# data[].attributes.body
Perspective. It removes the emotional connection to the work.

# data[].attributes.body
It allows you to see how accurate or inaccurate your grading is.

# data[].attributes.body
Transparency. Accountability. Access to to different content knowledge and levels of experience. Gaining perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
Wider scope of POV

# data[].attributes.body
Other perspectives are valuable & help us identify areas for improvement.

# data[].attributes.body
Collaboration with my dept head allowed me to get a better idea of what the students came from and where they are headed.

Allows me to use similar language

# data[].attributes.body
You get an outside perspective. Feedback from inner-department, outside-department, and grade level is valuable. It also helps us to identify common mistakes being made amongst students.

# data[].attributes.body
Identifying ways to support students who may struggle with a complex task.

# data[].attributes.body
Talking with other teachers in the dept. and identifying gaps in student knowledge across the whole curriculum

# data[].attributes.body
Opportunities to let others' work inform our own

# data[].attributes.body
Time

# data[].attributes.body
Allows for alignment in content. Jessica specifically has appreciated the attempt to align the research paper process and scaffold it over grade levels.

# data[].attributes.body
Time - This takes more time than it would seem.

# data[].attributes.body
The person you are reviewing with and yoru relationship to/with you

# data[].attributes.body
Shift priorities. Build trust with colleagues. Be flexible on what the context could look like.

# data[].attributes.body
Time and Fear. Emotional attachment to the assessment. Prioritizing the time over other things on my to-do list.

# data[].attributes.body
Trust amongst colleagues to make sharing a safe place. Built in time.