# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates how two different firms allocate their money to four sponsorship categories, namely sports, charities, scholarships and art&culture.
Overall, Best spent more money than Awesome regarding the total sponsorship budget. Additionally, the amount of money allocated to sports was by far the highest while the figure for arts&culture was the lowest.
Sports were the highest-spent sector, whereas the lowest amount of money was injected in arts and culture/ Arts and culture registered the lowest figure.
The quantity of money spent on sports by Best was by far the highest, with 500 thousands of Euros which was higher than the expenditure on sports of Awesome, standing at 400 thousands of Euros. In contrast, 200 thousands of Euros was allocated to Scholarships by Awesome which was more than Best that spent exactly 150 thousands of Euros.
Both Awesome and Best spent the least money on Arts and Cultures, which were 50 and 75 thousands of Euros respectively. Additionally, the amount of money spent on charities by Best was twice as much as Awesome, with 200 and 100 thousands of Euros respectively.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on four different sections in life, mainly charities, sports, scholarships and culture
Overall, Best spent more money than Awesome at sports charities art, and culture, Best sponsorship is always a step ahead. However, Awesome overcome in terms of scholarship

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart below show the cost that two different companies spent on sponsorship budget.
Overall, the Awesome company and Best company spent most money on Sports and their least sponsorship which they spent on is Art & Culture. Best company spent more money than Awesome company on 3 categories are Sports, Charities and Arts & Culture.
On Sports categories, Best donated 500,000 euros on this sponsorship, more than Awesome about 100,000 euros. Next, the money which Awesome spent on charities was a half of Best's budget
Otherwise, scholarship was the only sponsorship that Best injected more money than Awesome about 50,000 euros. And the Art & Culture categories which was the lowest sponsorship both of them spent on, 50,000 euros from Awesome and nearly 100,000 euros from Best

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates how two sponsors spend their money for 4 different areas of life, namely sports, charities, scholarships and art&culture.
Overall, Best sponsor more money than Awesome when 3 areas of sports, charities, art&culture Best always prevail over Awesome. Awsome is only better than Best in terms of scholarships.
Sports is the most sponsored by both companies up to 500,000 euros. And Art is sponsored the least when the maximum is only about 80,000 euros. The company Best donates their money to this sector the most when it is 100,000 euros more than its competitor. Art is the opposite when Best is only 30,000 euros more than Awsome. For scholarships, Awsome invests more in Best in them than the other company by 50,000 euros.
In contrast, Sports is the thing that gets the most investment.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates the amounts of money spent on four types of sponsorship namely sports, charities, scholarships and arts & culture by two different companies

Overall, awesome spent less than best and sport is the most sponsored of the four categories, in contrast to art which is the lowest.
Both companies spend the most money on Sports sponsorship. More specifically at Sports, Awesome only spent 400,000 and Best spent 500,000 euros. Best spent twice as much on Charities as Awesome, with respective being 100,000 and 200,000.

In contrast, at Scholarships, Awesome spends more than Best. More specifically, Awsome spent 200,000 on scholarships, while Best spent only 150,000 on this. Both companies spend the least money on arts & culture sponsorships, about 50,000 euros.

# data[].attributes.body
The given chart below accommodate information on how 2 different componies spent four sponsorship budget namely sports, , charities, scholarships, arts and culture.
Overall, Best spent more money than Awesome in terms of total sponsorship budget. Especially, sports are sponsored the most while arts and culture is sponsored much less money from the budget sponsor.
Both sponsorship budgets spent the most money on sports with 500,000 Euro from Best and 400,000 Euro from Awesome. Moreover, Best invests twice as much Awesome when Awesome spent only 100,000 Euro on the charities.
On the other hand, Awesome spent more money on scholarships with 200,000 Euros compared to 150,000 Euro from Best.
Under 100,000 Euro was the least amount of money that both Best and Awesome invested.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart illustrates the number of money that two distinct corporations spent on four sponsorship categories namely sports, charities, scholarships, arts & culture.
Overall, the budget that Best spent on these types of sponsorship is more than Awesome's. Especially, sports were the category which was spent the most money on, while arts & culture were the lowest.

Best spent $500,000 on sports sponsorship, which was $100,000 than Awsome. Besides that, the money that Best used twice as much on the charities as Awesome, at $200,000 for the former and $100,000 for the latter. Best donated to arts & culture about $90,000. On the contrary, Awesome just spent $50,000 on this sector.
On the other hand, in the category of scholarships, the figure of Awesome was more than Best's with $200,000. Altogether, Sports were the highest sector which was invested most about $950.000.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart demonstrates the amount of  money that two firms used on four sponsorships namely Awesome and Best.
As can be inferred from the data, Awesome spent less than Best. Across the four categories, Sports registered the highest of sponsorship while Art & Culture was the lowest.

Body:
Both companies spent the most money in Sport, with Best spending 500 thousands of Euro, which was 100,000 Euros more than Awesome. Best spent twice as much on the Charities as Awesome, with respective being 200,000 euros and 100,000 euros.
By contrast, Awesome spent more sponsorship money than Best in the Scholarship category which was more than 50 thousands of euros. Arts and Culture is the lowest-spending sector with grants less than 10,000 euros both companies.

# data[].attributes.body
The bar chart below illustrate the budget spent on 4 type of sponsorship of 2 company, namely Awesome and Best.
Overall, both company spent much of their budget on Sport sponsorship and the least spent was on Art & Culture. However, Best is dominate Awesome in 3 types which is Sport, Charities , Art while Awesome throw more money into schoolarships.
In the sports catagory Best spent 500000 euros  while Awesome spent 400000euros.  On the contrary, Best's money injected to charities was twice as much as Awesome, at 200000 euros for the former and 100000 euros for the latter.
Nevertheless, Awesome spent 200000 euros in schoolarships, which was 50000 euros more than Best. In the last sector, both company spent very low money ;however, Best still have more money spent than Awesome, with the respective figures being
100000 and 50000 euros.