# data[].attributes.body
1)Blockade

2)It stops the missiles from entering Cuba, thus protecting USA from any attack from Soviet Union or Cuba.

3)It may provoke Soviet Union as it stops the missiles from entering Cuba. Thus, may start a war with USA.

4)

5)

6)

7)

8)

9)

10)

# data[].attributes.body
1) Recommendat option :  Air Strike

2) No one would get hurt in the process, the Cuba and Soviet will see USA just protecting their country and might eventually stop. Nothing will threatened as USA's would simply be protecting their country.

3) Soviet union might take USA's non-agression for granted or take their air strike as an act of war

# data[].attributes.body
1) Invasion

2) Pros : End the conflict faster.

: Prevent damages to USA

: Control of Cuba to prevent nuclear war

: Changing Cuba to a Democracy system

3) Cons: Risk of angering Russia

: Risk of endangering the lives of innocent citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Recommindiid option: Air strike

2) Pros: To prevent Cuba from sending missiles to US with that US would not suffer any damages and Cuba will not be able to replace the lost missiles as quickly. US can buy more time to think about a better solution to defend themselves. Serve as a warning to Cuba that US will not back down.

3) Cons: Cuba may discover US even before US strike them. Cuba may attack back US and start a war. US will spend more money in the course of attacking Cuba.
Thank you for your kind attention. :)

# data[].attributes.body
Recommendattttt option : Blockade against offensive weapons, political talk.

Pros: There will be no damages dealt to either countries , pollution and casualties

Cons:

# data[].attributes.headline
Long Jun (35) , Hamzah (12), Chee Xian, Trisha

# data[].attributes.subject
Long Jun (35) , Hamzah (12), Chee Xian, Trisha

# data[].attributes.body
1. Secretly warn Cubans in a conference room (WARNING)

2. Pros-

1.There will be no danger to any of the citizens of USA and Cuba, if they cooperate.

2. Prevent the start of a nuclear warfare.

3.  Cons-

1. Castro can act as if nothing happened

2. May create riots and chaotic action in USA when the public of America finds out that such unofficial meeting was held.

3. Hi

# data[].attributes.body
1) Recommended option: Invasion - AIr Strike

2)Pros: -USA can defend itself by attacking as fast as they can because the Soviet Missile is on the way to USA.

-It won't allow Soviet Union to be an equal nation to USA.

-There won't be as many casualties than attacking by land.

3)Cons: -It will not stop the conflict between Soviet Union and USA.

-More money will be spent in the future if the conflict continues.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Prosssssssss By setting up a blockade to prevent Russia from Transferring Missles to Cuba,It ensures that USA would be in a Safe and secure position as There would not be Any Missles near enough USA to be an immediate threat,this would be able to prevent Russia from strategically attacking USA, by doing so USA would be in a much more advantageous situation as compared to Russia having Missles in Cuba, the blockade might be seen as a Defensive action by other countries,this signifies that USA would not want to engage in a war anytime soon.

2.Consssssss, This might Signal that USA is in a defensive Position and encourage Russia to Attack USA which may still result in war

Isaac(13) Hafidz (24) Renyong (33) Dunhong (43)

# data[].attributes.body
Recommended option: Blockade - Preventing Soviet Union ships from bringing offensive weapons into Cuba.

Pros - This would show Soviet Union that the US will be prepared against any forms of attack from Cuba and that they will not hesistate to attack Soviet Union if they were to start an attack. This will prevent a war from taking place thus making it a better option as prevention is better than starting a war.

Cons - However, this will not solve any of their current conflicts and might in return agitate Soviet Union as they might view it as US underestimating their power. Thus, leading to Soviet Union starting a war.

# data[].attributes.body
2) It won't be seen as an act of invasion, but rather as a warning of the consequences if they allied with the Soviet Union.  Moreover,  they would not have any grounds to say that they can invade USA because of aggressive actions.

Thus, using a warning would be a safer and more reliable option for Kennedy to use.

3) Even though the tone is aggressive, Castro would not neccessarily abide to USA as USA is just warning them with words and no action is taken.  It was also considered as a "pretty weak" response by the USA's friends and mutuals. Moreover, The USA had already stated that they would take action against offensive weapons, and for them to respond with a warning, it would be anti-climatic and would again be seen as  weak response.

-Ryan (28), Bella (2), Natasha (25), Shi Min (29)