# data[].attributes.body
Harry and Nikos
The A380 is considered as a revolutionary design as it can carry more passengers than any aircraft  before it. That means that the ticket price is cheaper for each passenger. The engineers did not think about the existing facilities like airports, airways so lots of changes had to be done in order for the aircraft to be accommodated. So in my opinion the A380 was clearly a disaster.

# data[].attributes.body
The MiG-23 was supposed to be the Soviet answer to the big American fighters such as the F-4 and F-111, a powerful swing-wing fighter that could also perform attack and interception roles. And the Flogger surely was powerful.

But the Flogger was a beast to fly and to maintain. American “Red Eagle” pilots, tasked with determining the capabilities of Soviet aircraft, considered the Flogger a disaster waiting to happen. In 1984, Lieutenant General Robert M. Bond died flying a USAF operated Flogger. A relatively large aircraft, the Flogger also lacked many of the best qualities of its predecessors, including a small visual profile.

The MiG-23 was initially intended to fill out the air forces of the Warsaw Pact, but the Soviet clients generally preferred to keep their Fishbeds. Indeed, in export terms the MiG-23 was essentially a cheap loss-leader for the Soviet engine and technical support industries, as it proved remarkably difficult to safely keep in service. By design, engines burned out quickly, meaning that export customers who had fallen out of Soviet graces quickly lost the use of their fighters. The Flogger’s combat record, generally in Syrian, Iraqi, and Libyan service, has not been positive. It’s hardly surprising that the MiG-23 will almost certainly leave service before its predecessor, the MiG-21

# data[].attributes.body
The BEECH STARSHIP was a failure due to poor mangement system, the management failed to produce the aircraft as they had promised.

# data[].attributes.headline
Beech Starship is a total FAILURE!!! Tobi, Farooq and Harrish

# data[].attributes.subject
Beech Starship is a total FAILURE!!! Tobi, Farooq and Harrish

# data[].attributes.body
Firstly, How can you plan to make something without planing the cost of what you are making. Meaning that the Beech was made without the company thinking about the cost. I blame the management, because its is just a poor managing system.

# data[].attributes.body
Preparing aircraft before anyone had fought an air war was undoubtedly a struggle for pilots and engineers. The Royal B.E.2 was one of the first military aircraft put into serious industrial production, with a run of around 3500 aircraft. First flown in 1912, it remained in service until 1919, with its responsibilities steadily declining as better aircraft became available.

In a sense, the B.E.2 inspired the first generation of fighters by displaying all of the qualities that no one wanted in a fighter aircraft, including poor visibility, poor reliability, difficulty of control, slow speed, and weak armament. The advent of the Fokker Eindecker made the B.E.2 positively hazardous to fly. Refinements often hurt more than they helped, with the plane becoming steadily more dangerous and accident prone as grew heavier.

It’s tough to give a failing grade to a first effort. But the B.E.2’s difficulty and poor reliability, combined with the British decision to keep it in service well beyond its freshness date, earn it a spot on this list. Incidentally, the failure of the Royal Flying Corps to effectively substitute for the B.E.2 in a timely fashion provided much grist for early advocates of the Royal Air Force, the world’s first independent air force.

# data[].attributes.body
According to me A380 is most successful as it the largest airliner in the world and it that massive to be airborne.  Although initially is made airport authorities to make change in larger scale in airport to allow this massive aircraft but it also make a successful path for the massive development in size of aircraft in terms of payload and passenger carrying capacity in the future scale.

# data[].attributes.headline
A380 according to me was a triumph, although some alterations, expansions were needed but passengers could be transported on denser routes. This is what our future demands would be. With some investments now, we can work effectively in the future and each time a new technology or a new aircraft comes out, it would demand some alterations which would be worth it.

# data[].attributes.subject
A380 according to me was a triumph, although some alterations, expansions were needed but passengers could be transported on denser routes. This is what our future demands would be. With some investments now, we can work effectively in the future and each time a new technology or a new aircraft comes out, it would demand some alterations which would be worth it.

# data[].attributes.body
The A380 is a Failure because the designers and the manufacturers made the Airbus 380 without considering the size of any airport in the world before going on with the making of the component. Also IAA feared that the plane is not in a safe flying condition. Finally spending more money to expand each airport just for one airline is totally a BIG FAILURE.