practice. More than that, rise in usage of computers may result in obesity and other medical problems which affect people's well being.

In conclusion, cutting-edge technology is significantly developed and is widely used by many people nowadays as it benefit directly to many essential sectors functioning services maintaining our human being such as education, entertainment and healthcare. Despite playing major role in our society, too much dependence on those computer systems may presumably lead to malfunction of

the fundamental capability of having own thought and self-independence as well as downgrades of creativeness

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, in terms of technology, it might seems to most people that high-tech computer systems are strongly relied on by considerable number of people and we couldn't deny the influence made by technology on the way our society operates. As we contemplate on this subject, it will raise two main questions: How will technology develop in the future? Is it beneficial to our human’s life if we continue to put more and more reliance on it. In this essay, I will dive into these major problems by considering the effects technology had on our society and progressive pace of developing hi tech in our society.

It is certain that technology accompanying with human’s intelligence is optimized every day . Consequently, the products of human's intelligence meeting the needs of people appear in daily usage more frequent than before, people could use them to educate children or for any other services such as healthcare or recreational purposes or even automation right at our houses. More than that, we are likely to witness automatic robots working in industry to reduce the costs of hiring human labour.

However, it is vital for us to recognize the detrimental effects of taking part in using these high-tech too much as it will take away our creativity and gradually the ability to have our own thought which is the natural fundamental operation of our mankind will significantly misfunction, in reality, if students depends too much on AI to deal with their schoolwork, they could not apply their knowledge in practice. More than that, rise in usage of computers may result in obesity and other medical problems which affect people's well being.

In conclusion, cutting-edge technology is significantly developed and is widely used by many people nowadays as it benefit directly to many essential sectors functioning services maintaining our human being such as education, entertainment and healthcare. Despite playing major role in our society, too much dependence on those computer systems may presumably lead to malfunction of

the fundamental capability of having own thought and self-independence as well as downgrades of creativeness

# data[].attributes.body
The diagrams show data about a range of alternative sources of news for Germans and Nigerians in a typical week.

Overall, the percentage of newspaper was the highest in Germany, whilst the one of TV was the largest in Nigerians. Nevertheless, the figure of Friends and family dominated the lowest rank in both.

As can be seen from the charts, the numbers of newspaper and TV are higher than the others in Germany. Particularly, there was 45% in the figure of newspaper, which is half as much again as the percent in TV. On the other hand, the proportion of newspaper in Nigerians was just 13%, lower by approximately 50% compared to the most significant one, TV. Additionally, the sum of these two figures accounted for roughly three-quarters in both countries.

Moving into the Nigerians’s percentage of radio, it was the second highest, at about 22%, and it was slightly double the one in Germans. Moreover, the proportion of radio and internet in Germans was nearly the same, 10% and 11% respectively. That was just 4% left for other sources and only 1% for the internet and friends and family in the other country.

# data[].attributes.body
The pie chart data indicate the principle ways of approaching and updating news of urban areas’ Nigerians and Germans in a typical week.

Overall, two most reliable news sources for Germans and Nigerians are TV and newspaper. Additionally, the use of radio in Nigeria are double the figure in Germany.

One of the most prominent features of this data is that, while in Germany, newspapers are the most common way to find out the news, accounted for slightly over two fifths, in Nigeria, the proportion of newspapers is almost three times lower. On the other hand, in contrast to the figure of Germans, the use of TV in Nigeria is substantially greater, which are 30% and 63% respectively.

In both countries, the smallest contribution of ways to find out news is by other sources, in particular from friends and family in Nigeria. In Germany, this accounts for 4% while in Nigeria the figure of this section represents a tiny minority, with just 1%. One major difference between Germans and Nigerians is that the use of internet in Germany is over twice as large as in Nigeria. For the figure of radio, in comparison with the use of radio in Germany, the use of this gadget in Nigeria is larger by a margin of 12%.

# data[].attributes.body
The two pie charts indicate the way germans and nigerians access to the contemporary news on a regular basis.

Overall, The two share the same primary methods of getting news which are through TV and newspaper and radio. Furthermore, the contribution of internet in Germany’s chart is significantly higher than the nigeria’s figures.

People in Germany get to the latest news through newspaper which accounts for 45% of them, wheras the rate of this in Nigeria was almost one third compare to Germany. In terms of the second greatest proportion consumption of the German’s chart which is TV, both share a large proportion in the chart. However this figure of Nigeria is two times greater than Germany,63% and 30% respectively.

In Nigeria, the contribution of radio is around 22% which approximately double the Germany’s with just around about 10%. In contrast to this, the rate of Internet in Germany accounts for 11% which over ten times larger than Nigeria’s which is only 1%

# data[].attributes.body
The pie charts show the priority choice of Germans and Nigerians when accessing the news in an ordinary week.

Generally, the most prominent ways to approach daily news for both countries are via television, printed sources, and radio. While printed sources such as newspapers dominate Germany’s news inception, a majority of Nigerians use television as a way to fathom world events. In addition, the proportion of radio usage in Germany has doubled in Nigeria.

One of the key features of this data is that in Germany, nearly a third of people have access to the news via television, accounting for 30%,  while it was double that in Nigeria with more than half of people in urban areas. In addition, the newspaper is at the top of Germany’s priority for getting news due to more than two-fifths of the percentage. However, only 13% of the majority know the news through printed materials in Nigeria.

# data[].attributes.body
the pie charts depicts the initial accomodation that Germans and urban Nigerian via to investigate news in a normal week,contain five disparate media resources.

Mainly,both Germans and urban Nigerians display a numberous quantity sectors televison,newspaper and radio.Conspicuosly, television viably accomplished to be the most favored postition in Nigerians.On the others hand newspaper outstanding the others in Germans

In Nigerians the estimated percentage of people reach theirs news by televison and radio accounted for 63% and 22% respectively as twice as Germans.Nonetheless r newspaper is just slightly under a half in Germans but only about a half of a quarter on the other nation.

Observate those two left over section

# data[].attributes.body
The pie charts below display which place does Germans and Nigerians first go to access the news in a typical week through five different media outlets.

In overall,it is clear that TVs, newspaper and radio are three most preferred news sources in both countries.Televison being the most common choice in urban Nigeria and radio in the second,while newspapers reign in Germany.

In Nigeria, TV are the predominant source of news,accounting for approximately three third,which is almost doubled when compared to Germany,where it stands at 30%.Notably,newspaper are the main source of news in Germany with a rate of 45%,while in Nigeria only has a figure of 13%,which is significantly lower.Radio also shows a marked difference, which is just 10% in Germany, and almost doubled in Nigeria.

Regarding the others,Germany and Nigeria exhibit contrasting preferences.11% of Germans use the Internet as their first news sources,a stark contrast to just 1% in Nigeria.Other sources,including personal networks such as friends and family,play a small role in both countries but are slightly more common in Germany at 4%,compared to 1% in Nigeria.

In conclusion,TV is used to get news often

# data[].attributes.body
The pie charts illustrate the prominent sources that Germans and Nigerians go to in order to access the news in a regular week.

Overall, one thing that can be seen from the data is that TV and newspaper is their first place to go for Germans and Nigerians in urban areas. Furthermore, the figures that gain access to the radio in Nigeria is a doubling numbers as in Germany.

In urban areas in Nigeria, the greatest proportion of approaching was from the TV, which is 63% of the total percentage. Meanwhile the numbers of this group for the Germans was just slightly under a third, at 30%. It is apparent that Germans often seek for newspaper with the accountant of 45%, as for the Nigerians the rate on this category is substantially lower, at 13%. When it comes to radio, the percentages of access for Nigeria is as two times higher than the rate in Germany, at 22% for Nigeria and 10% for Germany.

Both nations all share the same smallest ratio on the other sources, for instance the internet or from friends and family. In Nigeria, this accounted for 1% of the total survey, while the internet also represented 1%. In contrast, the figures of Germans using the Internet is only 11% with personal networks rate at 4%.

# data[].attributes.body
The pie chart provides data about five basic approaches used to receive the news in Germany and urban Nigeria in a typical week. Overall, it is apparent that three major news sources that inhabitants almost depend on are TV, newspaper, and radio. Notably, television is the most popular place for Nigerians to access the news, whereas Germans tend to choose newspaper. Moreover, Internet dominate more significantly in Germany than in Nigeria.

Newspaper plays the crucial role in announcing news to Germans, accounting for just under half, at 45%. In contrast, this number is approximately smaller in Nigeria, which represents 13%. Additionally, one of the most prominent differences between Germany and Nigeria is the figures of people accessing the news through the TV. In the other words, television is considerably used by 63 % of Nigerians, roughly doubles the proportion in Germany, which is slightly under a third. Radio also illustrates a remarkable gap between two countries, which means the percentage in Nigerian is substantially higher than the other.

# data[].attributes.body
The two pie charts indicate the primary way people in Germany and urban Nigeria go to in order to access the news in a typical seven-day period. Generally, TV and newspaper are the two most popular methods that are used to access the news. Additionally, the amount of urban Nigerians using radio to know about current affairs is double the figures of Germans.

The data reveal that the most popular place people in Germany go to first is newspaper, which present 45% of the total, while in urban Nigeria, the figure for this approach is just over a tenth. Conversely, television on another hand is the primary new-accessing way for 63% of urban Nigerians, more than doubled percentage in Germany, which account for 30%. Notably, radio, which hold almost a quarter urban population in Nigeria, only being chose by 10% of Germans.

As can be seen from the charts, the other two categories which are Internet and other sources are not preferred by Germans and urban Nigerians. It is witnessed that only 11% Germany people using Internet to access the news while that is one out of ten with urban Nigeria people. Other sources, including personal relationships such as friends and family play a trivial role in both countries but are slightly higher in Germany at 4%, compared to 1% in Nigeria.

# data[].attributes.body
The pie charts compare the prominent sources that people use to obtain news in two countries, Germany and Nigeria. Overall, television and newspaper are two of the main sources for news in both countries. However, in Nigeria, radio accounts for a higher proportion than newspaper. In Germany, the lowest percentage is allocated to radio, while in Nigeria, friends and family and the internet are the joint-lowest.

In Germany, newspaper is the most preferred way to obtain news with 45% of Germans using this method, whereas in Nigeria, the figure accounts for a significant lower rate of 13%. Conversely, in Nigeria, TV is the most favoured method to collect news with 63% of urban Nigerian, more than double the percentage of Germans which is 30%. In both countries, the usage of radio is also a noticeable difference with 10% in Germany and 22% in Nigeria.

In terms of two other categories, the proportions of both figures in Germany are higher than those of Nigeria. In Germany, internet accounts for 11% of Germans, whereas in Nigeria urbans, this proportion is 1%. Similarly, the share of other sources in Germany is 4% which is slightly higher than friends and family in Nigeria which stands at 1%.

# data[].attributes.body
The pie charts display where Germans and Nigerians first go to for news access in a typical week through five different news mediums.

Overall, it is clear that TVs, newspapers and radios are the three most preferred news sources in both countries. It is also apparent, televisions are the most popular in urban Nigeria, while newspapers dominated in Germany.

In Nigeria, TV has the highest usage percentage of 63% which is more than doubled when compared to Germany's 30%. Notably, newspapers are the main source of news for Germans with a rate of 45%, in contrast, Nigeria only has a mere figure of 13%, which is significantly lower. Additionally, Nigeria's has almost doubled the access rate for radios, whereas in Germany, being only 10%.

One major difference between Germany and Nigeria is the two other categories, Internet and other sources. With the enormous contrast in the use of the Internet as a news source is substantially higher in Germany compared to Nigeria, the figures 11% and 1% respectively. Other sources like friends and family, are much less present in both countries but are still more prevalent in Germany at 4% than Nigeria at 1%.

# data[].attributes.body
The pie charts illustrate the initial platforms that Germans and Nigerians consult to obtain news over the course of a typical week, encompassing a variety of five separate media sources: TV, newspaper, radio, Internet and other sources/friends and family.

Overall, it is obvious that the data presented in the pie charts highlights a distinct contrast in the primary news sources between Germans and Nigerians, with television and newspapers being the predominant mediums in Nigeria and Germany, respectively. Additionally, the charts reveal that radio is twice as popular in Nigeria compared to Germany, underscoring significant differences in media consumption preferences across these populations within a standard week.

In analyzing the first body, we delve deeper into the prominent roles played by television and newspapers as primary news sources in Nigeria and Germany, respectively. The pie charts unmistakably illustrate that television holds sway as the preferred medium for accessing news in Nigeria, commanding the attention of a significant majority of the urban population. Conversely, in Germany, newspapers emerge as the dominant choice, capturing a substantial portion of the populace's initial engagement with current events. This disparity underscores not only the differing media landscapes between the two countries but also cultural and infrastructural factors influencing news consumption habits.

In terms of the remaining two categories, Internet and other sources, Germany and Nigeria demonstrate divergent preferences. While 11% of Germans opt for the Internet as their primary news source, only 1% of Nigerians do so, indicating a significant contrast. Similarly, other sources, including personal networks like friends and family, play a marginal role in both countries. However, they are slightly more prevalent in Germany, accounting for 4%, compared to just 1% in Nigeria.