# data[].attributes.body
The open ended questions in the post surveys have been most helpful for me in terms of getting concrete feedback to implement for future program cycles.. I think shortening the surveys and giving Nashers concrete prompts (for open ended questions) could help gives us more qualitative data to work with.

# data[].attributes.body
Did this program challenge you in any way? Explain.

# data[].attributes.body
What have you learned from your time at SNLP (select all that apply)

# data[].attributes.body
Likert Scale - Has your perception of who can be/is a leader changed ?

# data[].attributes.body
Has your leadership grown from this program? How so?

# data[].attributes.body
What attracted you to this SNLP program? Did completing this program change this for you? How so?

# data[].attributes.body
The data hasn't been helpful because the survey questions don't necessarily speak to the impact of the program. The length of the survey + also the continuous likert scales makes Nashers just click agree, agree, agree - which doesn't make the survey meaningful since Nashers finish it in about 2 minutes and don't usually comment on the reason why they've given these ratings. We need to use survey methodology

# data[].attributes.body
To have data to show our funders, not to address or measure the impact of programs. Every year the % of nashers who believe they're leaders are very low - which is not the high percentile we advertise

# data[].attributes.body
Sometime when i look at Qualtircs for final reporting i feel very overwhelmed with the amount to questions there are but it helpful to see it laid out in one place. I think if I more time we could use the data in a more strategic way to better plan trips, lessons, guest speakers, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
is there a lesson that touched you deeply/ leared a lot from? Describe what you learned and how it made you feel.

# data[].attributes.body
See how nashers interact/ know about the world before engaging in SNLP programing and after