# data[].attributes.body
This section explores the author's personal relationship to Highway 99 by chronicling her family's history and her experiences working in agriculture. It explores the socioeconomic realities of rural areas, emphasizing the mistreatment of farm laborers and the apathy of affluent landowners. The story pivots to the present, addressing the state of California's water crisis and the contentious actions of agricultural tycoons such as the Resnicks, who leverage private agreements to get water supplies, so increasing social and environmental problems in the area.

Pros

Personal Connection: By offering a firsthand account, the part gives the story more substance and authenticity, which might pique readers' emotions.

Historical background: By presenting the hardships and life experiences of individuals living in rural communities, it provides insights into their past and can help readers better grasp the larger socio economic background.

Social Commentary: This section tackles significant social topics that readers may find thought-provoking, like the mistreatment of farmworkers, income inequality, and environmental concerns.

Descriptive Language: The rich and engrossing reading experience is enhanced by the descriptive language, which paints a clear picture of the scenes, people, and events.

Cons

Lack of objectivity: The story could take a skewed stand on particular people or groups, simplify complicated subjects, and leave out opposing viewpoints.

Limited Scope: Although this section offers insightful information about certain facets of farming communities and California's water dilemma, it might not provide as much background information or analysis of related subjects.

Long Descriptions: Some readers could find the extensive details of historical background or personal experiences to be too much, which could cause them to lose attention or concentration.

Potential Oversimplification: The section's depiction of affluent landowners and farmers as essentially exploitative or uncaring may oversimplify or stereotype these groups by ignoring the variety of viewpoints and experiences that exist within them.

# data[].attributes.headline
 Water storage and  Water Wars are issues of Federalism.

# data[].attributes.subject
 Water storage and  Water Wars are issues of Federalism.

# data[].attributes.body
In countries like the United States where water management is a shared duty between the federal and state governments, the section delves into the complex relationship between water storage, water wars, and federalism. It explores the division of powers, emphasizing how states are in charge of intrastate water management while federal agencies supervise interstate water resources. Federal involvement is frequently required to mediate or settle interstate disputes over the distribution and storage of water. Furthermore, federal funds and regulations have a significant impact on how states manage their water resources by influencing policies and projects related to water infrastructure. The section highlights how, in order to handle the intricate problems of water management within the framework of federalism, federal, state, and municipal authorities must coordinate and work together.

# data[].attributes.body
New developments in the case to maintain the flow of the Kern River: Striking the correct balance

In a recent court ruling over the Kern River's continued flow, supporters and the City of Bakersfield both voice hope. Both sides' attorneys have devised a provisional water distribution plan that gives the city's needs top priority above those of the surrounding agricultural and wildlife populations. Attorney Adam Keats, who represents some of the proponents of rivers and wildlife, points out that there isn't much dispute with the city attorneys about the proposal. After granted a preliminary injunction earlier, Judge Gregory Pulskamp of Kern County Superior Court decided that 40% of the river's flow must always remain in the river. The purpose of this ruling is to set river flow levels while the litigation is pending.

# data[].attributes.body
Rich water year allows wildlife to succeed on the grounds of Kern Water Bank.

A vital recharge facility, the Kern Water Bank is situated close to Panama Lane west of Highway 43. It stores water underground in an aquifer for use during dry spells. Covering an area of more than 32 square miles and with more than 80 recharge basins, it helps water seep into the aquifer over time. John Parker, general manager of the Kern Water Bank Authority, stated that a rich environment has been brought about by the quantity of water. This wildlife includes up to 35,000 water birds and about 240 different bird species. The site is brimming with life, with endangered species like the San Joaquin Wooly Threads and other special status species. This is the current high-water year. The water bank also oversees animals for restricted grazing.

# data[].attributes.body
Giving Big, a California Couple Gets Gratitude and Scrutiny

Lynda and Stewart Resnick, known for directing their pistachio fortune towards significant philanthropic contributions, have also faced criticism for their extensive water usage in California, a frequently drought-stricken state. At an extravagant party held at their lavish Beverly Hills mansion last fall, attended by notable figures like Diane Keaton and Bob Iger, author Walter Isaacson expressed gratitude towards the Resnicks as guests mingled over refreshments.

# data[].attributes.body
Forecasters Say California Could Avoid Drought Until 2025, Reversing Years of "Megadrought"

Following two consecutive years of huge winter storms that reversed what had been a threatening "megadrought," AccuWeather forecasts stated on Monday that they expect California to remain drought-free through 2025. Years of drought had left the state with parched soil.

# data[].attributes.body
Four years ago, there was a rift between two prominent farmers in California, Stewart Resnick and Farid Assemi, revealed through messages exchanged between them. John Vidovich, another major grower in the state, stepped in to mediate, despite his own history of disputes over land and water with fellow growers. The issue at hand was Assemi's plans to build a large pistachio processing facility in west Fresno County, perceived by Resnick as a challenge to his dominance in the industry, as he controlled a significant portion of California's pistachio supply. Despite their past friendship and business dealings, including significant loans from Resnick to Assemi, tensions escalated when Assemi sought an extension on a loan from Resnick. When Resnick refused, negotiations soured, leading Assemi to propose the rival facility.