# data[].attributes.body
The debate made me realise that there are many many aspects when it comes to comparing and contrasting things, especially when film is relatively subjective and there can be many opposing ideas coming from different individuals who view it differently. In a sense the skill to analyse critically and understand both films from its many different aspects, in order to come up with arguments/statements to defend/support our chosen film.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate made me realise that how good a film is is really based on the audience as it is a very subjective art. What one might like might just not suit the taste of the other, no matter how good it is technically or artistically or how much a certain audience might have liked it.
I used the my knowledge of film art in order to try and help think of counter arguments for my side, and also the skill of listening constantly to not miss a point and help find flaws in the other side's arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate made me realise that only claiming that your point/film is good or talking about its good points alone won't make you win. I learnt from the other side that countering your own side with its flaws and disadvantages, and praising the advantages of the other side can seize your side an opportunity.

It's also important to think deeper about all aspects of filmmaking. Even if you may not support your own side, by finding the reasons how and why your film/point was made will allow you to appreciate the process of the film and get good points for you to defend. Having a structure for your debate is also important. It should be organised and the way you convey it should be clear. Overall, it was a meaningful experience.

# data[].attributes.body
The skills I have used is to compare both stories and character development on how it affects the audience emotions (like peeping tom reveal the killer earlier while psycho only reveals at the end). I only talk about the comparison on both serve different purpose and motivation yet the same genre. However, I learned that everyone has their perspective on seeing films. What I may or may not have realised in the film does not apply to other person perspectives because we all have our own opinions and different ways of looking at the details, analysing a deeper meaning of the sequence, etc. In general, this debate makes me realise that there is no lose-win perspective from the opposing viewpoint but more like a win-win.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate has made me realized how films can actually be judged in a different way, different mindsets from one another can actually tell how good the film is able to published to the audience. Visual storytelling is one key factor in telling whether the film outcome is good or bad. Although the color is one factor of it, I feel that all you need is an actor who can portray according to what the film is going to be, even though is black & white, the audience will want to keep watching over and over again. Actor expression is the most important thing. Although the debate often goes off-topic when things get more intense, we actually pay more attention to those tiny little details of the film.

# data[].attributes.body
I think after the debate, it made me realise even more like how people think differently not just based on a film but like also the character in the film. Many had different opinions on who’s the scarier or more dangerous one, was it norman or mark?

For this debate, I really tried to understand the entire story first before diving in to the characters and then think of why and how the writers wrote what they write. And I tried to think if the film was plot driven or character driven which in my opinion peeping tom was definitely character driven.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate made me realise that there are so much more to analyze in the film. The small detail are especially so because a film is subjective. Therefore, everyone will have their own opinions and this can easily cause a topic to go off-track. At the same time, hearing everyone's opinion about the film actually helps me to improve the way I look at a film and through this, I learned a lot by paying more attention to details, for example, the character's movements, the setup, and the characters.

# data[].attributes.body
one thing i learnt is to try to listen and quickly process and understand what someone else is saying to be able to keep up. many things are subjective though, so i think when it comes to things like these its important to be able to bring your point across in a way where people understand what you're trying to say and why.

a skill i learnt is to try and look at things from a more rational and objective way instead of only focussing on story and emotions. as much as story is extremely important, but too much of something is no good too :)

# data[].attributes.body
One thing I have l learnt from this debate is that since there are so many factors into what makes a film good, how good a film is is ultimately subjective and up to the interpretation of the audience. It is very interesting to see how different factors have varying importance to everyone when judging a film. It helped me to realize that what I observe from a film is not always the only 'answer', and that my perspective may be too shallow too. I liked that we got to use our analysis skills during the debate to link the both films together, which helps us have a deeper understanding of the films of that period too!

# data[].attributes.body
Film is a really subjective medium; the audience has the right to judge whether a film is good or bad. They can analyse it as critically as film students do, or judge other’s taste through just another’s favourite director. Critiques can also be persuaded to say well about a film, regardless of quality, to stay on good terms with the industry or government or society. So ultimately, whether a film is deemed good or not is up to everyone’s own perception.

I used my knowledge of film art for the debate. Coming up with counter arguments usually involved picking flaws in the ways others critique the film, their basis, rather than the content itself. (Because the content itself is really subjective.)

# data[].attributes.body
The debate has made me realise that not only there are many different opinions on a topic, but also how the ideas are perceived by others. Instead of trying to make this debate all about one point and about “winning”, I went in with an open mind and accepted the opinions others had to say. Because of this, I am able to learn about both sides of the debate instead of shutting the opposing opinion down and closing off their viewpoints.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate made me realise that i should pay more attention to the film techniques used in film because i mostly focus on the emotions it makes me feel as an audience. However, i ddi realise that my perspective has widened after film history lessons as it is now easier for me to take in and understand what other people are saying while coming up with rebuttals too. The skills i have used was listening and comparing. I had to think of the different characteristics of Psycho and Peeping Tom and tried to compare and analyse them so that we would have points to say in the debate. Listening is also very important as in order to counter attack you have to listen and understand the other person's points.

# data[].attributes.body
I learnt that debates can get messy if you aren't focused and get lsot because then, everything is just jumbled up and you won't know what it happening. It's important to also get to the point if not you would possibly go off topic or your statement will become confusing. However, through this debate discussion I realise that im actually able to analyse films better than before and that I actually pay more attention to details of a film more than i expect myself to.

# data[].attributes.body
I've learnt that listening and looking at things from the opposing side's point of view is extremely important during a debate so as to we're able to dissect their statement, keeping in mind that a lot of these viewpoints are subjective, especially when it comes to film, and present them with a strong rebuttal and avoiding the straw man argument which eventually renders our argument inadequate.

# data[].attributes.body
1. something ive learnt is that  there are many similarities and differences despite it being of the same genre and produced in the same year. by listening to the different perspective, my own perspective is broaden with new insights and it's interesting to know that despite watching the same film, different pairs of eyes see differently.
2. skills used like Thinking Back bc psycho was so long ago help....but it's interesting to know which scenes stood out the most for us to have remembered it so vividly despite being so long ago.
another skill is possibly the act of listening. as mentioned in my first point, hearing what the opposition states is not only important to work on your rebuttal, but also accepting differing views with an open mind.

# data[].attributes.body
What I’ve learnt is probably a deeper understanding of both films. The “similarities” it has between each other like how both are related to parents and both of them are “psychopaths”. I used my film student knowledge HAHA  while analysing and worrying down points about peeping Tom🥳.

# data[].attributes.body
The debate made me realise that I have learnt to dissect films much better. I can take on an objective viewpoint and defend it because I am confident in my knowledge of film analysis. I used my skills in public speaking to be able to speak confidently, and I also used some listening skills to be able to understand other people’s viewpoint so I can counter it. I also used my knowledge of things like mise-en-scene, editing, etc. to be able to build a strong argument.