# data[].attributes.body
En este documento estan recopiladas las evidencias y especificaciones de la planeación y ejecución del trabajo grupal realizado de manera colaborativa por todos los integrantes siendo estos:

•Belsy Llamas

•Karla Fuentes

•Kislev Vargas

•Stiven Maldonado

•Daniel Campo

Esperamos sea de su agrado.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
¿Fue legal la decisión de Trump de atacar Irán? - BBC News Mundo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Algunos legisladores han calificado de “inconstitucionales” los ataques de Trump a Irán, ¿tenía entonces autoridad para ordenarlos?

# data[].attributes.body
Se evidencia como lo paises han tomado una postura con referente a los conflcitos recientes en medio oriente.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Un mundo dividido: las reacciones internacionales en Medio Oriente, Rusia, China, Europa y América Latina por el ataque de EE.UU. a Irán - BBC News Mundo

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Este sábado, el gobierno de EE.UU. anunció que se unió a la ofensiva de Israel para detener el programa nuclear de Irán.

# data[].attributes.headline
Repercusión de la guerra en el mercado petrolero

# data[].attributes.subject
Repercusión de la guerra en el mercado petrolero

# data[].attributes.body
Ya es evidente la fluctuación en el precio del petróleo tras la intervención estadounidense y como repercute globalmente, más allá de los paises involucrados en el conflicto.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
How Do Oil Prices Respond to U.S. Military Actions Against Iran?

Oil markets react swiftly and predictably to geopolitical tensions involving Iran, one of the world's significant oil producers. Military actions targeting Iranian facilities typically trigger immediate price spikes as markets price in potential supply disruptions. These reactions reflect the delicate balance of global oil supply chains and the strategic importance of Middle Eastern energy resources.

Historically, U.S. military actions against Iran have created volatility in oil markets, with oil price movements reflecting both immediate risk assessments and longer-term supply concerns. These fluctuations serve as barometers for the broader geopolitical stability of the region and its impact on global energy security.

What Happened to Oil Prices After U.S. Attacks on Iranian Facilities?

The impact of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities was immediately reflected in global oil markets, with prices surging within minutes of the news breaking. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude jumped approximately 2.4% to $75.62 per barrel, while Brent crude climbed 2.3% to $78.78 per barrel.

This swift market reaction demonstrates the heightened sensitivity of energy markets to Middle Eastern geopolitical developments, particularly those involving direct military confrontation between major powers and oil-producing nations.

Key Price Movements Following the Attacks

The price movements across various oil benchmarks paint a comprehensive picture of the market's reaction:

The Louisiana Light benchmark showed the most significant percentage increase, rising 3.29% over a six-day period. This differential response between benchmarks reflects regional supply dynamics and exposure to Middle Eastern imports.

What's particularly noteworthy is the immediacy of the price response-markets began repricing risk premiums within minutes of the attack news breaking, demonstrating the real-time nature of geopolitical risk assessment in energy markets.

Why Do Middle East Conflicts Impact Global Oil Prices?

Middle East conflicts create disproportionate effects on global oil markets due to the region's outsized role in global energy production and strategic transportation routes. When tensions escalate, particularly involving Iran, markets immediately factor in potential supply disruptions.

The price volatility following U.S. strikes against Iranian facilities exemplifies the market's hypersensitivity to threats in this region. Unlike disruptions in other oil-producing regions, Middle Eastern conflicts carry additional risk premiums due to the potential for broader regional destabilization.

The Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz

The Strait of Hormuz represents perhaps the world's most critical energy chokepoint, with approximately 20% of global oil supply passing through this narrow waterway. At its narrowest point, the strait is just 21 miles wide, with shipping lanes in each direction spanning merely 2 miles.

Following the U.S. strikes on Iranian facilities, market analysts began speculating about potential Iranian retaliation, including possible disruptions to this vital shipping route. These concerns were reflected in tangible market impacts-tanker rates through the Strait of Hormuz surged 60% as shipping companies incorporated higher risk premiums into their pricing models.

The strait's vulnerability creates an asymmetric risk factor-Iran doesn't need to completely close the waterway to impact global oil prices. Even minor disruptions or the perception of increased danger can drive significant price premiums across global markets.

Iran's Position in Global Oil Markets

Despite years of sanctions, Iran remains a significant oil producer with export capacity that impacts global supply balances. The country possesses the fourth-largest proven oil reserves globally, estimated at 157 billion barrels, representing about 9% of the world's proven reserves.

Military actions against Iranian infrastructure raise concerns about regional stability and potential supply disruptions that could extend beyond Iran's borders. These concerns are magnified by Iran's strategic location and its influence over proxy groups operating throughout the Middle East.

What makes Iranian oil particularly important is its quality profile-Iranian crude grades are generally medium to heavy with moderate sulfur content, making them ideal feedstocks for many Asian refineries specifically designed to process these grades. Disruptions to Iranian exports therefore have disproportionate impacts on certain refiners.

How Are Different Oil-Producing Regions Affected?

Geopolitical tensions involving Iran create ripple effects across global oil-producing regions, with varying impacts depending on geographical proximity, economic ties, and supply chain connections. These effects extend far beyond the immediate conflict zone.

The indirect consequences often prove more significant than direct impacts, as market participants recalibrate risk assessments and adjust strategic positions across multiple regions.

Middle Eastern Producers

Following the U.S. military strikes, several developments emerged across Middle Eastern oil producers:

Saudi Arabia and the UAE, while not directly involved in the conflict, face complex strategic calculations. As OPEC+ leaders with spare production capacity, they must balance market stability concerns against geopolitical alignments. Their decisions regarding OPEC production impact will significantly influence price trajectories.

U.S. Domestic Oil Production

The geopolitical tensions come at a time when U.S. domestic production faces its own challenges:

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum emphasized these findings represent "significant resources that can contribute to our energy security," highlighting how geopolitical events reinforce the strategic importance of domestic production capacity.

The relationship between Middle East tensions and U.S. production is complex-while higher prices benefit domestic producers in the short term, prolonged instability threatens global economic growth, potentially reducing demand over longer horizons.

What Are the Short-Term vs. Long-Term Price Implications?

Oil price responses to geopolitical events typically follow distinct short-term and long-term patterns. Understanding this temporal dimension is crucial for market participants attempting to distinguish between transient price spikes and fundamental shifts in market dynamics.

The initial reaction to the U.S. strikes against Iranian facilities demonstrates classic short-term behavior, while the sustainability of these price effects depends on subsequent developments.

The 2-3% price spike represents the market's immediate risk premium calculation. Historical patterns suggest that such geopolitical risk premiums can range from $2-10 per barrel depending on the severity of the conflict and potential supply disruptions.

Several immediate effects materialized within hours of the attacks:

These immediate reactions reflect the market's algorithmic and human traders rapidly adjusting positions to hedge against worst-case scenarios before complete information becomes available.

Longer-Term Price Outlook

While immediate price reactions are notable, several factors will determine the sustained impact:

Whether Iran actually follows through on threats to close the Strait of Hormuz (considered unlikely by most analysts but remains a tail risk)

The extent of any damage to Iranian production infrastructure

OPEC+ response to potential supply disruptions

U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve deployment decisions

Asian buyers' ability to secure alternative supply sources

Historical precedent suggests that initial price spikes often moderate as market participants obtain more information and adjust positions. However, a sustained risk premium of $3-5 per barrel often remains until clear resolution emerges.

The longer-term outlook depends significantly on whether the conflict remains contained or expands to impact additional oil-producing countries in the region. Any damage to production or export infrastructure could extend price impacts beyond the immediate crisis period.

How Are Different Market Participants Responding?

The reaction to Middle East tensions varies significantly across different types of market participants, reflecting their unique exposure profiles, strategic priorities, and risk management capabilities. These differentiated responses create both challenges and opportunities in the market.

Understanding these varied perspectives provides insight into how prices will evolve beyond the initial shock reaction.

Asian Oil Importers

Asian countries, particularly China, Japan, and India, are especially vulnerable to Middle East supply disruptions due to their heavy reliance on imports from the region:

For these nations, the risk extends beyond direct energy costs to broader economic and currency impacts. China, while maintaining a significant strategic petroleum reserve, remains particularly exposed to Middle Eastern supply disruptions given its position as the world's largest crude oil importer.

The responses from Asian buyers will significantly influence market dynamics, as they collectively represent over 35% of global oil demand. Their purchasing decisions in the weeks following the attacks will provide key signals about the duration of price impacts.

Global Energy Companies

Major energy companies are taking various strategic positions:

Energy majors must balance short-term profit opportunities against longer-term strategic considerations, including asset security, personnel safety, and sustainable operations. Their investment decisions following geopolitical shocks provide important signals about expectations for future market conditions.

The trading arms of major oil companies typically benefit from increased volatility, as wider bid-ask spreads and arbitrage opportunities emerge during periods of market uncertainty.

What Historical Patterns Can We Learn From?

Previous Middle East conflicts have shown that oil prices after U.S. attacks Iran facilities often follow a predictable pattern, offering valuable lessons for current market participants. While each geopolitical event has unique characteristics, historical precedents provide a framework for understanding likely market trajectories.

The current price movements align with established patterns, suggesting a likely evolution over the coming weeks and months.

1. Initial sharp price increase (2-10%) based on worst-case scenarios

2. Price moderation as actual supply impacts become clearer

3. Risk premium persistence until resolution of the conflict

4. Potential longer-term infrastructure investment to reduce regional dependence

The 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait provides perhaps the most dramatic historical example, with oil prices doubling within two months. More recently, the 2019 drone attacks on Saudi Aramco facilities triggered a 15% price spike that gradually moderated as production was restored faster than initially expected.

What distinguishes the current situation is the broader geopolitical context-the market faces this supply shock against a backdrop of global trade tensions and slowing U.S. shale growth. This combination reduces the system's flexibility to absorb supply disruptions compared to previous episodes.

Historically, major price spikes driven by geopolitical events have eventually been self-correcting through demand destruction and supply responses. However, the timeline for these corrections varies significantly based on the specifics of each situation.

Energy market volatility presents both risks and opportunities for different classes of investors. Developing appropriate strategies requires understanding the unique characteristics of geopolitically-driven price movements and their potential duration.

The current situation demands careful risk assessment and position management across energy-related assets.

Risk Management Strategies

Energy market participants should consider several approaches to manage heightened volatility:

For institutional investors, the optimal strategy depends significantly on investment time horizons. Short-term traders may benefit from increased volatility, while longer-term investors should focus on identifying structurally advantaged assets that benefit from sustained higher prices.

Options markets provide particularly valuable tools during geopolitical crises, allowing precise expression of views on both price direction and volatility levels. The current term structure of oil futures demonstrates backwardation (near-term prices higher than longer-dated contracts), reflecting the market's view that current disruptions will eventually normalize.

Market Signals to Monitor

Key indicators that will signal the direction of oil prices include:

Iranian naval movements near the Strait of Hormuz, particularly involving Revolutionary Guard vessels

Changes in tanker traffic patterns through strategic waterways, which can be tracked through satellite and AIS data

OPEC+ emergency meeting announcements or statements from key members about production intentions

U.S. military deployment changes in the region, especially carrier group movements

Crude oil inventory reports showing supply disruptions or cushioning from strategic reserves

Institutional investors typically monitor spreads between various crude benchmarks as an indicator of regional supply stress. For example, widening Brent-WTI spreads often signal increasing Middle Eastern risk premiums relative to North American supplies.

For retail investors, energy sector ETFs provide exposure to oil price movements with lower complexity than direct commodity futures trading. However, these instruments typically incorporate broader sector exposures beyond pure oil price sensitivity.

What Are the Broader Economic Implications?

The oil price spike occurs against a complex global economic backdrop, creating potential ripple effects across multiple sectors and regions. Energy price increases function effectively as a tax on consumption, with impacts distributed unevenly across different economies.

Understanding these broader economic implications provides context for assessing potential policy responses and second-order effects.

The oil price spike comes at a particularly challenging time for the global economy:

Emerging economies with high energy intensity and limited fiscal capacity face particular challenges from oil price spikes. These nations often lack the resources to implement effective consumer subsidy programs or maintain large strategic reserves.

The economic impacts extend beyond direct energy costs-oil price volatility affects business confidence, investment decisions, and financial market stability. The sector rotation typically seen during oil price spikes (toward energy producers and away from energy-intensive consumers) has already begun manifesting in equity markets.

Concerns about potential oil price crash analysis and the US tariffs impact further complicate the economic picture, as markets attempt to balance immediate supply concerns against longer-term demand uncertainties.

Frequently Asked Questions About Oil Prices During Middle East Conflicts

Will Iran Actually Close the Strait of Hormuz?

Most energy security experts consider a complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz unlikely despite Iranian threats. The economic consequences for Iran itself would be severe, and such an action would likely trigger a significant military response, according to analysis from CNBC.

However, targeted disruptions or harassment of shipping remain possible tactics that could still impact oil prices. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps maintains capabilities for rapid deployment of mines, small boat swarms, and anti-ship missiles that could create shipping hazards without fully closing the strait.

The more probable scenario involves selective interdiction or harassment that increases shipping costs and insurance premiums without triggering full-scale military confrontation. Even these limited actions could add $2-5 per barrel to global oil prices through risk premiums.

How Much Could Oil Prices Rise If the Conflict Escalates?

Historical precedent suggests that severe supply disruptions could push oil prices 15-30% higher from pre-conflict levels. During the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, oil prices doubled within two months.

However, today's market has more supply flexibility through U.

Ready to Spot the Next Major Resource Discovery?

Don't miss out on identifying significant mineral discoveries as they happen on the ASX. Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model provides instant notifications of high-potential opportunities, giving you a crucial market advantage before the broader market reacts. Visit the dedicated discoveries page to see how historic discoveries have generated exceptional returns for early investors.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Oil Prices Surge After U.S. Attacks on Iranian Facilities

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Discover how oil prices respond to geopolitical tensions as markets react to U.S. military actions against Iranian facilities.

# data[].attributes.body
En este articulo se exponen las afectaciones de los principales actores del conflicto.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
TRT Global - ¿Qué precio han pagado Irán, Israel y Estados Unidos por la “guerra de los 12 días”?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
El breve pero intenso conflicto causó grandes pérdidas económicas tanto para Irán como para Israel, con alteraciones al comercio mundial y el desvío de vuelos. Las consecuencias podrían prolongarse, según expertos.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cuanto cuesta un barril de petróleo en junio 2025 y cómo influye en el precio de la gasolina en EE.UU.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
La tensión entre Irán, Israel y Estados Unidos impulsó un nuevo aumento en el valor del crudo, lo que impactó en Wall Street y encendió alertas sobre inflación y consumo interno

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Bomba de balacín usada en la extracción del petróleo.

# data[].attributes.body
Como toda guerra, el impacto no se ve evidenciado únicamente en los actores de dicho conflicto, sino que también afecta a nivel mundial, y el factor económico no es la excepción. El ataque de Estados Unidos a Irán provocó no solo un aumento en el precio del petróleo, también repercutió en la inflación mundial, afectando especialmente a países dependientes del crudo. Este tipo de agresiones generan inestabilidad en los mercados, disuaden la inversión extranjera en zonas de conflicto y desvían recursos públicos hacia el gasto militar. En Irán, la presión bélica ha provocado el deterioro de su economía interna, evidenciándose la repercusión de los comercios y en el mercado energético, afectando mayormente a las clases populares. En Estados Unidos, los precios del petróleo siguen en aumento, lo que a su vez puede provocar el crecimiento en la inflación del país. Este patrón revela un sistema del gran capital imperial que se alimenta de la guerra como forma de control geopolítico, sacrificando la economía de los pueblos para sostener hegemonías.

# data[].attributes.body
Se analizan las posibles repercusiones de los sucesos que se han ido presentando y sus afectaciones en otros entornos globales, teniendo en cuenta lo incierto de las decisiones diplomaticas que puedan ser tomadas como respuesta a lo ya acontecido.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
¿Cuál es el panorama del conflicto entre Israel e Irán? | El Debate en MILENIO

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Posbles consecuencias politicas sobre el ataque dado por E.E.U.U a Iran, intervension a medio oriente y el creciente avance al conflictos diplomaticos entre naciones. 

# data[].attributes.body
Entre los efectos políticos más evidentes de esta problemática, está en vilo la creciente fragilidad del sistema multilateral, cada vez que E.E.U.U actúa de forma unilateral debilita a autoridades políticas como la ONU, alejándose de una unidad mundial desentendiendose países de los compromisos internacionales, generando un ambiente entonces que las normas pierden fuerzas por el poder.

Podria ir en aumento una polarización entre alianzas de países, dando desconcierto sobre las ideologias, reduciendo espacios para dialogos y desconfianzas entre potencias. Siendo evidenciado como estos paises compartian relaciones diploamticas hasta 1979, siendo el cambio dado por las revolucion islamica , sumidas en torno al programa nuclear llevado por Iran y dando consecuencias en junio de 2025, con constantes bombardeos y la escalada que se ha desencadenado y se han ido tomando posturas entre paises como Chile, Qatar, Argentina, Cuba, entre otros.

Este conflicto va mucho mas alla de ataques militares o discuros, se ha trazado por dispustas de control y poder, quien donde triunfe demuestre control global, debemos hacer un llamado a la diplomacia y a un discurso politico mas integral que llame a la estabilidad y paz.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Qué se sabe del ataque de EE.UU. contra instalaciones nucleares en Irán y sus posibles consecuencias

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Civiles movilizados por el gobierno de Irán 

# data[].attributes.body
El mundo en todos los tiempos ha estado sumergido en conflictos, algunas veces pequeños y otras veces fuertes como el que se presenta en la actualidad con Israel e Irán; un conflicto que lleva décadas y en el transcurrir se va extendiendo a otros países como Estados Unidos que ya se entrometió, tomando parte iniciando ataques. co

Consideremos que es de interés global la situación que se está viviendo por que nos afecta socialmente en diversos aspectos en los que nos encontramos atrapados en medio de las decisiones políticas que toman quienes nos representan como población.

Al día de hoy, sabemos que el impacto de las bombas que el actual presidente de Estados Unidos (Donald Trump) ordenó contra Iran, aúnque eran para lugares especificos se han llevado por delante innumerables vidas tanto de personas que sirven a su país que dejan a sus familias angustiadas guardando la esperanza de que su ser querido regrese a casa con vida, como de aquellos civiles que no están involucrados en este conflicto de manera interna, lo cual es tan devastador.

Saber que hay familias acabadas, algunas otras separadas, niños viviendo a la luz del día un desastre que probablemente no entienden, comunidades de algunas partes que por obligación han tenido que ser desplazadas a otros lugares dejando lo que han construido atrás, generando hambruna para quienes padecen estas situaciones, pero... ¿Qué sigue para aquellos que quedaron con vida después de estos terribles enfrentamientos? Una vida llena de miedos, de desconfianza por quienes no conocen, de traumas por el horror de la guerra, de corazones que lloran la ausencia de sus familiares y muchos otras consecuencias más que deja este conflicto a la humanidad.

Es aquí donde vemos el retroceso de la sociedad en cuanto a la paz que a pesar de los diálogos realizados por todas las partes de este conflicto, no se evidencian los avances, por ende, son palabras que se lleva el viento, mientras el odio sigue persistiendo en quienes anhelan el poder, siendo su respuesta para cumplir sus deseos políticos o de otra índole por encima de todo, sin importar los daños irrecuperables que causan a nivel global.

# data[].attributes.body
Las decidiones tomadas por el presidente de Estados Unidos representan una violación del derecho internacional y un acto de soberbia imperial. Ya que, EE.UU utilizó su poder militar sin la aprobación del Congreso ni de organismos internacionales, debilitando la legalidad global y reforzando su política de “excepcionalismo”. La acción que no es la primera vez que se ha tomado ha tensado anteriormente las relaciones diplomáticas no solo con Irán, sino con actores estratégicos como Rusia, China o la Unión Europea, que catalogaron en su momento la agresión como un precedente peligroso. Este acto unilateral en la actualidad también generó crisis de legitimidad interna en Estados Unidos, dividiendo a la opinión pública y mostrando un uso electoral del conflicto. En Medio Oriente, el ataque unificó momentáneamente a sectores diversos en torno al nacionalismo antiestadounidense, fortaleciendo actores radicales y debilitando voces moderadas. Este tipo de decisiones han llevado a un mundo multipolar que cada vez esta más inestable y donde el derecho se ve obligado a ceder ante la fuerza, y la política se reduce a la imposición y la retaliación.