# data[].attributes.headline
Victim blaming can affect trial outcomes - article

# data[].attributes.subject
Victim blaming can affect trial outcomes - article

# data[].attributes.headline
Perpetrator Management Toolkit - Dr Kelly Henderson

# data[].attributes.subject
Perpetrator Management Toolkit - Dr Kelly Henderson

# data[].attributes.headline
How Domestic Violence Perpetrators Manipulate Systems. 

# data[].attributes.subject
How Domestic Violence Perpetrators Manipulate Systems. 

# data[].attributes.body
Why Systems & Professionals Are So Vulnerable & 5 Steps to Perpetrator-Proof Your System

David Mandel, Anna Mitchell
& Ruth Stearns Mandel
Safe & Together Institute

# data[].attributes.body
These learning outcomes have been established as part of the formal accreditation process for this course. All assessment tasks are against these outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Participation – We ask that you take part as much as you can, we have included a variety of different activities so that everyone will hopefully feel able to join in as learning from each other is really valuable. If we have a skills practice session - just to reassure you, you will be in groups of 3 people and won’t have to practice in front of the whole group. You will just be asked to share feedback about how it went after practising in your small group.

Respect each other, we never know in the training room who may have their own lived experience of domestic abuse either now, or in the past as an adult or child. Be mindful of sharing any judgments and how that would impact a survivor in the room.

Challenge opinion not person.  It is ok to have differing opinions but let’s use that as an opportunity to be curious about the difference rather than challenge a person on theirs.

We also ask you respect this learning space by minimising distractions such as mobile phones and closing other tabs on your computer, especially email.

Confidentiality – Please do not share other people’s stories without consent or use their names. Throughout the day, we will consider why maintaining confidentiality is so important to survivors and this also applies to any colleagues who share their personal experiences. As trainers, we also have a responsibility to ensure that people are safe and if we hear information that indicates someone is at risk of harm, we may need to share that beyond this room. If this happens, we will speak to the person first before we do unless this puts someone at further risk. We are sharing this with you now so you’re aware and can make a choice about what you share with others.

Self-care - This training can be emotive. If you become upset or overwhelmed by any of the content, please take a break, turn camera off and mute yourself as part of looking after yourself – we are here to support/talk to at lunch/end of session. Can send a private message to the trainer in the chat (if Zoom) or contact us by email after the training.

Breaks: We will have 3 short breaks during the session – one 15 minute tea break and two 5 minute “stretch’ breaks

# data[].attributes.headline
Assessment tasks for the Leadership Modules in the Task Workbook.  

# data[].attributes.subject
Assessment tasks for the Leadership Modules in the Task Workbook.  

# data[].attributes.body
UPDATED 23 JUNE - PLEASE DELETE PREVIOUS VERSIONS.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
_Task Workbook Appendix 1_Assessment Tasks & Due Dates_UPDATED June 2021 (1)

# data[].attributes.body
T: 0191 525 5006 | DD: 0191 525 5430 | M: 07734 597658
E: Lisa.Smith@gentoogroup.com |

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Your search for the phrase domestic abuse returned 72 results.

Domestic abuse is a crime and affects the quality of life of the victims, their family and their friends, and can also affect a person's home. This page explains how you can get help and support if you are experiencing or perpetrating domestic abuse. Our Tenancy Agreement says the following:

Domestic abuse is a crime and affects the quality of life of the victims, their family and their friends, whilst also possibly affecting a person's home. You must not threaten violence or be violent... or sexual abuse to make anyone who lives with you leave the property. Domestic abuse is any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between... or sexuality. The abuse can encompass, but is not limited to: Psychological - Making you feel

to the organisation. "Our employees are ideally placed within local communities to challenge domestic abuse... in recognition of their hard work and commitment to tackling domestic abuse. Over the past year... to domestic abuse through an accreditation process, which assesses individual housing providers and supports...A Durham landlord has been accredited for its commitment to supporting those affected by domestic violence. Durham City Homes is the first landlord in the region to be recognised by the Domestic

a pattern of behaviour to frighten or humiliate you. Domestic abuse can happen to anyone regardless...Any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between those aged 16 or over who are, or have been, intimate partners or family members regardless of gender or sexuality. The abuse can encompass, but is not limited to: Psychological: Making you feel devalued and afraid, if you are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender (LGBT) threatening

Head Office

Emperor House, 2 Emperor Way

Sunderland

Doxford International Business Park

SR3 3XR

Gentoo Group Limited is a charitable community benefit society, registration number 7302

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Your search for the phrase domestic abuse returned 72 results. Domestic abuse is a crime and affects the quality of life of the victims, their family and their friends, and can also affect a person's home. This page explains how you can get help and support if you are experiencing or perpetrating domestic abuse.

# data[].attributes.body
1. To understand what good practice looks like in Priority Area 3: of Risk Management

2. To understand what good practice in risk management looks like in Priority Area 5: Perpetrator Management

3. To understand your role as a Lead in meeting the accreditation assessment criteria for these Priority Areas

4. To investigate actions that can be taken as a Lead in relation to these Priority Areas

# data[].attributes.headline
You have been asked to give evidence at a Domestic Homicide Review into Miriam’s death. 

# data[].attributes.subject
You have been asked to give evidence at a Domestic Homicide Review into Miriam’s death. 

# data[].attributes.body
Miriam died when Chris, her live-in boyfriend of seven months, beat her to death when her benefits status changed and their collective income dropped.

Miriam was a tenant of your housing authority. Your officers had given permission for Chris to live there six months ago when Miriam requested that.

Chris had been visiting Miriam at the property, at the supermarket she worked at part-time and at her church regularly for three months before they became a couple and Chris moved in.

Miriam had said to friends, ‘He might as well move in. I can’t seem to shake him any other way. He may as well be here.’

Miriam suffered from mental health issues including very low self-esteem. She was on a form of financial benefits that assisted people with disabilities to return to work.

That had helped her get her job at the supermarket. But that’s also what led to her benefits status changing – six months in the same job.

Over the last few months before she died, Miriam – as tenant – had been reported by neighbours for anti social behaviour – loud noises, arguments, fighting, broken windows.

Due to the frequency of the complaints and their increasing severity, your agency had to take enforcement action against Miriam, threatening her tenancy. Chris’ drug use did not help.

It meant that other people not associated with the tenancy were often in the property.

You must explain what steps your agency took to manage the risks Miriam faced.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: A Domestic Homicide Review (DHR) is a multi-agency review of the circumstances in which the death of a person aged 16 or over has, or appears to have, resulted from violence, abuse or neglect by a person to whom they were related or with whom they were, or had been, in an intimate personal relationship, or a member of the same household as themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Please note that I have removed the Safe & Together case notes slides pending approval to use them. Will add as a separate file once approval is received.

# data[].attributes.body
Language x 3

Training - it's everyone's business in the organisation to have DA Awareness

Holding perps to account

Language/case notes

Insightful

Missed opportunities - the importance of being aware of the opportunities to act

Accountability

Best most practical session yet

Informative

Risk assess at the first point of disclosure and dynamic risk assess after every incident

Freya did a presentation to our safeguarding leadership panel on DA Awareness - it was a good lead-in to capture that group

Working with DA charity GLOW in Stoke-on-Trent as a key partner. We commissioned them to develop and deliver DA bespoke training package

I was contacted byu our Chief Operating Officer who wanted info about DA and how to include at a senior level and ensure it could be included in our COVID recover plan for the organisation and the community

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Safe & Together Institute - Concrete strategies. Meaningful tools. Real change. | Formerly David Mandel & Associates LLC

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Concrete strategies. Meaningful tools. Real change. | Formerly David Mandel & Associates LLC

# data[].attributes.headline
Safe and Together Critical Components & Principles

# data[].attributes.subject
Safe and Together Critical Components & Principles

# data[].attributes.headline
False Allegations of 🤬 and domestic abuse - CPS report

# data[].attributes.subject
False Allegations of 🤬 and domestic abuse - CPS report

# data[].attributes.body
Myth: Women lie about abuse  False allegations about domestic abuse are extremely rare. The Crown Prosecution Service released the first ever study of this in 2013, and concluded that false allegations are even more infrequent than previously thought. In the 17-month period that the study examined, there were 111,891 prosecutions for domestic violence, and only six prosecutions for making false allegations.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
False Allegations of Rape and/or Domestic Abuse, see: Guidance for Charging Perverting the Course of Justice and Wasting Police Time in Cases involving Allegedly False Allegations of Rape and/or Domestic Abuse

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This guidance applies to cases when a charging decision is being made in relation to a person who has made an allegation of rape or domestic abuse and one of the following situations apply: It is suggested that their allegation is false; They have retracted their allegation; or They have withdrawn a retraction ["double retraction"].

# data[].attributes.headline
Lauren Masters Case Study - additional information.

# data[].attributes.subject
Lauren Masters Case Study - additional information.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lauren Masters_Why we should keep perpetrators of domestic abuse in sight

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence is suggesting that perpetrator programmes are effective according to this report by RESPECT UK

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We lead on the development of safe, effective work with perpetrators, male victims, and young people using violence in their close relationships.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
What are we going to do?

The Act introduces a new civil Domestic Abuse Protection Notice (DAPN) to provide immediate protection following a domestic abuse incident, and a new civil Domestic Abuse Protection Order (DAPO) to provide flexible, longer-term protection for victims.

The survivors Refuge work with consistently report that existing injunctions are limited in their effectiveness... Refuge, therefore, welcomes the provisions establishing the new consolidated Domestic Abuse Protection Order (DAPO) and that breach of a DAPO will be a criminal offence. Further, Refuge is pleased that the new DAPO can be applied for, and recognised, in both criminal and civil courts.

Refuge, written evidence to the Joint Committee on the Draft Domestic Abuse Bill, April 2019.

How are we going to do it?

We will enable DAPNs and DAPOs to be used to protect victims from all forms of domestic abuse, including non-physical abuse and controlling or coercive behaviour.

We will introduce a DAPN which, like the current Domestic Violence Protection Notice, will give victims immediate protection following an incident. A DAPN would be issued by the police and could, for example, require a perpetrator to leave the victim's home for up to 48 hours.

We will provide for DAPOs to have flexible duration so that longer-term protection can be provided where necessary and proportionate.

As with the current DVPO, police will make an application for a DAPO to a magistrates' court. However, we will introduce alternative application routes so that victims and specified third parties can apply for a DAPO directly to the family court. We will also enable criminal, family, and civil courts to make a DAPO of their own volition during existing court proceedings, which do not have to be domestic abuse-related.

We will enable DAPOs to impose both prohibitions and positive requirements on perpetrators. These could include prohibiting the perpetrator from coming within a specified distance of the victim's home and/or any other specified premises, such as the victim's workplace, alongside requiring the perpetrator to attend a behaviour change programme, an alcohol or substance misuse programme or a mental health assessment.

We will enable the requirements imposed by a DAPO to be varied by the courts so that they can respond to changes over time in the perpetrator's behaviour and the level of risk they pose.

We will provide courts with the express power to use electronic monitoring ('tagging') to monitor a perpetrator's compliance with certain requirements imposed by a DAPO.

All DAPOs will include notification requirements, which will require perpetrators to notify the police of their name and address and of any changes to this information. The Bill also includes the power for additional notification requirements to be specified in regulations, which courts may impose on a case-by-case basis as appropriate.

Breach of a DAPO will be a criminal offence, carrying a maximum penalty of up to five years' imprisonment, or a fine, or both. We will also enable a breach to instead be dealt with as a civil contempt of court, and would expect the victim's views to be considered together with other issues of public interest when deciding which sanction for breach is appropriate.

We will pilot DAPNs and DAPOs in a small number of areas across the UK to assess the effectiveness and impact of the new model prior to national roll out. The Act will repeal the current Domestic Violence Protection Notices (DVPNs) and Domestic Violence Protection Orders (DVPOs).

Background

There are a range of existing orders that can be used in domestic abuse cases, including Non-Molestation Orders, Occupation Orders, Restraining Orders and DVPOs. These orders vary widely in terms of who can apply for them, the conditions that can be attached to them and the consequences of breach. In addition, there is currently no single order that is accessible across the criminal, family and civil courts. This can lead to confusion for victims and practitioners in domestic abuse cases and problems with enforcement.

We have also heard from the police, practitioners and organisations representing victims that the effectiveness of the current DVPO is limited due to the absence of criminal sanctions if the order is breached, and the fact that it has a maximum duration of just 28 days.

DAPOs have the potential to place a significant burden on perpetrators. Isn't this disproportionate?

To make a DAPO the court must be satisfied that the order is necessary and proportionate to protect the victim from domestic abuse or the risk of domestic abuse.

The wide range of prohibitions and requirements available will enable the courts to impose a tailored order that will adequately protect the victim based on the specific facts of each individual case.

Before imposing a positive requirement, the court must receive evidence about its suitability and enforceability from the person who will supervise compliance with that requirement.

Won't victims and agencies still be confused if other protective orders remain available?

The Act repeals existing Domestic Violence Protection Orders.

Other protective orders, such as Non-Molestation Orders and Restraining Orders, will remain in place so that they can continue to be used in cases which are not domestic abuse-related, such as cases of stalking or harassment where the perpetrator is not a current or former intimate partner or a family member.

Our policy intention in creating new DAPNs and DAPOs is to bring together the strongest elements of existing protective orders into a single comprehensive, flexible order which will provide more effective and longer-term protection to victims of domestic abuse and their children.

It is our intention that DAPOs will become the 'go to' protective order in cases of domestic abuse.

Statutory guidance on the orders will cover how DAPOs fit within the existing protective order landscape and scenarios in which they should be considered.

What provision is there for positive requirements like accredited perpetrator programmes?

We will continue to work with local areas to support effective commissioning of domestic abuse services, including high-quality, safe, and accredited perpetrator programmes.

The Domestic Abuse Commissioner will play a key role in doing this, including through raising awareness of the issues, monitoring and overseeing the delivery of services and ensuring that work with perpetrators is effective, evidence-based and safe.

How will you ensure that effective action will be taken in response to breach of a DAPO?

The Government is keen to ensure that the will of the court is upheld. That is why the Act provides for breach of an order to be a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years' imprisonment, or a fine, or both.

For each positive requirement imposed by a DAPO, the order must specify the person responsible for supervising compliance with that requirement. That person will be required to promote compliance with the requirement and inform the police of any breaches or compliance.

All DAPOs carry notification requirements requiring the person subject to the order to notify the police of their name and home address and of any changes to this information, thereby assisting the police to monitor the perpetrator's whereabouts and the risk they pose to the victim. Breach of the notification requirements is also a criminal offence punishable by up to five years' imprisonment, a fine, or both.

What training and guidance will be put in place on the new orders?

We will produce detailed statutory guidance and a programme of training and toolkits for professionals to embed understanding of the new orders.

The Judicial College has a regular training programme for all judges and magistrates, and HM Courts and Tribunals Service provides training for all court staff. We will work with both partners to introduce training on DAPOs into ongoing training programmes.

Will legal aid be available for DAPOs?

Legal aid will be available for civil representation for victims applying for an order and for representing the respondent in criminal courts, subject to means and merits tests.

As a protective order, DAPOs could be added to the list of accepted evidence of domestic abuse and could therefore be used by the applicant to apply for Legal Aid in private family law disputes, subject to means and merits tests.

Will DAPO applications be free for the police?

We have made it clear that victims will not have to pay a fee to apply for a DAPO, to ensure that the new orders are accessible to victims.

However, we also want to ensure that the orders can be made without the victim's involvement where appropriate and that application fees do not in any way deter the police from using them.

Accordingly, we will provide sufficient funding to cover the cost of court fees incurred by the police for any applications for DAPOs they consider appropriate during the proposed two-year piloting of DAPOs.

We will use the pilot to better understand the cost to the police and we will then take a decision on whether to continue to provide funding thereafter when DAPOs are rolled out nationally.

Why are DAPO applications restricted to the police, victims and specified third parties?

Any person can apply for a DAPO, provided that the court gives them leave to apply.

The Act enables victims and the police to apply without leave of the court, and any other person to apply with leave of the court.

The Bill also includes provision for other persons as specified in regulations to be able to apply. These third parties would be able to apply without leave of the court and could include, for example, local authorities.

Key facts

In the year ending March 2020, 4,468 DVPNs were issued (data from 25 forces) and 6,267 DVPOs were granted (data from 37 forces).

In the year ending December 2020, 36,952 Non-Molestation Orders were made (an increase of 89% over the past nine years). We estimate that around 55,000 DAPOs will be made per year. This is based on the estimated use of DVPOs for all police forces, Non-Molestation Orders, Occupation Orders and Restraining Orders, that will that will become DAPOs, plus a 5-10% uplift.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Domestic Abuse Protection Notices / Orders factsheet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Act introduces a new civil Domestic Abuse Protection Notice (DAPN) to provide immediate protection following a domestic abuse incident, and a new civil Domestic Abuse Protection Order (DAPO) to provide flexible, longer-term protection for victims. The survivors Refuge work with consistently report that existing injunctions are limited in their effectiveness...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Content warning - this video contains descriptions and discussion of domestic abuse.

What needs to happen to stop the abuse?

The Domestic Abuse Act became law in April 2021. In this Act there is a legal commitment from the government to publish a strategy focusing on perpetrators of domestic abuse. Its time to make sure the strategy is a good one! Done right, it could turn the tide on domestic abuse, done wrong, nothing changes and victims are still left doing all the hard work to keep themselves safe.

Join us to make sure that this is a high quality Perpetrator Strategy, shaped by victim/survivor views.

Who can help change the story?

The government is now responsible for publishing the Perpetrator Strategy within a year. We welcome its plan to do this as part of a wider domestic abuse strategy.

The Call to Action for a Domestic Abuse Perpetrator Strategy sets out the five elements that according to over 100 experts, including survivors and organisations, must be included by government in the Perpetrator Strategy for it to be safe and effective. Click here to find out more about the 5 things that need to be covered.

MPs can play a part by encouraging the Home Secretary and other Ministers (we want every government department to be involved) to ensure it is a robust strategy, that includes quality funded responses for every kind of domestic abuse perpetrator alongside comprehensive funding for victims' services. We also want to see support for professionals from every sector - health, housing, education etc - to know how to respond safely when they come across domestic abuse perpetrators.

Currently, funding for perpetrator interventions mostly sits with the Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) in each area, so they can make a difference too. We want them to fund interventions that include strong victim support services, which are an essential part of quality perpetrator work.

How can I help?

Please share Helen's story and tag your local MP or PCC, telling them why it matters to you that the perpetrator strategy is a good one. You can find your local PCC here.

If you are part of a voluntary, statutory or academic organisation engaging with victims or perpetrators of domestic abuse and want to sign our Call to Action, please email us on info@driveproject.org.uk and show your support for the creation of a comprehensive Perpetrator Strategy that addresses perpetrators' behaviour effectively. Current signatories can be seen in the image below.

Get help if you are experiencing abuse

If you, or someone you know, is in immediate danger always call 999 and ask for the police.

If you are experiencing domestic abuse, or are supporting someone who is in that situation, help is available.

If you suspect that an abuser is monitoring your internet usage, find out how to hide your browser history.

If you are worried about your own behaviour

Please contact Respect's free phoneline at 0808 802 4040

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Content warning - this video contains descriptions and discussion of domestic abuse. The Domestic Abuse Act became law in April 2021. In this Act there is a legal commitment from the government to publish a strategy focusing on perpetrators of domestic abuse. Its time to make sure the strategy is a good one!

# data[].attributes.body
This infographic shows your journey from Module 1 to Module 12.

# data[].attributes.body
Lisa mentioned the Alice Ruggles case. Here is a link to an article.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Alice Ruggles' parents have revealed how they watched their confident happy daughter change before their eyes as her obsessive boyfriend Trimann Dhillon started to show his true colours.

Sue Hills and Clive Ruggles have given a shocking insight into just how quickly romance can turn to violence as they lift the lid on Alice's brief relationship with her killer.

Serving solider Dhillon cut Alice's throat at her Gateshead home, in October 2016.

Today, a Domestic Homicide Review has been published into her death making a series of recommendations about how similar tragedies could be prevented.

Alice's parents write an emotional foreword to the 104-page document in which they describe how the new couple's relationship rapidly deteriorated.

They reveal how they saw no obvious tell-tale signs that their daughter was in so much danger.

They wrote: "Alice was strong, independent, caring and intelligent. She was full of self-confidence and well able to look after herself.

"In our eyes, she was not vulnerable. The controlling nature of her relationship with the perpetrator did not become apparent to us until after her murder. This was because the perpetrator was so good at covering it up."

Alice, who is originally from Leicestershire, stayed in Newcastle after graduating and got a job with Sky.

Her parents say she met Dhillon through mutual friends on Facebook and they chatted online for several months before eventually meeting.

"Alice was introduced to the perpetrator by a mutual friend after he saw her in a picture posted on the friend's Facebook. The initial three months of their 'relationship' occurred online, as he was a soldier serving abroad," they explained.

"He and Alice eventually met in January 2016, when he returned to the UK for a short period of leave before returning to Afghanistan for a further two months."

Sue, 58, and Clive, 66, explained how they noticed a change in their daughter just months after she met Dhillon.

"Alice was initially charmed by his attentive and caring behaviour. After he came back to the UK in April, their relationship deteriorated. Alice was clearly not happy; she became withdrawn and lonely and lost weight," they explained.

"She fell out with her best friend and then her housemates and moved to a flat in Gateshead, sharing with a work colleague."

Alice's family noticed how withdrawn and unhappy Alice had become during a family holiday to Cornwall in July.

"Around this time, Alice was contacted by another woman whom the perpetrator had befriended on a dating website. This was the culmination of a series of events where the perpetrator had lied to Alice, and she was no longer able to trust him. Eventually, she ended the relationship."

But controlling Dhillon refused to accept that it was over.

He bombarded Alice with calls, voice messages, texts and emails.

"In some he professed his undying love; in others he used emotional blackmail, crying down the phone or threatening to kill himself," said Alice's parents.

"In one message he stated he was not used to being denied what belonged to him. He took control of her Facebook account and used veiled threats to release compromising photographs that he had of her.

"At first Alice tried her best to be pleasant to him, as it was not in her nature to be horrid, but he simply abused that in his attempts to get her back. When she began to ignore his messages, he contacted some of her family members and friends, trying to get them to influence her. He had also hacked into her social media, and it became clear that he was reading all her messages so that he knew who she was speaking to and where she was. The psychological effect of this on Alice was profound."

On the evening of September 30 Dhillon turned up at Alice's home, on Rawling Road in Bensham and repeatedly ran the doorbell , but ran away whenever she came to answer.

He then climbed into the back garden and knocked on her ground-floor window as she lay in bed. When she opened the curtains, she saw flowers and chocolates on the windowsill and Dhillon backing off. As he drove back to Edinburgh he left a chilling phone message, where he kept repeating that he did not want to kill her and would not kill her.

That night Alice called the police 101 non-emergency number. She was told that the perpetrator could be issued with a Police Information Notice (PIN) warning him that he would be arrested if he attempted to contact her again.

Alice's parents said she had been reassured by this initial police contact.

"Alice received a home visit from a police officer who reassured her that she was not wasting police time, took her statement, and told her to contact him immediately if the perpetrator contacted her again," they said. "She was immensely relieved by this and really believed that the stalking would stop."

But seven days later, Alice contacted the police again to report that he was still contacting her and no action was taken.

Her parents said: "Alice was distraught, as she now believed that nothing could or would be done to stop this stalking."

Five days later, Alice was dead.

Following the murder, Alice's family set up the Alice Ruggles Trust , which which aims to raise awareness of coercive control and stalking.

And Alice's parents have since worked closely with Northumbria Police, other forces and criminal justice agencies to help promote the message and educate officers and staff about the issue.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Alice Ruggles' parents on how blossoming romance ended in brutal murder

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Alice Ruggles' parents have revealed how they watched their confident happy daughter change before their eyes as her obsessive boyfriend Trimann Dhillon started to show his true colours. Sue Hills and Clive Ruggles have given a shocking insight into just how quickly romance can turn to violence as they lift the lid on Alice's brief relationship with her killer.

# data[].attributes.headline
Alice Ruggles parents speak about the training they have developed with Northumbria Police - video

# data[].attributes.subject
Alice Ruggles parents speak about the training they have developed with Northumbria Police - video

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The parents of Alice Ruggles discuss training they have developed with Northumbria Police

# data[].attributes.body
Partnered with a survivor

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Dr. Leanor Johnson is an Emeritus Professor of African and African American Studies in the School of Social Transformation at Arizona State University. Johnson's main research activities have been in Black family studies, cross-cultural sexuality, and work-family stress. In addition, she is an associate editor of the Journal of Family Relations, a consulting editor for the Journal of Sex Research and a reviewer for several other journals.
Research:

Leanor Johnson, Michael Todd, Ganga Subramanian. Violence in Police Families: Work-Family Spillover. Journal of Family Violence (2005).

Johnson, Leanor Boulin, Staples, Robert. Black Families at the Crossroads: Challenges and Prospects. (2005).

Johnson, Leanor Boulin, Staples, Robert. Black Families at the Crossroads. (2004).

Psychological Perspectives (2002).

Johnson, Leanor Boulin (Author). Burnout and Work-Family Violence Among Police: Gender Comparisons. Domestic Violence by Police Officers (2000).

Presentations:

Johnson, Leanor. The Spirit of Black History Month. Speech given prior to an Address by Barry Black, Chaplain of the U.S. Senate, Camelback SDA Church (Feb 2005).

Johnson, Leanor. The Spirit of Black History Month. Camelback SDA Church (Feb 2004).

Johnson, Leanor. Brown Bag Book Discussion- Reparations, A discussion of Dr. Randall Robinson's book: The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks. Arizona State University West Campus Black History Month (Feb 2003).

Johnson, Leanor, Tein, Jen-Yun, Lunka, Michelle. Work and Family Emotional Display Rules, Job Burnout, and Police Family Well-being. Conference on Persons, Processes, and Places: Research on Families, Workplaces and Communities (Feb 2002).

Johnson, Leanor, Gershon, R, Wetendorf, D, M Esposito, N. Police Work-Family Stress and Domestic Violence: Reports from Researchers, Practitioners, and Administrators. National Council on Family Relationships Symposium (Nov 2001). Service:

Camelback SDA Church, Scottsdale, AZ, Speaker (2004 - Present)

National Council on Family Relations, Leadership Workshop & Institute Houston, Texas and Orlando, Florida, Co-founder (2000 - Present)

Journal of Family Relations, Editorial Board (1989 - 2010)

Tanzania Calculator Project. Tanzania, Africa. Sullivan Foundation, Washington D.C, Organizer (2008 - 2008)

Pacific Union College, Board of Trustees Regent (2003 - 2008)

Camelback SDA Church. Black History Tribute, Consultant/Contributor (2005 - 2007)

African American Advisory Council for the State of Arizona, Advisor (2004 - 2007)

Between Nurses Foundation, Board Member (2004 - 2007)

Between Nurses Foundation. Phoenix, Arizona, Board Member (2004 - 2007)

Camelback SDA Church, Scottsdale, AZ, Consultant/presenter (2006 - 2007)

Personnel Action Committee AAAS, 3rd Year Review Committee, Chair (2006 - 2007)

Martin Luther King, Jr Celebration Committee, Member (2006 - 2007)

National Council on Family Relations, Co-organizer and Facilitator (2005 - 2006)

African American Advisory Council to Superintendent of Public Instruction, State of Arizona Department of Education, Member (2004 - 2006)

Journal of Family Relations, Associate Editor (1989 - 2006)

National Council on Family Relations, Leadership Institute Workshop (2006)

Personnel Action Committee AAAS, 5th Year promotion and tenure, Chair (2006 - 2006)

Pacific Union College, Member, Board of Trustees (2003 - 2006)

Takoma Adventist Academy Board, Member (2003 - 2006)

Thunderbird Adventist Academy Board, Member (2003 - 2006)

International Fellows Selection Committee, Panelist/Judge (2006 - 2006)

African American Advisory Council for the State of Arizona, Member (2005 - 2006)

Leon Sullivan Summit/IFESH (International organization), Consultant (2006 - 2006)

NCFR Silent Auction: "AZ Lost Boys of Sudan Center", Co-Chair (2005 - 2005)

National Council on Family Relations, Co-Chair, Local Arrangements Committee (2004 - 2005)

Family-Life Summit Workshop, Moderator (2005 - 2005)

NCFR Special and Plenary Session Session, Presider/Announcer (2005 - 2005)

Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration Committee, Judge (2005 - 2005)

NCFR Tribute to Paul Glick, Co-Organizer (2005 - 2005)

Work-Life Summit Advisory Committee, Active Member (2005 - 2005)

Personnel Action Committee AAAS, 4th Year Review Committee, Chair (2005 - 2005)

Essay and Poster Contest, Judge (2004 - 2005)

Ms Magazine, Consultant (2005 - 2005)

A Wade Smith Lecture Series on Race Relations, Member (2004 - 2005)

Committee for Introduction to Ethnic Studies Course, Co-founder & member (1998 - 2005)

Camelback SDA Church, Speaker (2005 - 2005)

Community Alliance for Black Student Support Advisory Board, Member (2003 - 2004)

Employee Assistance Advisory Board, Member (2003 - 2004)

Martin Luther King Jr Advisory Board, Member (2003 - 2004)

ASU African and African American Studies Personnel Action Committee, Member (2004)

ASU African and African American Studies By-laws Committee, Member (2004)

ASU West Campus Black History Month Symposium, Discussant (2004)

Academic Affairs Committee, Board of Trustees, Pacific Union College, Member (2004)

Coordinating Committee: Introduction to Ethnic Studies, Co-founder and member (2004)

Faculty Women's Association Advisory Board, Member (2004)

Time Magazine, Consultant (2004)

This Magazine, Consultant (2004 - 2004)

Community Alliance for Black Student Support Advisory Board, Member (2001 - 2004)

Faculty Search Committee, African & African American Studies, Chair (2002 - 2003)

A. Wade Smith Memorial Lecture on Race, Member (2003)

ACES Advisory Board, Member (2003)

Black Caucus, Member (2003)

By-Laws Committee for AAS, Member (2003)

COBA Board member, Member (2003)

Search Committee for African American Studies, Chair (2003)

Honors College, Co-organizer (2002 - 2003)

Carver/Phoenix Union High School Museum/Cultural Center & Oral History Project, Coordinator (2002 - 2003)

African and African American Studies, Chair (2002 - 2003)

COBA - National Symposium, Symposium Co-Facilitator (2001 - 2002)

African Art Museum, Phoenix, AZ, Board Member (1997 - 2002)

African American Faith Partnership with Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS), Member (1996 - 2002)

The African American Faith Partnership with Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS), Executive Board Member (1996 - 2002)

National Council on Family Relations- Election Council, Co-Chair (1999 - 2002)

National Council on Family Relations-Election Council, Co-Chair & Member (1999 - 2002)

Diversity Alliance, Member (2001 - 2002)

Leon Sullivan Summit/IFESH (International organization), Facilitator (2001 - 2002)

FBI Academy Advisory Board for Stress Issues, Expert Consultant (1998 - 2000)

FBI Academy Behavioral Science Unit, Quantico, VA, Advisory Board (1997 - 2000)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dr. Leanor Johnson is an Emeritus Professor of African and African American Studies in the School of Social Transformation at Arizona State University. Johnson's main research activities have been in Black family studies, cross-cultural sexuality, and work-family stress.

# data[].attributes.headline
Have deleted this post until we get approval for Safe & Together Institute to use it.

# data[].attributes.subject
Have deleted this post until we get approval for Safe & Together Institute to use it.