# data[].attributes.body
Source: Unesco
Credibility Evaluation: Group 1 (Scholarly Books and Article)
Source Bias: These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words  to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
Factual Reporting: High
Comment: This is a good article which explain about CSE and why we need to have a CSE.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why comprehensive sexuality education is important

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Did you know that only 34 % of young people around the world can demonstrate accurate knowledge of HIV prevention and transmission? And that two out of three girls in some countries have no idea of what is happening to them when they begin menstruating? These are some of the reasons why there is an…

# data[].attributes.headline
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand

# data[].attributes.subject
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand

# data[].attributes.body
Source: US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health
Credibility Evaluation: Group 2 (Trade books and journal articles)
Source Bias: Right-Center Biased
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Comments : This gave me some information about the prevalence of Intimate Violence in Thailand.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Abstract

There is no recent national data on the prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. This study proposed to examine the prevalence of intimate partner violence in 4 regions of Thailand by using a standardized questionnaire from the WHO multi country study on women's health and domestic violence. Two thousand four hundred and sixty-two married or cohabiting women aged 20-59 years were interviewed about their experiences of psychologically, physically, sexually violent, and/or controlling behaviors by their male partners. The study found that 15% of respondents had experienced psychological, physical, and/or sexual violence in their life time which suggests that 1 in 6 of Thai women have faced intimate partner violence. Of the 15% of women who reported intimate partner violence within the past 12 months, psychological violence was the most common (60-68%), followed by sexual violence (62-63%) and physical violence (52-65%). In addition, the percentage of women who faced various forms of controlling behaviors varied from 4.6% to 29.3%. Men who were more controlling were more likely to abuse their female partners. The results reveal that partner violence against women is a significant public health issue in Thai society that must be addressed.

Keywords: Intimate partner violence, Domestic violence, Thailand, National prevalence

Violence against women is a significant problem and a universal phenomenon around the world, including in Thailand. One in 3 (35%) women around the world have experienced physical and/or sexual violence by their partner in their lifetime (WHO 2016). The United Nations defines violence against women as any acts of violent behavior that results in physical, sexual or psychological harm to women (UN 1993). There are many forms of violence against women. One of the most common forms is Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) (WHO 2002). IPV is a major public health issue, a hidden social problem, and women's human rights violation (WHO 2016), (WHO 2005a) which negatively affects women's physical, mental, sexual and/or reproductive health (WHO 2016).

Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand

In Thai society, IPV is considered as a private issue and family matter because the family is an important social institution, and portrayed as a space of love and care, however, in reality family violence exists. Most Thais learn they should not tell outsiders about internal family matters. As a result, IPV remains an invisible and unrecognized issue in Thai society and women victims have to deal with their intimate violence in their lives alone (Archavanitkul et al. 2005). When violence occurs in families, it is not reported, thus the statistics on IPV in Thailand are likely to be underestimated. Most of IPV statistics in Thailand are reports from Government Organizations (GOs) and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) such as the One Stop Crisis Centre (OSCC). The OSCC is run by the Ministry of Public Health and is a unit in government hospitals aimed to assist victims of violent situations from police station, NGOs' and shelters. Individuals who notify the police or visit a hospital are likely severe cases of violence. Statistics show that the numbers of domestic violence cases have significantly increased from 25,767 to 31,866 between 2010 and 2013 respectively (Thai Health Promotion Foundation 2011), (The Women's Affairs and Family Development 2013). In addition, the report from the OSCC, Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) found that, in 2015, there were 23,977 women who used their services. Furthermore, there were 460 cases of partner violence wherein police were notified and 373 cases which were sent to the court (The Women's Affairs and Family Development 2015).

To address intimate partner violence, in 2007, Thailand launched "Domestic Violence Victim Protection Act, B.E. 2550" and amended the criminal law B.E. 2550 section 276 (Penal Code Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 ( 2007) 2007). The "Domestic Violence Victim Protection Act, B.E. 2550" comprises 18 sections; many sections are important to victims, perpetrators, and government officers. For example, section 4 states that "Whoever conducts any act of domestic violence or is said to commit domestic violence shall be liable to imprison for a term of not exceeding six months or to a fine of not exceeding six thousand Baht or both"; section 5 stats that "A domestic violence victim or a person who has found or known of domestic violence shall have the duty to notify a competent official for the execution of this Act.." Prior to 2007, the criminal law B.E. 2550 section 276, did not include marital rape as a crime so spouses were not legally protected against sexual abuse by their partner (Penal Code Amendment Act (No.16) B.E. 2546 ( 2003) 2003). However, changes to the law in 2007 added legal protection for spouses who are victims of sexually violence by their partner.

Intimate Partner Violence Research in Thailand

The WHO Multi-country study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence Against Women (2005) examined the prevalence of intimate partner violence in 10 countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, Japan, Namibia, Peru, Samoa, Serbia, Tanzania, and Thailand.

The study found that of the 24,097 women participants, 16.0% to 61.0% had experienced some act of physical partner violence in their lifetime. Sexual violence was reported by 6.0% to 58.0% of respondents. In addition, 16.0% to 69.0% of women reported that they had experienced either sexual and/or physical violence by their partners. In Thailand, the study found that 22.9% of women in urban areas reported physical violence, 29.9% reported sexual violence, and 41.1% reported physical or sexual violence, or both. Whereas, 33.8% of women in rural areas reported physical violence, 28.9% reported sexual violence, and 47.4% reported physical or sexual violence, or both. It is interesting to note that urban Thai women reported more sexual violence than physical violence. The percentage of both urban and rural women revealing one or more acts of controlling behaviors by male partner varied from 4.7% to 31.3%. Furthermore, in all settings, women who had experienced either physical and/or sexual violence regularly reported more emotional suffering and identified physical health issues such as pain (WHO 2005b).

In 2006, there was a cohort study on domestic violence among pregnant Thai women in one province. They recruited 421 women in third trimester of pregnancy and followed them until 6 weeks postpartum. The study revealed that 53.7% reported psychological violence, 26.6% faced physical violence, and 19.2% confronted sexual violence by their partner during the current pregnancy. Whereas, in the postpartum period respondents who had experienced some type of intimate partner violence ranged from 9.5% to 35.4% (Sricamsuk 2006).

The latest National Reproductive Health Survey from 2009 (Social Statistics Bureau 2010) revealed that the rate of intimate partner violence among Thai women across the country was 2.9%. More recently, Chuemchit and Perngparn ( 2014) reported that between July - December, 2010 there were 471 women in Bangkok city who used the services at One Stop Crisis Centre and more than 70% of women had been victimized more than once (Chuemchit and Perngparn 2014).

These data are the tip of the iceberg; the true extent of the issue cannot be seen. In Thailand, there have been no large-scale IPV prevalence studies since the 2005 WHO Multi-country study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence Against Women. In response, the aim of this study was to examine the current prevalence of the various forms of intimate partner violence, including physical, psychological, sexual violence, and controlling behaviors and to identify factors associated with partner violence.

Method

Participants

This study was a cross-sectional study in 4 regions of Thailand: central, northern, southern, and northeastern which are the official government-categorized zones. A multi-stage sampling technique was used; first, simple random sampling was used for selection of one province in each region, second, all districts from the region were chosen for the study.

The sample size was calculated by n = , π = The proportion of IPV in Thailand (5.13%), based on National Statistic Office 2006. Therefore, a total sample size of 2,462 eligible persons was sought. Then the sample was calculated as proportionate to the size of each province and district. Finally, convenience sampling was used to select the participants at each community site. At the community level, first, researchers went to see a community leader to request the names and addresses of married or cohabiting women. Second, researchers visited women's houses based on the list to conduct interviews. All eligible women we met were select as respondents. While both men and women can be victims, women are more likely than men to face various forms of partner violence and report IPV-related injury (Hegarty 2000), (Breiding et al. 2008), (Tjaden and Thoennes 2000). Therefore, this study focused on women age 20-59 years, still married or cohabiting with a partner, and willing to participate in the study. Table provides a brief description of the study areas.

Table 1

Procedure and Data Collection

Each province had research assistants under the supervision of the principal investigator. In order to ensure quality data was captured, the female research assistants recruited for the data collection had at a minimum a bachelor degree, worked in the area of public health, and were experienced in community- based research. In each site, the interviews were conducted by trained interviewers who passed the standardized training based on WHO women's health and domestic violence study (Jansen et al. 2004) covering issues of gender-based violence and its consequences, gender sensitivity, interviewing techniques and skills, ethic, and the questionnaire. To ensure the confidentiality and safety of participants, each participant had a separate and private interview by a trained female interviewer. All these processes were intended to protect the privacy of the participants and minimize the shame of respondents for disclosing details of their relationship. After finishing the interview, all respondents received useful information about available services, for instance, hotline call center, shelter houses, and OSCCs in each province. Interviewers also provided respondents with additional support from local health service providers if requested. The data collection was conducted in 2016.

Ethical permission for this study was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee for Research Involving Human Research Subjects, Health Science Group, Chulalongkorn University (COA No.201/2016), Thailand.

Measurement Tool

A questionnaire was developed from the WHO multi country study on women's health and domestic violence (Archavanitkul et al. 2005), (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006). The WHO multi country study on women's health and domestic violence, measures three items of "sexual abuse", six items of "physical abuse", four items of "psychological abuse", and seven items of "controlling behaviors" which were examined separately from psychological abuse. After the pre-test, the Cronbach alphas for this measurement tool was 0.94.

The participants were asked questions related to their experience of specific acts of psychological, physical, and sexual abuse by their current husband and/or cohabiting male partner. Furthermore, we also followed the WHO framing of the questions which highlighted "how partner's treat each other rather than so-called conflict negotiation" (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006), (Heise and Garcia-Moreno 2002) because much intimate abuse in the Thai context can be conceptualized as punishment.

The questions on psychologically violent acts focused on insulting, humiliating, scaring, and threatening behaviors. The questions on physically violent acts were categorized as: 1) mild-to-moderate violence and 2) severe violence based on physical injury. Mild-to-moderate violence included pushing, shoving, grabbing or slapping and severe violence included choking, kicking, or using a weapon (WHO 2005b) (see Table ). Sexually violent acts included using physical force for sexual intercourse, having sexual intercourse against women's will, and sexual humiliation. For each act of violence, each participant was asked whether it had occurred over a year ago or within the year and then asked about the frequency of each act: 1) once or twice 2) a few times or 3) more than five times. The lifetime prevalence of IPV was defined as women who reported any kind of violent experience by a current partner over a year before the interview. Current prevalence was defined as women revealing at least one act of partner violence during the past year.

Table 2

Psychological violence

Physical violence

Sexual violence

Controlling behaviors

Hit with fist or something that could hurt

Got angry if you spoke with another man

kicked, dragged, or beaten up

Was often suspicious that you were unfaithful

Chocked or burnt

Expected you to ask permission before going out

Threatened to use weapon

In addition, this study also focused on seven forms of controlling behaviors by women's male partners which consisted of various acts to force and restrict women's daily life. For each act of controlling behavior, each respondent was asked whether it had happened within the past year (Yes or No). "Yes" responses were given a score of one and "No" responses were given a score of zero. Total scores were categorized into four levels (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006): (1) None (2) low (3) medium and (4) high.

Data Analysis

All data was entered, cleaned and coded before analyzing. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 22) was used to perform Uni-variate, Bivariate, and multivariate analysis. Uni-variate analysis was used to describe and summarize variables and find patterns in the data. (e.g. frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviation). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were used to test relationships between variables. For bivariate analysis, Pearson's Chi square test with statistical level of P value <0.05 was used to analyze the association between controlling behaviors by male partner and experiences of violence. Multivariate regression was used to examine differences in lifetime IPV by demographic variables.

Results

In this study, four provinces from 4 regions were sampled according to the proportion of the population. The mean age of the respondents was 39.4. Thirty-four percent of women had finished higher education, the rest had completed high-school, primary school, secondary school, and no education, respectively. About 10.7% of participants were housewives and/or no occupation, while 89.3% had an occupation (See Table ).

Table 3

Results demonstrate that out of 2,462 respondents, 15.4% had encountered psychological, physical, or sexual violence, suggesting that 1 in 6 married or cohabiting Thai women have experiences intimate partner violence in their lifetime (See Table ).

Table 4

Table reflects the proportion of married/cohabiting women who disclosed having experienced psychological, physical, or sexual intimate partner violence in their lifetime (over 1 year ago) or currently (within the past year). The study revealed that the most commonly reported type of partner violence was psychological violence. Sexually violence by a partner was noticeably less prevalent than the other 2 types of violence. Mild to moderate physical violence were more prevalent than severe physical violence.

Table 5

The most common form of psychological violence was being scared (15.4%), followed by being insulted (14.8%), being humiliated or belittled (10.9%), and being threatened (7.5%). Reports of physical violence included being pushed or shoved (10.6%), follow by being slapped or thrown (8.3%), being hit with a fist (5.4%), being threatened with a weapon (4.4%), being kicked/dragged/beaten up (4.1%), being chocked/burnt (2.6%). Reports of sexual violence, found that 10.4% of respondents revealed unwanted sexual intercourse, 5.4% were physically forced to have sex and 3.3% were forced to do sexual activities that were degrading or humiliating.

There were considerable differences between the proportion of women who experienced lifetime violence and current violence. More than 60% of respondents faced all forms of psychological violence and all forms of sexual violence in the past year, more than half (>50%) had experienced both mild to moderate and severe physical violence in the past year as well.

The lifetime prevalence of IPV varied by the type of violence experienced. Psychological violence varied from 31.6% (threatened to hurt you or someone you care about) to 39.6% (humiliated or belittled in front of other people); physical violence varied from 34.9% (chocked or burnt) to 47.5% (pushed or shoved); whereas, sexual violence varied from 36.2% (was forced to do sexual activity that was degrading or humiliating) to 37.4% (physically forced you to have sex when you did not want). Most respondents reported repeated acts of IPV.

Tables and show the proportion of married/cohabiting women who reported having experienced controlling behaviours by an intimate partner and highlight the association between experiences of violence and controlling behaviours. The most frequently reported act of controlling behavior by a male partner was "insisted on knowing where the female partner was at all times" (29.3%) followed by "got angry if female partner spoke with another man" (28.5%), "suspicious that female partner is unfaithful" (21.3%), "ignored and treated indifferently" (16.5%), "keeps female partner from seeing friends" (15.2%), "expected female partner to ask permission before going out" (10.7%), and "tried to restrict female partner to contact your family" (4.6%).

Table 6

Table 7

The percentage of women who reported one or more acts of controlling behaviors by their male partner varied from 13.5% to 39.3%, which suggests that the level of male control over female behavior is normative to a certain degrees. The respondents who had experienced IPV were significantly more likely to have also experienced controlling behavior by their male partner than women who had not faced partner violence.

Table illustrates multivariate logistic regression models to determine relationships between lifetime IPV victimization and demographic variables. There were significant differences in IPV prevalence among provincial settings. Compared to women in Chonburi province (central), Phitsanulok province (northern) were significantly more likely to have experienced lifetime IPV victimization (OR 2.34; 95% CI = 1.34-4.06). Women who worked in "white collar" occupations were significantly less likely to report lifetime IPV victimization than women who worked in "blue collar" occupations (OR 0.66; 95% CI = 0.52-0.85). Women who completed higher education were significantly less likely to report lifetime IPV victimization than those who had no education and those who completed only primary education (OR 0.37; 95% CI = 0.15-0.91) and (OR 0.66; 95% CI = 0.49-0.89), respectively). Women who had sufficient income and savings were significantly less likely to report lifetime IPV victimization than those who had insufficient income and those who had sufficient but no saving (OR 0.26; 95% CI = 0.17-0.41) and (OR 0.46; 95% CI = 0.30-0.72), respectively).

Table 8

Discussion

According to this study 15.4% of married/cohabiting Thai women have experienced psychological, physical, and/or sexual intimate partner violence at some point in their lives. This number is considerably higher than the latest National Reproductive Health Survey in 2009 (Social Statistics Bureau 2010), which found that the national prevalence of partner violence among Thai women was 2.9%. This wide discrepancy in results could be due to the measurement tool. The 2009 survey asked only one question about experience of physical partner violence in the past 12 months, if the response was yes, then there were 2 following questions: 1) what was the reason for the violence and; 2) have you ever asked for any help. This single question is a limitation of the previous survey because intimate partner violence can be psychological, physical, and/or sexual violence and surveys should ask behaviorally specific questions in order to encourage respondents to disclose the entire scope of their violent experiences (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006), (Straus et al. 1996), (Ellsberg et al. 2001).

This study also showed that across the country, psychological violence had the highest prevalence followed by physical violence and then sexual violence. Similar findings have been recorded in the WHO multi-country study (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006) on women's health and domestic violence, across 10 countries, sexual violence was greatly less prevalent than physical violence. However, Thailand was an exception with rates of sexual violence higher than physical violence in the WHO multi-country study. Forty-four percent of women in the city and 29% of women in the province had experienced sexual violence by their partner (Archavanitkul et al. 2005), (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006), (Heise and Garcia-Moreno 2002).

To explain these contradictory results, we had look back over the past decades, particularly the Thai policies and campaigns on IPV prevention. For example, "Domestic Violence Victim Protection Act, B.E. 2550" and "Amended the criminal law B.E.2550 section 276". Prior to the amended law, section 276 stated that "any person who commits sexual intercourse with a woman who is not his wife, and against the latter's will, by threatening her, or doing any act of violence..., shall be punished with imprisonment..." (Penal Code Amendment Act (No.16) B.E. 2546 ( 2003) 2003). However, changes to the law, by removing the sentence "with a woman who is not his wife", added protection to spouses against sexually violence by their partners (Penal Code Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 ( 2007) 2007). These tools may gradually reduce the prevalence of sexual violence in Thai society but do not appear to have had a major impact over the last 10 years. However, today the campaigns related to IPV prevention are rarely seen in mainstream Thai society.

All of the women who reported physical violence had experienced more violence in the past year than over her lifetime. These study results confirm that IPV is a common experience worldwide. In a Japanese city, the lifetime prevalence of physical abused by an intimate partner was 13%, whereas, in Bangladeshi city it was 40% (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006). In Vietnam, the prevalence rate of physical partner violence was 30.9% (Vung et al. 2008). In Cambodia, 25% of women interviewed experienced partner violence since marriage, with 23% disclosing such violence in the prior year (Yount and Carrera 2006). Whereas, in Canada 6% of women revealed having been abused by their male partner (McCormick et al. 2016). In the USA, 5.3% of postpartum women stated that they were physically victimized by an intimate partner in the year prior to becoming pregnant (Stewart et al. 2017). A WHO Study recorded that the 12-month prevalence of partner violence was much higher in developing countries as compared to developed countries such as Canada and the USA (McCormick et al. 2016), (Stewart et al. 2017) which suggests that a good legal framework, effective government campaigns, sufficient shelters and women's individual empowerment are important and provide a foundation from which women have more resources to choose to withdraw from abusive relationships. Findings that emphasize the importance of resources and social status have been noted in Vietnam (Yount and Carrera 2006) and others, and suggest that partner violence might be different in settings of low income and unemployment status compare with higher socio-economic settings (Mallory et al. 2016). Finally, controlling behaviors by male partners were significantly associated with partner violence, which is consistent with WHO findings showing that men who are a perpetrators also show higher rates of controlling behaviors than men who do not abuse their partner (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006). Therefore, resources to support women coupled with campaigns to educate men and deemphasize traditional gender norms may be critical to reducing rates of IPV in Thailand.

Limitations

This study only asked about rates of IPV against women, although women may also be perpetrators of violence in relationships. However, research has consistently demonstrated that men are the dominant perpetrators of violence in relationships including married and cohabiting relationships (Archavanitkul et al. 2005), (Garcia-Moreno et al. 2006), (Zhang et al. 2012). Some studies have documented that women are almost eight times more likely to be victims of violence by a partner than men (Stuckless et al. 2015). Another limitation was this study based on self-report, which may be affected by recall bias, as well as cultural biases in disclosure which affect to participants' willingness to reveal their violent experiences. We recognize that in the Thai context, IPV is viewed as a family affair. The privacy of the family in Thai society strengths gender power imbalance and hierarchies that are often dependent on the sustainability of male domination and violence (Mohamad and Wieringa 2014). This research highlights the prevalence of psychological, physical and sexual intimate partner violence in Thai society. Although some differences in prevalence were noted in the results according to education, occupation, and number of partners these differences did not account for the varying rates of violence across provinces.

Strengths

This study had significant methodological strengths including: using a standardized questionnaire, pre-testing the questionnaire, training interviewers, and collaborating with communities to account for the ethical complexities of working on sensitive issues within communities in Thailand. All these methodological techniques may help to reduce bias in the study and increase disclosure. However, we believe that in Thai culture, violence is a deeply personal issue which likely leads to an underestimation of the overall violence situation in Thai society. Hence, the findings of this study should be thought of as an underestimation of the actual rate of intimate partner violence in Thailand.

Recommendations

This study confirms the high prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand which is a serious human rights violation and highly significant public health issue as IPV is linked to many negative health consequences. These results should encourage national action to prevent IPV and contribute national data to a spectrum of interest groups including policy makers, public health practitioners, multi-disciplinary, educators, media, activists, and communities. National policy change should work to eliminate the root causes of violence against women and re-build Thai society as violence free society. For instance, the government needs to prioritize the establishment of a special agency solely responsible for providing a comprehensive package of services to women suffering from various forms of violence. The services must include: counseling, shelter, rehabilitation and referrals to additional health and social support services and professional sensitivity training for multi-disciplinary practitioners on issues concerning violence against women and the enhancement of a public campaign through the mass media and social media to eradicate all forms of violence against women. Moreover, we must challenge social norms to ensure that domestic violence is a public rather than a private issue and create networks and community participation to prevent and to monitor domestic violence in the community. Media messaging should focus on promoting gender equity, respect for human dignity and non-violent relationships. In particular, media should work to avoid reproducing structural and cultural violence against women in media reporting and avoid producing content that reinforces and motivates violence.

Acknowledgments

This research project is supported by the Thailand Research Fund (2016).

Thank you to Dr. Marion Doull to revise and edit a final draft. Thank you to everyone who partcipated in this study. Contributions made by all participants are greatly appreciated.

References

Archavanitkul, K., Kanchanachitra, C., Im-em, W., & Lerdsrisuntad, U. (2005). Intimate partner violence and Women's health in Thailand. Nakhonprathom, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.

Breiding MJ, Black MC, Ryan GW. Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34(2):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.001. [[PubMed] [CrossRef] Google Scholar]

Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Pena, R., Agurto, S., & Winkvist, A. (2001). Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. Studies in Family Planning, 32(1), 1-16. [PubMed]

Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. The Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260-1269. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8. [[PubMed] [CrossRef] Google Scholar]

McCormick, A. V., Cohen, I. M., & Plecas, D. (2016). 1 Intimate partner violence in Canada.. Domestic Violence in International Context (27), 20.

Mohamad, M., & Wieringa, S. (2014). Family ambiguity and domestic violence in Asia: Reconceptualising law and process. IIAS Newsletter, 21-23.

Penal Code Amendment Act (No.19) B.E. 2550 (2007) Royal Thai Government Gazettee, 124, 56 a[, 1. Bangkok, Thailand: Royal Thai Government; 2007. Google Scholar]

Social Statistics Bureau . [National Statistical Office. Report on National Reproductive Health Survey 2009. Bangkok, Thailand: Nationeal Statistical Office; 2010. Google Scholar]

Sricamsuk, A. (2006). Domestic violence against pregnant women: A Thai perspective. (Doctor of Philosophy), Griffith University,

Stewart DE, Vigod SN, MacMillan HL, Chandra PS, Han A, Rondon MB, Riazantseva E. Current reports on perinatal intimate partner violence. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2017;19(5):26. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0778-6. [[PubMed] [CrossRef] Google Scholar]

Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316.

Thai Health Promotion Foundation. (2011). Situation of Violence Against Women and Child: One Stop Crisis Centre of Ministry of Public Health Retrieved from http://www.thaihealth.or.th/healthcontent/news/18221. Accessed 18 August 2017.

The Women's Affairs and Family Development . [Report on Violence Health (T. H. P. Foundation Ed.) Bangkok, Thailand: Thai Health Promotion Foundation; 2013. Google Scholar]

UN. (1993). Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women UN General Assembly. Retrieved from www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/vaw/reports.htm. Accessed 6 August 2017.

Vung ND, Ostergren PO, Krantz G. Intimate partner violence against women in rural Vietnam-different socio-demographic factors are associated with different forms of violence: Need for new intervention guidelines? BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-55. [[PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] Google Scholar]

WHO. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

WHO. (2005a). National report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

WHO. (2016). Fact sheet on violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/. Accessed 25 August 2017.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Thailand

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There is no recent national data on the prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. This study proposed to examine the prevalence of intimate partner violence in 4 regions of Thailand by using a standardized questionnaire from the WHO multi country ...

# data[].attributes.headline
Comprehensive Sex Education: Research and Results

# data[].attributes.subject
Comprehensive Sex Education: Research and Results

# data[].attributes.body
Source: Advocates for Youth
Credibility Evaluation: Group 3 (Government Resources)
Source Bias: These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words  to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
Factual Reporting: High
Comment: Give many information about the comprehensive sex education, which it is trustworthy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Also available in [PDF] format.

Since 1997 the federal government has invested more than $1.5 billion dollars in abstinence-only programs - proven ineffective programs which censor or exclude important information that could help young people protect their health. In fact, until recently, programs which met a strict abstinence-only definition were the only type of sex education eligible for federal funding; no funding existed for comprehensive sex education, which stresses abstinence but also provides information about contraception and condoms.

But the Obama administration's proposed budget for FY10 removed the streams of funding for abstinence-only programs, and created funding for programs which have been proven effective at reducing teen pregnancy, delaying sexual activity, or increasing contraceptive use. Not surprisingly, it is comprehensive sex education programs which help youth remain healthy and avoid negative sexual health outcomes. This document explores the research around comprehensive sex education and abstinence-only programs.

Comprehensive Sex Education Has Been Proven Effective

Evaluations of comprehensive sex education programs show that these programs can help youth delay onset of sexual activity, reduce the frequency of sexual activity, reduce number of sexual partners, and increase condom and contraceptive use. Importantly, the evidence shows youth who receive comprehensive sex education are NOT more likely to become sexually active, increase sexual activity, or experience negative sexual health outcomes. Effective programs exist for youth from a variety of racial, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds.

Researchers studied the National Survey of Family Growth to determine the impact of sexuality education on youth sexual risk-taking for young people ages 15-19, and found that teens who received comprehensive sex education were 50 percent less likely to experience pregnancy than those who received abstinence-only education.

Researcher Douglas Kirby for the National Campaign to End Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy examined studies of prevention programs which had a strong experimental design and used appropriate analysis. Two-thirds of the 48 comprehensive sex ed programs studied had positive effects.

40 percent delayed sexual initiation, reduced the number of sexual partners, or increased condom or contraceptive use.

30 percent reduced the frequency of sex, including a return to abstinence.

60 percent reduced unprotected sex.

Advocates for Youth undertook exhaustive reviews of existing programs to compile a list of programs that have been proven effective by rigorous evaluation. Twenty-six effective programs were identified, twenty-three of which included comprehensive sex education as at least one component of the program. The other programs were early childhood interventions. Of the 23 effective, comprehensive sex education programs:

Fourteen programs demonstrated a statistically significant delay in the timing of first sex.

13 programs showed statistically significant declines in teen pregnancy, HIV, or other STIs.

14 programs helped sexually active youth to increase their use of condoms.

9 programs demonstrated success at increasing use of contraception other than condoms.

13 programs showed reductions in the number of sex partners and/or increased monogamy among program participants.

10 programs helped sexually active youth to reduce the incidence of unprotected sex.

Abstinence-Only Programs Are Inaccurate, Ineffective and May Even Cause Harm

Where there is ample research to prove that comprehensive sex education programs give young people the tools they need to protect themselves from negative sexual health outcomes, there is little if any evidence to show that flawed abstinence-only programs are effective - even at achieving abstinence among teens.

A congressionally mandated study of four popular abstinence-only programs by the Mathematica found that they were entirely ineffective. Students who participated in the programs were no more likely to abstain from sex than other students.

Evaluations of publicly funded abstinence-only programs in at least 13 states have shown no positive changes in sexual behaviors over time.

In December 2004, the U.S. House of Representative's Committee on Government Reform led by Rep. Henry A. Waxman released a report showing that 80 percent of the most popular federally funded abstinence-only education programs use curricula that distort information about the effectiveness of contraceptives, misrepresent the risks of abortion, blur religion and science, treat stereotypes about girls and boys as scientific fact, and contain basic scientific errors.

Among youth participating in "virginity pledge" programs, researchers found that among sexually experienced youth, 88 percent broke the pledge and had sex before marriage. Further, among all participants, once pledgers began to have sex, they had more partners in a shorter period of time and were less likely to use contraception or condoms than were their non-pledging peers.

No abstinence-only program has yet been proven through rigorous evaluation to help youth delay sex for a significant period of time, help youth decrease their number of sex partners, or reduce STI or pregnancy rates among teens.

Public Opinion on Comprehensive Sex Education versus Abstinence-Only
Public opinion polls consistently show that more than 80 percent of Americans support teaching comprehensive sex education in high schools and in middle or junior high schools. In one poll, 85 percent believed that teens should be taught about birth control and preventing pregnancy; in another, seven in 10 opposed government funding for abstinence-only programs. Support for comprehensive sex education also cuts across party lines. In a poll of 1,000 self-identified Republicans and Independents, 60 percent of Republicans and 81 percent of Independents think that public schools should teach comprehensive sex education.

Young People Need Comprehensive Sex Education

The health and future of every adolescent is shadowed by risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, as well as by risk of involvement in unintended pregnancy.

The rate of STIs is high among young people in the United States. Young people ages 15-24 contract almost half the nation's 19 million new STIs every year; and the CDC estimates that one in four young women ages 15-19 has an STI.

Experts estimate that about one young person in the United States is infected with HIV every hour of every day.

Nearly 15 percent of the 56,000 annual new cases of HIV infections in the United States occurred in youth ages 13 through 24 in 2006.

African American and Hispanic youth are disproportionately affected by the HIV and AIDS pandemic. Although only 17 percent of the adolescent population in the United States is African American, these teens experienced 69 percent of new AIDS cases among teens in 2006. Latinos ages 20 - 24 experienced 23 percent of new AIDS cases in 2006 but represented only18 percent of U.S. young adults.

A November 2006 study of declining pregnancy rates among teens concluded that the reduction in teen pregnancy between 1995 and 2002 was primarily the result of increased use of contraceptives. However, new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics show that teen birth rates are again on the rise.

The NCHS reports a five percent national increase between 2005 and 2007 in teenage birthrates in the U.S; from 40.5 to 42.5 births per 1,000 young women aged 15-19.

Approximately one in five teens reports some kind of a abuse in a romantic relationship, with girls who experience dating violence having sex earlier than their peers, less likely to use to birth control and more likely to engage in a wide variety of high-risk behaviors.

Research clearly shows that comprehensive sex education programs do not encourage teens to start having sexual intercourse; do not increase the frequency with which teens have intercourse; and do not increase the number of a teen's sexual partners. At the same time, evaluations of publicly funded abstinence-only programs have repeatedly shown no positive changes in sexual behaviors over time. Young people need honest, effective sex education - not ineffective, shame-based abstinence-only programs.
References:

1. Baldo M et al. Does Sex Education Lead to Earlier or Increased Sexual Activity in Youth? Presented at the Ninth International Conference on AIDS, Berlin, 6-10 June 1993. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.

2. United Nations Joint Programme on HIV and AIDS. Impact of HIV and Sexual Health Education on the Sexual Behaviour of Young People: a Review Update. [UNAIDS Best Practice Collection] Geneva: UNAIDS, 1997.

3. Institute of Medicine, Committee on HIV Prevention Strategies in the United States. No Time to Lose: Getting More from HIV Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

4. Kirby D. Emerging Answers: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, 2001.

5. Alford S et al. Science and Success: Sex Education and Other Programs that Work to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, HIV & Sexually Transmitted Infections. Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth, 2003, 2008.

6. Kohler et al. "Abstinence-only and Comprehensive Sex Education and the Initiation of Sexual Activity and Teen Pregnancy." Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(4): 344-351.

7. Kirby D. "Sex and HIV Programs: Their Impact on Sexual Behaviors of Young People Throughout the World." Journal of Adolescent Health 40 (2007) : 206-217.

8. Trenholm et al. Impacts of Four Title V, Section 510 Abstinence Education Programs. Princeton: Mathematica Policy Research, 2007. Accessed from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/impactabstinence.pdf on July 15, 2009.

9. Hauser D. Five Years of Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Education: Assessing the Impact. [Title V State Evaluations] Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth, 2004.

10. Hauser D. Illinois Abstinence-Only Programs: Disseminating Inaccurate and Biased Information. Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth, 2008.

11. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform. The Content of Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Education Programs, prepared for Rep. Henry A. Waxman. Washington, DC: The House, 2004.

12. Bearman PS, Brückner H. Promising the future: virginity pledges and the transition to first intercourse. American Journal of Sociology; 2001; 106: 859-912.

13. Bruckner H, Bearman, PS. After the promise: the STD consequences of adolescent virginity pledges. Journal of Adolescent Health 36 (2005) 271-278.

14. Hickman-Brown Public Opinion Research. Public Support for Sexuality Education Reaches Highest Levels. Washington, DC: Advocates for Youth, 1999.

15. Kaiser Family Foundation, National Public Radio, and Harvard University. Sex Education in America: General Public/Parents Survey. Menlo Park, CA: The Foundation, 2004.

16. Ianelli D. "Reproductive Health Care Poll of Republicans and Independents." Public Strategies, Inc., 2009.

17. CDC. STD Surveillance Report, 2006. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.

18. CDC. Slide set: HIV/AIDS surveillance in adolescents and young adults (through 2006). Available at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/slides/adolescents
/index.htm.

19. Santelli, JS et al. Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: the contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use. American Journal of Public Health 2007; 97(1).

20. Hamilton B et al. "Births: Preliminary Data for 2007." National Vital Statistics Reports 2009; 57(12): 1-23

21. Halpern CT, Oslak SG, Young ML et al. Partner Violence Among Adolescents in Opposite-Sex Romantic Relationships: Findings From the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. American Journal of Public Health 2001; 91(10): 1679-1685.

22. Silverman JG, Raj A, Clements K. Dating Violence and Associated Sexual Risk and Pregnancy Among Adolescent Girls in the United States. Pediatrics 2004;114(2):e220-e225.

23. Silverman JG, Raj A, Mucci LA et al. Dating Vilence Against Adolescent Girls and Associated Substance Use, Unhealthy Weight Control, Sexual Risk Behavior, Pregnancy, and Suicidality. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001;286(5):572-579.

24. Decker MR, Silverman JG, Raj A. Dating Violence and Sexually Transmitted Disease/HIV Testing and Diagnosis Among Adolescent Females. Pediatrics 2005; 116(2);e272-e276.

Advocates for Youth © September 2009

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Comprehensive Sex Education: Research and Results

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Also available in [PDF] format. Since 1997 the federal government has invested more than $1.5 billion dollars in abstinence-only programs - proven ineffective programs which censor or exclude important information that could help young people protect their health.

# data[].attributes.body
Source: Factsanddetails
Credibility Evaluation: Group 11 (Tabloids Articles)
Source Bias: Unreliable, no credible sources
Factual Reporting: Unreliable, no credible sources
Comment: This gave me some information about the sex education, but it is not reliable.
http://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Thailand/sub5_8d/entry-3243.html

# data[].attributes.headline
Comprehensive sexuality education: The challenges and opportunities ofscaling-up

# data[].attributes.subject
Comprehensive sexuality education: The challenges and opportunities ofscaling-up

# data[].attributes.body
Source: Unesco
Credibility Evaluation: Group 2 (Trade books and Journal Articles)
Source Bias: These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words  to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
Factual Reporting: High
Comment: Reliable sites and it had a credible sources. Can trust the information from the articles.
(The Unesco site for this journal can't be share on the padlet, so I will put the same information from the other website)
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0022/002277/227781E.pdf

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Comprehensive sexuality education: the challenges and opportunities of scaling-up

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This report builds on a programme of work on sexuality education for young people initiated in 2008 by UNESCO. It is also informed by several other past and ongoing initiatives related to scaling up sexuality education, as well as drawing on case studies presented at the Bogota international consultation on sexuality education, convened by UNFPA in 2010.

# data[].attributes.headline
Review of Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Thailand

# data[].attributes.subject
Review of Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Thailand

# data[].attributes.body
Source: Unicef - Ministry of Education
Credibility Evaluation: Group 2 (Trade books and Journal Articles)
Source Bias: These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words.  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources.
Factual Reporting: High
Comment: This site is credible because it is from Unicef. This gave me many information about the comprehensive sexuality education in Thailand.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Highlights

This review of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE1) in Thai educational institutions collected data from students, teachers, guardians, school directors and national policy advocacy stakeholders. Standard international data collection tools were used, with the hope that important information could be gathered to guide the development of school-based CSE implementation in Thailand.

The findings indicated that nearly all general secondary and vocational institutions provide CSE instruction, either as an integrated or standalone subject or both.

Although diverse topics are covered in the CSE curriculum, many institutions teach about sexuality from a point of view that emphasizes the negative consequences of sex and does not cover positive aspects or promote students' analytic and critical-thinking skills related to sexuality. Topics related to the prevention of teenage pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections and HIV, as well as sexual anatomy and development are emphasized most, while topics related to gender, sexual rights and citizenship; sexual and gender diversity; gender inequality; safe abortion; safe sex for same-sex couples; and bullying are less often taught.

Many students still lack a correct understanding of a range of sexuality-related issues. When asked to self-assess their knowledge, students indicated that they had a good understanding of contraception and menstruation, but only a minority gave correct answers to multiple-choice questions about menstruation or the menstrual cycle. Many sexually active girls mentioned emergency contraceptive pills as their main method of contraception, whereas many boys indicated an unwillingness to use condoms. The findings indicate that many students lack understanding and awareness about contraception and lack communication and negotiation skills that they need in their sexual lives.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Review of Comprehensive Sexuality Education in Thailand

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This review of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE1) in Thai educational institutions collected data from students, teachers, guardians, school directors and national policy advocacy stakeholders. Standard international data collection tools were used, with the hope that important information could be gathered to guide the development of school-based CSE implementation in Thailand.

# data[].attributes.body
Source: Unesco
Credibility Evaluation: Group 2 (Trade books and Journal articles)
Source Bias:  These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words  to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
Factual Reporting: High
(The Unesco site for this journal can't be share on the padlet, putting the same information from the other website)
Comment: This gave me the information about the comprehensive sexuality education.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
[PDF] COMPREHENSIVE SEXUALITY EDUCATION : THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF SCALING-UP | Semantic Scholar

# data[].attributes.headline
Lack Of Sex Education At Home In School Education Essay

# data[].attributes.subject
Lack Of Sex Education At Home In School Education Essay

# data[].attributes.body
Source: UK Essay
Credibility Evaluation: Group 2 (Tabloid Articles)
Source Bias: Unreliable, no credible sources
Factual Reporting: Unreliable, no credible sources
Comment: This gave me some ideas of writing about the sex education, further investigation are required.
https://www.ukessays.com/essays/education/lack-of-sex-education-at-home-in-school-education-essay.php

# data[].attributes.headline
Sexuality education in Thailand: how far do we need to go?

# data[].attributes.subject
Sexuality education in Thailand: how far do we need to go?

# data[].attributes.body
Source: Teen Path
Credibility Evaluation: Group 1 (Scholarly Books and Articles)
Source Bias: These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words  to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
Factual Reporting: High
Comment: The information are a little bit bias, but mostly are trust worthy. I got many information about the sexuality education in Thailand from this website.