# data[].attributes.body
Using pictures to support writing development as it relate to story telling, sentence development...2nd semester

# data[].attributes.body
S. S was created for the student to master GKIDS and some of 1st grade... examples: Scholar will know how to take a spelling test by fall/ spring (Kinder)

# data[].attributes.headline
We created a scope & sequence using GKIDS standards.  How will we make sure that our assessments show that this Scope and sequence is working or not? How often will we meet as a K Team to discuss any of our gains and  any of the questions we have about the children who do not master. How will we reteach? How will we reassess? Are we on target with our timeline to finish?

# data[].attributes.subject
We created a scope & sequence using GKIDS standards.  How will we make sure that our assessments show that this Scope and sequence is working or not? How often will we meet as a K Team to discuss any of our gains and  any of the questions we have about the children who do not master. How will we reteach? How will we reassess? Are we on target with our timeline to finish?

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder if additional PD is need to support teachers with establishing time in their instruction to give feedback, reteach and reassess.

# data[].attributes.body
PD is needed to support teachers with establishing time in their instruction to give feedback, reteach and reassess.

# data[].attributes.body
We have created a scope and sequence for students to master g-kids standards and to integrate 1st grade standards. We also will be assessing weekly to insure mastery and to make a plan of action for those that are not.

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder how much time was spent on measurement and Data last year as 67% of students were in the needs remediation category.

# data[].attributes.headline
WOW this means that we need to truly, once and for all make sure we know EVERY child's individual learning style, their likes/ dislikes(be in a relationship to know this), and I also WONDER if iReady will be ONE of the ways we can FIX this?? Since iReady is doing this. we need in K to have computers from the beginning, and have the students proficient with using them BEFORE treating.   I know they are ordered and await their delivery so I can get my students using iReady to make sure we are ready when the next round of Diagnostics begins!

# data[].attributes.subject
WOW this means that we need to truly, once and for all make sure we know EVERY child's individual learning style, their likes/ dislikes(be in a relationship to know this), and I also WONDER if iReady will be ONE of the ways we can FIX this?? Since iReady is doing this. we need in K to have computers from the beginning, and have the students proficient with using them BEFORE treating.   I know they are ordered and await their delivery so I can get my students using iReady to make sure we are ready when the next round of Diagnostics begins!

# data[].attributes.body
How often are students provided feedback in Reading & Math? How often are students  provided an opportunity a additional practice and testing for mastery?

# data[].attributes.body
This means plentiful convos around the data (often), proof/ work samples that support

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder how much of a focus was put on Geometry last year.

I wonder what writing strategies were used and if teachers had time to conference with students about their writing.

# data[].attributes.headline
I wonder in 4th grade  if TESTING  skills were introduced.?

# data[].attributes.subject
I wonder in 4th grade  if TESTING  skills were introduced.?

# data[].attributes.body
In 7th grade we wonder if peer tutoring would have made a difference in their ELA scores and especially in their gaps between beginning/developing and those who were proficient. If peer tutoring had been used, would that have been a way to help those who maybe were not being remediated sufficiently?

# data[].attributes.headline
The data suggest that whatever we're doing for those at or above proficient, we may INCLUDE the developing and beginning with maybe peer tutoring/ heterogeneous grouping 

# data[].attributes.subject
The data suggest that whatever we're doing for those at or above proficient, we may INCLUDE the developing and beginning with maybe peer tutoring/ heterogeneous grouping 

# data[].attributes.body
In 4th grade MATH 62% were not prepared. What is the root  cause of this? Why do we have 55% in REMEDITE???
12.7 % have a distinguished at 4 in ELA and 43% were at level 3, so are developing.

# data[].attributes.body
For ELA I see that students struggled with writing and language. I also see that Geometry was a struggle for students over all.

# data[].attributes.body
I've noticed that only 24 students are beginning learners as it relates to reading

# data[].attributes.body
Due November 11th to Jackson, Edwards, Weems-Allen and Muhammad- Please email responses

Think about our data discussion today...consider the trends and implications to complete the following tasks.
a. Provide  list of best practices you will use across the grade-level and in specific content areas to increase the number of proficient and distinguished learners.( 2 lists of strategies)
b. Meet with departments/Grade-band to review TKES goals (are goals aligned to data reviewed)

c.    How are we supporting students with an IEP? Are we adhering to accommodations with fidelity?

d.     Who are the students right at the “cusp” of proficiency?                    e.      What are we doing move these students strategically?

f.    Who are the students right at the “cusp” of distinguished?

g.  What are we doing to enhance these learners’ experiencer?  Have we conferred with Ms. Ross for strategies to accelerate?
h. What PD is needed to support you reaching your goal?