# data[].attributes.body
There was a lot of slander in Shakespeare’s play that have lead numerous people to believe Richard lll was actually a terrible person. In reality, he did not cause all the chaos and slaughtering, so I think Richard would have felt extremely frustrated because Shakespeare wrote mostly lies. He would have also felt angry that his reputation left behind when he died was twisted into different words, that were not his own. although Shakespeare’s representation of Richard was poorly executed, he wasn’t a saint because in those times, life was very brutal and most kings were similar to the people in the play.

I think the play should still exist, as many centuries have past on   and it is only to entertain people. For example, in the news people write fake news, which hooks people in. That is also what Shakespeare was trying to achieve, amuse people. It is also an important part of history that portrays the times back then and also a small bit about Richard.

In the book, Richard is set out to be a physcopath that murders people, but the succession for the throne in those days was very difficult to achieve, so it as just like a game of survival and a competition. I feel like I understand him because of the circumstances he was in, but in the book he shouldn’t have created all the mess. In real life, I feel sympathetic for him as he, but it was just a play, so in the end I don’t feel anything.

# data[].attributes.body
How do you feel about king Richard (Shakespeare version)?

I personally like Richard.
I think he is quite the comedian and he finds his way around things. I love how he is so dramatic and so selfish in a funny joking way. He seems to know what he is doing and has mostly self confidence. I love how he pretends to decline the thrown while people are begging for him to become king so he doesn’t sound desperate. He is very careless as to sacrificing others lives for his own good.

# data[].attributes.body
Question 1:
I think Richard III wouldn’t be pleased of the lies the story tells, maybe a bit irritated and annoyed because it isn’t true and because the book says he’s a bad guy when he really isn’t. I also think he would feel devastated to be framed of a murder when he was just 3 years old!

Question 2:
I think the play should exist because it is entertaining but it’s not true so to make sure people don’t go wandering about saying false information, to tell them that it is not all true. But it does kind of hurt that King Richard III was the evil person when he didn’t do all those cruel things.

Question 3:
I think Richard III is like a king that is normal then, because he is not horrid nor he is the best person, though I don’t think he should be the one responsible with the murder and the false accusations.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Richard III will feel angry because Shakespeare didn't write the real thing in the play. I think the play should exist because it's fun to read and can learn new knowledges. I think Richard III in the play was bad and murdered lots of people but maybe Richard III in history was a good person.

# data[].attributes.body
Richard III would’ve thought  that William Shakespeare was a scandalous and he wouldn’t have liked the idea of him being the evil villain of the story. He would’ve been bothered by the false information that William Shakespeare wrote.

I think the play should exist because if William Shakespeare wrote what really happened, there wouldn’t have been a lot of drama or amusement to the audience. If it was about true history, most people would have a mindset that would tell them that history is boring so there’s no point in reading or watching it.

Richard was probably not that bad compared the the story William Shakespeare wrote but I think he would’ve been like other kings wanting to gain power. I don’t think he was that cruel, being responsible with a ton of murders.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Richard lll would have felt very frustrated and furious toward Shakespeare, as Shakespeare’s play has false and misleading information about him, which make people think that he was a bad guy! He probably would be very offended by Shakespeare for making a play about awful, cruel things that he never did!

I think the play should have existed, as it’s purpose is to entertain people, although it might contain some untrue information about Richard lll the play is meant to be fictional.

I think that Richard lll, was not a bad guy and Shakespeare’s play about him, that lead many people to believe that he was a murderer, even though he might not have been. I think he loved his castle and kingdom, and was kind for looking after his nephews. He did what he was supposed to do and what was best for his kingdom.

# data[].attributes.body
1.
I think Richard the III
Would felt annoyed because Shakespeare portrayed him so poorly and made him look like a Crazed Killer

2. I think the play should not have existed because....
He made everyone think the actual Richard was really mean and nasty

3. I think Richard III
Is a good book, I like it because we know that the actual Richard wasn’t mean, I also liked it because I liked How the made Richard seem in the book

# data[].attributes.body
I mean, I don’t think he would feel happy and elated about him being a villain but I don’t think he would mind that much, saying as it’s a play (not based off of true events) and it was successful, he also knows it’s not true.

I think the play should exist! It’s defiantly one of Shakespeare's successful ones and it’s really interesting! I really enjoyed reading it :)

I think, in general, Richard lll is a good guy and I respect his values. In the play, yes he might be a manipulative person murder, liar, just bad person overall, the way he commits these crimes were very fascinating so I guess I like him in the play as well. :)

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Richard lll would feel annoyed and sad that people think of him as an evil person because of Shakespeare’s play. I  think that the play should exist because it is a work of fiction for peoples enjoyment. I think that Richard lll was kind for looking after and helping his nephews and that he isn’t really a bad person as Shakespeare made him seem.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Richard the 3rd would probably be offended by this play, because he has been represented as a cruel, selfish and awful person who is filled with greed. Because this play is more famous than he is he has been remembered as something he isn’t if i were him and found out this I would be upset and angry.

I think they play is quite entertaining as it is supposed to be so it should exist, however it should be acknowledged by others that this is a twisted story and only semi based on the truth.

I think the Shakespeare version of Richard III is a horrible person and i am quite glad he is a fictional character that is not fully based on someone real. The real Richard seems reasonable so i think he is okay however i don’t overly like either of them.

# data[].attributes.body
I don’t think he’s happy about it. Because it sends out the wrong message about who he is as a person. From watching the play people think of Richard the 3rd as a bad cruel and evil guy and I don’t think that’s what he wants people to think of him.

I think the play should exist because lots of people really love it but I think it should be changed so that Richard doesn’t come across as such a bad person and so that people think that he is a good person in some ways.

I think Richard the 3rd is a good guys with good values. But in the horrible history’s I think he came across a bit to angry. The book is pretty good but it was a bit hard to follow for me. But overall I think which is the third is pretty good.

# data[].attributes.body
Should the play exist?
I think the play should exist.
But I personally think that it should not have been written about him. I think that the play could have been written without bringing a real king into it. If Shakespeare didn’t like history then why did he use it for his plays!?
I think it if unfair but also quite interesting.
I know that I would hate it if someone wrote those things about me and I don’t think they should have used King Richard.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Richard the 3rd would feel aa bit sad that everyone thinks he is the bad guy and that there are all these rumours about him that aren’t true. I think the play should still exist because it is entertaining. I feel a bit sorry but if he did kill he can’t fully be a good guy

# data[].attributes.body
Q.1:How do I think Richard would react to Shakespeare’s play?: I think that Richard would be absolutely infuriated because in the play he is a bad character where as in reality he really wasn’t.

Q.2:I think the play maybe shouldn’t have existed because it makes Richard look like a bad person when he wasn’t. But at the same time I think it should exist because it teaches people not to be so evil and manipulative like  Richard was.

Q.3:In the play I think that Richard is a hunchback who killed innocent people . I think in the play he was evil and manipulative. Richard was sadistic meaning that he took pleasure from pain and suffering of other people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Richard first sight of this story’s feeling will be confusing, a bit angry, and worried. But I still want to keep the story exist. Because the story is quit interesting. About thins story, I feel quit real, a lot of times, something like this might happen, and not even the Royals, in some normal life’s can happen too. I’m also a bit curious about why so many people want to be the king or the queen? It’s like so hard and weird.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Richard lll would have felt unhappy because there would be all these people spreading all these lies about him like how he supposedly murdered so many people and also about his appearance and he wouldn’t have been able to do anything about it because people wouldn’t have believed him. Richard might’ve also been quite happy because some parts of the play make him seem powerful and most rulers like being seen as powerful.

I think the play should have existed because its purpose of it is to entertain people and it’s quite fun to read and probably an interesting play.

I think Richard lll did what was right to him as he took care of the people he loved and did what he wanted and what was better for his kingdom.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Richard III would probably be mad or unimpressed by Shakespeare’s play, since it’s inaccurate and paints him in a bad light. It would probably be really horrible to be thought of as this super bad villain.
I think the play is fine, and since it is a work of purely fiction, it should still exist. It’s very entertaining and interesting, although not accurate. I think what would be more important is for people to be told that Shakespeare’s play is made up, so they don’t go around believing false things.
I think Richard III is just like all other kings from the past. They were usually all power hungry, wanting more and more, and not bringing themselves to care about commoners and peasants who were starving. I think Richard III may have gotten carried away with his plans, making him seem evil, although he probably just wanted to reign longer.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think That Richard III would be annoyed and angry at how Shakespeare interpreted how he was in real life to make the story more interesting or exciting and make him seem like a evil guy.

2. I think that the play should exist because it helps people to understand our history, although I think that they should include a disclaimer saying that it’s not all true.

3. I think that Richard III did do what he was supposed to do and cared for his nephews when their parents were ill, I think that over all Richard is not a bad guy as he followed the rules
and did what he was supposed to do.

# data[].attributes.body
How do you thinking Richard would feel?
I think he would feel really, really hurt that someone would write such things about him, not only that but A PLAY! Most kings back then where quite brutal knowing it was the 15th century. He might not have been the worst king but for sure not the best. He would feel upset, furious, bothered, guilty. Being framed for a murder when you where actually three years of age.