# data[].attributes.body
This video shows the actual film from the JFK assassination. The tape shows all three apparent shots that were fired. I am using this video as an example of Unexplained. Since there are multiple theories on what actually happened on November 22rd, 1963, this case is still unexplained. Yes we can believe the government in saying that Lee Harvey Oswald did it, however there are good points on each side of the argument. Until there is some exact proof, and we are 100% certain on what happened on that day, this mystery will forever remai unexplained.

# data[].attributes.body
This video shows a former FBI agent who believes that Oswald did not kill JFK, and it was in fact someone else. Too many, this former FBI agent's story could be seen as suppression by authorities. Many believe that the government is trying to cover up information based on this assassination. The proof shown by this former agent helps prove that the government was trying to hide some facts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Former FBI Agent Reveals Who Really Killed JFK

# data[].attributes.body
In this video they review the magic bullet theory and show how this theory is incorrect. This video is an example of Ancient wisdom. Many people believe because of wear both JFK and

John Connally got shot in relation to where they were sitting, that there must have been two snipers. However thanks to technology that we didn't have in the past, we can now do an exact recreation of the day to show that it was possible to only have one sniper.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
JFK Assassination Magic Bullet Computer Recreation

# data[].attributes.body
This article provides us with the medical evidence from the JFK assassination. It shows examples of how the bullet entered his head, as well as interpreting the x-ray from his scans for us. These medical records could be seen as an example of Proof by verbosity. They are just trying to provide us with as much information as possible. This is shown by them not only providing us with medical information, but in this article they also include multiple theories including what happened to Kennedy's coffin etc...

# data[].attributes.body
This article shows an interview with Hugh Aynesworth, who has been credited with being the only journalist to witness the JFK assassination. In this interview he goes over his account from everything that happened that day, as well as his belief to the theories behind the assassination. His accounts could be an example of reason for belief Perception/Observation. When this article was written, the assassination happened 50 years ago. Being 82 years old, it wouldn't be too crazy to say that his memory of this day could be a little shady.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Tired of answering phones in an empty newsroom while his colleagues covered President Kennedy's visit to the city, the 32-year-old science and aerospace writer decided to try to catch a glimpse of JFK for himself.

Having walked four blocks to the corner of Elm Street and Houston Street, he positioned himself amid the crowd of excited onlookers in front of the Texas School Book Depository.

Minutes later, shots rang out.

Within 48 hours, the reporter had witnessed the assassination of the president, the arrest of the assassin, and the shooting of Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby.

Aynesworth, a four-time Pulitzer Prize finalist and bureau chief of both Newsweek and the Washington Times, is today recognised as one of the most respected authorities on the Kennedy assassination.

As the world commemorates the 50th anniversary of the death of JFK, Aynesworth tells historyextra how 22 November 1963 unfolded, and why he continues to dispel conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination.

Crowds in Dallas, Texas, on 22 November 1963. (Credit The Dallas Morning News)Q: You are credited with being the only journalist to have witnessed the assassination. Can you run us through what happened that day?
A: I was 32 years old and I usually covered aerospace. At that time we were in a race with Russia to land on the Moon.

I had a good job, but I was not assigned to the story [of JFK's visit to Dallas].

I was a little upset by that - everyone was going. At the last minute I got tired of answering phones in an empty newsroom, so I decided to go to see the president. I was only four blocks away.

The crowds were exuberant. There had been some concern about the reception the president would receive, but in fact the crowds were eight deep along Main Street.

I went to the corner of Elm and Houston [Street], right in front of the Book Depository. It was so exciting. It had been raining that morning but at about 11am the sun came out, and it was a beautiful November day.

The crowd was exited. It was something you read about but you never quite get to witness.

I stopped and was only there for a few minutes when the motorcade went by me. Seconds later I heard what I thought was a motorcycle backfiring, but it was the first shot.

There were three shots. The place went wild. People were throwing their children down, screaming, crying, throwing up. Nobody knew what to do.

We did not know who was shooting, or how many shooters there were. I probably would have run, but I did not know where to run to.

My reporter instinct kicked in. I saw a man across from me pointing to the sixth floor window, saying "he's up there". The man had a hard hat under his arm.

Reporter Hugh Aynesworth. (Credit Bob Fallows/The Dallas Morning News)
I ran to him to talk to him, but he was scared when he found out I was a reporter. In the end two policemen had to force me away.

He was the only eyewitness, and he described the shooter perfectly. That description probably cost Officer Tippit [the policeman shot by Lee Harvey Oswald who, according to four government investigations, assassinated Kennedy 45 minutes earlier] his life.

I then started interviewing other people. People were imagining a lot of things. But trained observers said there were three shots. But still, we did not know who did it.

Being a reporter, I knew the place you needed to be to find out what was happening was close to a police radio. I heard a voice describing how an officer had been shot.

I thought, 'if someone shoots the president and then a cop is shot, there could be some connection'. But I had no way to get to the scene.

I finally found a TV crew with a mobile cruiser and said, "have you heard what's happened?" and they said "no". So I told them, and they said, "well get in!"

We flew like the wind to get there. We got to the scene of the shooting and I interviewed between six and eight people, I can't quite remember how many. I spoke to people who had seen Oswald shooting and running from the scene.

I got close to a police radio again, and heard that the suspect was in Texas Theatre. The reporter instinct is strong, especially when it's chaos around you.

I got to the theatre and a ticket lady said "he's in there". I ran in the front-right door, and straight away the lights went up. The movie was still running.

People started walking up the aisle, coming up towards me. I was about 15ft away from where Oswald was seated. An officer jumped on him, and soon there were three or four others.

They got him out of there in a hurry. I never understood how many people got there so fast.
Q: And you witnessed the shooting of Oswald too - can you tell us what happened?
A: My wife was pregnant with our first child. We drove to the police department at City Hall. I got in because of my press credentials, but my wife didn't.

A few minutes later they brought Oswald out, and I heard one pop.

We did not know it was [Jack] Ruby [who had shot him] for about an hour.
Q: How did you feel at that time, having witnessed what you had?
A: I knew I was excited and a little scared. Nobody usually experiences all that drama.

We did not have mobile communications then, so I didn't check in with my editor until about 2pm, when I found a pay phone.

I really did not know what it [the assassination of JFK] was. We did not know anything until Oswald was grabbed.
Q: You've always maintained Oswald acted alone, but many people believe there was more to the assassination. Why do you think we continue to engage with these conspiracy theories?
Lee Harvey Oswald. (Credit Bill Winfrey/The Dallas Morning News)
A: Conspiracies are exciting, and we love a mystery. We don't want to admit two nobodies - Oswald and Ruby - could change the course of world history.

I saw conspiracies building from day one. Everyone who got involved made some bad errors. They did not know what they were talking about, but they talked anyway.

The District Attorney [Henry] Wade was asked at a press conference how Oswald got from the Book Depository to the place he killed a cop. Wade said, "he got a cab", and said a man named Deryl Click was the cab driver.

To this day there has never been a cab driver in Dallas named Deryl Click. I later asked Wade why he said what he said, and he told me "it just popped out".

And a deputy constable said the gun was Mauser. We know it was a Mannlicher, because we saw it, touched it, examined it. But a lot of people asked "why did they lie to us, why did they say it was a Mauser?"

Even [John Edgar] Hoover, the director of the FBI, was not informed, but he kept talking. And much of what he said was totally wrong.

That type of thing went on and on. Reporters were reporting things they had been told [but had not corroborated].

It was stupidity, not lying. But that created distrust.
Q: In previous interviews you've said the assassination of JFK was a turning point in television history. Can you tell us more about this?
But there had never been anything like this in history. You had Pearl Harbour, but this was totally different. It was massive.

And remember, you had a lingering distrust of government at that time. All these things were factors to the strangest story in my lifetime.
Q: You said you were excited and scared the day Kennedy was assassinated. Have you gone back to the scene and retraced your steps?
A: Until the assassination, print media was the way people got the news. But in 1963, for the first time there was more than a 30-minute news show.

TV news teams covered the assassination exceedingly well.

A: I must have retraced my steps 100 times for documentaries and interviews and such. It's an odd thing. The Sixth Floor Museum [at Dealey Plaza] does a really good job of presenting what happened.

When I go in there, it's so touching. I hear children saying, "oh my God, listen to this," and I am touched.

I am surprised and pleased that there continues to be so much international interest. Kennedy provided that certain spark that caught on, no matter where in the world you lived.

Q: And you also covered the Jack Ruby trial - can you tell us about that? [Jack Ruby was tried for killing Oswald]
Q: You also secured the first-ever print interview with Marina Oswald [the wife of Lee Harvey] - what was that like?
A: It was a bizarre trial. Ruby's defence lawyer had never done a criminal trial before; he was a personal injury lawyer.

He came up with a defence that Ruby had suffered psychomotor epilepsy when he shot Oswald. It was convoluted and ridiculous.

A: I knew when interviewing Marina for the first time I had to be very careful. She did not speak very good English at the time, and she was scared the government might send her back to Russia or charge her with complicity.
Q: When did you realise you had witnessed one of the biggest moments in history?
Marina and I had a "love-hate" relationship.

But Oswald's mother was a pure bitch. She was always begging for money, and she perpetuated the conspiracy theories. She was a nasty woman.

A: It has come to me when I am at the site [of the assassination]. But you know, I have covered a multitude of big stories.

I have probably done more interviews of murderers than anyone else in the world.
Q: You've admitted you are disliked by conspiracy theorists. How do you deal with them?
I've written two books on [American serial killer] Ted Bundy. I spent some 125 hours with him.

The assassination is in my mind, but I have gone in other directions since.

A: Conspiracy theorists hate my guts. They accuse me of being a CIA agent or a FBI plant. It did not affect me until my kids were old enough to see it, and ask me 'dad, what's this about?'
Hugh Aynesworth is the author of November 22, 1963: Witness to History, published by Brown Books Publishing Group. He is a four-time Pulitzer Prize finalist and was bureau chief of both Newsweek and the Washington Times.
Even just last week, at Texas Book Festival, I was accused of being a CIA agent. It's continual. Conspiracy theorists have made a career out of it, plus is boosts their ego.

Some of these people weren't really important enough for anyone to care about them, until suddenly they fostered a new conspiracy theory and became more special or important.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The assassination of JFK: an eyewitness account

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Tired of answering phones in an empty newsroom while his colleagues covered President Kennedy's visit to the city, the 32-year-old science and aerospace writer decided to try to catch a glimpse of JFK for himself. Having walked four blocks to the corner of Elm Street and Houston Street, he positioned himself amid the crowd of excited onlookers in front of the Texas School Book Depository.

# data[].attributes.headline
Website 1: Why Did Lee Harvey Oswald Kill President Kennedy?

# data[].attributes.subject
Website 1: Why Did Lee Harvey Oswald Kill President Kennedy?

# data[].attributes.body
In this article the author reviews and tries to debunk the

Warren Commission, which is a commission on the assassination of President Kennedy. This article tries to debunk all of the evidence that the Warren Commission tries to provide. The author gives us many examples of why Lee Harvey Oswald didn't commit the crime. He even finishes the article by saying "The obvious failure of the single–bullet theory shows that more than one gunman killed President Kennedy. It is almost certain that Lee Harvey Oswald was not one of those gunmen, and that he cannot have had any motive for killing JFK." This article would relate to an Emotional Connection. Clearly the author believes that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't commit the crime, so of course all information in the article is going to be at least somewhat biased towards his beliefs.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Did Lee Harvey Oswald Kill President Kennedy? : The JFK Assassination

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Oswald's motive for JFK assassination, according to Warren Commission: violent person who resented authority and wanted to get his name in history books

# data[].attributes.body
In this photo, we can see many people on a train reading about the death of JFK from their newspaper. This photo is a great example of Appeal to authority. This newspaper may be the only way these people are hearing about this story and therefore, all of their knowledge on this subject will be based off of this one article. Many people will believe that the article is 100% true because it comes from a popular news company. However this may not be true. Just because a media outlet claim to have knowledge on a subject, doesn't mean they have the whole story.

# data[].attributes.body
Below we can see a photo of the assassin behind the death of JFK, Lee Harvey Oswald. Nobody really knows exactly why Lee Harvey Oswald decided to kill JFK. Many believe that his ideology of hatred towards authority is what led him to that decision. Along with his ideology, there are many other theories. Some other examples include:

1. His inability to enter into meaningful relationships with people, and a continuous pattern of rejecting his environment in favor of new surroundings;

2. His urge to try to find a place in history and despair at times over failures in his various undertakings;

# data[].attributes.body
In this photo we can see the route that JFK was driving on while he was in Dallas. The exact route of JFK was made to give him the most public exposure, instead of the most direct route. The exact route was give to the public a couple of days before his arrival. Many people believe that if they did not map out his exact route to the public, the shooter would have not have enough time to plan and set up, and JFK still could have been alive today

# data[].attributes.body
By: Ryan Scott