# data[].attributes.body
1. Me and me group first thought about how can we help them with what we already have and is useful we had money, resources,space and facilities and we realized we can use those things to help the refugees.

2. After researching about what the refugees needed and how we can help them our answer was YES. When my group had conflit we thought about what we can do to solve and how we can put our ideas together and if the issues is small little thins we have confidence in our belief and show our option and be calm when we talk

3. After hearing some more research/opinions we started to think of things we can supply for them like clothes, aid, jobs ,etc. and how it can effect the other countries and solutions for conflict.

4. Then we started to dig deeper into the issues of the refugees in some countries and what we can do to maintain peace and other things.

# data[].attributes.body
The decision making process in our group:
1. Our group thought about what we should agree to and what should we say. If we have one person in our group that disagree we listen to the most voted idea in our group.
2. We decided to say no to refugees and gave a speech about it.
3. After we finished the group of Syria persuaded us to move to accept refugees and they succeed.
4. We started making laws with our allies.
5. Our laws then needs to get voted and our law passed the voting.

# data[].attributes.body
The process of our decision making was:
1. First my group thought we should not accept refugees only but then we needed more explanation about the task and we now chose yes for we shouldn't accept refugees and persuade other countries to accept our refugees.
2. After that we needed to find reasons that the refugees needed to migrate to other better developed countries and then we needed to research for more detail for our reasons and use reliable websites for our research.
3. Then we needed to list down our results from our research findings and also we needed to make summaries and inferences of our research findings.
4. Then we typed our paragraphs from our research findings with the summaries and inferences with persuasive techniques and bias words.
5. After that in the MUN we needed to support our reasons with persuasive techniques and bias so that other countries can be persuaded to accept our refugees and help educate and medicate our refugees for support from a developed country.

# data[].attributes.body
The process in the group decision making.
1.Our group first thought about our country and we decided that we should say no because of our country.
2.We then thought about the reasons why which were related to resources and environment.
3. After we wrote down all the reasons we confirmed that we were doing no.
4. We made summaries, logical and critical inferences and then wrote them down on our position paper.
5. In the MUN, we supported our reasons and made a large part of our resolution.
6.Then, someone from the Syrian group convinced and persuaded us to say yes in the last parts of the MUN. We helped in the last part in their resolution by checking if it was ok and changing little parts of the resolution.
7.During the for and against speeches, my group members had conflict as we had different opinions. At first we fought, but then we let one of our group member have his way when we had the same opinion.
8. We then sent an amendment to the Syrian group when noticing problems in their resolution about money when remembering that our country, Ghana was still a poor country.

# data[].attributes.body
Our groups decision making process was:

1. My group think about if we agree or disagree to let/to accept refugees come to our country.

2. My group ended up saying that we Do Not accept refugees come to our country.

3. We wrote the reasons why we Do Not let refugees come to our country, then we get them checked.

4. From the reasons, we each chose one topic that we wanted to do. Nadine did Medical, Lakeisya did Conflicts and I did Resources.

5. We made our speech with all our reasons. We also had to include the MLA style of the sources we used, the reflection of why we chose those source and how the source helped me.

6. I printed 2 copies, one for grading and one for me.

7. I added notes on my copy so when I do my speech I don't follow what is on the paper and I will be more detailed.

8. When I do the speech I also say what I know about the speech and finally, I did the speech without looking.

# data[].attributes.body
The process for the group decision making:
1. First the group discussed about the decision and discussed about our country and we thought of what are the bad things that could happen if we let refugees in our country and thought some of the good things that can happen
2. Once we finished the discussion we decided to say no to refugees coming to countries because of the reasons we saw like conflict, money, and medicals
3. Then we researched about all our reasons and listed all the facts we researched about our headings
4. Then we finally typed up all our paragraphs from our research that we did and added some persuasive techniques to our text
5. After all that process in the MUN we gave our speeches in front of all the delegates in why we said no to the refugees
6. During the against speeches we had some conflicts with the delegate of Syria because they didnt agree about the kidnappers refugees fact

# data[].attributes.body
1. My group and I, were thinking about the safety of our country if we accept refugees, like the war and conflict, climate change and more. We also  thought about the refugees.

2. After that, we came up with an answer, how we came up the answer is just telling each other if we said yes or no. Then we came up with an answer, and it was NO!

3. Then, after we came up with the answer we explained the problems why in the paper, when we were finished with that we gave it to Mr. Matthew to have his permission to start on the research

# data[].attributes.body
The process of China's group decision making is:

1. First my group agree's that there should be refugee's in our country but i'm not that sure because the change of a president election. Then I told my group to research first before all of us agree. Then we contact each other that we choose not to have refugee's in China.

2. The next day me and my group is trying to make a choice who will pick Economy, Culture, Ideology, Security & Defence , Technology and tourism. I choose Tourism and Economy, Jamie choose ideology and technology and Robin choose security & defence and culture.

3. Then I research about China's economy and tourism. Then when it's pak Matthew's lesson pak Matthew told us to do a collecting research 4 square about China's tourism and economy facts. Maximum 3-4 facts. After we submit it we have another homework about our MUN organising research 4 squares with bias and persuasive technique about China's economy and tourism. Then the next day again we have another homework but it's the last time to do the 4 square. We need to mix the organising 4 square to a paragraph.

4.

# data[].attributes.body
The process of our group decisions making is:

1. We were thinking about the refugees safety. We were thinking if the refugee enter a country that has war, conflict, diseases, lack of education, poverty, inequality, and unemployment, the refugee wouldn't get a good future so we said not all refugee are forced to have refugees.

2. After we listed the reason of why we shouldn't force countries to have refugees we concluded we would choose no.

3. We listed the reasons and we divided the reason to my group members so they could collecting research for the reason. After we did that the teacher told us we were wrong because we thought why refugees should not go to our country but we were suppose to tell how refugees negatively affected the country.

4. After we researched of how the refugees negatively affected the country we still decided no becuase  of how the refugees have affected the other countries negatively.

5. We had some conflicts with Syria, Maldives, and U.S.A and we solved some of the problems by giving them note forms and we just spiked with them.

# data[].attributes.body
Process of my decision:
1. We had to discuss between our group members first we thought we shouldn't accept but pak Matthew help us and we change our mind and know we think refugee should be accepted.
2. Then we research about the reason why refugee should be accepted to all countries
3. We had to use persuasive technics and bias words to make other countries that do not accept refugees to think twice.
For extra information:
our conflict was when we had to rearrange who is going to present first and also choosing our decision I solve it by partcipating first and the other problem I solve it by giving reasons for my group to work with.

# data[].attributes.body
The Yemen group process decision was:
1. First we decided that all of the Yemen group member should agreed on letting refugee go to our country, and give an explanation and coming up with an idea of how we can help them.
2. Then we write an explanation for the MUN speech, then we print for the MUN for forcing us to accept.
3. We print 2 copies 1 for grading and 1 for the speech and try to convince other country to accept refugee people and kid.

# data[].attributes.body
Our decision making process was :
1. First off my group didn't accept refugees because we thought we can only choose not to accept or just accept, so we went to pak Matthew for more information on the decision making.
2. Second, pak Matthew helped us on our decision making, by talking about different decisions that we can pick, so we chose the decision to accept refugees to leave Afghanistan for a better life.
3. Third, we came up with decisions and we found different ones.
4. We had a conflict about not accepting decisions that some of us made.
5. One of our problems were rearranging our turns for presenting.

# data[].attributes.body
The procedure's of our group's decision-making.
1. First, we decided to say No to refugees coming into our country.
2. Then, we had to decide which role's we will have to research.
3. After, that we had to decide who was first,second and third speaker.
4. Later, we Dio didn't bring his script so he had to do it tomorrow.

# data[].attributes.body
The process of Maldives group decision:
1. First, before the MUN, we thought to not accept the refugees as our nation has some limited resources economically.
2. Then we realized that our "starter" country is supposed to be a country that has current or future refugees, so we changed our side and thinking about the refugees.
3. We made critical inferences and summaries related to our decision which was yes, and it made me and my partner agree to our decision.
4. As in our 4 squares, the statements were really good, we placed the good parts to our position papers.
5. At the end of the 1st day of the MUN, we did not change our decision making as there were much more groups that had better persuasive speeches related to our decision or yes. Which means that also in the second day of MUN, we were 100% for our decision.

# data[].attributes.body
The Process of our Decision Making was:
1. We agreed that we won' t take in refugees because of terrorist.
2. Then we made the collecting research about it.
3. Then we made the organizing research about it.
4. Then we made a speech about it.

# data[].attributes.body
The proses for the group decision making:
1. First, we thought about my country and think about the things we have, we don't have, the things we have to improve, the things we need to get rid of and think if we add so much more people in the country will it make more problems or make our country better and could be better than most of the other countries, once we are done we decided if we should let refugees and we say NO to refugees.
2. We wrote all the facts/reasons why we chose that topic and explain the small details, then we made the 4-square about the topics we chose.
3. We combine all the research that we did and made it into one paragraph for ourselfs, we checked it over and over again and made it into our position paper.

# data[].attributes.body
The progress of our decision making was:

1. My group first try to think first how can we help because Saudi Arabia is a developed country so we could help refugees and put refugees shoes and make a good decisions.

2.Then we research and get good facts and we make a good summary and we got our anwers yes.

3. After that we got to think what are we going to provide them with like clothes and more.

4.We started to put refugees shoes and we got to learn about refugees and then how to keep peace and with that we got to persuate people .

Conflict:
The conflicts we got is that we did not agree in some things and then one people wanted to talk and other not, so we solve it by trying to find Ideas and then see if all of the member agree on it and if not research.

# data[].attributes.body
Yemen process decision is:
1. First one of the group member diss agree that refugee can  access or stay in yemen.

2.  We have to make a position paper for the MUN

3. .  We have to write about why do we accept the refugees to access or to stay in the country yemen.

# data[].attributes.body
1.We need to decide if weaccept refugee in cuntries

# data[].attributes.body
Process of our decision making:
1. Firstly my group thought about, wether we should accept refugees into every country or not and persuade others about our groups opinion.

2. After that we need to think of persuasive reasons what our opinion on our decisions are if we actually let refugees into each and every country, and research about our reasons because we needed supporting facts to follow up with our opinions.

3. After researching for more detail we listed down our opinions and jot down our research findings.

4. Then collected all of our opinions and supporting facts and used the four square to help us get better understanding of our reasoning and to explain what are the reasons of what you think is true and reasonably correct.

5. Using our second four square we wrote inferences and summaries to completely understand on what our reasons are and state our opinions.

6. After completely understanding what we're writing about we as a group thought about during planning to create and make our speeches and paragraphs.

7. Finally we made our final speeches to state if you accept refugees or not and tried to persuade others why our opinion/s is more convenient for refugees.

Conflicts with other nations:

Maldives :
We passed a note form statement to Maldives, Maldives didn't accept our note and throw it down to the ground like Guatemala's statement was useless and un-convenient. After not accepting our note, Maldives didn't care and was disrespectful and scrunched the note.

United States of America:
USA didn't understand our question (note form) and decided to answer back in slang such as ; WDYM, IDK, WUT, and Guatemala thought it was unformal.

Syria:
Guatemala asked Syria a detailed question and the answered back with a short sentence with no detail and using very general wording and information.

# data[].attributes.body
1. At the very beginning, we discussed our options and decided we would pick Maldives as our environmentally challenged country.
2. Then, we split the responsibility of our 6 topics. I chose Economy, Culture and Defense&Security, while Robi chose Ideology, Tourism and Education&Technology.
3. Next, we both shared our facts and researched about our subjects. We helped each other with the Four-Squares and paragraphs.
4. After that, we made a presentation about our country using the paragraphs and pictures. We showed it to the class.
5. When we had enough information, we chose our side. At first, we agreed that we were going to say no to accepting refugees.
6. We used collecting and organizing 4-squares to plan our position papers. We used bias and persuasive techniques.
7. Finally, we presented them, but, unfortunately, I had a different side from Robi. However, I was still able to participate in the debate for a resolution.