# data[].attributes.body
What are the different perspectives we can see in our modern society and a look into a perspective through Kantian ethics?

# data[].attributes.body
Governments should not allow anyone access to guns it should be strictly for defense forces, police forces etc, as if everyone had access to obtain a license legally it would be an easy step by step tick box system. but if no one had access to firearms no one would be able to abuse them. and if you argue self defense, well if you had a gun and the enemy had a gun and you wanted "defend" yourself you'd only be putting more people in danger there are better ways to defend yourself from someone else who also doesn't have a gun such as Tasers, Sprays, martial arts and just avoiding certain scenarios/areas that'd require you to have to defend yourself.

# data[].attributes.body
to get a gun license in Australia...
-Obtain certificate of safety (doing a safety coarse first have to get perfect marks on a theory and practical component)
-Do a full police check witch usually takes 8 weeks
-then apply for gun license also takes around 8 weeks
-provide 20 points of identification
-once have a license you have to get a Permit to Acquire and inspect your house for safety of gun safe.
-only then can you get your gun.
also Australia has their guns divided into categories, many types of guns are actually banned in Australia such as all semi-automatic guns and fully automatic guns these are guns that have bullets fired with each pull of the trigger or guns that fire as you hold down the trigger. but bolt action and pump action guns are legal.

# data[].attributes.body
in Kantian Ethics we look at are the intentions/reasons good and what would be like if everyone did this? so are the reasons for owning a gun good? well for some their intention is defense for someone or themselves like police officers but other times they have bad intentions to kill or threaten a person. if everyone owned a gun it wouldn't be very safe for anyone and a lot of people would abuse the weapon and many "accidents" can occur, its an increased risk and it wouldn't be good

# data[].attributes.body
the Catholic religion focuses on being Christ like, acting as Jesus would in every situation of life. but although Jesus would not shoot someone even in self defense, the catholic believe that if a gun is your only means of protecting yourself then you may be forgiven to use it. but if there are other ways and more peaceful ways they would prefer that approach to any bad situation.

# data[].attributes.headline
What would happen if we keep allowing just anyone to have guns?

# data[].attributes.subject
What would happen if we keep allowing just anyone to have guns?

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion is that they should have a very serious system on who gets to own a gun and have strict laws on guns in public

# data[].attributes.body
the three major stake holders are the government the people in use of guns for practical reasons and people against guns in general they the government will be the deciding factor since they do control the decision made

# data[].attributes.body
It is most occurring in America and a matter of all people are affected as some argue use for self protection, hunting but others argue its more a danger than a protection.

# data[].attributes.body
Who is allowed to have a gun at what age and the different reasons for being allowed and not allowed to own a gun.
IN AMERICA
Five states allow students to carry concealed guns on college campuses.
Eight states have (symbolically) asserted their freedom to be exempt from federal gun regulation.
A few states make it easy for even violent felons to get their gun rights restored.

# data[].attributes.body
§ What is the issue? Provide some basic facts, figures and information to give your issue context.

§ Where is the issue occurring and who is affected by it?

§ Who are the major stake holders in this issue and how do their perspectives differ?

§ What is your opinion on this issue? What has influenced your perspective?