# data[].attributes.body
Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that space programmes should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

🟥𝓕𝓮𝓮𝓭𝓫𝓪𝓬𝓴
✨TR: 7.0; CC: 6.5; VC: 6.5; GR: 6.0✨
═══nn══════════════════════

G̶i̶v̶e̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶i̶m̶p̶o̶r̶t̶a̶n̶c̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶s̶c̶i̶e̶n̶t̶i̶f̶i̶c̶ ̶d̶e̶v̶e̶l̶o̶p̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶m̶o̶d̶e̶r̶n̶ ̶s̶o̶c̶i̶e̶t̶y̶,̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶q̶u̶e̶s̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶e̶x̶p̶l̶o̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶l̶o̶o̶m̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶l̶a̶r̶g̶e̶ 💥 VC: Mở bằng "với tầm quan trọng của" hơi an toàn và nhàm -> The debate over the cost of space exploration is increasingly significant in today’s world. While it is a common assumption that sending people into outer space costs a fortune, passionate supporters of these space programs argue that they are worth the investment. The following essay will analyse these conflicting views before giving my opinion, which posits that the key does not lie in the cost of space exploration, but rather t̶h̶e̶ ̶w̶a̶y̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶p̶ ̶i̶t̶s̶ ̶b̶e̶n̶e̶f̶i̶t̶s̶ 💥 VC: cụm này mơ hồ -> how its benefits are harnessed.

Advocates of space exploration tout the technological advancements that such programs fuel. These innovations often have far-reaching applications beyond space science, benefiting other industries such as medicine, transportation, and environmental monitoring. For instance, the development of CAT and MRI scans in detecting diseases was influenced by NASA’s imaging technology. Additionally, achievements in space exploration not only satisfy our thirst for scientific knowledge but also spark inspiration for the young generation. This is evidenced by the case of the Apollo moon landing, which has ignited a passion for science in young minds and motivated them to pursue careers in related fields.

On the flip side, p̶r̶o̶p̶o̶n̶e̶n̶t̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶e̶x̶p̶l̶o̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ 💥 VC: sai từ, ý mâu thuẫn với lập luận -> critics of space exploration contend that huge investments in this field should be allocated to e̶d̶u̶c̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶a̶l̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶h̶e̶a̶t̶h̶c̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶s̶y̶s̶t̶e̶m̶s̶ 💥 GR: sai chính tả -> education and healthcare systems. While such programs may help discover life on other planets, addressing the shortage of schools and hospitals is a more pressing concern. M̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶p̶e̶o̶p̶l̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶n̶k̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶s̶p̶e̶c̶t̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶m̶o̶v̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶i̶n̶h̶a̶b̶i̶t̶a̶b̶l̶e̶ ̶p̶l̶a̶n̶e̶t̶s̶ ̶b̶u̶t̶ ̶w̶i̶t̶h̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶a̶d̶e̶q̶u̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶h̶e̶a̶l̶t̶h̶c̶a̶r̶e̶,̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶m̶a̶y̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶s̶u̶r̶v̶i̶v̶e̶ ̶l̶o̶n̶g̶ ̶e̶n̶o̶u̶g̶h̶ ̶o̶r̶ ̶b̶e̶ ̶p̶h̶y̶s̶i̶c̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶f̶i̶t̶ ̶e̶n̶o̶u̶g̶h̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶l̶i̶v̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶i̶r̶ ̶d̶r̶e̶a̶m̶s̶ 💥 VC: câu dài dòng, ý không thực tế -> Critics argue that investing in basic needs like healthcare is more urgent than speculative ventures like interplanetary migration. In addition, space exploration can involve significant risks and dangers to human life. W̶e̶ ̶n̶e̶e̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶l̶o̶o̶k̶ ̶f̶u̶r̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶p̶o̶r̶t̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶N̶A̶S̶A̶ ̶a̶b̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶a̶s̶t̶r̶o̶n̶a̶u̶t̶ ̶f̶a̶t̶a̶l̶i̶t̶i̶e̶s̶ ̶d̶u̶r̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ ̶m̶i̶s̶s̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ 💥 GR: cấu trúc không tự nhiên -> NASA’s reports of astronaut fatalities during missions highlight these dangers. These realities highlight that the risks of space exploration could outweigh its potential benefits.

In conclusion, while space exploration may be exorbitant and risky, it still holds long-term value for scientific progress. W̶e̶ ̶m̶u̶s̶t̶ ̶s̶t̶r̶i̶k̶e̶ ̶a̶ ̶b̶a̶l̶a̶n̶c̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶b̶o̶t̶h̶ ̶e̶n̶s̶u̶r̶e̶ ̶b̶a̶s̶i̶c̶ ̶h̶u̶m̶a̶n̶ ̶n̶e̶e̶d̶s̶ ̶o̶n̶ ̶E̶a̶r̶t̶h̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶s̶u̶p̶p̶o̶r̶t̶ ̶m̶e̶a̶n̶i̶n̶g̶f̶u̶l̶ ̶r̶e̶s̶e̶a̶r̶c̶h̶ ̶b̶e̶y̶o̶n̶d̶ ̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶p̶l̶a̶n̶e̶t̶ 💥 GR: cấu trúc dài dòng -> A balanced approach is needed to address Earth’s basic needs while pursuing meaningful space research.

🚩 Các vấn đề ngữ pháp cần lưu ý:
▪️Range of sentence structures: E có câu phức (‘while it is a common assumption…’), nhưng thiếu cấu trúc nhấn mạnh như inversion hay câu đảo để tăng tính thuyết phục. -> Thử: Never has space exploration been more debated than in today’s resource-scarce world. hoặc Only by balancing terrestrial needs with cosmic ambitions can we justify its costs.
▪️Range of sentence tenses: E dùng hiện tại đơn tốt, nhưng thiếu hiện tại hoàn thành để nhấn mạnh tác động lâu dài. -> Ví dụ: Space exploration has long driven technological breakthroughs.
▪️Range of grammatical constructions: E có mệnh đề quan hệ (‘which has ignited…’), nhưng thiếu danh động từ làm chủ ngữ hay câu bị động. -> Thêm: Investing in space programs fosters innovation across industries. hoặc Astronauts are often exposed to significant risks during missions.
▪️Grammatical Accuracy: Lỗi như sai từ (‘proponents’ thay vì ‘critics’), sai chính tả (‘heathcare’), và cấu trúc dài dòng (‘we need not to look further’). -> Sửa: Critics argue that funds should prioritize education and healthcare systems. hoặc NASA’s reports highlight the dangers of space missions.
▪️Pronoun Agreement: Ko có lỗi lớn, nhưng ‘we’ trong kết luận hơi chung chung. -> Cụ thể: Policymakers must balance earthly needs with space exploration.
▪️Linking words: E dùng ‘additionally’, ‘on the flip side’ tốt, nhưng thiếu ‘thus’, ‘consequently’ để tăng mạch lạc. -> Thử: Thus, space exploration inspires future scientists. hoặc Consequently, neglecting basic needs undermines societal progress.
▪️Collocations: Sai collocation như ‘looming large’ (sáo rỗng), ‘think of the prospect of moving to other inhabitable planets’ (không thực tế), và ‘reap its benefits’ (mơ hồ). -> Sửa: Increasingly significant debate hoặc Harness its benefits.
▪️Punctuation: E dùng dấu chấm đúng, nhưng mở bài sáo rỗng và kết luận dài dòng. -> Sửa: In conclusion, a balanced approach ensures both earthly progress and cosmic discovery.

E có lập luận rõ, cân bằng hai phía, ví dụ thực tế (NASA, Apollo), nhưng lỗi ngữ pháp (‘proponents’ sai ý, ‘heathcare’ sai chính tả) và từ vựng sáo rỗng (‘looming large’) làm giảm điểm. Cần formal hơn, tránh lặp ý, và dùng collocation chuẩn.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that space programmes should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

🟥𝓕𝓮𝓮𝓭𝓫𝓪𝓬𝓴
✨TR: 7.5; CC: 7.0; VC: 7.0; GR: 6.5✨
═══nn══════════════════════

With the ongoing advancements of technology, it is hardly possible for humans to stay put 💥 rối và hơi dài -> As technology advances rapidly, as the question around outer space has lingered for too long 💥 GR: Cụm này mơ hồ, thiếu rõ ràng -> humanity’s curiosity about outer space persists. Even though space exploration comes with significant costs, it surely provides humans with numerous benefits 💥 VC: ‘Surely’ yếu, thiếu sắc thái -> offers substantial benefits. However, opponents of this matter 💥 VC: Từ này ko hợp -> endeavor argue that problems evident on Earth need to be solved first in order to continue the investment in space technology 💥 *GR: Cụm này dài dòng -> before further investing in space. This essay will discuss the two sides of the argument before giving my opinion.

On the one hand, critics of space exploration argue that its high financial cost outweighs any potential scientific gains. Opponents of space exploration 💥 VC: Lặp từ, thiếu thay thế -> of such programs believe it costs their countries billions of dollars to recruit, train, and pay for astronomers and research teams 💥 VC: ‘Astronomers’ ko chính xác, quá hẹp -> scientists and engineers without any clear benefits to the normal residents 💥 VC: Cụm này ko tự nhiên -> ordinary citizens. They assert that it would be more practical to invest money in essential sectors such as education, health care 💥 VC: Cụm này ổn nhưng thiếu trang trọng -> healthcare, and transportation to improve the quality of people’s daily lives. Additionally, the Earth is currently facing many hazardous problems, namely climate change and famine 💥 VC: ‘Hazardous’ ko đủ mạnh, ‘famine’ hơi hẹp -> pressing issues, such as climate change and food insecurity. If the money were redirected to solve these problems, a large number of human lives would be saved 💥 GR: Cụm này ổn nhưng dài -> countless lives could be saved.

However, I take sides with 💥 VC: Cụm này ko trang trọng -> align with advocates of space exploration. The most prominent benefit is that the technological innovation used in space science can surely be of practical use 💥 VC: ‘Surely’ thừa, yếu -> directly enhances, directly impacting people’s daily lives 💥 GR: Lặp ý, cần ngắn gọn -> everyday life. It is evident that the GPS or Google Map use signals emitted from space satellites 💥 GR: Cụm này sai ngữ pháp, thiếu mượt -> GPS and Google Maps rely on satellite signals, serving as a fundamental factor 💥 VC: Cụm này yếu -> key driver in developing many convenient apps like Grab, Be, and Shopeefood 💥 VC: Tên riêng ổn nhưng cần nhất quán -> and ShopeeFood. Satellites also expand people’s understanding of the unknown 💥 VC: Từ này mơ hồ -> cosmos, offering methodologies against underlying threats 💥 VC: Cụm này ko rõ nghĩa -> to counter potential threats. Not to mention the highly accurate forecasts of the weather and potential occurrence of natural disasters that we receive from space institutions 💥 GR: Câu dài, rối -> Satellites provide precise weather forecasts and disaster warnings, helping to prevent numerous tragic events. Plus 💥 VC: Từ này thiếu trang trọng -> Moreover, space exploration is anchored in providing value for humanity by answering fundamental questions about our species’ existence 💥 *GR: Cụm này hơi rối -> seeks to answer profound questions about human existence.

In conclusion, although money spent on expensive space programs could have been of practical use on many occurring matters on Earth 💥 GR: Cụm này lủng củng -> costly space programs could address earthly issues, it is reasonable to continue investing in these kinds of projects 💥 VC: Cụm này yếu -> initiatives, considering the benefits they provide to the human race. Therefore, I firmly believe that it is a wise choice to continue funding space exploration.

▪️Bài của e trả lời đc câu hỏi, phân tích lợi và hại của khám phá vũ trụ, nêu rõ quan điểm ủng hộ đầu tư. Lập luận khá, nhưng đoạn phản bác thiếu ví dụ cụ thể, chưa đủ sâu. Quan điểm rõ, nhưng diễn đạt đôi chỗ dài dòng, lặp từ, làm giảm thuyết phục. Các ý liên quan, kết luận ổn nhưng thiếu giải pháp cân bằng. Ví dụ: "Space exploration, while costly, drives innovation that benefits all, provided we address earthly priorities."

▪️E hỗ trợ ý bằng ví dụ GPS, Grab, nhưng thiếu chi tiết cảm xúc hoặc số liệu. Thử thêm: "Satellite-driven apps like Grab have transformed mobility in Southeast Asia, serving millions daily." Liên kết câu khá, dùng “however”, “additionally”, nhưng thiếu từ nối tinh tế như "by the same token", "in the vein of". Ý về vấn đề Trái Đất cần phát triển: "Redirecting just 5% of space budgets could bolster climate initiatives." Cần reference words như "these technologies", "such investments" để tránh lặp.

▪️Về từ vựng, e dùng đc “prominent”, “methodologies”, nhưng “surely”, “underlying threats” thiếu sắc thái. Độ chính xác từ vựng khá, nhưng collocation yếu như “normal residents”, “hazardous problems”. Thêm cụm như "at the forefront of", "nothing less than revolutionary". Sắc thái mạnh hơn ở “numerous benefits” bằng "invaluable advantages".

▪️Cấu trúc câu ổn, nhưng lỗi GR như lặp từ, cấu trúc rối làm giảm điểm. Dấu câu tốt, nhưng thiếu nhấn mạnh như "Far from frivolous, space programs fuel progress."

🚩 Tóm lại, e cần rút gọn câu, thêm ví dụ cụ thể, sửa lỗi GR.

# data[].attributes.body
- opinion:

+ discuss both views: discussion: khách quan (ông A ông B)

+ do you agree/disagree: argumentative (chủ quan: tôi tin/thấy...)

- account: WHAT ARE THE ... causes/ solutions/ effects

NGÔN NGỮ KHÁCH QUAN: we, it, there

# data[].attributes.body
opinion:

discuss both views : discussion: khách quan (ông A ông B)

do you agree/ disagree: argumentative (chủ quan: tôi tin/ thấy...)

account: WHAT ARE THE ... causes/ solutions/ effects

NGÔN NGỮ KHÁCH QUAN: we, it, there

# data[].attributes.headline
Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.) (haven't yet done)

# data[].attributes.subject
Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.) (haven't yet done)

# data[].attributes.body
🟥𝓕𝓮𝓮𝓭𝓫𝓪𝓬𝓴
✨TR: 6.0; CC: 5.5; VC: 6.0; GR: 5.5✨
═══nn══════════════════════

Whether for having an enjoyable job or having a high salary, the importance of having a balanced life is undisputed. However, when it comes to a better life, the debate has become particularly 💥 VC: cụm mơ hồ, thiếu rõ ràng -> remains heated. It is a common assumption that having a high salary enhances the life quality 💥 GR: cụm sai, ko tự nhiên -> quality of life, but many argue that working in an enjoyable enviroment 💥 GR: chính tả sai -> environment must take priority, such as incentive for employees, a comfort working place 💥 GR: cấu trúc lủng củng, danh từ ko đồng nhất -> incentives for employees and a comfortable workplace. This essay will analyze the issue from these contrasting views before giving my opinion, which posits the key lies in understanding the need for whether a enjoyable job or not across individuals, shaped by their personality 💥 GR: câu rối, thiếu tự nhiên -> that the key lies in balancing job satisfaction and salary based on individual priorities.

Proponents of having an enjoyable job emphasize the rising of mental health 💥 VC: cụm sai, ko đúng -> improvement in mental health and the productivity of employees. They argued 💥 GR: sai thì, lặp ‘argue’ -> argue that**,** compared to having a high salary equivalent to work in a competitive places 💥 GR: cấu trúc sai, lủng củng -> associated with competitive workplaces, individuals who choose an enjoyable job have the advantage of mental health increasing 💥 GR: sai cấu trúc -> enhanced mental well-being. The case for working in comfort workplace 💥 GR: thiếu mạo từ, danh từ sai -> a comfortable workplace is most compelling in Denmark, with its emphasis on work-life balance, reports high level of hapiness 💥 GR: thiếu chủ ngữ, chính tả sai -> which reports high levels of happiness. Apart from mental health, having an enjoyable job leads to high productivity, came from passion-driven employees instead of a myriad of indifferent employees 💥 GR: cấu trúc sai, lặp từ -> driven by passionate employees rather than indifferent ones. To see this, proponents easily point to studies that have shown employees of Google are more productive than other 💥 GR: thiếu danh từ -> others because they love what they do. Even if having an enjoyable job are less tangible 💥 GR: sai số, cấu trúc lủng củng -> the benefits of an enjoyable job are less tangible, they still hold long-term value.

On the flip side, proponents of preference to having a high salary 💥 VC: cụm vụng, ko tự nhiên -> prioritizing a high salary maintain that there is no substitute for individuals who keen on having a comfort work 💥 GR: cấu trúc sai, lủng củng -> seek a comfortable lifestyle when it comes to getting a variety of bills, had to pay 💥 GR: sai cấu trúc, lặp từ -> paying various bills. In essence, a high salary can secures a better lifetyles 💥 GR: sai thì, chính tả sai -> can secure better lifestyles such as paying for school fees or electricity bills. This is not exclusive to better lifestyles 💥 VC: cụm yếu, ko rõ -> limited to improved lifestyles, but also encompassing 💥 VC: từ nặng, ko hợp ngữ cảnh -> includes education, healthcare, and house investment 💥 VC: cụm ko tự nhiên -> housing investments. For example, some studies have shown that in country like the US 💥 GR: thiếu mạo từ -> countries like the US, education is very expensive, which is the reason why individuals in there have to 💥 GR: cấu trúc lủng củng -> why individuals there must work for a high salary. Added to this advantage is the opportunity to experience and explore life outside off the work 💥 GR: sai giới từ -> outside of work. To see the significant effects on individuals’ interest 💥 VC: sai từ -> interests, critics point to cases of many places like Dubai or America not only where people have a luxury lifetyles with a variety of hypercars and skyscrapers, but also tourist attractions 💥 GR: cấu trúc rối, chính tả sai -> where people enjoy luxurious lifestyles with hypercars, skyscrapers, and tourist attractions. Unless the

In conclusion, while having an enjoyable job may seem to provide a more comfortable workplace, it is not the be-all and end-all. In my opinion, though the productivity of work 💥 VC: cụm ko rõ -> benefits of job satisfaction is not inherently negative, the purpose of having work-life balance extend 💥 GR: sai số -> extends far beyond an enjoyable job. As long as having an enjoyable job and earning a high salary are balanced, the quality of life can bring 💥 GR: cấu trúc sai -> quality of life can deliver long-term benefits to society.

▪️Bài của e trả lời đc câu hỏi, phân tích hai khía cạnh, nhưng lập luận yếu, thiếu phản biện sắc bén và ví dụ cảm xúc. Quan điểm rõ, nhưng đoạn kết lặp ý, ko nhấn mạnh, làm mất điểm CC. Các ý liên quan, nhưng trật tự ý rối, đặc biệt đoạn 2 lặp từ “lifestyle” và thiếu mạch lạc. Ví dụ kết: “In the final analysis, balancing passion and income is key to a fulfilling life.”

▪️E có hỗ trợ ý bằng ví dụ (Denmark, Google), nhưng ví dụ chung chung, chưa gieo pathos. Thử thêm: “For a fact, a coder thriving in a vibrant workplace can spark innovation.” Liên kết giữa các câu yếu, lặp “for example”, thiếu đa dạng. Có thể dùng “By the same token”, “In contrast”, hoặc “Not to mention”. Ý về high salary chưa phát triển hết. Có thể viết: “All too often, a hefty paycheck enables families to access top-tier education.” Thêm reference words như “this balance”, “such benefits” để tăng mạch lạc.

▪️Về từ vựng, e dùng “proponents”, “tangible”, nhưng lỗi như “lifetyles”, “comfort work” làm giảm điểm VC. Collocation yếu, ví dụ “rising of mental health” -> “boost in mental well-being” hoặc “enhanced mental health”. Sắc thái mạnh hơn ở “hapiness” -> “contentment” (ví dụ: “Denmark’s focus on balance fosters deep contentment.”). Thử attitudinal word chỗ “productivity”: “This surge in productivity stems from genuine passion.”

▪️Cấu trúc câu đơn giản, lặp “is” nhiều, thiếu đảo ngữ hay nhấn mạnh. Dấu câu ổn, nhưng lỗi GR như “argued”, “can secures” nặng. Có thể dùng: “Never has work-life balance been more crucial.”

🚩 Tóm lại, e cần lập luận chặt hơn, thêm ví dụ cảm xúc, sửa GR cẩn thận. Cô đề nghị e dùng collocation chuẩn, từ nối đa dạng, và viết kết bài mạnh mẽ. Lần sau chú ý chính tả và cấu trúc, ko để mất điểm oan!