# data[].attributes.body
God of the gaps would then be hard to explain

# data[].attributes.body
I remember intelligent design from family radio.

# data[].attributes.body
It is somewhat similar to god of the gaps i can see the parallels there

# data[].attributes.body
Not really clear what they belive in

# data[].attributes.body
What is considered the natural world? Is it real?

# data[].attributes.body
god of the gaps to explain nature stuff that they think is amazing

# data[].attributes.body
I see god in this blade of grass

# data[].attributes.body
It is extremely introspective and arbitrary in discovering answers.

# data[].attributes.body
It may be too limited because it doesn’t account for scriptural truths.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the issue is that it discards falsifiability by saying that God= science. Science is no longer falsfiable

# data[].attributes.body
Nothing. Makes sense.

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of being a benevolent creator, God becomes more of a scientific explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that people can lose sight quickly about what is what

# data[].attributes.body
I dont know you tell me

# data[].attributes.body
How do you know that God is in the natural world

# data[].attributes.body
I think that an issue could be the fact that it is too invested in the physical world.

# data[].attributes.body
People could argue against it by saying that science is perfect and that’s what causes perfection in the world