# data[].attributes.body
In the words of Jaslyn Ting - "No text is unbiased"

# data[].attributes.body
since no source is ever objective, each source is bound to take a stand. however, why is the focus always on the negative aspects of the League of Nations?

would there ever be a source that just explicitly states facts with no involvement of personal feelings

# data[].attributes.body
Neutral questions asked
and pictures shows status of different parties

# data[].attributes.body
State our opinion/what we infer from the source and explain why we think so
Requires extensive knowledge to explain and understand the questions

# data[].attributes.body
1(a) cartoon + purpose
1(b) inference
1(c) message
2. German
3. USSR

# data[].attributes.body
Why is the opinion regarding the League of Nations skewed towards one side?

# data[].attributes.body
The picture used in the paper is a cartoon, and almost always has a negative portrayal. (For example, weak, powerless, ineffective etc.)

# data[].attributes.body
LON tends to be portrayed as weak

# data[].attributes.body
purpose and inferential questions
picture includes representation of the League of Nations and the problems they have with animals (predator and prey)

# data[].attributes.body
Is there more to life back then than this?
What should the League of Nations have done then?

# data[].attributes.body
All SBQ must explain the answer

# data[].attributes.body
- images mostly mock the League of Nations
-1 inference 2 purpose

# data[].attributes.body
The questions are phrased to test our understanding of the author's opinions of the different events

# data[].attributes.body
The questions make use of "why" and "what".

Images are biased and only show one point of view

# data[].attributes.body
Why and what questions
Pictures are usually targeted to insult someone or something

# data[].attributes.body
- What and why questions (sourced-based questions)
- League of Nations is always being portrayed in a negative image
- Tone is sarcastic and mocking the LON

# data[].attributes.body
The questions are asking for our opinion and to support our answer. The questions are open and easy to understand.

The images portray UN in a negative light and weak

# data[].attributes.body
The questions are asking for our opinions and what we can infer from the passage

The images always mock that the League of nations is unstable/weak/no authority.

# data[].attributes.body
The questions require us to write very long.
Weird and nearly always is to insult someone.

# data[].attributes.body
-Why and explain/reason questions with inference to sources. Usually from a passage or an image to depict the meaning.
-Objects in the pictures usually represent something. For example, the LON represents the rabbit and International strife as the snake.

# data[].attributes.body
Why and What questions. The League of Nations always getting dissed man. It's pretty sad.

# data[].attributes.body
- 5W1H, explain your answer, answer supported with evidence
-pictures are symbolic
-Bias against the LON

# data[].attributes.body
Only why and what questions
Point of Views and Points of view

# data[].attributes.body
Q1:
"Why"-Need to explain inferred purpose
"Artist...publish...cartoon"-Explain what you think is the artist POV/Opinion towards issue expressed through cartoon
Cartoon itself:
League of nations expressed as rabbit --> Vulnerable and hunted
International tribe --> more powerful and intimidating
POV of artist: negatively towards LON.

# data[].attributes.body
- Why and what questions
-General view being that the League of Nations was ineffective in maintaining peace.
- The picture is symbolic, using animals to represent the League of Nations(rabbit) and international problems(snake).

# data[].attributes.body
- Way questions are phrased
- The types of pictures used

# data[].attributes.headline
What questions do you still have after looking through the paper?

# data[].attributes.subject
What questions do you still have after looking through the paper?