# data[].attributes.body
What do you like about the video? Why?

When was Responsiveness, Respectful, Reciprocal interactions displayed?

What could be done better?

# data[].attributes.body
We like:

1) Educator responded to the child in a very engaging tone of voice.

2) Activity was sensorial

3) She responded to children’s cue

4) She allow children to choose by asking

5) She responds immediately when child call out

What could be done better?

Another educator should be around to facilitate (in Singapore context)

Look into the physical setting of the environment

# data[].attributes.body
1. The outdoor setting with natural environment, with fencing

2. Responding to children with gentle voices

3. Following children’s interests

4. Maintaining communication and eye contact with children, playing peek-a-boo, mimicking the child’s actions

5. Practising SSWB- keeping children in view, leaving children unattended, while following children’s interests, SSWB to be in place as well

# data[].attributes.body
video is at an open setting where children are able to explore freely and have hands on activities

Teacher facilitating mixed age group

Children allowed to explore area slightly away from peers

Responsiveness:

teacher went towards child who wanted to go to the sand pit and interacted with child

Allowed child to play in sand pit based on child’s interest

Respectful:

teacher tone of voice, warm and unhurried, displayed patience during interactions and facilitation

Reciprocal:

Two way communication was maintained throughout when child was holding magnifying glass

She communicated with child who was slightly away from the garden, uses facial cue to show interest in child’s wants

What could be done better?

SSWB - immediate supervision

# data[].attributes.body
What we like about the video?

-staff child ratio

-outdoor space

-open ended materials

-authentic and hands on

When was 3Rs interactions?

-Consistent reciprocal interactions during facilitation of play.

-Followed interest and cues of children (when deciding on what to play)

-Respecting children decisions (giving suggestion on bringing the sand indoor)

What can be done better?

-Could provide another adult to be present

# data[].attributes.body
1. The educarer was calm. She respected and gave choices to the children.

2. She is sensitive to the child's needs (e.g. mentioned about being cold).

3. She is responsive as she explained and faciliated the activity to the children at the sandpit.

4. She had sustained eye contact with the children and had unhurried conversations.

5. She showed respect by seeking children's permission to join in the play at the sandpit.

6. Intentional Planning - By having the activity outdoors, the educarer allowed the children the space to explore.

7. Child-directed play

What could be done better:

1. Active supervision could be ensured as two girls were left unsupervised.

# data[].attributes.body
》The children have the freedom to explore.

》Educarer splits her time among the children equally

Educarer does not force interactions - each interactions is genuine.

》 Respect: The educator respectfully honors the children’s ongoing play by observing quietly, acknowledging their chosen activities, and allowing them space rather than immediately redirecting them indoors

》Reciprocate: invites children into the decision-making process—for example, posing gentle questions like “Shall we head inside soon?”—so that the transition is co-created rather than imposed

》Responsive: interacting with the children, when child was not engaged, she sang song. Responds sensitively to each child’s cues—such as pausing when a child lingers or softly adjusting their invitation—attuning to the children’s pace and emotional rhythms during the change from outdoor to indoor play

》Active supervision, in SG context, blindspots

# data[].attributes.body
Respectful interactions with children

Hands-on learning exploration activities

Giving choices and opportunity for play

Child-directed play

3Rs Interaction

Respect

Educator keeps eye contact with the child even though the child is not looking at her.

Giving choices to children

Educator’s calm and collected tone

Responsiveness

Responds immediately when the child calls for her.

Acknowledging child’s interest - sand play

Reciprocal

2–way communication and conversation with the children

What could be done better?

Instead of leaving the children to play by themselves, it would be better if she could ask the children if they want to play together.

# data[].attributes.body
1. We like that there was serve and return.

2. She practiced autonomy by giving children choices by asking them to go indoors to play with the feathers and play dough and then changed it to sand play

3. She responded to the children cue when she went over to the child to help the child .Educator even told the children that she will be away .

4. The Educator responded by singing the song 🎵 and gathered the children .

Responsive- When child seemed hesitant to join the exploration, educator began to sing rhymes to calm her and tune her in slowly.

Respectful- She made eye contact with the child. She informed the group of children before going to tend to the child.

Reciprocate- Serve and return was seen throughout sustained interaction.