# data[].attributes.body
Main difference was that the three did not answer the question at all and was poorly written in terms of sentence structure and grammar, whereas the five did answer the question, however superficially and with limited analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
Main difference was that the seven had just slightly less connection in their analysis to the overall point of the sister however since their claims were backed up using evidence it remained effective, whereas the nine used the connection to the sister to show a more plausible reading of the text with higher vocabulary and slightly better syntax.

# data[].attributes.body
In essay 3 there was very little analysis as they were merely giving a summary of the story as in the 5 essay analysis was underdeveloped but still consisted of more analysis than the 3 essay.

# data[].attributes.body
In essay 7 the analysis was less perceptive than essay 9 as the 9 essay had analysis that showed the irony within the dialogue.

# data[].attributes.body
My predicted score is a four because I used superficial analysis, restated the question in the formation of my thesis, and the structure of my essay followed the 3-5 categories.

# data[].attributes.headline
The 3 essay was, for lack of a better term, all over the place whilst explaining the interactions between complying to social norms and giving into fierce human nature, while the 5 essay does so in a much more clear fashion, stating the interactions in a manner in which the reader can easily follow the points and evidence of each.

# data[].attributes.subject
The 3 essay was, for lack of a better term, all over the place whilst explaining the interactions between complying to social norms and giving into fierce human nature, while the 5 essay does so in a much more clear fashion, stating the interactions in a manner in which the reader can easily follow the points and evidence of each.

# data[].attributes.body
A 4 because analysis was present but there was only a little amount of it. I addressed social propriety but only in a sentence or so.

# data[].attributes.body
The 3 essay had no analysis or or clear claims whereas the 5 essay put in more effort it had an okay analysis of the characters and a clear claim

# data[].attributes.headline
While the 7 essay superbly addresses the question in an advanced format, analyzing the prompt in an excellent way and properly using short quotes as evidence, the 9 essay does so in a way that is "above and beyond", furthering the explanation and analysis past satisfactory, as well as using advanced vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.subject
While the 7 essay superbly addresses the question in an advanced format, analyzing the prompt in an excellent way and properly using short quotes as evidence, the 9 essay does so in a way that is "above and beyond", furthering the explanation and analysis past satisfactory, as well as using advanced vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.headline
While the 3 has adequate analysis of the passage it is often irrelevant and not very extensive at all, and it often resembles a summary the 5 stays on topic and fully answers the prompt even if it is not done in the best way

# data[].attributes.subject
While the 3 has adequate analysis of the passage it is often irrelevant and not very extensive at all, and it often resembles a summary the 5 stays on topic and fully answers the prompt even if it is not done in the best way

# data[].attributes.body
The main difference between the 7&9 essay was that the analysis of 7 was adequate whereas 9 was more in depth

# data[].attributes.body
The main difference between the two is that the 5 essay at the very least had a clear claim and addressed it at various points throughout the passage while the 3 essay had no such claim and thus the claims in the rest of the essay fall short of being persuasive and convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
I was confused about the passage and I didn't support my claim with proper analysis,

# data[].attributes.headline
I think I got a 4 because, although I always think giving my best on an essay would yield a high score, I usually miss a detail in the prompt or essay, resulting in a much lower score than I anticipated.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think I got a 4 because, although I always think giving my best on an essay would yield a high score, I usually miss a detail in the prompt or essay, resulting in a much lower score than I anticipated.

# data[].attributes.body
The biggest difference between the 7 and 9 essays is the much better and more sophisticated use of diction and overall writing in the 9 essay and the much more profound and interesting analysis and claims made in the 9 essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Most likely a 4 because the ideas could've been made clearer and I didn't use many techniques to support my claims.

# data[].attributes.headline
My predicted score is a 4 because my essay was meh, it could've stayed on topic better than it did. 

# data[].attributes.subject
My predicted score is a 4 because my essay was meh, it could've stayed on topic better than it did. 

# data[].attributes.headline
The 7 does everything that is asked with great completion and very extensively but the 9 goes above and beyond in everything so things like style  actually affect this category. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The 7 does everything that is asked with great completion and very extensively but the 9 goes above and beyond in everything so things like style  actually affect this category. 

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 3 had no claims and didn't answer the prompt, mostly summary, and poor diction. Essay 5 answered the prompt, decent claims, better diction and analysis, but analysis is not very in-depth

# data[].attributes.body
The 3 essay's lack analysis and is more of a summary whereas the 5 addresses the prompt and has analysis

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 7 was well-formulated, good diction, and analysis is in-depth. Essay 9 stood out, very high diction, deep-analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't finish my essay, because I was in a time crunch and I also wasn't connecting with the passage. I did a lot of summaring.