# data[].attributes.body
Delilaha, Hailey

# data[].attributes.body
scroll down to "Self-monitoring"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Location: KU via Zoom
Information: See flyer below
Registration: Follow links in flyer

ACTIVE SUPERVISION (POSTED March 30, 2017)

Active supervision can be used as a low-intensity, teacher-delivered strategy to support students meeting behavior by frequently and proactively monitoring students during specific settings or times. Active supervision is defined as the use of "Specific and overt behaviors (scanning, escorting, interacting) designed to prevent problem behavior and promote rule-following behavior" (Colvin, Sugai, Good, & Lee, 1997, p. 346). Its effectiveness is increased with the use of precorrections (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2005). Active supervision incorporates distinct elements (De Pry & Sugai, 2002; Haydon & Scott, 2008): established expectations, frequent scanning of context, positive interactions (verbal and nonverbal precorrections and prompts), reinforcement of desired behavior, and when necessary, correction to help success. Download all documents for Active Supervision, or download individual items:

BEHAVIOR CONTRACTS (POSTED DECEMBER 15, 2015)

Behavioral Contracts Behavior contracts, or contingency contracts, are written agreements between at least two individuals in which one or both agree upon certain behaviors. The contract document specifies an agreed-upon cause and effect between the completion of a behavior and the earning of a reinforcer. Most behavior contracts include three components: the behavior, the reinforcer, and the reporting sheet. There are many types of behavior contracts that can lead to positive behavioral change. Contracts can support behaviors students would like to change on their own, as well as agreements between teacher, student, and parent where each party agrees upon a certain individual behavioral goal. In these materials, you will learn about behavior contracts, how they are effective, the research supporting their use, benefits and challenges, and how to evaluate treatment integrity and social validity. Download all documents for behavior contracts, or download individual items:

The Behavior Education Program (BEP)/ Check In- Check Out (CICO) (POSTED November 11, 2016)

Check-in/Check-out, also referred to as the Behavior Education Program (BEP; Crone et al., 2004), is a low-intensity intervention that can be used as a support for students who require additional support to meet school-wide behavior expectations. The intervention consists of three primary components: a scheduled check-in with a school staff member at the beginning of each day, a Daily Progress Note, and a scheduled check-out with the same staff member at the end of the day. These three components are designed to provide opportunities for building positive relationships, access to adult attention, instructive feedback on the student's behavior throughout the day, and positive reinforcement for behavioral successes (Lane, Capizzi, Fisher, & Ennis, 2012). Download all documents for BEP/CICO, or download individual items: For more information, please consider Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd Edition). For resources and materials, please visit the Michigan's Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative (MIBLSI) website or visit pbis.org and search for Check-In Check-Out or the Behavior Education Program.

BEHAVIOR-SPECIFIC PRAISE (POSTED AUGUST 20, 2015)

Behavior-Specific Praise TRANSCRIPT Behavior-specific praise is an essential component of Tier 1 (primary) prevention frameworks used to teach a range of new behaviors and ensure continued use of established behaviors using positive reinforcement. In addition to being a core component of Tier 1 efforts, behavior-specific praise (BSP) can also be used as a targeted support at Tier 2 and as an element of Tier 3 supports. In these materials we invite you to learn more about the how and why of behavior-specific praise. Background: Creating a positive school climate and safe classroom environments where students feel connected to a caring adult can begin with the simple act of acknowledging appropriate behavior. Using general praise statements is most likely a part of every teacher's repertoire of behavioral strategies, but the form of praise that has proven to be most effective is behavior specific praise, or praise statements that include reference to the specific behavior for which the student is being recognized. Behavior-specific praise statements are statements that praise the student and clearly state what desirable behavior has been performed, such as "Bob, great job showing your work on your math homework," or, "I like the way you pushed in your chair as we got ready to go to lunch. That keeps the walkways safe." Behavior-specific praise can be used to acknowledge the appropriate behavior of an individual student or multiple students engaging in academic and non-academic tasks. It is a simple and effective strategy that is cost-free and time-efficient. For more information and resources on this strategy, please see Chapter 3 inSupporting Behavior for School Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Key Strategies (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015) available from Guilford Press. Download all documents for behavior specific praise, or download individual items:

DIRECT BEHAVIOR RATING (UPDATED January 09, 2020)

Direct Behavior Rating (DBR; Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Christ, & Sugai, 2009), also known as Daily Behavior Report Card (DBRC; Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Sassu, LaFrance, & Patwa, 2007), is an intervention and progress-monitoring tool that uses teacher feedback and home-school communication to help students meet behavior expectations to facilitate school success. There are two primary components of DBR: (a) frequent, structured teacher feedback to the student about his/her behavior, and (b) a DBR form used to rate one or more specific behaviors and share this information with other stakeholders, such as a student's parents (Music, Riley-Tillman, & Chafouleas, 2010). DBRs are flexible tools that can be used to target one or more behaviors across one or more time periods per day. For more information, DBR training, and materials please visit: http://dbr.education.uconn.edu.

Download all documents for DBR, or download individual items:

HIGH-P REQUEST SEQUENCE (HIGH-P) (POSTED November 03, 2016)

High-p TRANSCRIPT High- p Request Sequence (High- p) is a positive behavior support strategy that is relatively easy to implement with a little planning. High- p is an antecedent-based strategy, meaning it is both a proactive and preventative strategy which promotes success and does not require a problem behavior to occur before responding. The high- p strategy builds behavior momentum to increase responding to low- p behavior. High- p is used to engage learners while reducing the chance of reinforcing noncompliant behavior. At the same time, this strategy offers students high rates of reinforcement for appropriate responding. While there are different strategies associated with behavior momentum and high- p requests, we look to the definition offered by Cooper, Heron, and Heward (2007), which defines high- p strategy as "an antecedent intervention in which two to five easy tasks with a known history of learner compliance (the high- p requests) are presented in quick succession immediately before requesting the target task, the low- p requests" (p. 697). In these materials, you will learn about high- p strategy; how it is effective; the research supporting its use; benefits and challenges; and how to design, implement, and evaluate high- p strategy in your classroom including treatment integrity and social validity. For more information and resources on this strategy, you may also read Chapter 6 in Supporting Behavior for School Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Key Strategies (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015) available from Guilford Press. Download all documents for High-P, or download individual items:

REPEATED READINGS (POSTED DECEMBER 28, 2015)

Repeated readings is an instructional strategy used to support students in developing oral reading fluency. Students have multiple opportunities to practice the reading aloud of passages at their independent level, meaning they are able to read the text with at least 95% accuracy. When using repeated reading as an instructional strategy, identify a tutor (e.g., teacher, paraprofessional, peer), appropriate text (i.e., passages, Readers Theater, class texts), and other materials for implementation (e.g., timer, graph for student and tutor progress recording). The student and tutor set a fluency goal and monitor progress toward the goal, increasing the rate until the student is reading at the expected rate. Tutors provide instructive feedback to the student as necessary, focusing on accurate word decoding, prosody (e.g., intonation), and rate of reading. The use of repeated readings enables students to develop reading fluency, as the repetitive process increases familiarity with the text as well as comprehension through multiple exposures. In these materials you will learn more about the use of repeated readings, why it is effective, the research that supports repeated readings, benefits and challenges, and how to evaluate treatment integrity and social validity. Download all documents for repeated readings, or download individual items:

SELF-MONITORING (POSTED AUGUST 11, 2015)

Self Monitoring TRANSCRIPT Self-monitoring is a versatile intervention that can be used to address behavioral, social, or academic needs. In addition, it is relatively simple to implement. When teaching a student to improve self-monitoring, two processes must occur: observing and recording. The observation component requires that a student be able to determine whether a given behavior occurred. This requires that the student be very clear as to the exact definition of the required behavior. At the end of a given interval, the student must make a determination as to whether or not he or she was engaged during that entire period. Then the student needs to record his or her behavior - the second process of self-monitoring. Some students may require an external reinforce that meets the function of the behavior. In brief, people engage in behaviors to either obtain or avoid attention, activity, or sensory experiences. However, for other students, the act of monitoring and recording their behavior is reinforcing enough to increase the future probability of the target behavior occurring.

Download all documents for self-monitoring, or download individual items:

SELF-REGULATED STRATEGIES DEVELOPMENT (SRSD) FOR WRITING (POSTED APRIL 22, 2016)

Self-regulated strategies development (SRSD) for writing (Harris & Graham, 1992) is an evidence-based strategy to teach genre-specific and general writing, and the knowledge needed to use these strategies. This model is designed to teach the elements of the writing process across six stages of instruction. The number and duration of lessons varies because each stage of the model is taught to mastery (Harris, Graham, Mason, & Friedlander, 2008). The subsequent materials provide teachers a procedural checklist for implementing SRSD for writing as an intervention, sample writing cues, treatment integrity checklist, and pre/post-intervention social validity measures for students and teachers. For more information and resources on this strategy, please see Powerful Writing Strategies for all Students (Harris, Graham, Mason, & Friedlander, 2008). Download all documents for SRSD, or download individual items: For more information and resources, such as assessments, unit plans, and mini-lessons, visit theThink SRSD website ( http://www.thinksrsd.com/srsd/) or to view an IRIS Center module on SRSD click here or visit http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/srs/.

TIER 3: INDIVIDUALIZED DE-ESCALATION SUPPORT PLAN for MANAGING THE ACTING OUT CYCLE (POSTED AUGUST 10, 2016)

Intervention grid: PDF or MS-Word

Individualized De-escalation Support Plan TEMPLATE: PDF or MS-Word

Individualized De-escalation Support Plan SAMPLE: PDF or MS-Word

For more information and examples of how to use this strategy, please see the following references: Colvin, G. (2010). Defusing disruptive behavior in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Colvin, G., & Scott, T. (2015). Managing the cycle of acting-out behavior in the classroom (2 nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Location: KU via Zoom Information: See flyer below Registration: Follow links in flyer Active supervision can be used as a low-intensity, teacher-delivered strategy to support students meeting behavior by frequently and proactively monitoring students during specific settings or times.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary, Molly, Cindy

# data[].attributes.body
scroll down to "The Behavior Education Program (BEP)/ Check In- Check Out (CICO)"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
ACTIVE SUPERVISION (POSTED March 30, 2017)

Active supervision can be used as a low-intensity, teacher-delivered strategy to support students meeting behavior by frequently and proactively monitoring students during specific settings or times. Active supervision is defined as the use of "Specific and overt behaviors (scanning, escorting, interacting) designed to prevent problem behavior and promote rule-following behavior" (Colvin, Sugai, Good, & Lee, 1997, p. 346). Its effectiveness is increased with the use of precorrections (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2005). Active supervision incorporates distinct elements (De Pry & Sugai, 2002; Haydon & Scott, 2008): established expectations, frequent scanning of context, positive interactions (verbal and nonverbal precorrections and prompts), reinforcement of desired behavior, and when necessary, correction to help success. Download all documents for Active Supervision, or download individual items:

BEHAVIOR CONTRACTS (POSTED DECEMBER 15, 2015)

Behavioral Contracts Behavior contracts, or contingency contracts, are written agreements between at least two individuals in which one or both agree upon certain behaviors. The contract document specifies an agreed-upon cause and effect between the completion of a behavior and the earning of a reinforcer. Most behavior contracts include three components: the behavior, the reinforcer, and the reporting sheet. There are many types of behavior contracts that can lead to positive behavioral change. Contracts can support behaviors students would like to change on their own, as well as agreements between teacher, student, and parent where each party agrees upon a certain individual behavioral goal. In these materials, you will learn about behavior contracts, how they are effective, the research supporting their use, benefits and challenges, and how to evaluate treatment integrity and social validity. Download all documents for behavior contracts, or download individual items:

The Behavior Education Program (BEP)/ Check In- Check Out (CICO) (POSTED November 11, 2016)

Check-in/Check-out, also referred to as the Behavior Education Program (BEP; Crone et al., 2004), is a low-intensity intervention that can be used as a support for students who require additional support to meet school-wide behavior expectations. The intervention consists of three primary components: a scheduled check-in with a school staff member at the beginning of each day, a Daily Progress Note, and a scheduled check-out with the same staff member at the end of the day. These three components are designed to provide opportunities for building positive relationships, access to adult attention, instructive feedback on the student's behavior throughout the day, and positive reinforcement for behavioral successes (Lane, Capizzi, Fisher, & Ennis, 2012). Download all documents for BEP/CICO, or download individual items: For more information, please consider Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd Edition). For resources and materials, please visit the Michigan's Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative (MIBLSI) website or visit pbis.org and search for Check-In Check-Out or the Behavior Education Program.

BEHAVIOR-SPECIFIC PRAISE (POSTED AUGUST 20, 2015)

Behavior-Specific Praise TRANSCRIPT Behavior-specific praise is an essential component of Tier 1 (primary) prevention frameworks used to teach a range of new behaviors and ensure continued use of established behaviors using positive reinforcement. In addition to being a core component of Tier 1 efforts, behavior-specific praise (BSP) can also be used as a targeted support at Tier 2 and as an element of Tier 3 supports. In these materials we invite you to learn more about the how and why of behavior-specific praise. Background: Creating a positive school climate and safe classroom environments where students feel connected to a caring adult can begin with the simple act of acknowledging appropriate behavior. Using general praise statements is most likely a part of every teacher's repertoire of behavioral strategies, but the form of praise that has proven to be most effective is behavior specific praise, or praise statements that include reference to the specific behavior for which the student is being recognized. Behavior-specific praise statements are statements that praise the student and clearly state what desirable behavior has been performed, such as "Bob, great job showing your work on your math homework," or, "I like the way you pushed in your chair as we got ready to go to lunch. That keeps the walkways safe." Behavior-specific praise can be used to acknowledge the appropriate behavior of an individual student or multiple students engaging in academic and non-academic tasks. It is a simple and effective strategy that is cost-free and time-efficient. For more information and resources on this strategy, please see Chapter 3 inSupporting Behavior for School Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Key Strategies (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015) available from Guilford Press. Download all documents for behavior specific praise, or download individual items:

DIRECT BEHAVIOR RATING (UPDATED January 09, 2020)

Direct Behavior Rating (DBR; Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Christ, & Sugai, 2009), also known as Daily Behavior Report Card (DBRC; Chafouleas, Riley-Tillman, Sassu, LaFrance, & Patwa, 2007), is an intervention and progress-monitoring tool that uses teacher feedback and home-school communication to help students meet behavior expectations to facilitate school success. There are two primary components of DBR: (a) frequent, structured teacher feedback to the student about his/her behavior, and (b) a DBR form used to rate one or more specific behaviors and share this information with other stakeholders, such as a student's parents (Music, Riley-Tillman, & Chafouleas, 2010). DBRs are flexible tools that can be used to target one or more behaviors across one or more time periods per day. For more information, DBR training, and materials please visit: http://dbr.education.uconn.edu.

Download all documents for DBR, or download individual items:

HIGH-P REQUEST SEQUENCE (HIGH-P) (POSTED November 03, 2016)

High-p TRANSCRIPT High- p Request Sequence (High- p) is a positive behavior support strategy that is relatively easy to implement with a little planning. High- p is an antecedent-based strategy, meaning it is both a proactive and preventative strategy which promotes success and does not require a problem behavior to occur before responding. The high- p strategy builds behavior momentum to increase responding to low- p behavior. High- p is used to engage learners while reducing the chance of reinforcing noncompliant behavior. At the same time, this strategy offers students high rates of reinforcement for appropriate responding. While there are different strategies associated with behavior momentum and high- p requests, we look to the definition offered by Cooper, Heron, and Heward (2007), which defines high- p strategy as "an antecedent intervention in which two to five easy tasks with a known history of learner compliance (the high- p requests) are presented in quick succession immediately before requesting the target task, the low- p requests" (p. 697). In these materials, you will learn about high- p strategy; how it is effective; the research supporting its use; benefits and challenges; and how to design, implement, and evaluate high- p strategy in your classroom including treatment integrity and social validity. For more information and resources on this strategy, you may also read Chapter 6 in Supporting Behavior for School Success: A Step-by-Step Guide to Key Strategies (Lane, Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015) available from Guilford Press. Download all documents for High-P, or download individual items:

REPEATED READINGS (POSTED DECEMBER 28, 2015)

Repeated readings is an instructional strategy used to support students in developing oral reading fluency. Students have multiple opportunities to practice the reading aloud of passages at their independent level, meaning they are able to read the text with at least 95% accuracy. When using repeated reading as an instructional strategy, identify a tutor (e.g., teacher, paraprofessional, peer), appropriate text (i.e., passages, Readers Theater, class texts), and other materials for implementation (e.g., timer, graph for student and tutor progress recording). The student and tutor set a fluency goal and monitor progress toward the goal, increasing the rate until the student is reading at the expected rate. Tutors provide instructive feedback to the student as necessary, focusing on accurate word decoding, prosody (e.g., intonation), and rate of reading. The use of repeated readings enables students to develop reading fluency, as the repetitive process increases familiarity with the text as well as comprehension through multiple exposures. In these materials you will learn more about the use of repeated readings, why it is effective, the research that supports repeated readings, benefits and challenges, and how to evaluate treatment integrity and social validity. Download all documents for repeated readings, or download individual items:

SELF-MONITORING (POSTED AUGUST 11, 2015)

Self Monitoring TRANSCRIPT Self-monitoring is a versatile intervention that can be used to address behavioral, social, or academic needs. In addition, it is relatively simple to implement. When teaching a student to improve self-monitoring, two processes must occur: observing and recording. The observation component requires that a student be able to determine whether a given behavior occurred. This requires that the student be very clear as to the exact definition of the required behavior. At the end of a given interval, the student must make a determination as to whether or not he or she was engaged during that entire period. Then the student needs to record his or her behavior - the second process of self-monitoring. Some students may require an external reinforce that meets the function of the behavior. In brief, people engage in behaviors to either obtain or avoid attention, activity, or sensory experiences. However, for other students, the act of monitoring and recording their behavior is reinforcing enough to increase the future probability of the target behavior occurring.

Download all documents for self-monitoring, or download individual items:

SELF-REGULATED STRATEGIES DEVELOPMENT (SRSD) FOR WRITING (POSTED APRIL 22, 2016)

Self-regulated strategies development (SRSD) for writing (Harris & Graham, 1992) is an evidence-based strategy to teach genre-specific and general writing, and the knowledge needed to use these strategies. This model is designed to teach the elements of the writing process across six stages of instruction. The number and duration of lessons varies because each stage of the model is taught to mastery (Harris, Graham, Mason, & Friedlander, 2008). The subsequent materials provide teachers a procedural checklist for implementing SRSD for writing as an intervention, sample writing cues, treatment integrity checklist, and pre/post-intervention social validity measures for students and teachers. For more information and resources on this strategy, please see Powerful Writing Strategies for all Students (Harris, Graham, Mason, & Friedlander, 2008). Download all documents for SRSD, or download individual items: For more information and resources, such as assessments, unit plans, and mini-lessons, visit theThink SRSD website ( http://www.thinksrsd.com/srsd/) or to view an IRIS Center module on SRSD click here or visit http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/srs/.

TIER 3: INDIVIDUALIZED DE-ESCALATION SUPPORT PLAN for MANAGING THE ACTING OUT CYCLE (POSTED AUGUST 10, 2016)

Intervention grid: PDF or MS-Word

Individualized De-escalation Support Plan TEMPLATE: PDF or MS-Word

Individualized De-escalation Support Plan SAMPLE: PDF or MS-Word

For more information and examples of how to use this strategy, please see the following references: Colvin, G. (2010). Defusing disruptive behavior in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Colvin, G., & Scott, T. (2015). Managing the cycle of acting-out behavior in the classroom (2 nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn more about professional learning opportunities in Kansas and Hawai`i below, plus Tier 2 and Tier 3 strategies and interventions can be explored by watching an introductory video (where available) and downloading supporting documents. Getting Ready for 2020-2021! 2020-2021 Professional Learning Opportunities EMPOWER Sessions now have space for 200 people on Zoom!These five 2-hour stand-alone sessions Read More ...

# data[].attributes.body
video explaination

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Check-In / Check-Out: Providing a Daily Support System for Students

# data[].attributes.body
The research behind the Turtle Technique...

# data[].attributes.body
check out the free resources tab...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Welcome to the home of Kelso's Choice, the leading tool for teaching conflict management skills for children Pre-K through 5th grade. Home of the beloved choice wheel, this conflict resolution curriculum teaches children the difference between big problems and little problems. Kelso the frog is a fun and engaging way for children to learn conflict management.

Looking for our best-selling conflict resolution posters, counseling board games, award-winning conflict management curriculum and much more? Click here to see our Products page.

Looking to learn about the history of Kelso's Choice? Click here.
Want to download your free conflict resolution wheel? Click here for your free starter kit.
Click here for more

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Conflict Management Curriculum that empowers kids K-5

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Increasing Opportunities to Respond (OTR)

# data[].attributes.body
interactive games, insert your own content

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Nearpod: Foster a love of learning in every student

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create active learning experiences students can’t wait to be a part of.

# data[].attributes.body
a game-based learning platform that brings engagement and fun

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kahoot! | Learning games | Make learning awesome!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Kahoot! is a game-based learning platform that brings engagement and fun to 1+ billion players every year at school, at work, and at home.

# data[].attributes.body
Trivia and Review Games: The way it works is that a teacher/host picks a question set and a unique game mode.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.interventioncentral.org/tools/self-check-behavior-checklist-maker

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
PBIS initiatives help to improve school culture and climate by teaching and reinforcing positive behaviors. The majority of students in any given school will not need supports beyond Tier 1. However, for the roughly 15% of students who need behavior intervention support beyond the supports of Tier 1 PBIS implementation, there is Tier 2. The Check-In/Check-Out behavior intervention is a commonly used option for behavior supports within Tier 2.

Tier 2 interventions provide additional support for students who need more support to meet their goals socially, emotionally, and/or academically. The objective of Tier 2 is to provide students with the tools to self-govern, allowing them to move back into to Tier 1. There are a number of interventions at this level to assist in that goal.

Because Tier 2 interventions apply to a subset of students overall, each intervention can be personalized to each student's needs. The Check-In/Check-Out behavior intervention is one such customizable tactic.

Check-In/Check-Out in PBIS

As a Tier 2 intervention in PBIS, Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) can give students a boost and allow them to meet behavioral goals that can lead them back to Tier 1. Check-In/Check-Out intervention forms can be customized to reflect behaviors that need additional focus. Teachers provide feedback to the student on these behaviors throughout the day.

Reasons to use CICO in your PBIS implementation:

Provides structure in a student's day

Creates accountability

Provides teacher feedback to student and parents

Creates internal motivation

Improves student behavior

Increases academic success

Creates a stronger home-school connection

Identifying Students Who Will Benefit from Check-In/Check-Out Behavior Intervention

Because the Check-In/Check-Out behavior intervention applies to a smaller number of students needing Tier 2 supports, there are certain criteria you can use to identify these students:

A student who struggles with Tier 1 goals and behaviors

Little to no classwork participation or completion

Poor performance in submitting homework

Lack of participation in class

Poor organizational and/or time management skills

Struggles with emotion, focus, attentiveness, staying on-task

Often, behavioral issues in the classroom are pieces in a larger puzzle. Some students struggle developmentally and need a helping hand to strengthen their skills. Others may have external factors affecting their behavior.

Succesful Check-In/Check-Out Behavior Intervention in PBIS

There will be variables in the way Check-In/Check-Out behavior intervention is handled from school to school, but the basic premise is the same.

Students assigned to a CICO intervention check in with a coach/mentor at the beginning of the day to set goals for the day. This adult can be a counselor or other staff member who is not an instructor for that student. Typically, the student uses a "points card" that spells out the goals for each part of the day. As the student progresses through the day, their teachers evaluate behavior and assign points for meeting their daily goals. At the end of the day, the student checks out with the same staff member they began the day with, assessing their points total for the day. The final component of this process involves the student taking their points card to a parent at home, returning it signed at the next morning check-in.

At its most basic, the check-in/check-out meeting is an opportunity for student and mentor to work together to improve behavior. This intervention works well for students who respond well to adult attention. The mentor encourages the student to reflect on what they did well, how they feel, and what they need to work on. Students who receive such encouragement learn to self-monitor, internalize successes, and develop self-esteem.

Successful CICO doesn't focus on the student's struggles in behavior. Instead, it centers on the positive behavioral goals met and the efforts made by the student to attain those goals.

Moving Away from Check-In/Check-Out Behavior Intervention

Because Tier 2 interventions provide additional assistance to students, the expectation is that those students will eventually progress into Tier 1. Students who consistently meet their PBIS Check-In/Check-Out goals over a prescribed period should be considered for "graduation" from the intervention.

The criteria for graduation will differ from school to school and student to student. However, do not pull a student from CICO suddenly. The student may suffer a setback in behavior from an abrupt end to the support. Instead, step the student down from CICO by adjusting the duration and frequency of their goals. CICO should not be a long-term intervention; once the student has consistently attained their goals, move them into Tier 1 supports.

Tracking Data for PBIS Check-In/Check-Out

One component of CICO that we have not addressed yet is data tracking. PBIS initiatives that rely on manual tracking mechanisms may struggle, or find it nearly impossible, to assemble data in real time. The intervention forms used by students can also be problematic. Students may lose them during the course of the day, going between classes, or in transit from school to home. Tracking progress can be difficult in this instance, and filing the forms away can obscure trends in the data.

When researching Check-In/Check-Out systems for students, you will want to consider data tracking as an essential component. Fortunately, PBIS Rewards offers Check-In/Check-Out! Because it's completely digital, PBIS Rewards Check-In/Check-Out allows coaches and mentors to track student progress throughout the day. No paper Check-In/Check-Out intervention forms needed! You can configure and adjust goals as students progress back to Tier 1. Our reporting feature provides updated data in multiple configurations to help you understand the progress of your Tier 2 PBIS initiative as well as staff usage.
A digital Check-In/Check-Out system for students can be simpler with PBIS Rewards! Want to know more?
Explore our solution for Check-In/Check-Out in PBIS Rewards.

Here are some related articles you may find interesting:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Check-In/Check-Out Behavior Intervention & PBIS

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Check-In/Check-Out behavior intervention is a wonderful example of a Tier 2 PBIS implementation that provides additional support to those students who are in need of more support with the social, emotional, and/or academic aspects of life.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.interventioncentral.org/node/970770