# data[].attributes.body
I know that gun control is an issue because there have been a lot of mass shootings, especially recently because there isn't a lot of regulation on who can get a gun.

# data[].attributes.body
What I find interesting is that this problem became more widely known after the Columbine shooting in 1999, so it's been 24 years and the number of school shootings have only increased. I'm not sure why the government hasn't really done anything about it.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is essentially saying that nobody under the age of 21 should be able to buy a gun. The author points out that emotional maturity in teenagers varies and split second decisions can end a life, especially when a gun is involved. The author also points out that data from the FBI reveals that from 2000 to 2019, more than half of the perpetrators of shooting incidents were under 18.
I think that it is a useful source in the way that it used facts (FBI data) and the information is reliable. However, it is definitely biased and you can tell by the way that the author states their stance on this many times (nobody under 21 should be able to purchase a gun).
This source will help me with my final product because I can use some of the points that were made in it to raise concern over this topic.

# data[].attributes.body
The point of this article is to show that by January 24th of 2023, the number of people that have died from gun violence is higher than the number of days that have passed since the year started. The article exists to raise concern over this.
I think that it is a useful source as it has quotes from survivors of mass shootings that describe what it was like to be in that situation, and that can be used to gain empathy from the audience. The source, however, is obviously biased because the people that the quotes are from (politicians, survivors of shootings) make their opinion that we need more gun laws clear.
This article fits into my research because it gives me quotes from first hand witnesses and survivors of shootings, which I can use.

# data[].attributes.body
The article essentially says that California's gun laws, while they haven't completely ended gun violence there, have been helpful in lessening it. California the seventh lowest gun related deaths in the country. Also, California is more progressive than other states when it comes to advocating for stricter gun laws. In California, "semiautomatic guns with certain technical features, such as a flash suppressor" are banned. It also limits the amount of bullets a gun can hold to ten.
This is a useful source because it gives an idea of what stricter gun laws could do if implemented. The source seems to be objective because it just states facts and history about California's gun laws. The goal of the source is to inform readers about the gun laws in California.
This fits into my research because while the other sources I used mentioned the problem with gun violence, this one offers an idea for a solution. It helps to get more people to care because it shows how much these laws have helped.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
About Gale In Context: Global Issues Analyze important global issues and events through topic overviews, international viewpoints, news, and multimedia content. Don't know how to login? Depending on this location's preferences, the log-in process could include your library card number, a student or user ID, or another provided password.

# data[].attributes.body
If people continue to overlook the issue of gun violence, it will only continue to become more normalized and looked at as something that just happens. There was a solution presented in my source, which was the one about California's gun laws. It talked about the gun laws in California, which could help the country if they are implemented nationwide. I think that is the best solution because there isn't much else that can be done about it.