# data[].attributes.body
Britian's navy protected the colonists when they traded with England and benefited the colonists in that perspective. However, mercantilism policies hindered the American colonies growth because they couldn't expand their economy and it made the colonists dependent on Great Britain. Therefore, the colonists should not have had the mercantilism policies.

# data[].attributes.body
Many text books will tell you that mercantilism was a bad thing for colonies. However the pros re that it was a guaranteed market for the raw goods, London paid well, and they had protection from the strongest navy in the world st the time. Thus mercantilism was not that bad for the colonies

# data[].attributes.headline
Many people will say they are many disadvantages to mercantilism. However,  because the colonies were protected by the world's most powerful navy and a strong army mercantilism was helpful. London also paid well to colonial producers. Yet making mercantilism not bad for the colonies.

# data[].attributes.subject
Many people will say they are many disadvantages to mercantilism. However,  because the colonies were protected by the world's most powerful navy and a strong army mercantilism was helpful. London also paid well to colonial producers. Yet making mercantilism not bad for the colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Merchantilism was good for protecting raw materials to sell to England. However, the merchantilist system had a flaw in economic growth and it also led to the colonies to have a dependency on the British mother land. Therefore, the merchantilist system hindered the American colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Although many would say the mercantilist policy of great Britain was a good thing, it hindered the colonies economic growth, and required the colonies to become dependent of Great Britain.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though the colonies had a guaranteed market with the British, their mercantilist policy hindered the colonies. The colonies complete dependency on Britain and extremely limited economy is what hurt them.

# data[].attributes.body
British mercantilist policies may have allowed the colonies a guaranteed trading partner, but Poor economic growth and a dependency on British consumers hindered the American colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
British mercantilism helped the colonies because the mother country protected their goods. However, Britain's mercantilist policies actually hindered the colonies because they limited the economic growth in the colonie, and it required the colonies to be dependent on the mother country. Thus, the mercantilist policies didn't actually help the colonist.

# data[].attributes.body
Although Great Britain gave the colonies a guaranteed market, British mercantilist policy hindered the American Colonies by, limiting the economic growth, and making them dependent on British good.

# data[].attributes.body
The British mercantilist policies were a hinder to the American colonies because it meant that the colonies were dependent on the British, also the British basically took the raw materials from the colonist and sold them back finished products. This ment that the American colonist were losing money while Britain gained

# data[].attributes.body
British mercantilist policies are often put down and vilified by the modern American people due to the dependency and stunted economic growth. However the assured trade and protected goods by the most powerful navy of the time in reality helped the beginnings of the colonies who would not have been able to protect or reliably trade their goods from such an early stage.

# data[].attributes.body
To the British mercantilism was a very good thing. However, for the colonies it was not, mercantilism caused for dependency on the British for goods,and it limited their economic growth.

# data[].attributes.body
British mercantilism may have been a bad for the growth of a already large economy. However this policy was good because it helped America obtain a stable economy, and much like training wheels help a child get the feel for riding a bike, this policy allowed for America to "get a feel" for international economics. Overall, mercantilism was a good policy.

# data[].attributes.body
Although the mercantile policies of Britain increased money flow to them, the American colonies were being hurt by this because of their limited opportunity for gaining power and their dependency on the British.

# data[].attributes.body
Although Britan helped the colonies by providing protection from pirates, it hurt the colonies more then it helped. It limited economic growth and required dependency on the British, something the colonies didn't like at all.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though the colonies were guaranteed a market with the British. The mercantilist policy still

# data[].attributes.body
The British mercantilist policy was a hinder to the colonies because

# data[].attributes.headline
The British mercantilist policy helped the American colonies. Thats because the colonies were protected by the world's most powerful navy and 

# data[].attributes.subject
The British mercantilist policy helped the American colonies. Thats because the colonies were protected by the world's most powerful navy and 

# data[].attributes.body
Some people say that the British mercantilism policy helped the American colonists because of the guaranteed market it provided. However, it was more substantial that it limited there economic growth and requiers dependency on Britain. Therefore, the british mercantillism policy hindered the American colonists more then helped.

# data[].attributes.body
Although mercantilism gave colonies a guaranteed market and military protection, it still was a hinderance because it limited the colony's freedom of who they could trade with and created dependence on England.

# data[].attributes.body
Mercantilism systems were great for protecting raw goods. However, the system had flaws with economic growth and having dependency on the British. Therefore, the merchantilist system hindered the colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Some may argue that the British mercantilism policies helped the colonies; However the policies limited economic growth and made the colonies very dependent on the British. Therefore the British mercantilism policies hindered the American Colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Britian's navy protected the colonists when they traded with England and benefited the colonists in that perspective. However, mercantilism policies hindered the American colonies growth because they couldn't expand their economy and it made the colonists dependent on Great Britain. Therefore, the colonists should not have had the mercantilism policies.

# data[].attributes.headline
The British mercantilist policy hindered the American Colonies because even though the colonists ignored the policy and issued their own paper money, they were faced with many negative outcomes like limits on economic growth and dependency on the British, therefore the mercantilist policy did not help the American Colonies.

# data[].attributes.subject
The British mercantilist policy hindered the American Colonies because even though the colonists ignored the policy and issued their own paper money, they were faced with many negative outcomes like limits on economic growth and dependency on the British, therefore the mercantilist policy did not help the American Colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Contrary to popular belief that the British mercantilist policies helped the American colonies, but because of the limited economic growth and the dependency on Britain, this statement isn't true, therefore the British mercantilist policy hindered the American Colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Some may argue that the British mercantilist policies had a npositige effect on the colonies. However, they caused limited economic growth in the colonies, and created a dependency on the mother country. Therefore,the British policies were negative  for the colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Although the colonies certainly grew due to British mercantilism, the British Mercantilist policies hindered the colonies overall due to limited economic growth and dependency on the British Crown

# data[].attributes.body
Many text books will tell you that mercantilism was a bad thing for colonies. However the pros re that it was a guaranteed market for the raw goods, London paid well, and they had protection from the strongest navy in the world st the time. Thus mercantilism was not that bad for the colonies

# data[].attributes.body
Although the mercantilist policies of Great Britain hindered the economic growth of the colonists, the security of market and the protection of goods provided by the British outweigh this stunting. Therefore the mercantilist policies of Britain helped the colonists

# data[].attributes.headline
Although the colonies under the mercantilist system were protected by the strongest navy in the world at the time, the policy rather hindered on the American colonies more than helped. It wasn't a very helpful policy because it limited economic growth and it required dependency on the British. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Although the colonies under the mercantilist system were protected by the strongest navy in the world at the time, the policy rather hindered on the American colonies more than helped. It wasn't a very helpful policy because it limited economic growth and it required dependency on the British. 

# data[].attributes.body
Mercantile policies were not very good imo