# data[].attributes.headline
(SPED) Obstacle: Making sure Sped students are included in small groups in addition to getting pulled for Resource.

# data[].attributes.subject
(SPED) Obstacle: Making sure Sped students are included in small groups in addition to getting pulled for Resource.

# data[].attributes.body
Small group-  We planned our own outside of planning. I don't know who and how my teammates planned theirs

# data[].attributes.headline
(SPED)  Obstacle/Strength: Implementing accommodations in gen ed so students are successful.  

# data[].attributes.subject
(SPED)  Obstacle/Strength: Implementing accommodations in gen ed so students are successful.  

# data[].attributes.headline
(SPED) Obstacle: With our schedule how do we make time to collaborate with grade levels/team members?

# data[].attributes.subject
(SPED) Obstacle: With our schedule how do we make time to collaborate with grade levels/team members?

# data[].attributes.body
effective= we all shared ideas
not effective= not  very purposeful- we ran out of time a lot because we used to get side tracked

# data[].attributes.body
Effective = We all get on the same page and are able to plan for Monday big groups and are able to give suggestions for other specials.
Obstacle= Our lessons are all different and feel like sometimes we could be more productive planning our individual subject

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: We always left our meeting with our lessons planned and materials.
We also had math centers materials.
We planned tutoring groups.
Weakness
We did not talk about a more targeted instruction during small groups for different levels.

# data[].attributes.headline
(SPED) Obstacle: How do we support 5th grade  curriculum (or other grades) for a student who is cognitively on a lower grade level? 

# data[].attributes.subject
(SPED) Obstacle: How do we support 5th grade  curriculum (or other grades) for a student who is cognitively on a lower grade level? 

# data[].attributes.body
Obstacles: Having some of our team members not prepared-->not knowing the TEK we are about to plan.
Effective: We were able to look at our curriculum map and use what worked and what didn't.
Small group: I planned with Banuelos and we flexed group for small group instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths: Mayra and I talked all day everyday- and we completed each other- so we'd switch off subjects to plan or complete a part that wasn't done yet. Sandra made us more disciplined and purposeful :)
Obstacles: We planned whole group well, and came prepared but small group wasn't always discussed and we were disjointed. I'd love for more focused time on details for small group in reading and conferencing in writing and discussion of progress monitoring.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths:
*Knowledge of content areas

Obstacles:
*Lack of strength in an area,  or new to grade or first year teaching
*Venting sessions instead of planning
*Not sharing resources
*Building trust and capacity
Smal Group:
ability grouping
transference:

# data[].attributes.body
Effective= I felt that everyone participated and everyone stayed focused on the planning
Not effective= It was never really "purposeful"- we knew what we wanted to plan, but we always ran out of time because we spent a lot of the time looking up ideas instead of actually bringing up ideas and choosing which one was best/ building off each other's ideas. We also didn't really reference our Lead4ward documents/ map as much as we should've
Small group instruction= towards STAAR we kind of planned the same thing, but day to day small group instruction we did individually.
We did NOT bring student samples in hardly ever. I would maybe reference past weeks assignments or the DA's when we met, but we never actually brought student work into our planning.
A lot of the time the plans didn't always follow EXACTLY what we did in the classroom, because I usually tweaked what didn't work and just did things off the cuff.