# data[].attributes.body
Wikipedia is more credible than we may think; there are many efforts that are taken to keep the website accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
-Wikipedia is a controversial platform among people when it comes to its credibility

-Wikipedia takes detailed measures to keep its platform accurate and up to date

-Wikipedia is evolving just like the rest of the world; we have to accept change

# data[].attributes.body
Disputes

Arbitrators

Governing force

Array of forces

Human-derived resource

# data[].attributes.body
- "It's high time people stop kvetching about Wikipedia, which has long been the best encyclopedia available in English, and started figuring out what it portends instead" ( Bustillos 1)

-"Prof. Goldhagen's page has been revised 607 times since its first publication in 2004" (Bustillos 4)

- "'The ownership of an idea' was made inevitable by the invention of printing; it is this era that we are outgrowing, as McLuhan foresaw" (Bustillos 5)

# data[].attributes.body
Artificial Intelligence and the internet are strippingg authenticity away from original publishers and websites.

# data[].attributes.body
-The author is upset that platforms like Wikipedia have been brought onto a pedestal

- Highlights a study that compared Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica, and the topic of research gave Wikipedia the upper hand

-Mentions other platforms similar to Wikipedia that have taken advantage of this "pedestal", to further bury authenticity

# data[].attributes.body
Meta

Artificial Intelligence

hive mind

personality

Centrality

Collective

# data[].attributes.body
- "A desirable text is more than a collection of accurate references. It is also an expression of personality" (Lanier 4)

-"The reason the collective can be valuable is precisely that its peaks of intelligence and stupidity are not the same as the ones usually displayed by the individual. Both kinds of intelligence are essential" (Lanier 8)

-"The results were a toss up. While there is a lingering debate about the validity of the study. The items selected for the comparison were just the sort that Wikipedia would do well on: Science topics that the collective at large doesn't care much about. "Kinetic isotope effect" or "Vesalius, Andreas" are examples of topics that make the Britannica hard to maintain, because it takes work to find the right authors to research and review a multitude of diverse topics. But they are perfect for the Wikipedia" (Lanier 3).

# data[].attributes.body
The internet has taken over and put hard working business owners in the shadows.

# data[].attributes.body
-Internet has caused people to turn away from professionals and look to the internet instead

-Business owners are losing their jobs due to the internet

-People can resort to the internet for easier and faster access of material to support their jobs

-Internet can take advantage of people to make profit

# data[].attributes.body
Internet age

stock industry

Standards and practices

Artificial Intelligence

Crowdsourcing networks

# data[].attributes.body
-"All these companies grew up in the internet age and were designed to take advantage of the networked world" (Howe 2)

-"In 2000, Harmel made roughly $69,000 from a portfolio of 100 stock photographs, a tidy addition to what he earned from commissioned work. Last year his stock business generated less money – $59,000 – from more than 1,000 photos. That’s quite a bit more work for less money" (Howe 2)

-"A few companies, however, are already taking full advantage of the Turkers" (Howe 5)

-"Al Gore’s Current TV is placing the most faith in the model: More than 30 percent of its programming consists of material submitted by viewers" (Howe 2)

# data[].attributes.body
-All based on internet platforms

- Lanier and Bustillos reference the same Nature study

-All mention the change in the world and people over the years

# data[].attributes.body
-Articles do not share similar views; Bustillos gives credit to Wikipedia while Lanier dislikes platforms like Wikipedia