# data[].attributes.body
5

# data[].attributes.headline
Very happy to be there, thanks for Patience of all kind. :)

# data[].attributes.subject
Very happy to be there, thanks for Patience of all kind. :)

# data[].attributes.body
I liked and understood the first courses (up until if and when loops), but then it was to much for me. I could not do the later homeworks, even when investing up to 2 hours into it. So i got frustrated and lost my drive to do the seminar.

# data[].attributes.body
I now understand the basic functionality of coding in R.

# data[].attributes.body
Vivi did the best she could do to help us learn how to code. She was always open for any questions and very enthusiastic.

# data[].attributes.body
I prefer trying it on my own first and asking when i need help, rather then following along with every step.

# data[].attributes.body
The seminar got to hard too fast. We should have spent much more time on learning and working with the basic functionalities.

# data[].attributes.body
In the later lessons, there some important steps missing in the pdf, which made it impossible for me to finish some exercises. But maybe i was just not smart enough to figure it out on my own...

# data[].attributes.body
I agree, i liked the idea of class and home exercises.

# data[].attributes.body
Good, but too hard for me.

# data[].attributes.body
Im a bit sorry about dropping out, but i was missing a bigger picture on why we should learn all this stuff. Maybe it would have helped to set a goal, following a real task we might encounter in science.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked the course because it was challenging but at the same time rewarding.
The classes got harder over time and I realised that I would not have been able to do the later exercises on my own.

# data[].attributes.body
I definitely learned useful knowledge and skills in this course - I think I know have an idea of basic programming.

# data[].attributes.body
Viviana did her best to teach us in R. She was always friendly, helpful and sympathetic.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked that Viviana commented on the steps she did in the exercises - this helped me a lot.
It became harder for me, when we had to to several steps in one code

# data[].attributes.body
Thanks Viviana for your staying power in explaining every step I did not understand. You did all your best!

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't stuck around till the end, but from what I rembered, it was on a good level - not to challenging but also not so easy that it became boring.
The only part I found very dull, was in the Seminar, when the teacher just showed/ typed in what to do and we had to repeat it. A more interactive approach might have been more suited to catch my interest for a longer time.

# data[].attributes.body
I re-learned a lot about a R in general.
Sadly the operations we used R for, seemed to be only really usefull to students of physical geography, while the human geography side (-where I come from -) was neglected.
This led to me abbonding the cause after while, because it felt, as if there was nothing usefull to learn for me specificly.

# data[].attributes.body
The teacher did a great job, even though she didn't manage to keep me interested throughout the whole Semester. This was not because of her teachings skills but for the topics of the Seminar, which felt as if they were of no use to me.

# data[].attributes.body
Mostly yes.

# data[].attributes.body
The part I participated in, was well structered. I just think that the teacher sometimes focused too much on one specific question or problem of just one student.

# data[].attributes.body
I found the provided materials usefull.

# data[].attributes.body
Sometimes it was impossible to finish them, because I failed somewhere at the start and this did make it hard to follow in the Seminar.
Provided solutions might have helped here.

# data[].attributes.body
I think its good, BUT only for people, which are on the physical geography side.