# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SITI KHOFIFAH N (REVISED ACADEMIC TEXT ANALYSIS)

# data[].attributes.body
2215140306

# data[].attributes.body
nuriyana - 2215143377

# data[].attributes.body
I can't upload the document somehow in this padlet. I'll tr it again later.

# data[].attributes.headline
Thank you for submitting analysis tex 1 and 2.

# data[].attributes.subject
Thank you for submitting analysis tex 1 and 2.

# data[].attributes.body
Here I attached the file of article. Please analyse use functional Grammar. The due date 6th of June 2017. Thank you

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A Functional Grammar Approach to Analysing Asian Students' Writing

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This paper compares aspects of Singaporean and PRC students' writing at the university level while enrolled in the freshman composition courses. These aspects involve instances of nominalization, theme, and use of modals (or their inappropriate usage) at various parts of the essays submitted by these students.

# data[].attributes.body
SITI KHOFIFAH N ( 2215145575)
COMPARISON ANALYSIS OF TEXT 1 & 2

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
IFG COMPARISON ANALYSIS (SITI KHOFIFAH NOVIYANTI)

# data[].attributes.headline
[Comparison Text 1&2] Mega Sekar Pratiwi

# data[].attributes.subject
[Comparison Text 1&2] Mega Sekar Pratiwi

# data[].attributes.body
Anisa Olyvia

# data[].attributes.body
Muhairani (comparasion)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
comparison of text 1 and text 2 nuriyana

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
IFG Comparisons Text 1 and 2-Syahadatunisa 2215140299

# data[].attributes.headline
Danar Drestanto (Comparison and conclusion)

# data[].attributes.subject
Danar Drestanto (Comparison and conclusion)

# data[].attributes.body
Article 2

# data[].attributes.body
Anisa Mariandini-text 2

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Anisa Mariandini_Analysis of New York Times

# data[].attributes.headline
Aini Amalina - Process Percentage Text 2

# data[].attributes.subject
Aini Amalina - Process Percentage Text 2

# data[].attributes.body
Analysis Text 2

# data[].attributes.body
SITI KHOFIFAH N (2215145575)
ANALYSIS WITH THE PERCENTAGE

# data[].attributes.headline
Analysis Text 2 -- Novia Dwi Ariani (2215140313)

# data[].attributes.subject
Analysis Text 2 -- Novia Dwi Ariani (2215140313)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Draft 2 -- Novia Dwi Ariani - The New York Times

# data[].attributes.body
ANALYSIS TEXT 2 SITI KHOFIFAH N

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Mega Sekar Pratiwi IFG 2215140311 (TEXT 2)

# data[].attributes.headline
aldho's analysis of new york times (text 2)

# data[].attributes.subject
aldho's analysis of new york times (text 2)

# data[].attributes.body
Sevira Kusumawati

# data[].attributes.headline
Gracella Aprilyani 2215140303 (OWN ANALYSIS REVISION)

# data[].attributes.subject
Gracella Aprilyani 2215140303 (OWN ANALYSIS REVISION)

# data[].attributes.headline
Gracella Aprilyani on Nuriyana (FEEDBACK REVISION)

# data[].attributes.subject
Gracella Aprilyani on Nuriyana (FEEDBACK REVISION)

# data[].attributes.headline
[Revised] Peer Feedback Mega to Muhairani

# data[].attributes.subject
[Revised] Peer Feedback Mega to Muhairani

# data[].attributes.headline
Own Analysis [Revision] Mega Sekar Pratiwi

# data[].attributes.subject
Own Analysis [Revision] Mega Sekar Pratiwi

# data[].attributes.body
revision analysis Nuriyana

# data[].attributes.body
feedback revision on Gracella

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Gracella Aprilyani 14 DB 2215140303, peer feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Peer feedback Revision Jakarta post-Novia Dwi Ariani

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
(Revised) Novia Dwi Ariani-The Jakarta Post

# data[].attributes.headline
[Revision] Aini Amalina Analysis Text 1 Jakarta Post

# data[].attributes.subject
[Revision] Aini Amalina Analysis Text 1 Jakarta Post

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
[Revised] Aini Amalina IFG text 1 Jakarta Post

# data[].attributes.headline
[Revision] Peer Feedback Aini to Anisa Mariandini

# data[].attributes.subject
[Revision] Peer Feedback Aini to Anisa Mariandini

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
[Revision] Peer feedback Aini to Anisa Mariandini

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Feedback and Detailed Analysis Syahadatunisa 14 DB

# data[].attributes.headline
Peer feedback revision Syahadatunisa to Siti Khofifah N

# data[].attributes.subject
Peer feedback revision Syahadatunisa to Siti Khofifah N

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Peer Feedback-Syahadatunisa to Siti Khofifah Novianti

# data[].attributes.body
Risna Triani (Revised

# data[].attributes.body
Revised analysis text 1

# data[].attributes.body
The revised pair feedback is on the file that I attached below. Thank you

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SITI KHOFIFAH N REVISED PAIR FEEDBACK (2215145575)

# data[].attributes.headline
Dear all, thank you for your participant in joining the second step activities in giving pair feedback.

# data[].attributes.subject
Dear all, thank you for your participant in joining the second step activities in giving pair feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
Here are  some review to all your feedback.
1. Feedback should be in content not on the way how to analyse. Check be datailed whether all the analysis already be approriated for each column.
2. Aldo, Dian, Wisam and Danar are well systematic in giving a feedback. Thus, everyone can follow the pair feedback to them.
3. Gorgeous analysis has done by Danar in revision. Please follow his stages of analysis in finding the meaning.
4. Please revise or reorganize your own analysis. submit on thursday 11th of May 2017 at 08.00 am.

# data[].attributes.body
Gracella thank you for the feedback, be detailed on content not the way how to analyse. It's good on making correction in verb process. follow how Aldo Analyse.
PEER FEEDBACK TASK
I’m giving feedback to Nuriyana's analysis of article 1. She has analyzed quite well and used the table to make it understand and read easily for the readers. She also added independent/dependent clause column which I did not add. However, I found some shortcomings in her analysis, such as she did not give conclusion of her analysis, some independent/dependent columns did not explain whether the clauses are paratactic or hypotactic, also the participant and the process are mismatched, namely, National police chief Khalid Abu Bakar is participant as an actor (should be sayer) and Said is a verbal process. Overall, Nuriyana has analyzed the article well.

# data[].attributes.headline
Anisa Mariandini - Aini Amalina (Peer Feedback)

# data[].attributes.subject
Anisa Mariandini - Aini Amalina (Peer Feedback)

# data[].attributes.body
Please be datailed, follow the previous feedback I sugest.

# data[].attributes.headline
Syahadatunisa to Siti Khofifah peer feedback

# data[].attributes.subject
Syahadatunisa to Siti Khofifah peer feedback

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't find the feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Follow my previous feedback Anisa ,not on the way how. The content.....

Im giving feedback to sevira kusumawati's work . based on my analysis of her work she has done the work in a systematic way by using table, so we can easily understand  what are the participants, processes, etc. She also gives the detail of the role of the participant . But, unfortunately, she forgot one column  which is the conjuction column and I think her conclusion should be more spesific and clear

# data[].attributes.body
Please comparing the quantitative data between your dominant result with Muhairani. Follow Aldo

# data[].attributes.body
Good job Aldo. how about verbal proses? 23 means????

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tabel Analysis IFG Artikel 1 Syahadatunisa 14 DB

# data[].attributes.headline
I am sorry, there are something wrong with my handphone. Syifa Hayati Give a feedback to Syahadatunisa. The feedback in the bottom of syahadatunisa'analysis

# data[].attributes.subject
I am sorry, there are something wrong with my handphone. Syifa Hayati Give a feedback to Syahadatunisa. The feedback in the bottom of syahadatunisa'analysis

# data[].attributes.headline
I Give feedback foto Syahadatunisa.the feedbac

# data[].attributes.subject
I Give feedback foto Syahadatunisa.the feedbac

# data[].attributes.body
Muhairani please give feedback like what Aldo made. Focus into the content not how to analyse. Thank you

# data[].attributes.headline
Peer feedback Aini Amalina to Anisa Mariandini

# data[].attributes.subject
Peer feedback Aini Amalina to Anisa Mariandini

# data[].attributes.body
Follow my sugestion on giving feedback on content not the way how.

# data[].attributes.body
Nuriyana 2215143377
peer feedback Gracella

Be detailed in content not the way how to analyse

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Gracella Aprilyani 14 DB 2215140303, peer feedback

# data[].attributes.headline
SITI KHOFIFAH NOVIYANTI (TEXT 1 ANALYSIS)

# data[].attributes.subject
SITI KHOFIFAH NOVIYANTI (TEXT 1 ANALYSIS)

# data[].attributes.body
SITI KHOFIFAH NOVIYANTI (2215145575)
PEER FEEDBACK TASK

In my opinion Syifa has done good analysis with clear colums of participant, process, circumstance direct, indirect and clause complex eexplanation. But for little correction, it will be better if Syifa gives the different colors for the participant, process and the circumstance. Also in the part of clause complex, there are some numbers which did not put the sentence of hypotactic/ paratactic. But overall Syifa's analysis has good enough.

# data[].attributes.body
thank you for detailed feedback Husam. Risna please revised.

I’m giving feedback to Risna Triani’s analysis. I think it’s confusing when looking at the table because she didn’t specify which one is the 1st participant and which one is the 2nd participant and some of the participants are placed in the process column. Another problem is that some of the process and participants are mismatched or doesn’t have a match. She also needs to put her conclusion regarding her analysis. She didn’t forget to put the independent/dependent column which I forgot on my own table. Overall, she needs to look back to the handout more when analyzing the article.