# data[].attributes.body
In the second essay our group decided to give the writer a 3 because it was mainly summary and repetitive. She had good points but didn't back it up well enough and instead reiterated herself they whole time. But at least her hand writing was nice.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 6/6. This essay received the sophistication point because it situates the work in a broader context while also connecting her points to her thesis statement. There was also clear commentary and eloquent connections.

# data[].attributes.body
We gave this one a 4 because they did have a good thesis and great evidence from the book, but lacked in sophistication. Although they were good points, they were very repetitive and the order of them didn't flow very well. The commentary was the same for multiple examples that could have been condensed into less paragraphs and flowed better.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 3 since the paper failed to give clear and extensive details, lacked a specific thesis, and was just overall generic and lacked professionalism and advanced writing skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 4 because her thesis was present and she had evidence. Her commentary lacked substance and was confusing to read.

# data[].attributes.body
We gave this essay a score of 3. There is a thesis, however the conclusion does not connect back to it. The commentary is limited, and only touches on the basics of her points. She only briefly mentions familial hierarchy, and societal expectations, rather than explaining them thoroughly.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 4 because the evidence was clearly stated. There was also a lot of repetition in the commentary which costs her one of the points. The essay could have had more depth.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 3/6. We thought that this writer gave a lot of evidence but did not connect it back to their thematic statement or the prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 5 she had a strong thesis and a lot of specific evidence. She didn't have any nuance or broader perspectives to earn the 6th point.

# data[].attributes.body
Our group gave this essay a 4 since the thesis and points made were very clear and established, however it was extremely repetitive and lacked creative skill.