# data[].attributes.body
I think that both cities are urban cities as in both pictures,the buildings were well structured but Singapore buildings were higher and looked better structured.I also think that Singapore’s population density is more compared to Darwin.
~kyle 2t1

# data[].attributes.headline
Both cities are urdan cities. Both cities are well structured. The population in Darwin is more than in Singapore. Thee are alot more skyscrapers in Darwin compared to Singapore. I think Singapore alot more smaller than Darwin

# data[].attributes.subject
Both cities are urdan cities. Both cities are well structured. The population in Darwin is more than in Singapore. Thee are alot more skyscrapers in Darwin compared to Singapore. I think Singapore alot more smaller than Darwin

# data[].attributes.body
Mounica 2T1(25)

# data[].attributes.headline
Danlin 2T1(I’m sorry if it’s too Long :/)

# data[].attributes.subject
Danlin 2T1(I’m sorry if it’s too Long :/)

# data[].attributes.body
In my point of view,Singapore although small compared to many other countries , is more successful then most places . This is caused by the fact that Singapore is a very popular port country where many would come to trade , work and even settle in . its popularity made it a popular trading place and more and more people migrated here from poorer rural countries in order to earn a living for their families thus the population size gradually grew larger and larger and due to Singapore’s lack of space the demand for space also increased and so Singapore adapted high rise buildings and because there was a demand for high rise buildings there would also be a higher demand for construction workers , making Singapore most suitable for people of lower status to work in and earn money for their families thus urbanisation took place.As even today Singapore’s population is still slowly growing there is still much demand for high rise buildings and so Singapore became an industrial society , slowly becoming richer and slowly becoming  more technology advanced . Darwin however has a smaller population size I assume this because if they had a big population size they would have adapted like Singapore and built more high rised building and skyscrapers,but compared to the buildings in Singapore it is much smaller , thus making them less technology advanced and though both countries are urban societies they have very different social standings but even so Darwin would have more land ,meaning they have a lot more natural resources than Singapore but despite this fact Singapore is still a more developed country , where everywhere you turn there would always be skyscrapers and high rises buildings everywhere.

# data[].attributes.body
In my view, both are urban area and are developed fairly well. However, I think that darwin’s city is far more developed than singapore because their buildings are taller, more decorated (such as lights) and more unique in their design. Some comparative words that I would use is taller, more shining, decorative

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the population size of Darwin is smaller than the population size of Singapore.I think the reason is because the land size of Darwin is smaller than Singapore.The population density of Singapore is higher than the population density of Darwin.Both are Cosmopolitan City because Singapore and Darwin have many people from diverse cultural backgrounds that came from other countries to come and live in Singapore and Darwin. Both are Built-up area, Singapore have more tall buildings and seems like the buildings are more closed or packed together while Darwin have more small buildings and a little bit more spreaded than Singapore. Both Singapore and Darwin are human environment because the surroundings have been changed by people and it includes settlements and economic activities.

Comparitive words I could use: smaller, higher, taller, more spreaded, more packed

# data[].attributes.body
Both of the places are urban area as they both have less trees and more buildings. For comparison, I would say Singapore is more developed as there are a lot more high buildings compared to the cities in Darwin. Although Darwin have a lot of buildings, they are not as tall as the buildings in Singapore. In my opinion, city in Darwin is less populated than Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
Both picture depicts a urban area but the second pictureshows that it is way more developed as there are more tall buildings which means that there is alot of people working and living in the second picture. The first picture is less developed as is shows very less buildings and it is more spread out, and not many tall buildings.

# data[].attributes.body
Darwin's land size is much wider than Singapore. Singapore is  known as the RED DOT. I assume that Darwin has a larger population size than Singapore although the buildings are short and spread across in Darwin. Singapore has a higher population density than Darwin. Singapore is more of a cosmopolitan city than Darwin because many people from diverse cultural backgrounds come and live together in Singapore. Both Darwin and Singapore are built-up areas but I feel like Singapore is more of it because there are many giant skyscrapers than Darwin. Buildings in Darwin are short and spread all across the area whereas the buildings in Singapore are tall and densely packed together. Both Singapore and Darwin are known as human environment as there are no mountains, forests, etc and they both are built-up areas with large numbers of people and buildings and a lot of activities going on. Therefore, I would say that Singapore is a more developed country than Darwin as there are more transportation networks, gigantic skyscrapers, traffic congestion and office buildings where people do economic activities.

Comparative Words: wider, larger, spread across, higher, giant, developed, urban, built-up

# data[].attributes.body
Compare to Darwin,Singapore have more tall building So I think Singapore have higher population density

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Singapore is a place with shorter buildings which is surrounded by sea where as Darwin has lots of tall buildings and a lot more people living in the city, I think I could use comparative words like where as, but, and even though.

-SHUMING-

# data[].attributes.body
I think that both cities are urban as they both have modern buildings and technology but Singapore is more developed than Darwin as Singapore has more tall buildings than Darwin and appear to be more technologically advanced

# data[].attributes.body
I would say that both cities are urban and human environments . But Singapore seem to have more build-up buildings and more roads . Singapore also seem more populated than Darwin. Darwin also have shorter building and Singapore have some skyscraper and taller buildings . I think that Singapore also is more densily populated than Darwin .

# data[].attributes.body
Both cities are urban but Singapore is well developed as there are many tall buildings and also many electricity is used for the lighting compared to Darwin. I would also say that Singapore have greater populations than Darwin because Singapore have alot and taller flats, and as for Darwin , they have lesser and shorter flats.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore is more developedthen darwin however upon observing the pictures i can tell that darwin has more land then singapore and is more "naturey"

# data[].attributes.body
From my point of view, I can see that both are urban areas but having Singapore being densely packed with buildings; Darwin isn't as fully packed and it seems to have a lesser population. The tall skyscapers in Singapore represents how high in technology Singapore is compared to Darwin, having smaller buildings.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on what I see, Darwin has shorter buildings and Singapore has taller buildings. To build taller buildings , it costs a lot, which means that Singapore is a more well developed country. Darwin has shorter buildings maybe also because there is a sea right by the buildings and for safety reasons (tsunamis,landslide) maybe they may have buildt shorter buildings for those reasons. Both of them are urban areas.

# data[].attributes.body
Both cities are urban but Singapore is well developed as there are many tall buildings compared to Darwin

# data[].attributes.body
I will say that Darwin has short buildings that are placed around the area while Singapore has tall buildings around which tells me that Darwin has larger land area than Singapore.Which means that Singapore is densely populated than Darwin.Singapore is crowded while Darwin is spacious.This conclude that that Singapore is more developed than Darwin

# data[].attributes.body
Both cities are urban and have alots of buildings but Singapore is well develop

# data[].attributes.body
From what I can see, the buildings in Singapore looked more well-made and not to mention, the skyscrapers in various parts of the more well-known area for tourist attractions. Compared to Darwin, Singapore looks like a country which has a higher standard in terms of technology and cities like these, mostly attracts foreigners due to their high-tech developments, resulting it to be a more densely populated country. Whilst Darwin, which barely have any skyscrapers even though it was clearly a bigger country than Singapore.

Comparative words :
Singapore is much more well-developed compared to Darwin and Darwin has a wider range of space compared to Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore has more high-risied buildings that the buildings in Darwin. Moreover Singapore has skyscrapers which are more designsed ,structured and organised.This actually shows that the features can be defferentiated by different comparative words

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore have many taller buildings like skyscrapers. They also have many buildings so there is a chance of having higher population than Darwin. Singapore have more technology and even more electricity to light up all the places.

Comparative words :
Singapore have higher population than Darwin. Singapore have more built-up areas than Darwin

From : Divya 2T1

# data[].attributes.body
The two photos both show the urban area in the Darwin and Singapore.However,I think the technology in Singapore is better than Darwin as I can see the buildings in Singapore are taller than the buildings in Darwin and there are also many lights in the buildings at Singapore's night. I think more densely population in Singapore than Darwin.But the buildings in Singapore seems all squeezing together and Darwin seems have more space to have the buildings.I think it is because there is lesser space in Singapore than Darwin.

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore have more taller buildings like skyscrapers. They also have many building so there is a chance of higher population in Singapore than in D

# data[].attributes.body
The buildings in Singapore are taller, structured and more organised.Moreover,Singapore actually uses lights to decorate the buildings and seem more bettet

# data[].attributes.body
I feel

# data[].attributes.headline
The buildings are taller in 2 picture  than the 1 one which tells me that there are more people in 2 than 1  and also the 2 pic it feels like it is fully covered by buildings

# data[].attributes.subject
The buildings are taller in 2 picture  than the 1 one which tells me that there are more people in 2 than 1  and also the 2 pic it feels like it is fully covered by buildings

# data[].attributes.body
more/less developed
higher/lower population density
more/less high buildings

# data[].attributes.body
From what I can see, Singapore has more taller buildings than Darwin. Its because Singapore is a smaller country with not much space as Darwin, whereas Darwin has a larger space, which shorter buildings can be built. Singapore had to build taller buildings as there is no where else to build but on the limited space.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the second picture is more shiny than the first one

# data[].attributes.body
I can say that both are urban areas as there are no Farm and villages there.As both cities has been changed by human.But this city came from two different countries.So both cities is human environment

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore looks more crowded with more buildings while Darwan looks more spacious. I think this has to do with the amount of space the country has. Since Singapore is smaller more tall buildings are built and since Darwan is bigger buidings are bulit more spaciously.

# data[].attributes.headline
Both cites have buildings but Singapore is much more develop than Darwin as Singapore have more tall buildings than Darwin. Compare the both picture more people would like to go to Singapore as there is many tall buildings which allow more people to get job and most probably have high population density as there is many buildings compared to Darwin.             

# data[].attributes.subject
Both cites have buildings but Singapore is much more develop than Darwin as Singapore have more tall buildings than Darwin. Compare the both picture more people would like to go to Singapore as there is many tall buildings which allow more people to get job and most probably have high population density as there is many buildings compared to Darwin.             

# data[].attributes.body
Singapore is a more more built-up area than Darwin as Singapore is more developed than Darwin.

# data[].attributes.body
From the picture,I can safely say that Singapore is far more denser in population,the number of building and the types of building is also quite different,the comparative word i use will be taller,more advanced

# data[].attributes.body
Both cities have buildings;  Darwin has smaller buildings and they are scattered around, which suggests that the city has more land area than Singapore, which has tall buildings that are nearer to each other, because Singapore has smaller land area. Also, from what we can see on the two pictures, Singapore is more densely populated than Darwin

# data[].attributes.headline
I'd say that although both are urban societies and human environments, Singapore seems more densely populated than Darwin. Multiple high-rise buildings suggest that there is a larger population of people than in Darwin, where buildings seem to be shorter with a few taller buildings scattered around. Alternatively, it could also indicate a lack of space in Singapore. I say this because if, for instance, both cities had the same population, why would their buildings have to be different? I think that Singapore, being a generally small country, would need taller buildings to make up for the lack of land, whereas I assume Darwin spans over a bigger area, allowing them to have multiple shorter buildings. I assume Darwin is larger due to the ocean that covers half of the picture, suggesting that buildings reside on shores, which usually occurs in bigger countries/cities. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I'd say that although both are urban societies and human environments, Singapore seems more densely populated than Darwin. Multiple high-rise buildings suggest that there is a larger population of people than in Darwin, where buildings seem to be shorter with a few taller buildings scattered around. Alternatively, it could also indicate a lack of space in Singapore. I say this because if, for instance, both cities had the same population, why would their buildings have to be different? I think that Singapore, being a generally small country, would need taller buildings to make up for the lack of land, whereas I assume Darwin spans over a bigger area, allowing them to have multiple shorter buildings. I assume Darwin is larger due to the ocean that covers half of the picture, suggesting that buildings reside on shores, which usually occurs in bigger countries/cities. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Compare the cities of Darwin and Singapore.

# data[].attributes.subject
Compare the cities of Darwin and Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on what features would you compare the cities? What are some comparative words you could use?