# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Sydney on the belief that the internet desensitizes us and makes us more ignorant. The internet has personally allowed myself over the past 16 years the see how it's effected my current generation. I see people much more often use the internet to talk to one another instead of face to face, completely cutting out the practice of social skills making us more ignorant when we are forced to use them.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Matt's statement that we shouldn't blame the internet for societal norms but instead society itself. Societal norms have always been around one way or the other but technology is just the leading factor that helps spread these ideas. For example tools weren't commonplace until they were used more and more over time where it becamea necessary to survive and hunt in a society. Same goes with movies projecting a typical jock or nerd on a screen and is now still the basic representation for those stereotypes.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Virtous's claim that we can't look at the actions of people who have passed on and truly analyze the impact of what they did. Where we are as a society now shows the effects of what that person did and we can analyze how those actions affected peoples lives during that periods of time, between, and now.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Sasha's claim stating that "Social media is forcing people to be the same and trying to brainwash us."  Social media promotes the idea of trends and other fandoms where people are encouraged to like and enjoy the same things.  What's different though is that social media encourages people to explore and find what they like specially accustomed to them, not entirely make everyone the same.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the internet hinders critical thinking as today the youthful generations don't remember anything or somewhat vague knowledge because of the mindset that the internet holds all their information for them.  I do believe however that creativity is at an all time high because the internet benefits creatavity and promotes it by encouraging and allowing access to  a variety of tools and inspirational media.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Mayson's claim that the internet is a tool used to blame our faults on, rather than ourselves. The internet is not blamed for effecting the way we think, it is prosecuted. There is undeniable proof that the Internet effects our minds in good and bad ways. We don't push our problems on the internet, the internet is the reason we have them. What other factors could have affected us in such a profound way? The internet is the platform that everyone uses, no other platform is as big. We use the internet to try to benefit us in life, but it actually hurts us. The internet is the reason we have certain problems with how we think, it  is not subjected unfairly.

# data[].attributes.body
Virtous is wrong in her claim that we cannot look at the past actions of our ancestors because they developed differently. The past is an endless well of knowledge and wisdom. Without looking back at our ancestors, we might repeat their same mistakes. We need to take their ideas and build upon them, or else we will repeat them. Like the Holocaust, if we where to not spread the  belief that Hitler's ideas where a mistake, then we are bound to repeat them in some way. Yes, they weren't exactly raised as us, but their limitless wisdom is what we use to raise ourselves and better our world.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Sasha's argument on how the Internet allows vast cultures to interact to be very strong. Much evidence supports this idea, including how many of our youth have begun to dive in to foreign foods and languages. Google Translate is a prime example of allowing people from around the world a means of interacting with each other. Anybody, from anywhere can talk to one another because of the ease of the Internet.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Michael's statement that we us the internet as a way to individually distract us, rather than benefit society. There are instances where a good message is spread to others using the web, but it does not make up with how much we neglect ourselves by using it. Even the good messages, like the ice bucket challenge, was just a trend that became another internet "challenge" rather than a spreading of awareness. The internet mainly gives individuals the means to spread fads, rather than the betterment of our world.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the claim that the Internet hinders creativity. With the internet, others are able to morph our thoughts and ideas. But it is actually inspiration. The internet allows society to inspire one another with their creations. A individual can take these creations or beliefs, and add-on to what was already existing. Inspiration is the drive for the creative process and allows individuals to develop their own creations by taking others and putting their own individual twist on it.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think coding is essential coding should go into what you want it to be. I agree with virtous about how its a growing business but it's gonna grow in my opinion into something more critical down the road.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Sasha that using the internet is a tool to help clarify novels in school. I use it to make sure I understand what I just read, not because i'm lazy, but because if I don't understand the book the way i'm supposed to then my grades will suffer. There is a pressure brought on by school that brings stress that we must instantly recognize exactly what happens in a book written 200 years ago. Assistance is vital in order to strive in school grade wise.

# data[].attributes.body
While the internet can form our opinions I don't think that the internet causes us to lack creativity. I think that the internet helps us form our own opinions. The internet can give us the chance to see the full understanding of something and then allow us to post/share about what we think. I think the internet just allows us to get a better understanding of the entire picture of something and it allows us to not only see our opinion but also many other peoples opinions. This can help our creativity because it can give us new opinions and ideas to add to ours.

# data[].attributes.body
I didn't realize how essential the internet is for businesses. The internet allows people to make online shops to sell their products for profits. This could help the disabled make money. For example if you are paralyzed and cant work but you can make scrunchies and sell them on etsy this would lead to that person making a profit that they wouldn't be able to make without without the internet.

# data[].attributes.body
Eslie's use of statistics helps to excel her argument and make it so much more impact.

# data[].attributes.body
While it is sad that human trafficking is happening II don't really think that it is the internets fault. These things happen all the time without technology I don't think that we should blame technology for Human trafficking. The technology may promote human trafficking but it also helps these people who are going through though times. Technology can help find and track down people that are going through human trafficking.

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly disagree with Eslie when she said that the internet is like weed. sure weed might be a drug but it really does have beneficial components like cdb that helps with depression and anxiety.
the internet also has beneficial components people who cant find friends in school are able to find friends on the internet. they both have their negatives but they also have very important positive components.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Eslie that there's crime on the internet like human trafficking, but not everyone uses it for crime, they also use it for good, to make a difference in the world, to stop crimes like human trafficking.

# data[].attributes.body
Michael changed my mind on the internet's addictiveness by comparing it to a drug and with this analogy I understand how the internet is something that is used as a handicap for people in social situations as well as situations that involve critical thinking

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with sasha with social media forcing people to be the same and trying to brainwash us.

# data[].attributes.body
Although I see Grace's point of view about needing renegotiation from social media, I can't fully agree. Everything I do on social media isn't for everyone else. I have elements of social media meant just for me that I will never show anyone else. I find it easier to express myself in solitude and share aspects of myself that truly represent myself to a small, select few and I use the internet and social media as a vessel to do that.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology gives us resources so quick and the people today rely on it because people think why would they work harder than they have to. Carr stated "I find it remarkably hard to concentrate. I scroll back and fourth, search for keywords, and interrupt myself even more than usual to refill my coffee cup, check my e-mail ,check the news, rearrange files in my desk drawer."(Carr 104) This proves that the internet distracts our society. Without the internets distractions we could get a lot more done.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Matt when he says that we should not blame the Internet for societal norms, we should blame society for it. Societal norms have always existed in past decades, amongst young people. This can be seen in various movies from the past, such as the nerd, wearing glasses and maybe a polo sweater. Now, a young person may be judged for what they post online.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Matt when she said "the internet doesn't cause the segregation and judgment of each other its more the society that uses it" the internet is only bad if people use the internet that way

# data[].attributes.body
Virtuous is correct in saying that we can't look at the actions of our past companions bcause they did not grow up in the same circumstance as we do now and so their actions do not have the same validity as they would when they did them

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Eslie on her claim with how our brain begins to adapt on things we are getting used to so if  we feed ourselves on our internet use its gonna always gonna reform to that.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mason makes a great point when she says "we use the internet as a scape goat for our personal faults" . We control our own lives, we control our time. You have the power to decide if you want to write your essay or go on social media. It all depends on the individual and that reflects in society.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mayson when she says we use the internet as a scapegoat, when we can't concentrate, blame the internet. When we can't think or read deeply, blame the internet. When we can't remember something, and our memory is getting worse, blame the internet. It's time we took responsibility for ourselves and our actions, don't just throw the blame somewhere else.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Virtuous when she stated that the Internet is making us less intelligent. The Internet allows multitudes of information to be accessed, far more quickly than one could access in times before the Information Age, when people only had books to rely on for information. We can only become more intelligent with the Internet's plethora of information.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Eslie, technology is taking culture away from us. Instead of going home and spending time with our family and friends we go home and sit on our phones. Today there are now apps that have shown to increase your dopamine instaed of being happy from your friends and family we now hppy with sitting on our phones. Technology is weakening relationships within our civilization. Since we aren't spending as much time with our family and friends we aren't learning about as many cultures and we aren't getting the full experience from culture people don't spend time with each other.

# data[].attributes.body
While I see Eslie's point that technology and its advancements aren't always positive, they are tools created by man and so its not the technology that has negative outcomes, but the actions of men. She uses an example of the cotton gin and slavery but even before the cotton gin, slavery was still around.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with sasha when she said that "the internet has helped us have large technological advances in the modern world" the internet really helps get across information that is beneficial to our advancements.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Virtous when she says "the internet doesn't benefit the individual, it benefits society" because technology can be a great resource if it's used correctly. Individuals who use the internet to further research help benefit the population. However, a majority of the population lacks the drive to use the internet as a tool of knowledge and prefer to use it as a form of entertainment.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with michael when he says we're not using the internet to its fullest extent, instead of using it to better ourselves as a whole, we're using it for attention, hopping on whatever trend is the newest, demoralizing ourselves to gain followers, when we have a whole world of information on the internet, we can learn so much, but we choose not to.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Eslie, productivity has gone down due to the instillation of efficient forms of technology. However, I think that although we are less productive individually, we still maintain the expected levels of intelligence. I still feel as though we are an intelligent group of individuals as long as the drive to become intelligent is still there. It's easier to gather knowledge in this society due to easy accessibility.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not agree, the internet makes our society more ignorant and desensitizes us. While some people people may say it connects the people in our society I don't think it really connects us.People rely on texting people instead of really talking to people. People don't really get to learn who people are without a screen. People also bully people on the internet because they can hide behind behind a screen. People also rely on the internet, we use the internet as a crutch so its making the society dumber due to us relying on it so much.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Sasha about how the internet is always changing but i don;t think our productivity is changing i think we are more active then ever . I think we have more options on what we want to do . The world is always changing and all the internet wants to do is shape it into a way that prepares us for it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Sasha. Her evidence from The Shallows strengthens her claim that the Internet has allowed many societies across the world to communicate, and therefore has allowed many parts of the world to become more advanced. Communication across the world has become quick and easy, as opposed to the times before the Information Age.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with eslie when she said that "using the internet has made us less human" when we use the internet we learn to not use our brains as much. when we need to find an answer we don't need to think about it and try to dig for the information and we can just look up answers right away.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the internet hinders critical thinking due to the fact that we rely on the internet to find knowledge and entertainment...
For example, someone googling a math problem instead of using our knowle

# data[].attributes.body
Michael is correct in making the distinction between society and the average person in his argument against the internet's effect on society. It is good for society, but is detrimental to the average person

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the internet is very valuable to society because it has become a necessity to our way of life. It's used for work, school, to express yourself, the internet is all around us.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Kendel. Having a paper copy of a book or anything really is easier to annotate and absorb the information that's been presented where as when it's online, I get really easily distracted and i usually forget the information as soon as I finish reading it

# data[].attributes.body
Reading the shallows was a valuable experience, because all of the claims that i already had about the internet, i find are supported by tons of evidence, which reminds me to limit my internet use severley. I can sit and think for hours without external stimulation, and this is a skill that has been lost by society because the rapid mindset that the internet encourages has affected so many to a large extent. So i now do my best to not use the internet unless im forced to

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like we aren't looking at online books in relationship to their benefits to people who are less fortunate than us. Online books are great tools for those who vision is poor, allowing them to change the brightness in order to see it better. It was the same thing with people have no vision, being that they could have the story read to them. It is very useful also since a lot of stories have digital and audio versions, but not ones in braille.

# data[].attributes.body
Digital books are very important for society, they're a great way to store and preserve this knowledge of books. The library of Alexander for example, destroyed by fire, flood, raids. Digital books are also cheaper than regular books so its more accessible. And with digital books, you can read in the dark! It takes away the cumbersome task of holding a torch and trying to read at the same time. You also don't have to worry about snaking and staining your pages because with a tablet or phone, it can easily be cleaned with wipes. Also when I'm reading online, I'm more likely to click on a word and find its definition if it sounds unfamiliar while if I was reading a physical copy, I would go on being ignorant.

# data[].attributes.body
People say that the online book is distracting but they don't understand that it is made to help us access it easier and it helps me but at the same time its the same thing when you have a phone because If I really wanted too I could do anything so I think it depends on if I am motivated to get the work done or let my self get distracted.

# data[].attributes.body
While I was reading the emirson I found it much harder to be reading it online. So, I had to print it because I couldn't focus, understand, or annotate the online version. Reading an e-book allows you to become more distracted because you can literally do a million things on a computer and its only a few clicks away.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't agree with the example of the ALS ice bucket challenge. While it is very true that people merely did it because of a challenge, it most certainly was a good cause. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were raised in the name of this disease, and awareness spread to a celebrity level. There was clearly a substantial impact that took place when this challenge occurred. The challenge, even thought it was a trend for a summer, did so much for the cause and brought a lot of light towards the issue.

# data[].attributes.body
using symbolism to show your care about a current issue, has changed from being a humble cause for change, to being a selfish cause for attention for most people on the internet. And the ALS ice bucket challenge is a prime example, because nearly all who did he challenge just wanted views, over the need for helping sick people. it disgusts me

# data[].attributes.body
The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge was created as a marketing scheme to get more people, mostly young people, involved. Of course it isn't the things that they are doing. It was mostly a way to get the word out.

# data[].attributes.body
The internet doesn't make us less moral, all its doing is publicizing the horrible things in society. We need to take perspective in to consideration. The holocaust happened, human sacrifices were a thing, 150 years ago human beings were being kept as slaves, 50 years ago African Americans were being lynched, and while we could argue that these things still happen, they're much less. Things have always been this bad even more, all the internet and television is doing is broadcasting these abhorrent things for the world to see.

# data[].attributes.body
I actually think the ice bucket challenge really did help raise awareness because I saw a lot of people do the challenge while donating at the same time and I thought it was a really smart idea it get the idea out there and help them raise money.

# data[].attributes.body
I do think attempts to be the next viral sensation is dangerous. There is an episode of South Park that puts this in perspective. The boys are shown a video of why it is dangerous to start tends by showing a video of people getting hit by trains while tebowing. While this is an extreme example the idea that this episode presents is very relevant to popular culture today.

# data[].attributes.body
The internet does cause people to be less moral because when disturbing things happen, everyone uses it as a way to become popular and gain attention, instead of solving the problem. This angers me to no extent, because its childish and simply wrong. People are becoming less and less careful and smart about their immediate responses to problems

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of the things in the world are mainly there to make money, so we can not only say that the internet is a money grab. An example is the epipen that prices suddenly shot up for no reason, even though it is something that saves people's lives.

# data[].attributes.headline
Eslie Kouandi- Do you guys think that the internet has made us lose empathy for others?

# data[].attributes.subject
Eslie Kouandi- Do you guys think that the internet has made us lose empathy for others?

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion the internet has played a big role in how dehumanized we have become , this is also apart of the chain reaction from polarization in the media. Often when we disagree with someone in real life e can discern that that person is not their beliefs holistically and that they are still flesh and blood behind it all , when we strip away the physical we are less likely to remember that behind these angry tweets are HUMAN beings, a big step forward from all this hate and lack of humanism can be just remembering that e are all still growing and e are clay, some views may be cemented like a certain persons faith but political views are societal constructs, if we can respect each other as members of one human race then we can progress forward and depolarize.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the internet doesn't solely cause morality, but it highly inheances it. People are going to be people, no matter what is around. Even without the internet things like shooting, etc.. will still happen and people will witness it. Just the internet spreads it around quicker, but there's still things like the newspaper that's spreads information decently fast.

# data[].attributes.body
People only react to disturbing situations if they see them in person, but on the internet they are not phased. This shows how superficial internet use is, because its such a strong filter that dehumanizes our initial emotions

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the internet desensitizes us to violence because I get dark humor but was so shocked when I was scrolling through comments o an Instagram post against gun violence and saw a comment making a joke about it, garnering so many likes .

# data[].attributes.body
Joe's mentioning of how screens desensitize us from seeing something in real life is a very valid claim. With all of the video games and movies that are out right now, people will see gore and people being killed, all of the time. People think that everything that happens on a screen is fake, but they don't realize that gore, death, blood, and violence are all very real topics.

# data[].attributes.body
While I agree with everyone that the internet is lowering morals, the internet really isn't the sole root of this issue, it's only a gateway. The real cause of this issue is just these tragic events that keep repeatedly occurring. These events are just becoming mainstream and accepted as a part of society. The internet just showcases these events on websites. People are merely becoming desensitized to these awful events, and the internet is only the portal to see these events.

# data[].attributes.body
The internet desensitizes people to what happens in the world. Like Sydney said, video games are the main reason this occurs. a lot of video games are really gory and disgusting, and because this happens so often, a lot of people don't have any reaction to it at all which is really sad and scary. Not only that, but social medias do the same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Kendel argues that they internet has changed how we react to many things. I also agree with this because I am so used to seeing people getting shot, ran over, killed etc. If I see something like that I wouldn't be surprised I would think to my self like I have seen alot of these its normal.

# data[].attributes.body
The internet does desensitize humans to immorality, because it provides a medium for entertainment that is unethical. whatever disgusting, disturbing, situation you can think of, its most likely viewable on the internet, if not on the dark web.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Kendel. People hide behind a facade online, they only project the image they want and it may not be entirely real. Just like Robin Williams, like she said.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the internet polarizes us, like a personal example would be me unfollowing other users when I realize that they don't agree with my views. A close mutual of mine who we didn't know each other personally but we were friendly but when she posted about a "ship" I disagreed with, I unfollowed her. I just couldn't fathom how she could be justifying incest even if they were adopted so not biologically brothers.

# data[].attributes.body
While it is true that people sometimes fall into pits where they are constantly only hearing their own ideas, there are times that the internet really changes someone's views. An example is a story that goes around every once in awhile about a child and their parents who were disagreeing on sexuality until the parent took to social media and saw the whole community surrounding sexuality, so they started to accept their child.

# data[].attributes.body
Seeing peoples ideas on social media platforms, allows you to see the other side and where they're coming from. By having the tools to do this people will have a fuller understanding on certain topics and will adapt their opinions based off of these newly learned opinions. But there are people like Joe said that have peoples opinion right in front of them and people don't even listen they just keep on arguing that their opinion is right and its the only right answer.

# data[].attributes.body
Polarization through the media is a very important issue to discuss, it is something that has touched every aspect of the society from politics to civil rights. As joe stated on certain social media platforms on specific view is project as if it is the only option good or bad no between , for example the republican vs democrat culture has become increasingly violent due to the fact that people are inflamed and emboldened by their platform to attack other ideologies that do not subscribe to one side or another.

# data[].attributes.body
Many users are desperate for whatever attention they can get, to the extent that they're willing to do terrible things to get the likes and views. The whole mentality of any press is good press. This is fueled by all the narcissism that is rampant today, grandiose exhibitionism, inflated self views, superficial personalities and shameless self promotion. The internet is that it provides quick and accessible information and as we get accustomed to having even our most minor needs met to this degree, we grow more entitled.

# data[].attributes.body
Kendel syas that the internet allow things like little kids comparing themselves to models. The internet allows this to happen, the internet allows things like cyber bullying. People gather a more negative opinion of themselves by peoples opinions and what they see online. Society is already bad enough about self image, and the internet adds on to this.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at what we are all doing now. People here, on padlet, are having a slightly easier time getting their ideas out compared to those in the inner circle where there are slight moments of pause where people have to really think about what they are saying. We have an easier time interacting with people online and saying what we want because we are not face to face with anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the internet heavily promotes negativity amongst individuals in the sense that people are more likely to be negative if they see negative people succeeding and all we see in our idols, celebrities and role models is negativity.Not in all of them but most of them. Scandals, infidelity, racism, misogyny and "beef".

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Kendel. Social medias are, in her words, "a breeding ground for hate." As she said, people always compare themselves to others and this is not good for anyone because it lowers people's self-esteem.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the idea that the internet further polarizes us through pushing people to certain sides of an argument. If anything, it offers people to take more balanced sides. Firstly, this is an issue that takes place outside of the internet. Political viewpoints is a prime example of this. Something as simple as saying that you agree with a bill that Trump passed, will automatically make people think that you are super right-wing conservative, and vice versa. This certainly takes place outside the internet. Going back to the internet, it opens people to be safe from any type of ostracizing, and here thousands of unique viewpoints are born. Allowing this anonymity offers people to express their viewpoint freely, and this opens people to express how they truly feel, which opens a more wide variety for people to learn from and dispute.

# data[].attributes.body
People wouldn't have incentive to be creative of they didn't have the audience social media and the internet provides.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the impact of social media is dangerous, but Facebook is losing users at an unprecedented rate. Anonymous social media like Reddit is becoming increasingly popular, and the appeal is that no one knows who you are, and you can say how you feel without personal repercussions.

# data[].attributes.body
Joe argues that if we went to a library we would find more information than on the internet, however the internet is easier and quicker to find information on. There is plenty of available information online, and you can't access some information from a library like you can online.

# data[].attributes.body
Stephen says theres so many platforms to express our opinion, and Sydney makes the point that these platforms are also the way people make money. The internet allows people to voice their opinion because we have freedom of speech and you can even do it anonymously. People also do their jobs online and can now make money from it, and if we took that away people would lose so many jobs and lose their lives.

# data[].attributes.body
If we're making the argument of cave men, well cave men didn't know how to use technology, write or read, cure some diseases. We come bac to the point that we loose skills just as we gain others and we must be resigned to that fact if we want to grow and advance as a society and people. And why must we sift through loads of information just to find what we truly need if we can get it quickly and easily.

# data[].attributes.body
Sydney argues that the society can not do anything thing without technology and out problem solving skills are poor but she fails to understand how much we have advanced since the cave mans. Also as we advance I think we should use the new tech is it helps us. I believe the new techs were made to help us so why not take advantage of what we have.

# data[].attributes.body
Zion argues how the internet hinders our thinking how ever he fails the understand that the internet helps us to expand more and brings out the creativity sides of us.

# data[].attributes.body
Stephen stated that people get distracted, and lose their critical thinking, because the lure of the internet pulls us out of that element. That is not necessarily true. People, in general, tend to stay away from tasks that they just don't like. People who don't like writing essays will always find a way to not do it. The internet is more so an excuse for recurring problems in today's society. If people don't want to perform a task, they simply will find ways to stay distracted, so that they won't. Going outside, walking around their house, or talking with friends. It just so happens that when people want a way out of doing something, they turn to the internet. The internet seems to be a scapegoat for a problem that has pre-dated the internet.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Sydney. Our dependence on technology has made it harder to do simple things in life that people have done, like cook without a microwave or get up without an alarm clock.

# data[].attributes.body
I just think people are easily distracted, with or without the internet. People who find what they are doing boring will always find something more exciting to do, no matter how marginally more interesting it may be.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Josh that repeating the same formats over and over gets boring,. Maybe the issue isn't the internet limiting our creativity, but instead we are having the same ideas pushed onto us all the time and we look for distractions because we are bored of learning the same thing over and over.

# data[].attributes.body
Zion claims that internet is hindering our concentration because there is quick information everywhere. The quick and easy distractions make us unable to think for ourselves and process information. I agree with this claim because the human mind can't process many things at one time. When focused on the internet, the mind is overloaded with dozens of distractions all at one time. Because humans have relied so much on the internet, in forms of smartphones, laptops, and computers, we have grown accustomed to following distractions in our everyday lives. This causes us to not focus on one specific thing for one time.

# data[].attributes.body
Sugam Khanal

I agree with syd that the internet doesn't hinder out thinking but instead it helps u explore more and lets us see what we might like.

# data[].attributes.body
While Austin argues that using the internet to look at art and creative ideas does not help boost creativity heails to recognize that creative ideas and thoughts can derive from looking at art on the internet. There isn't a difference looking at art in person and looking at it in real life. Using the internet makes more works of art and creativity easier to access, compared to not having internet access

# data[].attributes.body
By emphasizing how distracting the internet can be, you fail to consider how beneficial the internet truly is. The internet lets aspiring creators find large audiences for their work and more incentive to make more. If drawing stick figures is your passion, there's probably a fandom for stick figure lovers.

# data[].attributes.body
The internet does'nt stop you from thinking, rather, it enables students to be more involved in their learning and thinking process. Instead of listening to the teacher go on and on about a topic, the students who are better stimulated by audiovisuals can access information that caters to our needs. we're able to craft better responses due to the quantity of diverse information we have at our disposal.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with what Kendel claims about how the internet promotes and enhances creativity. The internet offers this ability that people can pull from other ideas, and build upon these pre-existing ideas. Copying is not really an internet-exclusive issue, and if anything, still encourages people to be creative because they find new ideas to expand upon themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that the potentially distracting nature of the internet could enhance creativity, but I disagree with the idea that most people randomly click links like Carr describes in The Shallows.

# data[].attributes.body
Sydney's claim that the internet helps build interest and helps to learn new things is accurate because like she said all the searching we do online can promote creativity.