# data[].attributes.body
- not only  in conclusion but throughout the essay
- significance of the topic is discussed and the limitations/difficulties.

# data[].attributes.body
-A good reflection is one that can be evident throughout the paper
-Students must discuss the implications of their results
-they must consider the significance of their findings
-Students must state the limitations of their results or processes used and also any possible extension or application of their results

# data[].attributes.body
I always tell my students that if they wish to show reflection they have to show it at every stage of their work. It is not enough just to summarize it at the end.
At every stage of their work they have to ask the question: why? and what next? as well as what if?
They need to consider limitations at every stage. Also they have to be critical about what they wrote and consider that things could be done in a different way (better?).
If they are engaged they will think about these questions.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a difficult one for me. Some students have said to me that if they write what they could have done things differently...the 'what if' then are they shooting themselves in the foot.
What I look for is that they comment on results, look at limitations and try to derive meaning/application from their results. It reads better if these are evident throughout their work and not just in the conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
A superficial reflection is limited to just describing the results of your work.

I expect my students to go in depth about their work. I also encourage them to write it in their own words. (Most of my students are EAL and there are limits to their grammar).
A good reflection should demonstrate some consideration of limitations and/or extensions and relate mathematical ideas to their own previous knowledge.

I want a reflection to be critical, students need to think about what could have gone better. Did they spend to much time looking for a topic? How did they find their data?
etc...

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Troy!
I feel that my students want to keep the reflection till the very end of their paper while I would like them to think about their 'actions' throughout their work.

# data[].attributes.body
A good reflection  is a sign of personal engagement.

Very good point. THX (HM)

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at the domain and range of a graph is meaningful reflection.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the paper the students can write down their 'what if ...?' question and try to find the answer to it. Mentioning the limitations and recommendations for further investigation are more appropriate in the conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
What constitutes superficial reflection?
"Simply describing results represents limited or superficial reflection"

What is the difference between a “meaningful” and “critical” reflection?
The guide gives the teacher the list on what took for to assess whether the reflection is either meaningful or critical. It states that:
"some ways of showing meaningful reflection are: linking to the aims, commenting on what they have learnt, considering some limitations or comparing different mathematical approaches" while "some ways of showing critical reflection are: considering what next, discussing implications of results, discussing strengths and weaknesses of approaches, and considering different perspectives."

# data[].attributes.headline
Quinn -  What do we look for when looking for good reflection? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Quinn -  What do we look for when looking for good reflection? 

# data[].attributes.body
Students must analyze their results in an easy to understand language, after they have stated them scientifically/mathematically.

Students must be able to include on their papers the significance of their findings and results, limitations of their exploration, and recommendations for further study.

# data[].attributes.body
Students need to be reflecting on their work throughout the paper rather than simply in the conclusion. I find that I need to train my students to take a minute and pause throughout the paper. Students should look for ways to connect each piece to the overall aim of the paper and consider limitations and potential extensions throughout.

# data[].attributes.body
Students need to be answering the 'what if...?' questions throughout. They need to making comments about what they could have done and why they did it this way throughout. Maybe how their conclusion could be applied to other relevant/similar situations?