# data[].attributes.body
The author shows the feelings of the other characters by having the main character mention the reactions the other characters have to her. She likes to add in how she thinks or feels the other characters are feeling about her when they react to some of her new actions.

# data[].attributes.body
it could have been a more detailed point of view, but it wouldn't have felt as authentic as it did coming from the mind of the character herself. Having a third-person-point of view would help the reader get a very detailed description of the character's actions when in this state, but not the character's own personal beliefs and feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
The author shows the emotions of the other characters by diolougue and their actions.

# data[].attributes.body
This would have been different if written in the third person because the suspense and end of the story would have been revealed. There wouldn't be wondering about who is behind the wallpaper because the POV would already show and reveal that.

# data[].attributes.body
When the narrator interacts or describes the other characters, she is giving the reader the others' emotions (how she perceives them.) Of course it may not be accurate, but it's a strategy used in first-person writing to work past the limitations of one singular point of view.

# data[].attributes.body
The author mainly shows the perspectives and feelings of other characters through the use of dialogue and interactions between the characters. For example, we can tell that John does not see the severity of the narrator's mental issues through the way he repeatedly laughs off her requests to get rid of the wallpaper.

# data[].attributes.body
If a third-person point omniscient narration had been used instead of the original, it would not have had the same effect. Any suspense would have been revealed, and it wouldn't be as immersive. The choice of a first person point of view was a better one, as it lets the reader make their own theories on the meaning of the story.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it would have provided more details about the other characters and would reveal their thought process behind decisions and actions however I think it would have been harder to understand the main character condition because it would feel less like putting yourself in her shoes.

# data[].attributes.body
The dialogue and actions allowed the author to show the characters thoughts and feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
If the author had used a third-person omniscient narrator, the story would have felt much more complex and overwhelming, as it would include not only the narrator's spiral into madness but also the other character's experiences. I feel that this would have made the story much harder to digest.

# data[].attributes.body
This would create a positive affect. It would give the readers a greater understanding, because the story would've included the other characters thoughts and feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
The author shows it through dialogue with other characters. The main character gives many details about how the other characters react to her.

# data[].attributes.body
They show the feelings of the other characters with their actions. For example, Jennie was a part time caretaker of the narrator so we know she probably cared for her.

# data[].attributes.body
She gives good dialogue and details to help the reader understand the other characters without fully being in there thoughts

# data[].attributes.body
she describes their interactions with her in detail herself- nonverbal ques and such being interpreted through her point of view. we know her husband loves her due to the way she describes his actions

# data[].attributes.body
He hints at what he wants us to know. The author hints at the readers by showing the tone and actions of the character.

# data[].attributes.body
The author shows the feelings of other characters by having the narrator describe their actions and quoting their dialogue.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it would be worse because even though there were only a few characters, I think it would have made the reader not be fully attentive to the wife and what's going on with her and her issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Via dialogue and actions. They also give what the narrator thinks other characters feel.

# data[].attributes.body
The author shows the feelings of others through the dialogue of the main character. She notes how people's tones sound and how they feel.

# data[].attributes.body
We would have not only gotten the thoughts of the woman but also of the husband. There also wouldn't be a deeper understanding of what the woman is going through in the story.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it have been both better and worse because we would be able to understand how the husband though his actions through but we would not be able to understand the main characters true feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
The story would have more details and the readers would know everyone's pov.

# data[].attributes.body
By hinting at their actions and expressions as seen by the narrator. This helps to interpret what the other characters are thinking and or why are they are doing what they're doing.

# data[].attributes.body
It would have made it better. it would have been able to have all the ideas, thoughts, and feelings in the story and how they felt while trying to help

# data[].attributes.body
The author can still show the thoughts and feelings of a secondary character through dialogue and interactions the character has with the main character.

# data[].attributes.body
There would be less depth in how the wallpaper affected the wife. It would show the difference in how the wife perceived things versus the reality of the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
The author shows the feelings of the other characters by saying something they might have thought. For example, in the story, the husband thought he was helping his wife and felt happy and proud doing so.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel as if it would've been worse. Despite the challenge of being limited to one person's thoughts, it also allows us to become immersed. This immersion helps us develop the main character's personality.

# data[].attributes.body
The story would've given us the thoughts and feelings of the other characters so we could have a better idea how they feel about the narrator.

# data[].attributes.body
It would allow for a better understanding of John and Jennie's points of view and help to see what they were doing and why.

# data[].attributes.body
It would include everyone's thoughts and feelings. It would make it better by describing how the husband felt throughout the time she was stuck in the house.

# data[].attributes.body
we probably wouldn't have gotten such a focus on the woman's perspective - rather it would be split between the other characters thoughts and actions

that would have been a detriment because then the story's no longer about how she's personally being affected by her confinement

# data[].attributes.body
The author shows the feelings of the other characters by their dialogue and their actions.

# data[].attributes.body
Answer answer answer