# data[].attributes.body
-Subsidies can have negative impacts in farms, because the farmers use a lot of fertilizers
-Subsidies are good for the economy
-Subsidies create a stable farming system

# data[].attributes.body
- Subsidies are employed to change behaviour and solve problems
- They reduce incentives for producers to boost efficiency and shift their focus from crops to farming subsidies
- In addition to that, subsidies lead producers to overuse fertilisers which can result in negative environmental impacts

# data[].attributes.body
-I feel that a growing agriculture around the world is good because it shows development in other places then ours.
-Subsides can lead to many things like trade, more income for lower classes and more
-Subsides are more good than bad because the problems it cause are problems we as individuals can have an affect on.

# data[].attributes.body
- Subsides allow for farmers to be able to have more of a consistant income whether their crops fail or not
- However, subsides are also quite expensive and can harm the environment due to having too many pesticides.
- One benefit of subsidies is that it allows the general economy of the country to grow as cheaper food is available.

# data[].attributes.body
-subsidies help to create a more stable and higher-producing environment for farmers but over time farmers can become dependent on these subsides and this would decrease production.
-Farmers should be given to farmers, but they should be given in moderation and in a different way.

# data[].attributes.body
-subsidries are not aways efecient and can hurt the enviroment and dont leave farmers with being able to change
-but they can also be good by regualting economy so no big sudden changes so it can make farming more stable
-subsideis can also force farmers to compete which makes better products

# data[].attributes.body
-Suicide rates for Indian farmers are increasing because of increasing debt.
-The reasons for increasing debt are the rising of costs of production and the falling prices of farm commodities.
-trade liberalization and corporate globalization

# data[].attributes.headline
Cherry's Comments (Seeds of Suicide to Seeds of Hope)

# data[].attributes.subject
Cherry's Comments (Seeds of Suicide to Seeds of Hope)

# data[].attributes.body
- Suicides of Indian farmers began when India was required to open up its seed sector to global corporations
- The corporations are bad for Indian farmers because they have to buy new seeds every season at a higher price since the new GMO seeds are non-renewable.
- To prevent a suicide economy, Navdanya has started a Seeds of Hope campaign, which is a shift from non-renewable GMO seeds, chemical farming, and unfair trade.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Global subsidies lead producers to overuse pesticides which lead to many negative impacts.
2. Farm subsidies prevent the possibility of price spikes and other negative effects. It also allows farmers to compete in the market.
3. Subsidies can increase environmental pollution.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Subsides create a stable farming system
2.Agricultural subsides cost taxpayers 20 billions a year
3. Most farmers make more than the average taxpayer

# data[].attributes.body
= Subsidies given to farmers shouldn't be too expensive, as they will hurt the average taxpayer

# data[].attributes.body
- The U.S. government has been protecting farmers against unpredictable hardships such as bad weather since the 1930s, when the drought and the Great Depression devastated the nation's agriculture industry.
- While the farmer claims to benefit from farm subsidies, economists attribute the benefits to land owners.
- It appears that landlords do receive some of the subsidy benefits through higher rental rates, but they receive far less than economists would have expected.

# data[].attributes.body
-the seed monopoly by mosanto is putting Indian farmers in even farther dept
-on top of that, the GMO seeds are made so tat they dot reproduce, so the farmers ave to get new seeds every crop
-the seeds also cost more, putting farmers in a bad situation

# data[].attributes.body
1. Subsidies help farmers but they can end up depending on them, which is bad
2. Subsides shouldn't be really expensive and they cost the taxpayers a lot of money
3. Farmers usually make more than the average person and don't need money from the government.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Global subsides causes producers to overuse the fertilizer and pesticide causing the soil to be warm and plants can't be plants on that soil in the future
2.  Farmers that receives subsides are more likely to be able to produce more food and can have a more stable suppy of food with help from the money given to them.

# data[].attributes.body
Many developing nations opposed agricultural subsidies in the US

# data[].attributes.body
- I believe that subsidies should be given to farmers but they should be limited because taxpayers are basically paying farmers extra money they most likely don't need
- subsidies started during the Great Depression and helped farmers overcome not being able to pay for their crops
- farmers mostly have a good income and don't always need the money from the gov't; they make more than the average US taxpayer