# data[].attributes.body
I was most intrigued with this question because it compares men to women and about who is more nurturing at first we all thought it was talking about nurturing babies and I believe that got my attention because men can nature babies just as good as women it just takes practice but really talking about any nurturing I think we are just as nurturing as women

# data[].attributes.body
This question challenged my thinking a little more than the rest of the questions. Now a days there is a lot of corruption which makes us belief that leaders that are in power and not qualified enough to be in charge. However, we must not forget about those who actually worked their way up the ladder to be in that position.

# data[].attributes.body
The question is highly provoking of personal reflection as well as the meaning of understanding. I feel like the question should be left complex in order to broaden the aspect ratio. I thought that the views brought out of the 4 corners of the room were very interesting.

# data[].attributes.body
I was enlightened regarding this question. My previous mindset only included personal examples, and I neglected to realize that there are some females who have weak nurturing abilities.

# data[].attributes.body
This question challenged my way of thinking, because although my classmates had some pretty great arguments, I believe that for the most part many of us were able to agree that depending on the who the person and/or parent is really helps to determine whether this statement is true or not

# data[].attributes.body
This question was extremely intriguing, mostly because nobody chose any of the other sides. It is evident that the capability of both genders has been extremely debatable throughout the ages, yet it was good seeing that all of my classmates chose the (in my opinion) "good side".

# data[].attributes.body
This question really got me thinking as I wasn’t quite sure what was my stand in the end. The statement that left me thinking is how millionaires claim to be helping the poor or needed. The statement made then lead me to the question I asked myself, Are are they actually truly understanding the event or is it for the sake of fame or recognition?

# data[].attributes.body
This question was extremely intriguing, mostly because nobody chose any of the other sides. It is evident that the capability of both genders has been extremely debatable throughout the ages, yet it was good seeing that all of my classmates chose the (in my opinion) "good side".

# data[].attributes.body
This question was the most interesting because I believe that this is questions that mostly everyone found middle ground.

# data[].attributes.body
The question that challenge my way of thinking was the one that about privileged can never understand the disadvantage, because 

# data[].attributes.body
The privilege one was hard for me because i didn't know what side to choose.

# data[].attributes.body
I really think people do have a position in what they do because they are the most qualified for that position but yet again their are many people who have the same position that don't even know what is going on or what the qualifications they need to be in that certain position.

# data[].attributes.body
This question was the one that made me think with more effort than the others, and the reason would be that it really reflects on history. What I mean with this is that many people over the time have been some type of predecessor's, but don't actually want to follow these work or duty left for them because they're not capable of doing so like they're ancestors.

# data[].attributes.headline
Question #3 : The privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.subject
Question #3 : The privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.body
The question that challenge my way of thinking was the one about privileged can never understand the disadvantage, because you can never know what a successful person lived through, privileged people maybe before they became privileged they could pass over things that not all people would understand.

# data[].attributes.headline
The privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.subject
The privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.body
This question was the one that made me really question myself because it all came down to empathy vs. sympathy. Like can one truly understand another person when they haven't been in their shoes and experienced what they have. But on the other hand only because someone is privileged doesn't mean they can't understand what others are truly going through. Additionally, just because they are privileged doesn't mean they are exempt from hardship; everyone no matter who they are go through tough times. And you can't say someone experiences something more profoundly than another person because you can't measure people's experiences. Everyone experiences things differently.

# data[].attributes.body
This question got me thinking because they mentioned how you were brought up and what you believed in.

# data[].attributes.body
This question was extremely intriguing, mostly because nobody chose any of the other sides. It is evident that the capability of both genders has been extremely debatable throughout the ages, yet it was good seeing that all of my classmates chose the (in my opinion) "good side".

# data[].attributes.body
This question of whether the privileged people can sympathize with the disadvantaged was the one I was most intrigued by and strong with my point of view. I don't agree that the privileged can truly sympathize with the disadvantaged, for one can only understand what a certain hardship feels like by having experienced it.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like people that have more can still be able to understand what its like to be in the position of a person that doesn't have as much as them, because they could have experienced it before or will experience it later on in life

# data[].attributes.headline
The question that really was challanging for me was the one that said that privilieged can never understand the  disanvantage of the less privileged. I couldnt quite make a decision cause yes your never going to be able to understand their experience and what they went through   but everyone starts somewhere whether it was an easy road or bumpy    

# data[].attributes.subject
The question that really was challanging for me was the one that said that privilieged can never understand the  disanvantage of the less privileged. I couldnt quite make a decision cause yes your never going to be able to understand their experience and what they went through   but everyone starts somewhere whether it was an easy road or bumpy    

# data[].attributes.body
The statement that I found most challenging was : The privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged. Regarding the definition of understanding as sympathy, it is possible. However, if it was referring to empathy, that would be a completely different story because they wouldn't have been in their shoes and experienced those unfortunate events.

# data[].attributes.body
This question really make me doubt my self on the way that it talked about people being in charge.

# data[].attributes.body
This question was challenging because while we were debating I though everyone made such good arguments. And while I was listening it made me think maybe I did agree rather than somewhat agree. Overall this question really made me think and it was nice to see everyone's opinion on this topic.

# data[].attributes.body
This question really get me think because we may think of powerful people to be the most qualified for the job but we also need to understand that people who has no power also can be qualified because what makes you qualified are your experiences and knowledge and not your position you are in.

# data[].attributes.body
This question made me think about the actually depth of the fact that no matter who you are you will never fully understand what someone is going through because you both were raised differently, had different life changing events, are two different people and no matter what even if you tried you will never full understand someone and thats just the way life is intended to be maybe?

# data[].attributes.body
This question

# data[].attributes.headline
Women are more suited to nurturing than men.

# data[].attributes.subject
Women are more suited to nurturing than men.

# data[].attributes.body
This question made me think more about my thoughts because overall, almost all, if not all of us associated nurturing with babies, when it was a personality trait

# data[].attributes.headline
Privileged people can sympathize with the disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.subject
Privileged people can sympathize with the disadvantaged.

# data[].attributes.body
This made me think the most because one must question the motivations of the privileged donations. Are they doing it to gain publicity, or are they doing it because they genuinely care? Furthe

# data[].attributes.body
The debate we had over whether or not the people in power are the most qualified to be in charge. This debate was interesting to me because I feel like mostly everyone could agree that people aren't always the most certified to be in the position they are in. Personally, I don't think that being president should be about how much they know but about whether or not they are good at what they are doing. I think there are people who are in power who don't entirely deserve to be in charge and that's why I found this debate amusing.

# data[].attributes.body
This question really got me thinking because they mentioned how it depends on how you were brought up and the religion you believe in.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the question regarding if women are better nurtures than men caused me to reconsider my choice. I was only thinking of it in a baby point of view however, I should of looked at it regarding all ages

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this question can only really be answered if you look at everyones personality and if you actual see them in a situation where you need to be compassionate and caring. Both women and men have shown to be caring just like both women and men have both shown to be hostile or just flat out uninterested. It depend on no facts or logistics, but personality and how that person prefers to handle people in certain situations.

# data[].attributes.body
i think this was the one that really opened my eyes. because yes i may seem privilged but trust me im not. ive lived a pretty tuff life and when people tell me that im pivileged it bothers me bc i the stuff i have not only did i have to work hard but my parents did. just overall the word privileged just gets to me.

# data[].attributes.body
It brought multiple points of view on the question and it gave me different ways to look at, which subsequently led to my thinking of my answer based on these points of views.

# data[].attributes.body
The question that I found most challenging was the one that asked whether the most qualified people are

# data[].attributes.body
This question really got me thinking because I'm a very atheist person. When religion is brought up i have a lot to say. I agree that people who practice any kind of religion are the ones that do very inhumane stuff and they try to justify it by saying the bible says its right or whatever. For example priests have been abusing girls for decades, even the pope has said priests molest nuns. The christian church has also made some very inhumane stuff if you look back in time. They would torture people and justify it with the bible. If there really is a God and e was a good person, why would he have so many priests sexually abusing little kids. Plus i just think everything is a hoax.

# data[].attributes.body
The question about religious people being the most hostile towards others made me think because the question carries a lot of exceptions and there are good people who just happen to be religious, but there are many sides that I had to consider and that's why it stuck with me the most.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that one because the you do but then you don't really know what they are going through. You may know how they are suffering and may know what is goin on but you don't really feel it. You don't know how its like to be prevailed or not privilege at all.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this question made me really think ,because i'm not privileged and some points of view of my classmates were useless basically because if you had pass by that situation you do not understand how not privileged people had been through horribles things

# data[].attributes.body
This question really made me think a lot overall. This is something that we should have an idea about due to the circumstances of our world and the changing of traditional gender roles. However, this is something that hardly ever crosses our mind. Overall, a person's character, rather than their specific gender, really dictates how loving, caring, and ultimately nurturing the person is.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I was most intreged by the privilage one because, I just found amazing the way other classmates thought of privilage, and the different significance of privilage, I don’t think I changed my opinion on the subject, but it was enjoyable to see the different views to the situation, and the question itself

# data[].attributes.body
I think the third question made me really think a lot because this topic has been going on for quite a while in history and im not really privileged in many things so it made me open my mind in many ways 

# data[].attributes.body
I think the last question about "People in power are there because they are the most qualified to be in charge", challenged my way of thinking because others had really good arguments in which I somewhat agree.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it can be and is, very misconstrued the definition and meaning of qualification, which is difficult to apply in positions of higher power. It can be difficult to support someone, but in today's world, one in which people are subject to the ability to vote, it is very hard for me to say that a person is not qualified to be in a position when considering the circumstance of voting through the people; that being present in not only the United States, but in many other countries - a majority - bringing me to believing it to be so that the most qualified gains his or her job. Qualification in a way, is overrated, as there is not a clear guideline as to what is "required" to get a job of power, where there is not a degree that says "president." Once again, disagreeing with a person, does not mean they are under qualified, especially in high status government, that is voted by and for the people.

This question was definitely the most intriguing seeing how many people seem to misunderstand qualification. I think that many people tend to put bias into questions of sort, and I wonder whether if we were under a different Administration, there would be different answers, or opinions on the subject. If I could go back in time I would definitely go to 2015 simply to see the types of answers given about this specific question, and I truly believe opinions would be wildly different. Unfortunately, time-travel doesn't exist (or does it), and I cannot see the different responses of my peers, if there would be any, regarding the question in 2015.

# data[].attributes.body
I enjoyed discussing these topics/issues in class. I understand that we will all have different
opinions and I respect that.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the one about the mom been more caring 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the one about the mom been more caring 

# data[].attributes.body
The question that really got me thinking was the last one because they had really good points, I was disagreeing then I later agree

# data[].attributes.body
this was the most challenging because i didn't believe that many people think that religious people bas, ad also when they were saying about people who are religious hate others so it was hard because of course there are people that hate.

# data[].attributes.body
people who are religious arent the most inhumane but rather opposite. in charities and all they are one of the most humane.

# data[].attributes.body
This question made me question my thinking because I was raised very religious and ultimately went away from it because of the crimes the Church has committed against a variety of groups. 9

# data[].attributes.body
Woman are more suited to nurturing than men. This made me think a lot because of how everyone viewed this question from their perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
The last question really made me think a lot about what it really needs to be a president, and also made me think if really the presidents in the past of the U.S had been really qualified to serve and represent our country. I think I am disagree because no one would be qualified because a lot of them brought their votes in order to became presidents.

# data[].attributes.body
White privilege is not real. The only real privilege is the American Privilege. Blaming people who are rich is basically blaming them for working hard towards that. Sure, people can be born into wealth, but the parents worked for that. Poor people can work for that same thing. Wealth

# data[].attributes.body
I think question 2 challenged my viewpoint the most, mostly because we were forced to think about the question in another light. I think we mostly ended up manipulating our answer, though.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the last question about

# data[].attributes.body
I was most intrigued by the first question because it is very fluid and greatly dependent on the person answering it. However, nothing swayed my opinion in any argument.

# data[].attributes.headline
the privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged...  

# data[].attributes.subject
the privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged...  

# data[].attributes.body
i thought this subject was really interesting to talk about because so many people had many opinions about the topic and they were all somehow different but its cool how we all understood one another while talking about it

# data[].attributes.body
The last question really got me thinking because I was disagreeing but later understood the circumstances that leader become leaders.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the last question is what really challenged me to change my way of thinking and fully understanding the entire question. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the last question is what really challenged me to change my way of thinking and fully understanding the entire question. 

# data[].attributes.body
6. This question made me start considering what side I was really on. The word qualification had many routes to out and can be depicted in so many ways. It also has to do with the view point that one sees when speaking towards this statement.

# data[].attributes.body
At this question I originally choice somewhat disagree. But then i reanalyzed the word "truly" in the the question. I switched my sides and choice somewhat disagree because they issues privileged and unprivileged face are very different because finical and family based issues although they can affect one another they are still different.

# data[].attributes.body
This question really made me think because of the multiple point of views that were made towards this topic. i think men have become a huge part of caring towards other not only women.  For example, people prefer to be with male nurses when being at the hospital because it as been said that male nurses treat patients better than females since they believe they are superior and know more than men. idk...

# data[].attributes.body
women are more suited to nurturing than men.
women end up taking care for their children. I believe they have a better bond most of the time because they have carried the child for 9 months.

# data[].attributes.body
This question had me thinking really hard since I felt like I had the experience where I can agree, but the people around me had reasons why they could disagree or not.

# data[].attributes.body
Question number three completely challenged my way of thinking because I had many arguments going both ways.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the one that really got me thinking was the last question. I guess I would be considered somewhat disagree and agree because it just how one believes in. I think that the word Qualify is just different for everyone. But i do believe that there has been people who are qualified (as person, president and education wise) to be in a higher position but also sometimes people get manipulated and choose someone that is not meant to be for that position. Its just a matter of persuasion, i guess.

# data[].attributes.body
The question that intrigued me the most was the last question. I did not move from my position which was mostly disagree. People were saying that influence is technically a qualification but having the power to influence others doesn't necessarily mean you have the qualifications to be in charge. Though I do see their point, which got me me thinking.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the third question made me really think a lot because this topic has been going on for quite a while in history and im not really privileged in many things so it made me open my mind in many ways 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the third question made me really think a lot because this topic has been going on for quite a while in history and im not really privileged in many things so it made me open my mind in many ways 

# data[].attributes.body
1. People who participate most zealously in religious activities are often the ones who treat others the most inhumanely.
2. Ignorance is bliss. Knowledge is power.
3. The privileged can never truly understand the disadvantaged.
4. Emotional connections make us weaker and easier to exploit.
5. Woman are more suited to nurturing than men.
6. People in power are there because they are the most qualified to be in charge.